on 15/11/2011 17:07 Baptiste Daroussin said the following: > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 04:34:22PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> >> Does anyone know good any alternative(s) for cpuburn? >> If not, then I would like to request that this port be restored. >> I am prepared to be designated as its maintainer and to host its distfile >> (via my >> FreeBSD account). >> >> Maintaining the port should be rather easy as it can not have any security >> issues >> by definition and at the moment there is no active upstream, so no code >> changes >> are expected. >> >> P.S. Sorry that I've missed its deprecation. I haven't noticed the activity >> until >> I needed to use it at yet another system. >> > > I often use sysutils/stress don't know if that fits your needs?
I didn't know about this tool before... Unfortunately I do not see a detailed description of how exactly it loads CPU and if it does any validation/verification. cpuburn is more explicit about this and is kind of proven. Besides it has additional stuff like e.g. burnBX/burnMMX. So, I would I love to still have it. Thank you for pointing me to sysutils/stress in any case. -- Andriy Gapon _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
