On 15.11.2011 16:07, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 04:34:22PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Does anyone know good any alternative(s) for cpuburn?
If not, then I would like to request that this port be restored.
I am prepared to be designated as its maintainer and to host its
distfile (via my
FreeBSD account).
Maintaining the port should be rather easy as it can not have any
security issues
by definition and at the moment there is no active upstream, so no
code changes
are expected.
P.S. Sorry that I've missed its deprecation. I haven't noticed the
activity until
I needed to use it at yet another system.
I often use sysutils/stress don't know if that fits your needs?
I've just noticed that cpuburn is gone and stress is not an alternative
for my task. Why? Because I use cpuburn to verify the undervolting
capabilities of AMD cpus's for sysutils/cpupowerd which needs to
explicitly hammer the CPU with MMX instructions and parallel with normal
CPU instructions while lowering vcore.
--
Bernhard Froehlich
http://www.bluelife.at/
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
