I have pidgin installed on two 8.0 systems:
1) FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE #0: Wed May 5 10:17:16 EDT 2010 - pidgin-2.6.6_1
2) FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE #0: Mon May 17 00:51:56 EDT 2010 - pidgin-2.7.0_1
Both the package and the build of pidgin-2.7.0_1 appear to install without any
images. A diff of the pa
I made a mistake trying to add a new package and had to update xfce. Among other
changes webkit2-gtk3 was updated from 2.8.5_2 to 2.8.5_3. This generated error
in some packages added including firefox, thunderbird, and xpad. These programs
fail with the error:
/usr/local/lib/libgtk-3.so.0: Un
Simon Morgan wrote:
> compat4x doesn't seem to be running ldconfig after it's installed
You don't say what version you're using currently, but have you run
mergemaster lately? The ldconfig magic for this stuff is in /etc/rc* now.
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature saniti
Hans Lambermont wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote:
>
>> Hans Lambermont wrote:
>>> Doug Barton wrote:
>>>> 3. Add -o option to replace an installed port with a new port from a
>>>> different location (e.g., portmaster -o emulators/linux_base-fc4
>>>&
The protcol is probably
different but the underlying idea is the same.
--
Doug White| FreeBSD: The Power to Serve
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.FreeBSD.org
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.
sted by [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks.
I use acroread a lot, so I tested it on my 6-stable and -current systems
(both i386) and the new version works great, including printing through cups.
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
_
than
one port with the same ORIGIN" issue (since it should never happen).
I suppose I could add code to deal with this, but I'd really prefer some
kind of assurance that I'm right in thinking it shouldn't happen. :)
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
%). IOW, there is actually less bit rot
(in terms of unintended brokenness) than I would have expected.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
ster for each and everyone of those.
For future reference, you could also do 'portmaster -r db44' and it will
rebuild them for you.
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
ht
hat has been around for a while, and so far no one
has stepped up to make a definitive fix.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
T
ess, if not time consuming. There is also the burden to our
users of editing config files, firefox app preferences, etc. etc. Some of
these can be handled automatically by the ports, many of them cannot.
Frankly, I'm still waiting to hear some really good reasons to make this
change, but
ix-clean, than
this won't matter. If it's not, it needs to be fixed, regardless of what the
default values of *BASE are.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd
ile.
In my mind that's a good argument for making and enforcing consistent
policies, not for changing the defaults. But reasonable minds can differ on
this issue. Like I said, my mind is not made up yet one way or another, but
I have yet to see a very good reason for
f the port we're checking in the config step
too.
9. Reverse the wording of the verbose message in -r mode to actually make sense.
10. Warn the user during config mode if a port sets IS_INTERACTIVE.
You can find the new version at http://dougbarton.us/portmaster. Thanks in
advance for any fe
/step4/cups/net.html
> On a sidenote, I was having difficulties installing hpijs when hplip was
> already installed
I'm working on that.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
ht
27;t be doing so many fetches at once. You can keep moving "up"
the dependency "tree" a port at a time, or once you get most of the ports
updated you could then use -a safely.
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
_
he other reason I like this format (and
added tabs to another message that prints in -v mode) is that it is very
visually distinct, and does not run the risk of getting missed in a quick scan.
> I'll continue testing now.
Thanks!
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your prot
s very exciting stuff! Thanks for your hard work on this.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
gt; which does nothing. The script waits for bfilter to stop until it times
> out.
Thanks for bringing this to our attention. I fixed up that rc.d script and
bumped the PORTREVISION, so please let us know if that works for you.
I also fixed up the sig_stop values in other scripts where they we
Doug Barton wrote:
> I just uploaded a version that has what should be a fix for this, can you
> give it a try? And thanks for catching this, you're right, it's an oversight
> on my part.
