Am 08.01.2017 um 23:19 schrieb Dave:
> Does this mean 10.3 is a libc++ system and 9.3 isn't? Or does it mean I have
> stuff left over from the 9.3 system that should now be removed?
Dave, the former. I am not aware of the details surrounding the Pan
news reader, but the former is true:
FreeBSD
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Am 05.01.2017 um 22:29 schrieb abi:
>
> On 05.01.2017 22:12, Grzegorz Junka wrote:
>>
>> On 01/01/2017 17:28, abi wrote:
>>>
>>> On 01.01.2017 18:28, Grzegorz Junka wrote:
I am using FreeBSD 10.3 x64. I understand that to run Windows
applications on that configuration I can use only one
On 09/01/2017 13:19, Stefan Esser wrote:
Am 05.01.2017 um 22:29 schrieb abi:
On 05.01.2017 22:12, Grzegorz Junka wrote:
On 01/01/2017 17:28, abi wrote:
On 01.01.2017 18:28, Grzegorz Junka wrote:
I am using FreeBSD 10.3 x64. I understand that to run Windows
applications on that configuration
Jan Bramkamp wrote on 2017/01/05 11:30:
On 04/01/2017 18:32, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Do you I understand correctly that it is impossible now to install
both samba44
and libreoffice using the official FreeBSD package repository?
Or samba44 and KDE?
If yes, then that sucks...
Yes and yes it sucks.
Miroslav Lachman wrote on 2017/01/09 23:48:
Jan Bramkamp wrote on 2017/01/05 11:30:
On 04/01/2017 18:32, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Do you I understand correctly that it is impossible now to install
both samba44
and libreoffice using the official FreeBSD package repository?
Or samba44 and KDE?
If ye
> On 9 Jan 2017, at 11:54 PM, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote:
>
> I don't need SASL for LDAP client, but somebody messed up ports tree with
> WANT_OPENLDAP_SASL which is for users and not maintainers:
>
> # WANT_OPENLDAP_SASL
> # - User-defined variable
Edemic enforcement of unwanted security technologies propagates further on.
Port net/p5-perl-ldap requires port security/p5-Authen-SASL,
which by defaul turns ON kerberos support.
This brings situation, when
private key infrastructure (PKI) software by default depends from Kerberos,
which is as if
