On 7/5/2016 11:26, John Marino wrote:
On 7/5/2016 10:36, Matthias Fechner wrote:
Am 04.07.2016 um 22:03 schrieb John Marino:
sorry, the correct invocation is "synth status-everything". There is
a man page (man 1 synth) as well.
thanks for this tip.
As I have to check my poudr
On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Matt Smith wrote:
On Dec 08 05:16, Daniil Berendeev wrote:
Although portmaster is not releated to the FreeBSD project and is an
outside tool, there aren't any alternatives from the project itself. So
use it or die. Not a nice situation.
People have been trying to get port
On 12/15/2016 09:49, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote:
On 15.12.2016 16:29, John Marino wrote:
Although portmaster is not releated to the FreeBSD project and is an
outside tool, there aren't any alternatives from the project
itself. So
use it or die. Not a nice situation.
People have been tryi
On 12/15/2016 10:31, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote:
On 15.12.2016 17:00, John Marino wrote:
It is every week. Consider the FreeBSD forums as well.
No, it isn't. Lets check the history. This is just a general statement.
portmaster was added 2006 and the portstree startet in 1994.
Can you
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 6:42 AM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2016-Dec-15 19:31:22 +0100, list-freebsd-ports at jyborn.se wrote:
Interestingly, the most vocal proponent of deleting portmaster and
portupgrade is the author/maintainer of synch.
It's not interesting at all. Synth was in a large part
From Kevin Oberman:
Just to add another voice of those who use portmaster on a regular basis. I
moved to portmaster about seven years ago and have has very few issues with
it. I have had issues building ports from time to time, but it's been a
long time since i hit one that was not a problem with
Roger Marquis wrote
It is every week. Consider the FreeBSD forums as well.
"misuse" and "misunderstanding" failures are attributed to the tool. Let's
stop making excuses for portmaster. It is what it is and we've had years to
evaluate it.
If portmaster was part of base I'd agree that it shoul
On 12/16/2016 10:09, Roger Marquis wrote:
I never understood why people went ape- over it, unless they don't
understand what "deprecated without expiration" actually means.
Perhaps then this is the crux of the issue. From my experience
"deprecated" means only that something will not appear
On 12/17/2016 07:55, Michael Gmelin wrote:
On 17 Dec 2016, at 14:26, Alphons van Werven wrote:
John Marino wrote:
In fact, anyone that updates ports should use either poudriere testport
or synth test.
Then consider these relinquished:
/usr/ports/archivers/zip
/usr/ports/astro
On 12/17/2016 01:49, Hrant Dadivanyan wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 6:42 AM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2016-Dec-15 19:31:22 +0100, list-freebsd-ports at jyborn.se wrote:
Interestingly, the most vocal proponent of deleting portmaster and
portupgrade is the author/maintainer of synch.
It's not i
From Thomas Mueller:
From John Marino:
Starting with a clean system: 1) install synth from binary package
from official freebsd builder (a single
package) 2) Configure synth if necessary 3) command synth to build
itself 4) pkg delete synth (system is once again clean) 5) pkg add -F
/path/to
abi wrote:
I tried to switch from portmaster to synth yesterday. Tests was
sponsored by zfs snapshots.
I still have strong opinion that synth IS NOT replacement for portmaster
and not usable at all.
Yes, synth build ports, however it's just builds them. I don't receive
information:
1. Why it b
On 12/17/2016 12:34, abi wrote:
2. It doesn't provide dialog for port options, so
2.1 I don't receive information if port options have changed. I don't
know what else will be pulled to my system after port tree update.
which of course is a false statement.
If you set port options which then c
On 12/17/2016 13:35, Mark Linimon wrote:
This is the sixth "top of thread" post. Could you please arrange to stop
breaking email threading? Thanks.
mcl
I have to assume you're talking to me.