Hans,
I'm curious if you've had a chance to try that fix, as I'd like
Hans Lambermont wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote:
>
>> Doug Barton wrote:
>>
>>> I just uploaded a version that has what should be a fix for this, can
>>> you give it a try? And thanks for catching this, you're right, it's
>>> an oversight on my
e a new version of port a, I uninstalls port a and install
> the new version.
> Vola!
> port a have vanished from /var/db/pkg/port_b/+REQUIRED_BY list.
That shouldn't happen (even without using a port management tool), can you
fill in some names for port_[abc] so we can test it?
Do
nd something to delete, or run
out of file name. (IOW, for a distfile named a-b-c-1.23.tar.gz, first try
a-b-c*, then a-b*, etc.)
5. Don't try to delete directories as if they were distfiles
6. Add PATCHFILES to the list of potentially stale files to test
As always, your testing and feedbac
I am the maintainer of the qpopper port. I now have the IPv6 patches
working for qpopper-4.0.9 and would like to update the port with
them. What is the proper format to submit the update?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.free
Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> It is a known issue, I have reported to Doug a while back.
*nod*
> As for solution, right now I am thinking about check on each port's
> conflict. Like for example:
>
> - Check on if devel/bison has any of CONFLICT.
> - CONFLICTS is deve
x27;re still reading, thanks! :) I hope that it's
useful, and that we can continue having a rational discussion about the pros
and cons of the various alternatives.
Regards,
Doug
- --
This .signature sanitized for your protection
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.
Doug Barton wrote:
> Jeremy Messenger wrote:
>
>> It is a known issue, I have reported to Doug a while back.
>
> *nod*
>
>> As for solution, right now I am thinking about check on each port's
>> conflict. Like for example:
>>
>>
x ports Boris is needing this part, I
> vote for another dependency (like we have already with USE_GCC in other
> ports).
FWIW, I agree with Brooks and Pav here, and that's speaking as someone who
still actively maintains his ports on RELENG_4 (although I'm looki
he awkward position of not being able
to contribute work towards this goal, just "helpful" suggestions. :)
One place to start might be the division between
*share/gnome/applications/mimeinfo.cache (interesting that gnome has it in
both places itself) and *share/applications/mimein
Scot Hetzel wrote:
> This shouldn't be flaged as an mtree error. The reason that
> linker.hints was left behind is due to this file is generated by
> kldxref. The port/package runs kldxref during the install of the
> firmware module to update the existing or create a linker.hints file,
> and when
roblems. Many Thanks to him for
>> his nice work!
>>
>> http://people.freebsd.org/~miwi/vbox/virtualbox_2.tgz
>
Working for me with a fresh cvsup of 7.2-STABLE (17 May 09).
Installing a 7.2-RELEASE amd64 guest as I write this.
--
Regards,
Doug
_
ing in make.conf? Particularly
the new make jobs safe stuff?
Doug
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
ounds like a dmake memory bug on amd64. The stuff you pasted
from gdb is in fact portmaster stuff, and CUR_DEPS is an environment
variable that can grow quite large depending on what you're doing with
portmaster.
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature saniti
asking you if you want to remove the glob-match
distfiles to issue a suggestion to try the --clean-distfiles option at
some point in the future, which seems like a happy medium to me. As
soon as I get time to do it anyway. :)
hope this helps,
Doug
___
fr
my previous message about loading vboxdrv causing my machine
to wedge, it happens to me both in X and on the console. Haven't tried
with v5 of the port yet though.
Doug
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
such. User confusion is a bad thing. :)
Doug
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
to do
something with the ports system. I do think it's reasonable to provide
instructions such as, "If you use toolA, do X, for toolB do Y, and if
you don't use a tool do Z, etc."
