Miroslav Lachman wrote on 2017/01/09 23:48:
Jan Bramkamp wrote on 2017/01/05 11:30:
On 04/01/2017 18:32, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Do you I understand correctly that it is impossible now to install
both samba44
and libreoffice using the official FreeBSD package repository?
Or samba44 and KDE?
If yes, then that sucks...
Yes and yes it sucks. The "solution" is to build your own repo and set
the right flags to always use the same LDAP client port. With binary
packages and the speed of modern x86_64 systems I for one no longer see
removing SASL support from OpenLDAP as useful enough to justify the
complexity. Are there any reasons other than saved build time to disable
this dependency (e.g. a bad security track record/process, different
licenses)?
And what is the right way to choose SASL / NON-SASL version globaly?
We are building packages in our poudriere, but I cannot find the proper
variable / option for this.
Miroslav Lachman
I don't need SASL for LDAP client, but somebody messed up ports tree
with WANT_OPENLDAP_SASL which is for users and not maintainers:
# WANT_OPENLDAP_SASL
# - User-defined variable to depend upon
SASL-enabled OpenLDAP
# client. Must NOT be set in a port
Makefile.
So why it is set there
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/databases/ldb/Makefile?r1=430417&r2=430416&pathrev=430417
and there
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/net/samba43/Makefile?r1=429692&r2=429691&pathrev=429692
and maybe in some other places
Miroslav Lachman
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