Mark:
1) I am not subscribed to the mail list
2) FreeBSD chooses not to store the raw email content
On 12/17/2016 13:47, Alphons van Werven wrote:
Needless to say, not being a committer myself, whether/that said folks are
required to use Poudriere and/or Synth for their QA checking is ipso facto
none of my concern. However, I'm pretty sure I know what comes next. When
maintainers need to provid
On 12/17/2016 19:35, Peter Jeremy wrote:
$ cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/synth/ && make
[ about an hour of grinding away elided ]
===> ini_file_manager-03_2 depends on file: /usr/local/gcc6-aux/bin/ada - not
found
===> gcc6-aux-20160822 is only for amd64 i386, while you are running armv6.
Overall
On 12/18/2016 00:43, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Saturday, 17 December 2016 at 20:16:12 -0600, John Marino wrote:
On 12/17/2016 19:35, Peter Jeremy wrote:
$ cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/synth/ && make
[ about an hour of grinding away elided ]
===> ini_file_manager-03_2
David wrote
On 12/16/2016 04:06 PM, John Marino wrote:
Starting with a clean system:
1) install synth from binary package from official freebsd builder (a
single package)
What about just building synth from ports? Then the OP have everything
built from ports.
--
David
In the example, the
Grzegorz Junka wrote:
On 17/12/2016 18:51, John Marino wrote:
On 12/17/2016 12:34, abi wrote:
2. It doesn't provide dialog for port options, so
2.1 I don't receive information if port options have changed. I don't
know what else will be pulled to my system after port tree upd
On 12/19/2016 00:48, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2016-Dec-17 20:16:12 -0600, John Marino wrote:
On 12/17/2016 19:35, Peter Jeremy wrote:
$ cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/synth/ && make
[ about an hour of grinding away elided ]
===> ini_file_manager-03_2 depends on file: /usr/local/gcc6-
On 12/19/2016 04:18, Boris Samorodov wrote:
17.12.2016 22:40, John Marino пишет:
I am not subscribed to the mail list
A port's committer is not subscribed to the ports@ ML?
Is it a joke?
I don't want to participate in this list. The only reason I'm stuck on
this topic is
On 12/18/2016 23:42, Jim Trigg wrote:
On 12/18/2016 02:24 AM, John Marino wrote:
2) portmaster's dirty build method is inferior to clean environment
builds (true)
3) There is better and official alternative (true)
Maybe. I have a case where portmaster (on my current production box)
b
On 12/19/2016 18:36, Warren Block wrote:
On Mon, 19 Dec 2016, John Marino wrote:
On 12/19/2016 04:18, Boris Samorodov wrote:
17.12.2016 22:40, John Marino пишет:
I am not subscribed to the mail list
A port's committer is not subscribed to the ports@ ML?
Is it a joke?
I don'
On 12/19/2016 20:22, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 07:07:06PM -0600, John Marino wrote:
It's a natural reaction to stop attempting to contribute when previous
contributions don't get "attention they deserve".
Which some people (including me) see as odds wi
On 12/20/2016 18:39, Warren Block wrote:
On Mon, 19 Dec 2016, John Marino wrote:
On 12/19/2016 20:22, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 07:07:06PM -0600, John Marino wrote:
It's a natural reaction to stop attempting to contribute when previous
contributions don't get
On 12/21/2016 01:23, Jim Trigg wrote:
No, that's not what I'm saying. I can't find anything online showing
that this problem has been reported.
I've see this reported before, probably on this list, maybe by you.
I can't reproduce it using the tool
that I've been using for years (portmaster).
It seems to me that portsmon has stopped showing error logs since the
new year. Additionally the build environments seem outdated (84 and
93). Probably related, I can't seem to connect to beefy* anymore to
search for build logs manually.
Finally, the "Active Problem Reports" has been non-fun
(resent, diff address)
It seems to me that portsmon has stopped showing error logs since the
new year. Additionally the build environments seem outdated (84 and
93). Probably related, I can't seem to connect to beefy* anymore to
search for build logs manually.