That said, if someone can explain what it is that needs to be done, I
will be glad to
pid = 1
Also, I got the following when trying to build with debug. Building
without debug worked.
hth,
Doug
kBuild: Compiling vboxdrv -
/usr/local/home/dougb/virtualbox/work/virtualbox-2.2.2r19980/src/VBox/HostDrivers/Support/freebsd/SUPDrv-freebsd.c
kBuild: Compiling vboxdrv -
/usr/local/h
Wesley Shields wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:58:05AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>> Kelly Hays wrote:
>>> On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Martin Wilke wrote:
>>>>Once the installed Python has been updated to 2.6, by using one of the
>>>>
sion of bsd.port.mk.
Portlint will bark about various things being added too late in the
file, but there are no other options (pardon the pun). :)
Doug
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubsc
d but is a full
install of apache the only way to get those libraries?
--
Regards,
Doug
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Thu, May 28, 2009 09:20, Glen Barber wrote:
> Hi, Doug
>
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Doug Poland
> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have a question about this port. If one wants a client only
>> install, and one wants to use https as the communication prot
it's easy to add this feature to the repocopy script then I would
suggest it be done.
Doug
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
think you'd need to answer the question of how is this solution
similar to just running '/etc/rc.d/foo start'?
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/
Doug Barton wrote:
> Edwin Shao wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I was wondering if there was a port of the Linux/UNIX service
>> <http://www.manpagez.com/man/8/service/>,
>> <http://linux.die.net/man/8/service> command? If not, is there any
>> philosoph
cal/etc/rc.d/$script" ]; then
/usr/local/etc/rc.d/$script $*
else
echo "$script does not exist in /etc/rc.d or"
echo "/usr/local/etc/rc.d"
return 1
fi
}
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature saniti
27;ve tried which pre-dates the MegaCLI
for FreeBSD. Prior versions of MegaCLI also did. I can't say I've
tried all options with the latest MegaCLI.
Doug A.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Upgrade of perl-5.8.9_2 to perl-threaded-5.10.0_3 complete
>
> hellas# nice +18 portmaster -v -r perl\*
As someone else already pointed out, the -r option can only take one
port, so if the glob matches more than one it won't work. Specifying
the specific installed port from th
be an issue.
In any case, I updated the instructions for this, and the other
portmaster examples in /usr/ports/UPDATING a couple days ago so
hopefully no one else will stumble over this.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
fre
eing, the self identified ports in misc
> would get relocated. All other ports would simply be extended with the new
> virtual category name.
You've probably already covered this, but are you making a distinction
between ports that are used to _do_ localization-related tasks, and
por
I don't really want to clear all ports options before each
> portmaster / portupgrade run
You don't need to clear them all with portmaster, you can use the
--force-config option which will run 'make config' for each port but
preserve the ch
zation" would be the better choice.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
use the -i option, and only rebuild the actual p5-
ports. A lot of ports have what I consider "indirect" dependencies on
perl that make the -r option for portmaster and portupgrade do more
work than it probably ought to. However that's a topic for another
thread. :)
Good luck,
Doug
--
he kind words, they are greatly appreciated. :)
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Scott Bennett wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:30:11 -0700 Doug Barton
> wrote:
> There ought to be an automated way to deal with the package issue that
> causes the failure of the entire update run just because it wants a human
> to type "make deinstall &&am
You might want to try 'portmaster --clean-distfiles' for this purpose.
It parses the distinfo files from each installed port to generate the
list of current distfiles so there is no chance of deleting something
that you need. It's also quite fast.
hope this helps,
Doug
--
Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> Hijacking the thread slightly,
Generally better to start a new one, FYI.
> but is there a way to exclude multiple
> ports using the -x switch
Not at this time, you'll want to use the -i option.
hth,
Doug
___
Try using just this:
portmaster -x mysql-client- phpMyAdmin-3.1.5
That should work. If it does not, please let me know.
Doug
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any
Anton - Valqk wrote:
> works now, but now the libiconv breaks with missing mans...
> there is something wrong in whole thing...
You need to report these problems to the maintainers of the affected
ports.
