Hello Yasuhiro,
On 3/10/21 6:30 PM, Yasuhiro Kimura wrote:
> From: "Janky Jay, III"
> Subject: MariaDB Options for Port.,MariaDB Options for Port.
> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 17:59:35 -0700
>
>> I've been trying to add a MariaDB option to a port I maintain b
mative documentation or
maybe even provide an example port that is already doing this? I've
searched the ports tree but failed to find anything helpful.
[1] - https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/porters-handbook/#uses-mysql
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I look forward to testing more in the future once I can completely
rely on ports/pkg for the installation of all software. I'm not going to
use "pip" to install anything on a production FBSD server as I fear
keeping the software up-to-date will be sketchy at best.
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
In the future, if you can, try using "screen" or "tmux" to run these
large builds in so you don't take the risk of losing the
terminal/console. Or, maybe I'm completely off-base as to how it was
lost to begin with.
On 7/8/20 9:30 AM, bob prohaska wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 10:44:03AM +0200,
png-1.6.37
qt5-core-5.14.2_2
qt5-concurrent-5.14.2
desktop-file-utils-0.24
I don't see any mention of "xcb-util". Granted, I'm also running
xpdf in a very minimal xfce4 environment so maybe there are other
underlying issues?
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
__
On 3/6/20 7:41 PM, Marcin Cieslak wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Mar 2020, Janky Jay, III wrote:
>
>> Still broken for me as well. I just figured I'd look into it when I
>> got a chance. Also using FBSD 12.1 RELEASE.
>
> Maybe it depends on the mirror being used?
Perhaps. I&#
Still broken for me as well. I just figured I'd look into it when I got a
chance. Also using FBSD 12.1 RELEASE.
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
On March 7, 2020 12:38:55 AM UTC, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>On Friday, 6 March 2020 at 12:29:44 +0100, Lars Engels wrote:
>> On We
uot;MAINTAINER=" line in the port's "Makefile".
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Hi @lbutlr,
On 6/6/19 12:22 PM, @lbutlr wrote:
> On Jun 6, 2019, at 8:15 AM, Janky Jay, III wrote:
>> I had to do a "portsnap fetch extract" and install audio/lame via ports
>> to get this to work. Now I have a full ports environment for just one
>> dependency. It
e.
The real issue, though, is that this was installed using "pkg" and does
not work correctly due to audio/lame being a dependency that does not
have a package. Hence the reason the maintainer will be removing
audio/lame as a dependency.
On 6/6/19 5:06 AM, @lbutlr wrote:
> On Jun
timeout issue
for me. So, hopefully that can help troubleshoot the package install of
xrdp-devel (I haven't tried the port but I'd imagine it probably works
fine).
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
On 5/8/19 4:00 PM, Janky Jay, III wrote:
> Hello Koichiro,
>
> Is there any update to th
time on the other.
Also, can you please provide a link to the GH post/report that you
created? I'd like to take a look and follow that as well if I can.
Thanks again!
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
On 2019-02-17 12:23, Janky Jay, III wrote:
> Hello Meta,
>
> On 2/16/19 6:37 PM, Koichir
Hello Meta,
On 2/16/19 6:37 PM, Koichiro Iwao wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 11:31:36AM -0700, Janky Jay, III wrote:
>> This also causes the connection to take 16 seconds to open XFCE4 once
>> it finally gives up on channels. I see 4 errors so I'm guessing there
ly identical. So, I'm curious as to why
one is able to connect to channels while the other is not? If anyone has
any ideas or wants additional info/logs/etc... I'm all ears and will be
more than happy to provide any additional details.
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
quot; to see what ports "portname"
depends on (IE: What dependencies "portname" installed). You can also
use "pkg info -r portname" to see the what the portname is a dependency
of (what installed this port). Does that help at all?
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hello Miroslav,
On 12/29/18 6:16 PM, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> Janketh Jay wrote on 2018/12/30 01:03:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> On 03/12/2018 2:17 pm, Reko Turja via freebsd-ports wrote:
>>> Hello Janky Jay!
>>>
>>> -Original Message- Sent: Monday
Hello Miroslav,
On 12/29/18 6:03 PM, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> Janketh Jay wrote on 2018/12/30 01:03:
>
> [...]