Finally, the "Active Problem
On 2/3/2017 14:55, Matthias Andree wrote:
Am 29.01.2017 um 20:22 schrieb John Marino:
Author: marino
Date: Sun Jan 29 19:22:47 2017
New Revision: 432796
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/432796
Log:
graphics/rawtherapee(-devel): Fix OSVERSION, use with OPSYS
The OSVERSION
On 2/4/2017 16:24, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Fri, 3 Feb 2017, John Marino wrote:
AFAIK it's not documented, but it's been spoken here quite a few times
and the result was "try to be nice and if you must use OSVERSION, guard
it with OPSYS". Anything else is a bug because
On 1/13/2014 23:05, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
> I submitted ports/185362 and ports/185361 over a week ago and I have heard
> nothing but automated replies so far.
>
There are 180 Open PRs just with the words "new port" in the title:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports&sever
On 1/15/2014 14:36, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I'm maintaining net/Sockets, which currently has "NO_STAGE=yes" added.
>
> I believe this is unneeded and no other change is necessary, but I'm
> quite noob.
> I've already followed https://wiki.freebsd.org/ports/StageDir and tested
> with
On 1/15/2014 23:23, Maxim Sirenko wrote:
> )))
> OK
> I can't do that -- not enough knowledge & experience.
> I thought the author maintains the port.
>
> Good Luck!
>
The port is unmaintained, as seen in the second line of its description:
http://www.freshports.org/net/abills/
The means the mo
On 1/19/2014 11:09, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Ports.
>
> I want to write something like this in port's Makefile
>
> ===
> SOME_FILE=${WRKDIR}/name
>
> some-target: ${SOME_FILE}
>
> ${SOME_FILE}: ${WRKDIR}/${DISTNAME}
> # Some commands to generate ${SOME_FI
On 1/19/2014 12:54, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, John.
> You wrote 19 января 2014 г., 14:23:11:
>
> JM> Many ports carry a BSD makefile in the files subdirectory, install that
> JM> and that makefile does all the internal building.
> Problem is, I want to use a lot f variables defined by our p
On 1/19/2014 23:03, Yuri wrote:
> After the ports update my qbittorrent fails due to this collision:
> $ qbittorrent
> /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version GLIBCXX_3.4.15 required by
> /usr/local/lib/libtorrent-rasterbar.so.7 not found
>
> I guess, all packages depending on gcc47 libs would likely fai
On 1/19/2014 23:14, Yuri wrote:
> On 01/19/2014 14:07, John Marino wrote:
>> The gcc47 should be built with specs that automatically insert a runpath
>> (-Wl,-rpath,) of /usr/local/gcc47/ so that every binary and library
>> built by it knows where to look.
>>
>&g
On 1/20/2014 09:29, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2014-Jan-19 23:07:50 +0100, John Marino wrote:
>> On 1/19/2014 23:03, Yuri wrote:
>>> After the ports update my qbittorrent fails due to this collision:
>>> $ qbittorrent
>>> /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version GLIBC
On 1/20/2014 16:24, nano wrote:
> Trying to build ports with "portmaster -f" after
> upgrading to 10.0-RELEASE results in build error:
>
> ===> $PORTNAME Do not define STAGEDIR in command line.
> *** Error code 1
>
> Stop.
> make: stopped in /usr/ports/$PORTSCATEGORY/$PORTSDIR
>
>
> All ports
On 1/20/2014 16:33, nano wrote:
>
> You're right. It appears to have been fixed. Do you know what the
> problem was? I could find nothing in UPDATING or online.
>
The breakage:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head/2014-January/043072.html
The fix:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail
On 1/21/2014 16:06, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Ports.
>
> Wiki on Stage dir support says, that if port supports staging, MANx
> variables in Makefile is useless and I need simply list all man pages in
> pkg-plist and they will be gzipped automagically.
>
> portlint -A says, that I need to
On 1/23/2014 20:53, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote:
> Am 23.01.2014 20:04 schrieb "Yuri" :
>>
>> On 01/21/2014 15:31, Shane Ambler wrote:
>>>
>>> I think you will find that qbittorrent will need to be built with the
>>> same gcc version as libtorrent-rasterbar.
