Re: what is the purpose of the quarterly ports branches?

On Tue, 13 Dec 2016, at 23:14, Grzegorz Junka wrote: > I heard that ports' SVN is mirrored to Github. Isn't it enough to just > create a branch or tag for each quarterly release? Even if quarterly > packages are deleted, re-building packages from such branch/tag should > allow to recreate thos

Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

On 15.12.2016 18:43, Miroslav Lachman wrote: John Marino wrote on 2016/12/15 17:46: [1] I've got it on my todo list to provide a new method that would eliminate the "my builder just rebuilt 150 packages, but pkg(8) only upgraded 2 packages" issue that some users don't want to see. It's a lot m

Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

On 12/16/16 07:42, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: FWIW, I'm a happy portupgrade user. Me too. I just frequently run into a bug: when icu is updated, somehow the old libraries are not saved and all ports depending on icu break. Now I know that I should take care with that single port. Also, I wis

Re: (In)Stability of the Quarterly Branch

On 16.12.2016 08:24, David Demelier wrote: 2016-12-15 17:25 GMT+01:00 Matthew Seaman : On 2016/12/15 16:01, Olivier Duchateau wrote: The problem is that there are no tests in FreeBSD ports. All source based systems I've tested: pkgsrc, FreeBSD ports, OpenBSD, Gentoo; FreeBSD is the one that hav

Re: (In)Stability of the Quarterly Branch

On 15/12/2016 9:43 PM, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote: On 15.12.2016 14:16, David Demelier wrote: [...] What I want: a ports tree that matches the FreeBSD version like OpenBSD. You have FreeBSD 11.0? You get a ports tree for that version specifically. No major update, no breaking changes. Just bug

Re: what is the purpose of the quarterly ports branches?

On 16/12/2016 4:01 PM, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: On Tue, 13 Dec 2016, at 23:14, Grzegorz Junka wrote: I heard that ports' SVN is mirrored to Github. Isn't it enough to just create a branch or tag for each quarterly release? Even if quarterly packages are deleted, re-building packages from such br

Re: (In)Stability of the Quarterly Branch

On 2016-12-16 11:08, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote: There are two problems with this: 1) Many ports have no maintainer 2) Even more ports have no tests at all We can't have our cake and eat it :) Obviously, a STABLE repo would have to be a subset of ports, not all 26k of them. The criteria I sp

Re: what is the purpose of the quarterly ports branches?

On 16-12-2016 11:10, Julian Elischer wrote: > On 16/12/2016 4:01 PM, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: >> >> On Tue, 13 Dec 2016, at 23:14, Grzegorz Junka wrote: >>> I heard that ports' SVN is mirrored to Github. Isn't it enough to just >>> create a branch or tag for each quarterly release? Even if quarterly

Annoying problem lzma - lzmalib

Hallo ! Some ports fails with "undefined reference." different statement but points to lzma. Mostly I can solve it with adding LDFLAGS+= -L/usr/lib -llzma to the Makefile. Today it was an update of rpm4. I had to delete lzmali, update rmp4 and reinstall rpm4. In summary I hav

Re: Annoying problem lzma - lzmalib

some typos I had to delete lzmalib, update rmp4 and reinstall lzmalib. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: sysutils/php56-fileinfo exit signal Segmentation fault

Hello, this was also issue for me. I think it is conflict with svn module - after disabling dav_svn_module problem disappeared. Best regards, Tomas Ciernik. Dňa 12/16/2016 o 02:43 Miroslav Lachman napísal(a): > I am running webmail Roundcube on many machines but on one machine file > upload (

Re: sysutils/php56-fileinfo exit signal Segmentation fault

to...@ciernik.sk wrote on 2016/12/16 14:12: Hello, this was also issue for me. I think it is conflict with svn module - after disabling dav_svn_module problem disappeared. Thank you for this information. It is true that machine in question have dav_svn_module and other machines doesn't. I a

Re: what is the purpose of the quarterly ports branches?

On 16.12.2016 11:38, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: On 16-12-2016 11:10, Julian Elischer wrote: On 16/12/2016 4:01 PM, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: On Tue, 13 Dec 2016, at 23:14, Grzegorz Junka wrote: I heard that ports' SVN is mirrored to Github. Isn't it enough to just create a branch or tag for e

The ports collection has some serious issues

On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 6:42 AM, Peter Jeremy wrote: On 2016-Dec-15 19:31:22 +0100, list-freebsd-ports at jyborn.se wrote: Interestingly, the most vocal proponent of deleting portmaster and portupgrade is the author/maintainer of synch. It's not interesting at all. Synth was in a large part

