On Sat, 2017-12-02 at 01:12 +, Ben Woods wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Dec 2017 at 2:36 am, Carmel NY
> wrote:
>
> > >
> > --
> > Carmel
>
>
> Hi Carmel,
>
> My understanding is that poudriere is the only package building
> system that
> is officially supported by the portmgr, apart from raw make.
>
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
On Saturday, December 2, 2017 5:40 AM, Stari Karp stated:
> On Sat, 2017-12-02 at 01:12 +, Ben Woods wrote:
> > Hi Carmel,
> >
> > My understanding is that poudriere is the only package building system
> > that is officially supported by the portmgr, apart from raw make.
> >
> > There are many
On 2017-12-02 12:53, Carmel NY wrote:
I am hoping that someone can get "synth" back up and working
correctly. If not
it might be time for me to look at another OS for my network.
This has been mentioned several times as a "solution", but I really
don't understand it. What other OS would b
On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 09:59:33AM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> First, welcome flavors. It has been badly needed for a while and is going
> to clean up a couple of messes that have been plaguing the port system for
> a long time.
>
> Second, whither port msanagement tools? At least portmaster now
On 02/12/2017 06:53, Carmel NY wrote:
> Well, I certainly have no intention of installing and then learning how to use
> an industrial sized solution line poudriere for a relatively small home
> network.
>
poudriere is not industrial-sized at all. Sure, it has many features
that I don't exactly u
* Henrik Hudson wrote:
So, I must be missing something. I have a poudriere jail specific
make.conf like this:
#Python
DEFAULT_VERSIONS+= python=3.6 python2=2.7 python3=3.6
Same here, and this happens:
# cat /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/py3-make.conf
DEFAULT_VERSIONS+= python=3.6
# poudr
On 12/02/17 06:53, Carmel NY wrote:
On Saturday, December 2, 2017 5:40 AM, Stari Karp stated:
On Sat, 2017-12-02 at 01:12 +, Ben Woods wrote:
Hi Carmel,
My understanding is that poudriere is the only package building system
that is officially supported by the portmgr, apart from raw make
On 12/02/17 07:04, Vlad K. wrote:
On 2017-12-02 12:53, Carmel NY wrote:
I am hoping that someone can get "synth" back up and working
correctly. If not
it might be time for me to look at another OS for my network.
This has been mentioned several times as a "solution", but I really
don't
* Steve Kargl wrote:
On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 01:42:27PM -0700, Adam Weinberger wrote:
On 1 Dec, 2017, at 13:07, Steve Kargl wrote:
ports/UPDATING does not seem to include an entry noting
the last subversion revision prior to the flipping on
flavors. Is revision 455205 the penultimate revisio
On 12/02/17 07:23, Charlie Li wrote:
On 02/12/2017 06:53, Carmel NY wrote:
Well, I certainly have no intention of installing and then learning how to use
an industrial sized solution line poudriere for a relatively small home network.
poudriere is not industrial-sized at all. Sure, it has ma
On Saturday, December 2, 2017 8:01 AM, Baho Utot stated:
> On 12/02/17 07:23, Charlie Li wrote:
> > On 02/12/2017 06:53, Carmel NY wrote:
> >> Well, I certainly have no intention of installing and then learning
> >> how to use an industrial sized solution line poudriere for a relatively
> >> smal
On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 02:06:32PM +0100, Christian Ullrich wrote:
> * Steve Kargl wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 01:42:27PM -0700, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> >>> On 1 Dec, 2017, at 13:07, Steve Kargl
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> ports/UPDATING does not seem to include an entry noting
> >>> the
On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 01:04:12PM +0100, Vlad K. wrote:
> On 2017-12-02 12:53, Carmel NY wrote:
> >
> > I am hoping that someone can get "synth" back up and working
> > correctly. If not
> > it might be time for me to look at another OS for my network.