>>>
>>> I believe qbittorrent is loading /us
On 1/24/2014 18:52, Jose Gonzalez wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I posted this thread on the forum too, but then I saw this email address
> checking into the ports version for OpenERP. Here's the thing.
>
> My company wants to start looking into OpenERP v7.0. I have seen some
> deployments in different f
On 1/24/2014 19:10, John Marino wrote:
> On 1/24/2014 18:52, Jose Gonzalez wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I posted this thread on the forum too, but then I saw this email address
>> checking into the ports version for OpenERP. Here's the thing.
>>
>> My comp
On 1/24/2014 19:10, John Marino wrote:
> On 1/24/2014 18:52, Jose Gonzalez wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I posted this thread on the forum too, but then I saw this email address
>> checking into the ports version for OpenERP. Here's the thing.
>>
>> My comp
On 1/25/2014 00:30, Big Lebowski wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I wanted to ask about the growing time of reaction to ports PR's - what is
> the problem? It seems to me, as a ports contributor, that this time is only
> growing, not shrinking, and there's no formal/automated procedures that
> would help
On 1/25/2014 01:03, Big Lebowski wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 12:41 AM, John Marino
> wrote:
>
>> On 1/25/2014 00:30, Big Lebowski wrote:
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> I wanted to ask about the growing time of reaction to ports PR's - what
&g
On 1/25/2014 01:36, Big Lebowski wrote:
> I was hoping to get some discussion revealing how the work is organized
> around ports PR, perhaps some ideas on improving them and I hoped that
> people who can make decisions and changes would notice it and consider
> them, since as they say, the squeeky
On 1/25/2014 05:16, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>> Thus, are you volunteering for this role? It's not my call, but if you
>> really want to do clean out and triage the all PRs on an ongoing basis,
>> my guess is that would be very welcome and we'd figure out a way to set
>> that up. It would definite
On 1/25/2014 09:55, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> On 1/24/14, 11:45 PM, John Marino wrote:
>> On 1/25/2014 05:16, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>>>> Thus, are you volunteering for this role? It's not my call, but if you
>>>> really want to do clean out and triage
On 1/25/2014 18:11, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> Still missing the point. Git can sit on top of svn.
>
Other than converting SVN to Git, I don't know anything about that. It
would never be done in an official capacity. Git is not an official
tool of FreeBSD.
> From what I'm reading you may kn
On 2/6/2014 13:27, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> Michel Talon wrote:
>> charset=us-ascii
>
> Junk mail format, not impressed. Use Ascii
This is petty.
>> i can only conclude, like
>> Matthew that you are being absurd.
> Personal inuendo does not impress.
While you may take this as an unnecess
On 2/6/2014 13:58, Rick Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 7:23 AM, Daniel Nebdal wrote:
>
>> I suspect he meant "a certain version, and *not* newer" - sometimes
>> you might want to hold back a package.
>>
> Correct. My wish is the functionality be extended further to mean "a
> certain ver
On 2/6/2014 13:54, N.J. Mann wrote:
> For many years I have set NO_MANCOMPRESS (and before that NOMANCOMPRESS)
> in /etc/make.conf on all my machines. In the last few weeks I have
> noticed that this setting is being ignored by port updates. Has this
> setting been silently depreciated?
>
You h
On 2/6/2014 14:31, N.J. Mann wrote:
>> I don't believe it was ever a user variable.
> It was and still is for the base system - this machine was updated to
> 8-STABLE r261161 ten days ago and all base manual pages are
> uncompressed.
okay, that's right.
It's a case where ports honored a base varia
On 2/6/2014 17:13, Randy Pratt wrote:
> My experience with mixing ports and packages dates back to 2.2.5 and
> the disasters it created. Most of the problems were created by the
> ports tree and package builds not being syncronized. I switched to
> ports exclusively and have not had those problem
On 2/7/2014 14:43, Benjamin Podszun wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Change of mail address, new thread with a decent title (previously:
> prosody update, which is sort of independent as far as I've confirmed so
> far).
>
> With the attached patch luasec-0.5 builds & installs fine in my
> environment.
