EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -a
FreeBSD vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com 6.1-RELEASE FreeBSD
6.1-RELEASE #4: Tue May 16 12:43:32 EDT 2006 [EMAIL
PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/VANQUISH i386
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusio
you can install a
separate copy of mailman in each jail. This will keep them happily
independent of each other.
That's obviously not the only way to get what you want, just my
suggestion.
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/
e to voice your opinion, I don't understand your purpose
in spamming three mailing lists with this demand. What problem are you
trying to solve?
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/
___
ngle problem and include as a patch file for barnyard2. That way it's
not a true beta, it just has that single patch to fix a known problem.
For me, I think that would be the preferred method in this case.
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmo
In response to Paul Schmehl :
> --On Wednesday, October 21, 2009 10:31:21 -0500 Bill Moran
> wrote:
>
> >
> > In response to Paul Schmehl :
> >
> >> I am the maintainer for security/barnyard2. This is an updated version of
> >> security/barnyard, w
On 1/23/10 3:02 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 01/23/10 10:16, Martin Wilke wrote:
Before we get more mails with the question why we not update
firefox to 3.6, the answer is easy, nox@ found some problems
with some plugins, this problem seems to be only FreeBSD
releated under Linux or Windows seems
message:
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 20:33:48 -0500
From: Bill Moran
To: v...@freebsd.org
Subject: VirtualBox coredump on FreeBSD 8 during build
FreeBSD monster 8.0-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p1 #3: Sun Dec 13 14:53:34
EST 2009 r...@monster:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
Ports tree u
Assurance... ROTFLMAO.
If we're taking a vote, I vote for the following:
a) We ban Tuomo from our lists.
b) We remove all his software from the ports and refuse to accept
any more by him.
The guy is obviously just around to start flame wars.
--
B
for the
FreeBSD ports system to guarantee compliance with his arbitrarily
chosen "28 days" rule. If he's going to demand that his terms be
followed, then it has to come out of the ports.
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
free
essary. :sigh:
>
> Distro folks are not reasonable; they think authors should be their
> undemanding and unquestioning slaves. I think we have learned that
> already.
Who's we? You and all the voices in your head?
Remind the voices that FreeBSD isn't a Linux distro, and m
In response to Tuomo Valkonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 2007-12-12, Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It's impossible for the FreeBSD ports system to guarantee compliance with
> > his arbitrarily chosen "28 days" rule.
>
> There is no
, it is an
> appreciated piece of software.
Fair enough. In that case, those who appreciate it should submit patches
that meet Tuomo's requirements. This is how it's done. This is how it's
_always_ been done. If the original maintainer is no longer keeping up
with the software
Mikhail Teterin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> середа 12 грудень 2007 06:35 по, Bill Moran Ви написали:
> > It's his software. If his requirements can't be met, then the port comes
> > out of the tree. What else do you expect to happen?
>
> I expect the
e that you can find emotional healing Tuomo. I, for
one, will be glad to see you return as a sane person but have no desire
to watch this thread continue as long as you're sick.
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
instead.
Perhaps you're right. However, I'd like to hear the opinion of a lawyer
as to whether this is acceptable or not.
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/li
nd it's damn near impossible to take legal action against them if it
was all verbal.
Of course, I am not a lawyer either, so you should consult with one
before entering into any important agreement.
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
s is exactly the way to proceed.
If the maintainer is not responding, open the issue as a PR so it's
officially tracked. If the maintainer does not respond withing a
reasonable length of time, request a maintainer timeout to have another
committer c
In response to Vladimir Zorin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Bill Moran wrote:
> > In response to Dominic Fandrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >> Vladimir Zorin wrote:
> >>> I tried to get in touch with Alex Dupre, the maintainer of the
> >>> bs
The above mentioned port is marked BROKEN because it "does not build with
GCC 4.2"
I commented out the BROKEN line, figuring I'd see if I could help fix it,
but much to my surprise it built without problems and runs just fine.
$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: i386-undermydesk-freebsd
Confi
Erwin Lansing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 01:28:14PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
> >
> > The above mentioned port is marked BROKEN because it "does not build with
> > GCC 4.2"
>
> Are you sure you are looking at the right po
ts@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://li
sting, but it seems as if a tweak
to make it respect that setting would be nice.
On a (possibly) related note, that port seems to require openldap-2.3
and the build breaks because I have openldap-2.4 installed.
Unfortunately, I don't have time to investigate that now.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborat
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/168583
This bugger is about a month old at this point. Of course,
part of that is my fault for being slow to respond, so I'm
just putting a heads-up out -- if anyone is able to commit
that, it'd be great.
--
Bill
On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 15:44:51 +0800
Christopher Hall wrote:
> When running PostgreSQL with the uuid-ossp extension the server fails
> with signal 10 (bus error).
http://pgfoundry.org/projects/uuid-freebsd/
--
Bill Moran
___
freebsd-ports@freeb
On Mon, 7 Oct 2013 11:20:23 +0800 Christopher Hall
wrote:
> Hello Bill,
>
> On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 08:34:35 -0400
> Bill Moran wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 15:44:51 +0800
> > Christopher Hall wrote:
> >
> > > When running PostgreSQL with the uuid-
; the port tree.