The ports collection has some serious issues

From Kevin Oberman: Just to add another voice of those who use portmaster on a regular basis. I moved to portmaster about seven years ago and have has very few issues with it. I have had issues building ports from time to time, but it's been a long time since i hit one that was not a problem with

Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

It is every week. Consider the FreeBSD forums as well. "misuse" and "misunderstanding" failures are attributed to the tool. Let's stop making excuses for portmaster. It is what it is and we've had years to evaluate it. If portmaster was part of base I'd agree that it should be deprecated, ho

The ports collection has some serious issues

Roger Marquis wrote It is every week. Consider the FreeBSD forums as well. "misuse" and "misunderstanding" failures are attributed to the tool. Let's stop making excuses for portmaster. It is what it is and we've had years to evaluate it. If portmaster was part of base I'd agree that it shoul

Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

It is just semantics. That may be but as illustrated in this thread people maintain unreasonable expectations of portmaster which they often blame on the ports subsystem. I never understood why people went ape- over it, unless they don't understand what "deprecated without expiration" actu

Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

On 12/16/2016 10:09, Roger Marquis wrote: I never understood why people went ape- over it, unless they don't understand what "deprecated without expiration" actually means. Perhaps then this is the crux of the issue. From my experience "deprecated" means only that something will not appear

Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

John Marino wrote: From porters handbook, section 12.15: "It is possible to set DEPRECATED without an EXPIRATION_DATE (for instance, recommending a newer version of the port) I'd consider that to be a bug. So it's not a contradiction. Ports that have a specific removal date must have EXPIRA

CIERRE FISCAL 2016

En línea y en Vivo / Para todo su Equipo con una sola Conexión CIERRE FISCAL 2016 PARA PERSONAS MORALES 22 de diciembre - Online en Vivo - 10:00 a 13:00 y de 15:00 a 18:00 Hrs Objetivo: Identificar las principales disposiciones de la Ley del ISR, relacionadas con el cierre fiscal del

Re: what is the purpose of the quarterly ports branches?

On 16/12/2016 10:10, Julian Elischer wrote: On 16/12/2016 4:01 PM, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: On Tue, 13 Dec 2016, at 23:14, Grzegorz Junka wrote: I heard that ports' SVN is mirrored to Github. Isn't it enough to just create a branch or tag for each quarterly release? Even if quarterly packages

thanx for thunar crash on rename bug fix!

Hi, I just wanted do say thank you to whoever fixed Thunar, or something lower below, so that Thunar does not crash anymore when renaming files. -- Before enlightenment - chop wood, draw water. After enlightenment - chop wood, draw water. Marko Cupać https://www.mimar.rs/ __

Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

On 16/12/2016 14:45, John Marino wrote: DragonFly has switched to Synth from poudriere as it's primary package builder. That means it builds entire repositories (25,000 packages) biweekly on multiple servers. It's highly used which serves as continuous testing. I also use it on FreeBSD to

Re: Annoying problem lzma - lzmalib

Bext oribken with liblzma: math/R checking for lzma_version_number in -llzma... no configure: error: "liblzma library and headers are required" ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. Please report the problem to j...@freebsd.org [maintainer] and attach the "/ram/usr/ports/math/R/work/R-3.3

Re: Annoying problem lzma - lzmalib

correct Next problem with liblzma. (Sorry). ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Gettext Issues

> 2014-11-30 > Affects: users of devel/gettext (close to everyone) > Author: t...@freebsd.org > Reason: > The devel/gettext port has been split up in devel/gettext-runtime, a > lightweight package containing runtime libraries, and devel/gettext-tools, > a package containing developer tools.

CFT: OpenVPN 2.4 port update (upstream rc2) for FreeBSD

Greetings, I've put up a new OpenVPN 2.4-rc2 port for FreeBSD for testing. Get it from . This time, it also contains the openvpn23 and openvpn23-polarssl ports (as modified copies of what we have now) that I plan to keep for the firs

Irrlicht-1.8.4 sparc64 compatability?

I was browsing through the commit history of this package and noticed that it has problems compiling for sparc64? I wanted to find out if there was a particular reason for that? Please let me know! Best, Michael Brodeur ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org

Re: Gettext Issues

> On 16 Dec 2016, at 00:22, @lbutlr wrote: > > >> 2014-11-30 >> Affects: users of devel/gettext (close to everyone) >> Author: t...@freebsd.org >> Reason: >> The devel/gettext port has been split up in devel/gettext-runtime, a >> lightweight package containing runtime libraries, and devel/ge

Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

> > > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 6:42 AM, Peter Jeremy wrote: > >> On 2016-Dec-15 19:31:22 +0100, list-freebsd-ports at jyborn.se wrote: > >> Interestingly, the most vocal proponent of deleting portmaster and > >> portupgrade is the author/maintainer of synch. > > It's not interesting at all. Syn