>
>
> This has been mentioned several ti
On Sat, 2 Dec 2017 09:58:15 -0800
Steve Kargl wrote:
> I have a laptop with 664 installed packages. It has 6.4 GB
> of free diskspace and 3.5 GB of available memory. It is the
> only i686 system that I have and it is used to develop and
> test all of the libm code that I contribute to FreeBSD.
On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 11:53:58AM +, Carmel NY wrote:
> Looking back at other port management utilities like "portmanager",
> "portmaster", "portupgrade" and now "synth", The FreeBSD team has
> done a pretty good job of obfuscating and rendering them impotent.
That's one possible explanation.
On 12/2/2017 1:43 PM, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 11:53:58AM +, Carmel NY wrote:
Looking back at other port management utilities like "portmanager",
"portmaster", "portupgrade" and now "synth", The FreeBSD team has
done a pretty good job of obfuscating and rendering them imp
> On 2 Dec, 2017, at 5:55, Christian Ullrich wrote:
>
> * Henrik Hudson wrote:
>
>> So, I must be missing something. I have a poudriere jail specific
>> make.conf like this:
>
>> #Python
>> DEFAULT_VERSIONS+= python=3.6 python2=2.7 python3=3.6
>
> Same here, and this happens:
>
> # cat /usr/l
> On 2 Dec, 2017, at 13:41, Baho Utot wrote:
>
>
> On 12/2/2017 1:43 PM, Mark Linimon wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 11:53:58AM +, Carmel NY wrote:
>>> Looking back at other port management utilities like "portmanager",
>>> "portmaster", "portupgrade" and now "synth", The FreeBSD team has
On 30/11/2017 21:05, blubee blubeeme wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 9:25 PM, blubee blubeeme
> wrote:
>
>> Here's a build log:
>>
>> running install_scripts
...
>> ===> blender-2.79_2 depends on shared library: libOpenColorIO.so - not
>> found
>> ===> opencolorio-1.0.9_3 needs Python 2.7 at
Build opens too many file descriptors, and fails:
http://beefy5.nyi.freebsd.org/data/103i386-default/455387/logs/RStudio-1.1.385.log
http://beefy6.nyi.freebsd.org/data/103amd64-default/455387/logs/RStudio-1.1.385.log
It looks like kern.maxfiles on beefy needs to be beefed up.
Yuri
> On 2 Dec, 2017, at 18:57, Yuri wrote:
>
> Build opens too many file descriptors, and fails:
>
> http://beefy5.nyi.freebsd.org/data/103i386-default/455387/logs/RStudio-1.1.385.log
>
> http://beefy6.nyi.freebsd.org/data/103amd64-default/455387/logs/RStudio-1.1.385.log
>
>
> It looks like kern
Rozhuk Ivan rozhuk.im at gmail.com wrote on
Sat Dec 2 18:18:39 UTC 2017 :
> I dont want poudriere because I dont need ZFS, jails and other crap on my
> system.
> I dont want to play system administrator: keep and admin build servers at
> home/work.
>
> I just want update from source all my port
I do not have anything related to python in my make.conf only ccache.
WITH_CCACHE_BUILD=yes
.if (!empty(.CURDIR:M/usr/src*) || !empty(.CURDIR:M/usr/obj*))
.if !defined(NOCCACHE) && exists(/usr/local/libexec/ccache/world/cc)
CC:=${CC:C,^cc,/usr/local/libexec/ccache/world/cc,1}
CXX:=${CXX:C,^c\+\+,/
Hi Mikael,
Your patch seems to have applied, but I've run into a spot of trouble.
I forgot to apply the patch before starting make, so I killed it
with control-c, applied the patch and tried to restart. The attempt
failed, some sort of error in /tmp/mountpoint... I've tried various
cleanu
Hi Eric,
Please update ports-mgmt/synth to 2.00, which was just recently
tagged. This will bring in Flavors support.
Cheers.
--
Jonathan Chen
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubs
26 matches
Mail list logo