Well ... here's where I'm not much help, as I'm not very familiar with
the care and feeding of Java apps.
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
r/local/sbin/portupgrade:2208
If I comment out line 106 in that Makefile, all is fine.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 412-422-3463x4023
IMPORTANT: Th
In response to Marcin Wisnicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:51:23 -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
>
> > cvsupped my ports tree just this morning. #uname -a
> > FreeBSD vanquish.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com 7.0-RELEASE
> > FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #4
In response to Marcin Wisnicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:45:10 -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
>
> > In response to Marcin Wisnicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >> On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:51:23 -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> >>
> >&
In response to Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Bill Moran wrote:
> > It's a combination of a number of issues:
> > 1) The ports infrastructure shouldn't let you set options that don't make
> >sense.
>
> I think that one could argue that i
ns for eons.
(Especially since I think most of the ports you complained about are
already in the right place.)
In all seriousness, what did you expect was going to happen as a result
of your email? What did you really hope to accomplish?
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
__
27;m floored by the pervasiveness of
this insanity, and there's absolutely no reason for it to continue.
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lis
In response to Warren Block :
> On Mon, 2 Feb 2009, Bill Moran wrote:
>
> > How about:
> >
> > Options for port-fu
> > [ ] BRG Bernstein Riggs Guillotine parsing
> > [X] QFZ Quantum Freeze Zulu rending
> >
> > At least that one gives me
k or a quick synopsis, of what
> > the differences are between the current ports tree and NetBSD's
> > pkgsrc tree?
>
>
> $ date
> Sun Apr 1 21:09:38 BST 2007
OK. I have to know ... who took all the time to write that all
up?
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
_
erver load are important
> considerations.
mail/postgrey
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
g? I know
this has been discussed before but I can't find any reference to it now.
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any
In response to Vivek Khera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Apr 25, 2007, at 1:22 PM, Bill Moran wrote:
>
> > My thought is to make /usr/ports/private (or similar) and teach cvsup
> > not to blow it away. Then I just need to make sure that portupgrade
> > and other
riodic.conf
> doesnt exist; should I be deleting the 4 files at the bottom or creating
> a file /etc/periodic.conf with the below contents?
>
> And you can disable some sendmail specific daily maintenance routines in
> your
> /etc/periodic.conf file:
Create the file if it d
tem doesn't seem to have any way to recover from a corrupted download,
it just reports it and aborts.
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
gic is less sophisticated than it should be.
Does anyone know of a reason why this couldn't be changed to allow
fetching of conflicting ports distfiles?
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 4
In response to Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Bill Moran wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/databases/postgresql82-server]# make
> > fetch-recursive
> > ===> Fetching all distfiles for postgresql-server-8.2.4_1 and dependencies
> > ===> postgr
, but for fetching distdata it
> seems erroneous.
That is correct. I apologize if I was unclear earlier.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 412-422-3463x4023
___
freebsd-p
In response to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Linimon):
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 08:58:55AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> > Why? Is there a legitimate reason why the fetch process refuses to
> > download this?
>
> The intention of the logic is to warn a user, as soon as poss
Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Friday 20 July 2007, Mark Linimon wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 04:07:49PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> > > Even better would be for make to realize that it's only doing the
> > > fetching, and do it anyway.
However, the
subject title could be better. Something like, "Would a committer
please look at 113611" then mention in the email what port it
relates to and comment that the person responsible seems to be
timing out.
Have you contacted Araujo directly?
--
B
In response to Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 06:20:53AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> > Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Friday 20 July 2007, Mark Linimon wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at
throw together a patch, but I realized I'm fuzzy on the
difference between .if and @if -- so if anyone wants to take a few
minutes to clarify those for me, I'd be happy :)
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
(in
my mind) of open source projects is that you can choose what works for you
with no strings, and even fork off a project and do it your own way if you
so desire.
If you're having so much trouble with the FreeBSD community, I would suggest
one of two strategies:
*) re-evaluat
hile that may not
have been your intent, that's how it reads. Demanding things of
volunteers usually doesn't win you a lot of friends. Consider
using phrases like, "is there any way I can help speed up the
process" It's quite possible that ale@ is
n't cause any (or much) fragmentation
* As long as important information on the wiki is cleaned up and
committed to the official FreeBSD docs, it won't result in
unmaintained garbage.
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
freebsd-port
them on the secured systems.
It would make life easier if "make fetch" and "make fetch-recursive"
could ignore these kinds of dependency errors. It seems to me that
"make fetch*" should _never_ fail because of dependencies.
