Re: [removed ports] sysutils/cpuburn

2011-11-16 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 16/11/2011 10:19 Doug Barton said the following: > On 11/15/2011 09:44, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> It should be >> >> MASTER_SITES=${MASTER_SITE_LOCAL} >> MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR= avg > > Um, no. That's not an advantage over the previous situation, where the > distfile mirror became the

Re: [removed ports] sysutils/cpuburn

2011-11-16 Thread Doug Barton
On 11/16/2011 00:27, Chris Rees wrote: > > On 16 Nov 2011 08:19, "Doug Barton" > wrote: >> >> On 11/15/2011 09:44, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> > It should be >> > >> > MASTER_SITES= ${MASTER_SITE_LOCAL} >> > MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR= avg >> >> Um, no. That's not an advant

Re: [removed ports] sysutils/cpuburn

2011-11-16 Thread Chris Rees
On 16 Nov 2011 08:19, "Doug Barton" wrote: > > On 11/15/2011 09:44, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > It should be > > > > MASTER_SITES= ${MASTER_SITE_LOCAL} > > MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR= avg > > Um, no. That's not an advantage over the previous situation, where the > distfile mirror became the only wor

Re: [removed ports] sysutils/cpuburn

2011-11-16 Thread Doug Barton
On 11/15/2011 09:44, Andriy Gapon wrote: > It should be > > MASTER_SITES= ${MASTER_SITE_LOCAL} > MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR= avg Um, no. That's not an advantage over the previous situation, where the distfile mirror became the only working master site by default. Please provide a proper master

Re: [removed ports] sysutils/cpuburn

2011-11-15 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 15/11/2011 18:04 Chris Rees said the following: > On 15 November 2011 14:34, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> >> Does anyone know good any alternative(s) for cpuburn? >> If not, then I would like to request that this port be restored. >> I am prepared to be designated as its maintainer and to host its di

Re: [removed ports] sysutils/cpuburn

2011-11-15 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 15/11/2011 17:07 Baptiste Daroussin said the following: > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 04:34:22PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> >> Does anyone know good any alternative(s) for cpuburn? >> If not, then I would like to request that this port be restored. >> I am prepared to be designated as its maintai

Re: [removed ports] sysutils/cpuburn

2011-11-15 Thread Chris Rees
On 15 November 2011 14:34, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > Does anyone know good any alternative(s) for cpuburn? > If not, then I would like to request that this port be restored. > I am prepared to be designated as its maintainer and to host its distfile > (via my > FreeBSD account). > > Maintaining the

Re: [removed ports] sysutils/cpuburn

2011-11-15 Thread Bernhard Froehlich
On 15.11.2011 16:07, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 04:34:22PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: Does anyone know good any alternative(s) for cpuburn? If not, then I would like to request that this port be restored. I am prepared to be designated as its maintainer and to host its d

Re: [removed ports] sysutils/cpuburn

2011-11-15 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 04:34:22PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > Does anyone know good any alternative(s) for cpuburn? > If not, then I would like to request that this port be restored. > I am prepared to be designated as its maintainer and to host its distfile > (via my > FreeBSD account). > >