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your prot
delete
the old library when everything (or almost everything) has been
updated in the natural course of events.
hope this helps,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd
2 API available". This was me trying to start kde, while the complete
upgrade did not finish yet.
That can happen sometimes, yes, but not often. I did what I suggested in
my post (portmaster -w) and haven't had any problems yet.
Doug
--
This .signature sani
portmaster -x print/ghostscript8\* -v -w -a
portmaster -x print/ghostscript8-8.64_2 -v -w -a
'portmaster -x ghostscript' should work.
Good luck,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org ma
t; Most likely because that option changes PREFIX, so the BUILD_COOKIE changed,
> but the target was already in make's list of targets to make. After options
> are stored in /var/db/ports, BUILD_COOKIE will end in ._usr.
I believe Mel is right here. 'make clean ; make confi
an' is nonintuitive in the context of
changing OPTIONS. What is your expectation of how it should work?
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/list
ated new signature files with a different key. I've updated
the ports just now.
Unfortunately some of ISC's mirrors still have the old signature
files, so there will be a period of time that this is problematic.
Please be patient,
Doug
- --
This .signature sanitized for your pr
/var/db/ports/*/distfiles is only used to
make sure all of the distfiles associated with a port are deleted if
the user chooses that option. The checksum information is stored, but
is not used at this time. See also
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=106483
hth,
Doug
--
This .signa
Mel Flynn wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 July 2009 10:57:05 Doug Barton wrote:
>> Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
>>>> I believe Mel is right here. 'make clean ; make config ; make' worked
>>>> for me.
>>> As does a second make after getting this er
IX, but that's
the whole purpose of the option.
Could you please open a PR about this with a subject something to the
effect of "OPTIONS that change PREFIX cause an error after 'make
config'" and describe how to reproduce this?
Thank
the bug with gqview as well, and the cinfo->scale_denom
patch to gtk on that forum worked for me.
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinf
mpile but
will not
run.
I assume you mean the port? What do you mean by it won't run? How are
you starting it?
Doug
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send a
Oliver Fromme wrote:
> However, pkg_infor -r doesn't list any dependencies.
> I compiled bind96 with the IDN option, so it also
> compiled and installed dns/idnkit.
Mistake on my part that I just fixed. Thanks to danger@ for submitt
y happens,
hopefully we can stop flogging this horse soon.
That said, if anyone really really wants to pursue the dependency
graphing issue further, can I suggest a new thread focused on that topic?
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
k/index.html
and figure out how to do this work yourself. It is just like any other
skill, it gets easier with practice. :)
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd
1) and didn't have any problems. Can you please post the
contents of /var/db/ports/alpine/options? Also, do you have any
options related to thread libraries in /etc/make.conf, and are you
using openssl from the ports, or in the base?
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for
nd anything that is corrupt, it
will only find things that don't apply to your currently installed ports.
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mail
n't need it anymore (and in this case you almost
certainly do not) then you can use 'portmaster -e xphelloworld' to
delete it (or just good old 'pkg_delete -f').
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
__
cd /usr/ports/lang/perl5.10
vi Makefile (replace the MAKE_JOBS_SAFE with MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE)
make clean
make config
make
Then report your results.
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org maili
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, Doug Barton wrote:
>
>> Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
>>> The fact that the error occurs AT ALL is the bug and what is
>>> counterintuitive, and many people would not think to try typing "make"
>
_will_ have pain.
hope this helps,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
for FreeBSD.
> - switch to a multi-level solution (e.g. Archlinux).
In DiegoBSD you should feel free to use any solution you think is
useful. :)
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://li
ind of
an odd configuration, and could very well produce the kind of edge
case I described above.
hope this helps,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mail
t; py26-openssl-0.8_1 Python interface to the OpenSSL library
>
> I also recompiled openssl to make sure all was well.
Do you still have the openssl stuff in the base? This might cause a
conflict such as the one you're seeing. Also, try disabling threads in
OPTIONS and see if
h subsequent release.
