[snip irrelevant info]
>
> Where do I find acroread8?
>>
[snip irrelevant info]
Sigh, you never -ever- learn do you?
checkout www.freshports.org for a real easy search option, or what I just
did:
grep ^acroread /usr/ports/INDEX-6
acroread8-8.1.1_1|/usr/ports/print/acroread8|
that wasn't SO
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>
>
>>> did:
>>>
>>> grep ^acroread /usr/ports/INDEX-6
>> It was not in the ports collection or the index thus the
>> question.
>
> it is (As you obviously can see)
Ok super genius show it to me:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:dev/thistest/ui/cmdline% grep ^acro
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 11:49:47 +0900 (JST)
Hiroki Sato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nikola Lečić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[...]
> ni> it will not work in Linux and QT apps (incl. Reader 7). The
> ni> problem is (I don't know if this is FreeBSD specific) that
> ni> GTK_
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 13:28:06 +0900 (JST)
Hiroki Sato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> If you are using Adobe Reader 8.1.1 with SCIM or UIM, please try the
> following and then run acroread8:
>
> # cd /usr/ports
> # fetch http://people.allbsd.org/~hrs/FreeBSD/imm-ports.tar.gz
> # ta
On Tuesday 08 January 2008 02:02:34 am Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
> >>> did:
> >>>
> >>> grep ^acroread /usr/ports/INDEX-6
> >>
> >> It was not in the ports collection or the index thus the
> >> question.
> >
> > it is (As you obviously can see)
>
> Ok super genius show it to me:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED
On 1/7/08, Xin LI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think the proper use of *_BDB variables is that:
>
> WITH_BDB?= 46
>
> (An advisory usage), and
>
> USE_BDB=yes
>
> as in the attachment.
>
I have no objection to that patch.
Scot
___
freebsd-
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 03:02:34 -0500 Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
> btw INDEX-8 is current as of a few hours ago.
Have you ever dare to do "man ports"?
WBR
--
Boris Samorodov (bsam)
Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP
FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Se
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 11:09:41PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> slunky wrote:
> > Will you please update this port to the latest version (I believe it is
> > 0.32 from the Warsow website) The version in ports is only 0.12, and it
> > will not allow me to play online or over LAN without the latest
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Vasil Dimov wrote:
I intend to upgrade graphics/hugin from 0.6.1 to 0.7.b4.
The beta4 has been available for quite sometime.
It would be nice if you can test the attached patch - that's what I am
going to commit in the next few days, provided there are not any
problems repor
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 09:19:13PM -0500, Piotr wrote:
>
> I've installed the newest libpcap-0.9.7_1, but I'm still getting errors:
>
> # pkg_info | grep libpcap
> libpcap-0.9.7_1 Ubiquitous network traffic capture library
>
[snip]
> In file included from Pcap.xs:43:
> stubs.inc:91: error: r
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 23:09:41 -0800
Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tony Chidester wrote:
> > Will you please update this port to the latest version (I believe
> > it is 0.32 from the Warsow website) The version in ports is only
> > 0.12, and it will not allow me to play online or over LAN
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 11:26:38 +
Alexey Dokuchaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 11:09:41PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> > Giving it a go yourself would get the update done that much
> > faster. :)
>
> No need to, I do have update ready for commit, all there is that I
> have
Hi all
is there any progress on updating Audacious in ports?
Current version of Audacious is 1.4.5, but in ports is older 1.3.2. Also
the same for audacious-plugins..
Best regards
---
Jan Sebosik, Slovakia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.o
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> is there any progress on updating Audacious in ports?
> Current version of Audacious is 1.4.5, but in ports is older 1.3.2. Also
> the same for audacious-plugins..
I believe so.
Check the PR database; I think patches were submitted a week or so ago...
_
Hello ,
A Greeting Card is waiting for you at our virtual post office! You can
pick up your postcard at the following web address:
[1]http://www.all-yours.net/u/view.php?id=a0190313376567
visit E-Greetings at [2]http://www.all-yours.net/
and enter your pickup code, which is: a
Apparently this is not just a transient problem:
=> fp7_archive.zip doesn't seem to exist in
/usr/ports/distfiles/flashplugin.
=> Attempting to fetch from
http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/get/flashplayer/installers/archive/.
fetch: fp7_archive.zip: local modification time does not match remote
=>
Hello List,
Here is an attempt to build a package for FreeBSD-5.5. But (pay
attention to [*]):
-
building py25-lxml-1.2.1_1 on gohan49.freebsd.org
in directory /x/tmp/5/chroot/3
building for: 5.5-STABLE i386 [*]
maintained by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
port directory: /usr/ports/devel/py-lxml
b
On Jan 09, Sam Lawrance wrote:
> This message usually indicates a failed fetch attempt, leaving a wrong
> timestamp on your local file. Delete the distfile with "make distclean"
> and try again.
You were indeed correct. Why do we have a system that gets hung up with
stuff like this? This seem
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 13:53:37 -0600, Tim Kellers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Clint Olsen wrote:
Apparently this is not just a transient problem:
=> fp7_archive.zip doesn't seem to exist in
/usr/ports/distfiles/flashplugin.