--
In response to Bjorn Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Bill,
>
> On Aug 21, 2006, at 5:07 PM, Bill Moran wrote:
>
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/www/bacula-web]# make fetch
> > This port requires the Apache Module or the CGI version of PHP, but
> >
In response to Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 05:07:59PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/www/bacula-web]# make fetch
> > This port requires the Apache Module or the CGI version of PHP, but you have
>
6.1-p10
Ports tree updated earlier today.
Any thoughts?
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail
In response to Juergen Lock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> (Btw did 4.x have aio? If not we need to add an
> IGNORE now I guess...)
>From the aio man page:
HISTORY
The aio facility appeared as a kernel option in FreeBSD 3.0. The aio
kernel module appeared in FreeBSD 5.0.
x27; token
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/edje/work/edje-20060926/src/bin.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/edje/work/edje-20060926/src.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/edje/work/edje-20060926.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/g
re's
some sort of magic that allows this to work in the absence of a packing
list ... are packing lists even required any more? Does the porters
handbook need updated? Are eggs good for you or bad for you?
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
IMPORTANT: This message contains confid
In response to Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 09:24:46AM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
> > Now, crack.so is in /usr/local/lib/php/20060613/crack.so, so it would
> > appear as if my pkg-plist needs updated. No worries ...
> >
> > e
tupgrade
like you describe, it's because some already installed port requires
something I don't want as a dependency. The above trick has fixed it
every time for me.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential information and is intended on
that
future, drastic reorganizations to the ports tree could force you to
do additional manual corrections, but it's been my experience that
you'll have that now and again no matter what you do.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential inf
't see any info on
> > it in man ports.
>
> I run "make update" from /usr/src - it updates /usr/src, /usr/ports, etc.
portupgrade updates the information in /var/db/pkg. If make update
doesn't change /var/db/pkg, then the two will not affect one another,
for bette
he FreeBSD Porters Handbook:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/
2) Create a port for your program.
3) Submit a PR based on the guidelines in #1, be sure to note in the
PR that this port supersedes the old os-bs port, so the committer
can do the right thin
grade -a"
(with the devel version)
Everything upgraded with no problems.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential information and is intended only
for the individual named. If the reader of this message is not an intended
recipient (or
I heard from the port maintainer on this, and he's already opened PRs
with fixes:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=104328
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=104786
Isn't the ports tree thawed now?
In response to Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
, thus stop and
restart work poorly.
Is there a mechanism within the rc system that can work around this
so the rc script can be improved?
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/m
In response to Erik Trulsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 05:09:43PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
> >
> > Noticed that the rsync port has an rcng compliant script for starting
> > rsync in daemon mode. Nice.
> >
> > Unfortunately, rsync do
Beech Rintoul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Can someone tell me where the config options for a port are actually stored?
/var/db/ports/
But the canonical way to adjust these is with "make config" in the port
directory.
-Bill
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.
Josh Paetzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm in the process of writing a port and it has a dependancy that's
> not in the ports tree, so I'm porting that as well. My question is
> what's the procedure in such a case? Should I submit them both as
> part of the same pr? Obviously the one can
o comment? Obviously there are workarounds, but I'd like to
get this "fixed" if possible.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To u
In response to Shaun Amott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 05:39:50PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
> >
> > Why should the fetch-recursive target care what's installed? Hell, I just
> > want the distfile on the server so I can install it on other ma
In response to Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 10:24:19AM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
> > In response to Shaun Amott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 05:39:50PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
> > > >
&g
maintainer" is a volunteer position. If you start
dictating too many things about what they must and must not do, you're
going to run short of willing volunteers.
I only maintain a few ports, but I'd quit maintaining those if someone
were to tell I had to reconfigure my mailserver.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Anton Blajev - Valqk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello Group,
>
> I'm wondering what tool to use for system and processes monitoring?
> For example your disks goes filled and you get a mail,
> the machine has load over 50 for more than an hour and you get a mail...
> Some predefined processes
Anton Blajev - Valqk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Bill Moran wrote:
> > Anton Blajev - Valqk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hello Group,
> >>
> >> I'm wondering what tool to use for system and processes monitoring?
> >> For ex
e
> pgsql users password.
>
> Is there a better way?
Depends. Do you allow untrusted users to log in to that machine? If
so, then you've probably got the best approach. Make sure that .pgpass
file is chmoded 600
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
___
usr/ports/databases/postgresql82-server" effecting one "make
> config" does not appear the support.
>
> Somebody would know as to solve the problem.
The FreeBSD port does not currently have an option to enable LDAP
support. You'll need to patch the Makefile.
--
you may want to consider volunteering to
maintain it.
Generally, I open a PR. If I don't hear back from someone within a week
or so, I'll ping the mailing list asking a committer to look at it, but
usually someone jumps in and takes care of it.
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.co
self in to with OpenSSH -- it could be easy
or hard, but the place to start would be that handbook. If you hit specific
problems, post the details of where you get stuck to the list and I'm sure
others will help out.
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
_
78 matches
Mail list logo
