On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:28:45 +0100 Kris Kennaway wrote: > Pav Lucistnik wrote: > > Boris Samorodov píše v st 09. 01. 2008 v 02:16 +0300: > >> On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:10:45 +0100 Pav Lucistnik wrote: > >> > >>>>> No, the port is using sysctl(2) to query the OS version which cannot > >>>>> be wrapped. > >>>> Hm, ports-mgmt/tinderbox masks it somehow... And doesn't get > >>>> an error for this port. > >>> The FreeBSD version inside the tinderbox is same as the host? > >> OK, I found the difference. The port builds for all FreeBSD version > >> except 5.x. The same is for ports-mgmt/tinderbox. Thus I think that > >> there is something that was not MFS'd to 5-STABLE that causes the > >> difference. > >> > >> For now I'm going to mark the port as IGNORE for OSVERSION < 600000. > >> A question to portmgr@: Do you have any objections? > > > > It would be nice to know what exactly is going on in there.
> Yeah, I can't imagine what it would be, unless it is using uname(1) or > (3) and 5.x doesn't have the environment variable overrides...but in > that case hundreds of other things would break. The port is using "uname -r" at the Makefile: ----- OSRELEASE!= /usr/bin/uname -r ----- WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