>
> IF (c
On 2/7/2014 16:32, Benjamin Podszun wrote:
> On Friday, February 7, 2014 2:55:48 PM CEST, John Marino wrote:
>> On 2/7/2014 14:43, Benjamin Podszun wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> Change of mail address, new thread with a decent title (previously:
>>> prosody u
On 2/8/2014 00:34, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Dimitry.
> You wrote 8 февраля 2014 г., 3:24:34:
>
>>> And it seems, that most of USE_GCC-equipped ports pull all this development
>>> toolkit for nothing!
> DA> Well, some ports can be more or less difficult to get building with
> DA> clang. So
On 2/8/2014 09:20, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, John.
> You wrote 8 февраля 2014 г., 3:39:37:
>
> And it seems, that most of USE_GCC-equipped ports pull all this
> development
> toolkit for nothing!
>>> DA> Well, some ports can be more or less difficult to get building with
>>> DA>
On 2/8/2014 10:24, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, John.
> You wrote 8 февраля 2014 г., 12:32:23:
>
>>> JM> dynamically linked libraries.
>>> JM> libcstd++
>>> JM> libgfortran
>>> JM> libquadmath
>>> JM> libssp
>>> JM> libgcc_s
>>> JM> etc,etc
>>> 90% of USE_GCC-ports don't use libgrotran & libqu
On 2/8/2014 11:26, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Individual examples aside, I recollect that one of the selling points
> for STAGING, together with pkgNG, was that we would later have the
> chance to split up one build into multiple binary packages.
>
> Not sure what other changes to the infrastructure
On 2/25/2014 23:08, A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven wrote:
> Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
>> Can we stop advertising the above, this is completly wrong, it hides the
>> dust behind the carpet and won't fix anything!
>>
>> The said port is needed a fix.
>
> Granted: it's not staging itself that is the probl
On 2/26/2014 18:56, Gergely Czuczy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Could you please update devel/yaml-cpp to 0..5.1? It's out for almost a
> year now, and the last commit, which is 5 weeks old, i still only 0.3.0
>
Gergely,
Why did you include the entire ports@ mail list for this request?
If Tim doesn't re
On 3/3/2014 18:21, hiren panchasara wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 11:49 PM, hiren panchasara
> wrote:
>> Poudriere failed to build mutt for me and here is the error log:
>>
>> http://bpaste.net/show/184460/
>>
>> I have today's current and up-to-date ports tree.
>>
>> Please let me know if I can
On 3/4/2014 16:47, Wolfgang Riegler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> poudriere fails configuring digikam because "MySQL install_db tool
> found.. NO". MySQL server is in my bulk list as well.
>
> k3b fails while packaging: pkg-static:
> lstat(/wrkdirs/usr/ports/sysutils/k3b-kde4/work/stage/usr/loca
On 3/6/2014 08:36, O. Hartmann wrote:
> With the update of devel/readline in r346608 (from 6.2 -> 6.3), port
> textproc/refdb gets corrupted (see PR ports/187271).
>
> It is obviously that the new readline breaks the API (missing: Function,
> CPPFunction).
>
Hi Olivier,
You forgot to attach the
On 3/11/2014 13:16, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 11 March 2014 07:05, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> To be able to migrate most of the zip files to use bsdtar when they case we
>> have
>> added USES=zip[:infozip] for consistency I do plan to make the same kind of
>> USES
>> for every kind
On 3/12/2014 14:02, Koichiro IWAO wrote:
> I receive following pkg-fallout notices and they're annoying.
> It says failed in checksums but I fixed checksums weeks ago.
> Why pkg-fallout notices such old checksum mismatches?
> How can I stop it?
>
> http://beefy1.isc.freebsd.org/bulk/10i386-quar
On 3/12/2014 14:27, Koichiro IWAO wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 02:12:21PM +0100, John Marino wrote:
>> You get the idea.
>> You fixed head, you didn't fix the quarterly branches.
>> How you can stop it?
>> MFC your fix to quarterly branch.
