In response to Paul Schmehl <pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.com>: > --On Wednesday, October 21, 2009 10:31:21 -0500 Bill Moran > <wmo...@potentialtech.com> wrote: > > > > > In response to Paul Schmehl <pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.com>: > > > >> I am the maintainer for security/barnyard2. This is an updated version of > >> security/barnyard, which I also maintain. The version of my port is the > >> current release version, but it has a really irritating problem that is > >> fixed > >> in the current beta version. > >> > >> Barnyard2 is a program that parses snort logs and inserts them into a > >> database (mysql or postgresql). It is supposed to create a placemarker > >> file > >> (called a waldo file) that maintains a record of what logs it has already > >> parsed. (This is only one way of using the program. There are others as > >> well.) The problem in the release version is that it does not read the > >> waldo file when the program is restarted. So every time you restart > >> barnyard2, it reinserts into the database every alert you still have log > >> files for. The beta version fixes this problem. > >> > >> I have created a port for the beta version and am using it myself, but I > >> know > >> that using beta versions of software is frowned upon. Should I go ahead > >> and > >> submit this port because it solves this problem? > >> > >> If I do, my thinking is that I should adjust the pkg-message file in the > >> existing port to warn the user about the problem and note that the beta > >> version solves it so they might want to consider using that instead. > > > > An option that you did not mention is to take the patch that fixes that > > single problem and include as a patch file for barnyard2. That way it's > > not a true beta, it just has that single patch to fix a known problem. > > > > For me, I think that would be the preferred method in this case. > > > > I *might* be able to do that, if I can figure out where in the code the > problem > is fixed. I've had two semesters of C++, but I am not a programmer and > consider myself the rankest of novices wrt code.
In a perfect world. you wouldn't have to be a C++ coder. In theory, you should be able to look at their SVN/CVS/git/whatever repository and find the commit that says it's fixed this problem, then just generate a diff between that version and the release version. Of course, that's in a perfect world. I'm not familiar with that project, so I don't know if they're that organized or not. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/ _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
