On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:12 PM, PJ <af.gour...@videotron.ca> wrote: > PJ wrote: > > I have heard that there is an alternative to flash that is apparently > > more efficient and less cumbersome in terms of data transfers; and that > > it is "lighter" whatever that may mean. > > Anyone know anything about this? >
I think you are referring to Silverlight, right? Silverlight on FreeBSD is extremely lightweight. regards, usleep > > TIA > > PJ > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org > > > Could F3 be the alternative/replacement? > http://blogs.sun.com/bblfish/entry/f3:_a_replacement_for_flash%3F > http://blogs.sun.com/chrisoliver/ > > I'd like to hear some opinions on this. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