>
> OK, I was
On 3/12/2014 14:49, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote:
> I am just going to ignore emails from pkg-fallout that have "-quarterly"
> in their subject line. I don't really see the point of fixing the
> stable branches, since I pressume they are just a snapshot of ports at
> the time when the correspon
On 3/14/2014 10:15, portsc...@freebsd.org wrote:
> Port| Current version | New
> version
> +-+
> games/doomsday | 1.12.2 |
> 1.14.0-bui
On 3/14/2014 10:30, Philippe Audéoud wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Mar 2014, John Marino wrote:
>
>> On 3/14/2014 10:15, portsc...@freebsd.org wrote:
>>> Port| Current versi
On 3/14/2014 11:47, John Marino wrote:
> On 3/14/2014 10:30, Philippe Audéoud wrote:
>> On Fri, 14 Mar 2014, John Marino wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/14/2014 10:15, portsc...@freebsd.org wrote:
>>>> Port|
On 3/14/2014 12:08, A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven wrote:
> John Marino wrote:
>
>> I wanted to suggest that maybe portscout can not send any notice to
>> ports@ by rule if the port is unmaintained.
>
> On the other hand, seeing that a certain port is unmaintained migh
On 3/15/2014 09:02, Ondra Knezour wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I use the sysutils/wait_on utility, which has been removed because
> (recurring) unavailability of the distfiles. I have missing file and I
> am willing to find some new sweet home for it on my machines, so the
> question is - how to reques
In December, Nicola set the license for Arabtex to LPPL10.
The result is that the port is no longer packagable:
> >> Ignoring arabic/arabtex: License LPPL10 needs confirmation, but BATCH
> is defined
> build of /usr/ports/arabic/arabtex ended at Mon Mar 17 16:12:44 PDT 2014
>From a quick con
On 3/22/2014 22:16, CyberLeo Kitsana wrote:
> On 03/22/2014 02:27 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 10:29 AM, John Marino
>> wrote:
>>
>>> In December, Nicola set the license for Arabtex to LPPL10.
>>> The result is that the port is no long
On 3/23/2014 00:05, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 2:16 PM, CyberLeo Kitsana
> wrote:
>
>> On 03/22/2014 02:27 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>>> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 10:29 AM, John Marino >> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In December, Nicola set
On 3/24/2014 08:55, Mark R V Murray wrote:
> /bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.
> -I./../include -DHAVE_all_vecs -DBINDIR='"/usr/local/bin"'
> -I/usr/local/include -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
> -Wshadow -Werror -O2 -pipe -DRL_NO_CO
On 3/27/2014 23:09, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 24 Mar 2014, at 22:32, Mark R V Murray wrote:
>>
>> On 24 Mar 2014, at 15:34, pizzamig wrote:
>>> I've already got a report about that, but I'm on holiday, without a CURRENT
>>> system, I cannot work on it right now...
>>> I guess CURRENT has a new
(again, I think
this is do to everyone expecting somebody to organize/lead the effort
before they jump in)
Regards,
John
On 3/23/2014 13:20, John Marino wrote:
> On 3/23/2014 00:05, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 2:16 PM, CyberLeo Kitsana
>> wrote:
>>
>&
On 3/27/2014 11:35, Paul Pathiakis wrote:
> Thank you, Anton. I'm now enlightened. I guess my main request for a
> port is the ability to watch Netflix. Yes, I know Silverlight is
> dead, however, this hasn't stopped Netflix from it's continued use.
> :-) I didn't know how to request a port that p
On 3/28/2014 11:46, Paul Pathiakis wrote:
> Here's a big part of honesty I'm a senior systems architect. I'm
> building a company and hope to go live soon, after two years of
> developing product and infrastructure. I do this when not
> contracting/consulting.
Good luck with the startup!
I a
On 3/29/2014 04:14, Thomas Abthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 10:33:25AM +0100, John Marino wrote:
>> It's been a few days and there's been no response to this.
>> Should I assume that tabthorpe@ read this but is not prepared to review
>> his work?
&
On 3/29/2014 11:14, Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 09:39:42AM +0100, John Marino wrote:
>> *this* is a crappy attitude though.