Thank you for the kind words, they are appreciated.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send
Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Tom Uffner wrote:
>> Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote:
>>
>>> Can't xconsole do the job for you instead of contool?
>> more or less. i am using xconsole by default. however i prefer contool
>> because it has the following features which
Lars Eighner wrote:
> Okay after it didn't work a few times I did
>
> portupgrade -fr qt4\*
>
> and still the make of devel/dbus-qt4 fails thus:
What happens if you do this:
cd /usr/ports/devel/dbus-qt4
make clean
make config
make
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized
Scott Bennett wrote:
> Yesterday's ports updates are just *loads* of fun. :-( Until portmaster
> reached the rebuilding of perl5.10, *every* *single* *port* that got rebuilt
> ended in failure on a "make deinstall/make reinstall" recommendation, *none*
> of which actually worked when tried.
that there is now an entry in
ports/UPDATING that covers this though, so at least users who pay
attention to that file will not run into the same problem.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mai
Tom Uffner wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote:
>> I thought contool looked interesting so I tried build it. It requires
>> xview, which fails as follows on a fairly recent -current (8.0-BETA2
>> r195917: Mon Jul 27 16:09:24 PDT 2009):
>
> i posted an ugly workaround for this a
Ok, so now I'm up to the point where starting contool give me this:
contool
Assertion failed: (ret != inval_id), function _XAllocID, file
xcb_io.c, line 378.
Abort trap: 6 (core dumped)
gdb log attached
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
$ gdb /usr/local/bin/contool contool.
ingless in this scenario, and -w is
actually a bad idea, FYI.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
All the other qt4 stuff updated just fine, this one doesn't (and I
already disabled make-jobs).
Doug
c++ -c -pipe -g -g -O2 -Wall -W -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE
-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -DQT_NO_DEBUG -DQT_SCRIPT_LIB -DQT_XML_LIB
-DQT_GUI_LIB -DQT_NETWORK_LIB -DQT_CORE_LIB -DQT_SHARED
-I/usr/local/
designer and vlc's
operation does not seem to be adversely affected, so that's how I'll
leave it for now.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/ma
Matthias Andree wrote:
> Am 06.08.2009, 05:38 Uhr, schrieb Doug Barton :
>
>
>> I have considered changing the order of how portmaster does things from:
>>
>> build
>> backup package (unless -B)
>> deinstall
>> install
>>
>> to:
>>
Lars Eighner wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, Doug Barton wrote:
>
>> Naram Qashat wrote:
>>
>>> Actually, I had this problem as well, I found the solution (after a bit
>>> of Googling), is to deinstall devel/dbus-qt4 and then install it again.
>>> A
Doug Barton wrote:
> All the other qt4 stuff updated just fine, this one doesn't (and I
> already disabled make-jobs).
Well I'm a bit embarrassed. :-/ I just re-read the UPDATING entry on
qt4 stuff and it turns out that this issue is mentioned. Deleting the
port first and th
systems like Ubuntu that are focused
on the end user.
You're clearly very frustrated, and I'm not going to judge whether
your frustration is justified or not. But before you expend a lot more
energy railing about the sad state FreeBSD is in you might
ymbol "_ZN14nsAutoLockBaseC2EPvNS_14nsAutoLockTypeE"
The 0.95.7 from the enigmail web page works just fine.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/f
man page about +IGNOREME files.
> Doug, what do you think of the attached patch?
I think it's interesting, but not quite how I would do it. I have
plans to rewrite the command line parser in order to accommodate this,
and make things easier to work with generally, so stay tuned.
Doug
--
be able to do. If you want
to do it on the command line instead you can also use -i, but if
you're dealing with a lot of ports (like with -a) that can get annoying.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-ports@freeb
I vaguely recall seeing something about this, but don't recall if
there was a resolution.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-
1 - 100 of 1640 matches
Mail list logo