=> Attempting to fetch from
http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/get/flashp
Boris Samorodov wrote:
Hello List,
Here is an attempt to build a package for FreeBSD-5.5. But (pay
attention to [*]):
-
building py25-lxml-1.2.1_1 on gohan49.freebsd.org
in directory /x/tmp/5/chroot/3
building for: 5.5-STABLE i386 [*]
maintained by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
port directory: /
Clint Olsen wrote:
Apparently this is not just a transient problem:
=> fp7_archive.zip doesn't seem to exist in
/usr/ports/distfiles/flashplugin.
=> Attempting to fetch from
http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/get/flashplayer/installers/archive/.
fetch: fp7_archive.zip: local modification time does
Kris,
thanks for your help.
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 21:49:10 +0100 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > I'm not sure if that's a port problem. What do you think?
> No, the port is using sysctl(2) to query the OS version which cannot
> be wrapped.
Hm, ports-mgmt/tinderbox masks it somehow... And doesn't get
a
Boris Samorodov píše v st 09. 01. 2008 v 00:45 +0300:
> > No, the port is using sysctl(2) to query the OS version which cannot
> > be wrapped.
>
> Hm, ports-mgmt/tinderbox masks it somehow... And doesn't get
> an error for this port.
The FreeBSD version inside the tinderbox is same as the host?
Boris Samorodov wrote:
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:10:45 +0100 Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Boris Samorodov píše v st 09. 01. 2008 v 00:45 +0300:
No, the port is using sysctl(2) to query the OS version which cannot
be wrapped.
Hm, ports-mgmt/tinderbox masks it somehow... And doesn't get
an error for thi
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 11:44:18PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 12:57:27PM -0800, Stephen Hurd wrote:
> > Mark Linimon wrote:
> > >On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 05:10:56PM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote:
> > >
> > >>Please see http://wiki.freebsd.org/Sparc64Packages for a writeup on
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:10:45 +0100 Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> Boris Samorodov píše v st 09. 01. 2008 v 00:45 +0300:
> > > No, the port is using sysctl(2) to query the OS version which cannot
> > > be wrapped.
> > Hm, ports-mgmt/tinderbox masks it somehow... And doesn't get
> > an error for this port.
Boris Samorodov píše v st 09. 01. 2008 v 02:16 +0300:
> On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:10:45 +0100 Pav Lucistnik wrote:
>
> > > > No, the port is using sysctl(2) to query the OS version which cannot
> > > > be wrapped.
> > > Hm, ports-mgmt/tinderbox masks it somehow... And doesn't get
> > > an error for t
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:10:45 +0100 Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > > No, the port is using sysctl(2) to query the OS version which cannot
> > > be wrapped.
> > Hm, ports-mgmt/tinderbox masks it somehow... And doesn't get
> > an error for this port.
> The FreeBSD version inside the tinderbox is same as th
> On Jan 09, Sam Lawrance wrote:
>> This message usually indicates a failed fetch attempt, leaving a wrong
>> timestamp on your local file. Delete the distfile with "make
>> distclean"
>> and try again.
>
> You were indeed correct. Why do we have a system that gets hung up with
> stuff like this
On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:28:45 +0100 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > Boris Samorodov píše v st 09. 01. 2008 v 02:16 +0300:
> >> On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:10:45 +0100 Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> >>
> > No, the port is using sysctl(2) to query the OS version which cannot
> > be wrapped.
On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:20:53 +0100 Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> Boris Samorodov píše v st 09. 01. 2008 v 02:16 +0300:
> > On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:10:45 +0100 Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> >
> > > > > No, the port is using sysctl(2) to query the OS version which cannot
> > > > > be wrapped.
> > > > Hm, ports-mgm
On 09/01/2008, at 6:34 AM, Clint Olsen wrote:
Apparently this is not just a transient problem:
=> fp7_archive.zip doesn't seem to exist in
/usr/ports/distfiles/flashplugin.
=> Attempting to fetch from
http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/get/flashplayer/installers/archive/.
fetch: fp7_archive.zip:
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Vasil Dimov wrote:
I intend to upgrade graphics/hugin from 0.6.1 to 0.7.b4.
The beta4 has been available for quite sometime.
It would be nice if you can test the attached patch - that's what I am
going to commit in the next few days, provided there are not any
problems repor
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Boris Samorodov píše v st 09. 01. 2008 v 02:16 +0300:
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:10:45 +0100 Pav Lucistnik wrote:
No, the port is using sysctl(2) to query the OS version which cannot
be wrapped.
Hm, ports-mgmt/tinderbox masks it somehow... And doesn't get
an error for this po
Boris Samorodov wrote:
On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:28:45 +0100 Kris Kennaway wrote:
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Boris Samorodov píše v st 09. 01. 2008 v 02:16 +0300:
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:10:45 +0100 Pav Lucistnik wrote:
No, the port is using sysctl(2) to query the OS version which cannot
be wrapped.
Hi,
Is there any information about running snort as non-root?
Regards,
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 01:30:47AM +0100, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for maintaining snort.
>
> Currently the default snort_flags are "-Dq". Running snort as root IMO is a
> bad idea. Would you mind to chan
Marius Strobl wrote:
FYI, it's fixed by the following commit:
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200711051136.lA5BaHpL069527
Marius
Looks like a low chance of it making it into 7.0-RELEASE?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.fre
Good day!
Is XML support planned in Postgresql-server-8.3 ?
We have made a patch:
=
*** Makefile.ORIG Wed Jan 9 11:00:41 2008
--- MakefileWed Jan 9 11:29:56 2008
***
*** 82,83
--- 82,87
.endif
+ .if !defined(WITHOUT_XML)
+
38 matches
Mail list logo