>
> No, that's the sound of burnout.
>
> IMVHO, one of the contributing factors to burnout is exactly this kind
> of email.
On 3/29/2014 11:48, Chris Rees wrote:
> On , John Marino wrote:
>> This licensing topic is actually kind of a big mess that nobody seems to
>> be leading, and it's not even clear if missing licenses is a problem.
>> What's the policy? It would be better to disab
On 3/29/2014 14:25, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 29 March 2014 11:01:04 GMT+00:00, John Marino
> wrote:
> I think you may have success as far as dports is concerned if you
> just disable it your end- there is a knob for that.
>
> If you think it's inherently bad, you shou
On 3/31/2014 16:57, A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The port mail/xmailbox is set to be removed soon because it has been
> unmaintained since 2000. In this case, does "unmaintained" refer to just
> the FreeBSD port, or to the software itself? And in either case, is there
> anything tha
On 4/3/2014 19:52, J David wrote:
>
> The net effect of all of this is that even if you do take 24 hours and
> rebuild all the ports that depend on perl because of that foobar
> vulnerability, including bazqux, you *still* end up pissing off the
> bazqux users because it rev'd bazqux from 1.5 to 2
On 4/8/2014 16:30, Dave Duchscher wrote:
> Port Maintainers,
>
> Just a suggestion: If you are going to remove an option from your
> port, it would be nice if you would make the port break when that
> option is used. We build our own packages with custom options and
> this little issue just cause
On 4/9/2014 11:22, Big Lebowski wrote:
> While we are not having any way to measure ports usage (or am I wrong
> here?), we're still building packages from ports, and I would hope that we
> could get some statistics of pkg usage for certain packages from official
> repositories, could we? This is n
On 4/9/2014 12:38, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 8 Apr 2014, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
/var/db/pkg/libyaml-0.1.6/distfiles
> ...
>>
>> No, once you run pkgng, these files are in /var/db/pkg. The only files in
>> /var/db/ports are options files.
>
> Ah, my bad.
> Though it makes no se
On 4/9/2014 13:45, Big Lebowski wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 11:28 AM, John Marino wrote:
>
>> On 4/9/2014 11:22, Big Lebowski wrote:
>>> While we are not having any way to measure ports usage (or am I wrong
>>> here?), we're still building packages from
On 4/9/2014 19:56, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> On 2014-04-08, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
>> Then, once it is reasonable to assume that a port is unused it is first
>> marked deprecated which gives users some time to step forward.
>
> There seems to be the general problem, seen again and again, that
On 4/9/2014 20:17, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So, after the detour...
There was no detour. You were given a comprehensive answer.
>>> On 4/9/2014 12:38, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
>
Though it makes no sense in my mind. Distfiles belong to ports not
packages. What problem was solved
On 4/10/2014 19:44, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>
>> On 10/04/2014 18:53, Helmut Schneider wrote:
>>> I created a new port, Typo3-LTS. The tgz contains
>>>
>>> - Makefile
>>> - distinfo
>>> - pkg-plist
>>> - pkg-descr
>>> - a diff from www/typo3
>>>
>>> The file has ~150kB so
On 4/10/2014 20:28, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 07:32:31PM +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>>
>> On 10/04/2014 18:53, Helmut Schneider wrote:
>>> I created a new port, Typo3-LTS. The tgz contains
>>>
>>> - Makefile
>>> - distinfo
>>> - pkg-plist
>>> - pkg-descr
>>> - a diff fr
On 4/10/2014 22:05, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 4/10/2014 1:35 PM, Janne Snabb wrote:
>>
>> I think I have noticed binary package updates only about once a week. Is
>> my observation correct? Why such an infrequent update cycle? If there is
>> some real reason to build package updates so rarely, woul
On 4/13/2014 07:21, Matthew Rezny wrote:
>> On 4/9/2014 19:56, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
>>> On 2014-04-08, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
Then, once it is reasonable to assume that a port is unused it is first
marked deprecated which gives users some time to step forward.
>>>
>>> There seems t
201 - 300 of 330 matches
Mail list logo