>
>> diff -Naur maia.orig/cache.php maia/cache.php
>> --- maia.orig/cache.php 2015-02-15 15:19:45.0 -0700
>> +++ maia/cache.php 2018-
Hi Miroslav,
On 12/29/18 6:16 PM, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> Janketh Jay wrote on 2018/12/30 01:03:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> On 03/12/2018 2:17 pm, Reko Turja via freebsd-ports wrote:
>>> Hello Janky Jay!
>>>
>>> -Original Message- Sent: Monday
Hi All,
On 03/12/2018 2:17 pm, Reko Turja via freebsd-ports wrote:
Hello Janky Jay!
-Original Message- Sent: Monday, December 3, 2018 4:17 PM
Subject: Re: Maia Mailgaurd
Okay. No sweat. I'll work on getting a port patch going as that seems
it would be the easiest way to push thi
Perfect! Thanks for the replies and the clarification, guys!
On 12/11/18 11:21 AM, Stefan Esser wrote:
> Am 11.12.18 um 18:51 schrieb Janky Jay, III:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> After a portsnap to pull ${latest), I'm seeing the following:
>>
>> clamav-0.101.0_
e and it appears
version 0.101.0 is, in fact, the latest. So, I'm wondering if there was
possibly a revision issue that's causing this?
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hello Reko,
On 12/1/18 7:58 AM, Reko Turja wrote:
> Hello Janky Jay!
>
> --Original Message-- Monday, November 26, 2018 10:11 PM Subject: Re:
> Maia Mailgaurd
>
>> That being said, with just a few minor changes, I have been able to get
>> Maia to work with PHP 7.2 wi
Hello Gary,
On 11/25/18 6:13 AM, Gary J. Hayers wrote:
> Hi Janky Jay,
>
> Can I ask if you there are any plans to patch Maia so it can run on php70+?
>
> Many thanks for the great port.
>
At the moment, there are a lot of changes happening to the Maia code
(more c
/var/db/freebsd-update/*
Is there a reason you're moving the directory and creating a new, empty
one?
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Mel,
On 02/16/2018 05:02 AM, Mel Pilgrim wrote:
> On 2018-02-14 19:13, Janky Jay, III wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> May have spoken too soon...
>>
>> On 2/14/2018 7:45 PM, Janky Jay, III wrote:
>>> Hello Mel,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
May have spoken too soon...
On 2/14/2018 7:45 PM, Janky Jay, III wrote:
> Hello Mel,
>
> On 2/13/2018 7:42 AM, Mel Pilgrim wrote:
>> (Putting on my mail/postfixadmin maintainer hat)
>
>> On 2018-02-11 15:24, Janky Jay,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Mel,
On 2/13/2018 7:42 AM, Mel Pilgrim wrote:
> (Putting on my mail/postfixadmin maintainer hat)
>
> On 2018-02-11 15:24, Janky Jay, III wrote:
>> Hello All,
>>
>> Versions: FreeBSD - 11.1-RELEASE-p6 PostfixAdmi
either (unless, as mentioned) it *IS*
a Smarty3 version issue. I'll just contact the maintainer and wait for
the next PFA release.
Thanks again!
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
On 2/11/2018 4:41 PM, Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote:
> No answer?
>
> https://sourceforge.net/p/postfixadmin/disc
ies. Has anyone else
seen this behavior or is this a configuration issue of some type, maybe?
I will mention that PFA was working perfectly fine less than a month ago.
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.fre
Never mind. I ended up figuring this out. I basically re-created all my
jails and started from scratch. Anyone else that might be struggling
with the same issue can find what I did at the URL below.
http://www.purplehat.org/?page_id=566
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
Looks like the latest update broken more of the previously fixed issues.
Also, it appears that F2B 0.9.X is the latest stable and 0.10.X is
"experimental". Why is the default port experimental? Shouldn't this be
broken up into two ports?
Anywho, below is an example of the fail2ban.log output when
uot;{ tcp, udp, ipv6, icmp, esp, ipencap }"
privnets = "{ 127.0.0.0/8, 192.168.0.0/16, 172.16.0.0/12, 10.0.0.0/8 }"
set loginterface $ext_if
scrub in on $ext_if no-df random-id
>
> 17.10.2017 23:15, Janky Jay, III пишет:
>> In the new 0.10 version, the action rule creates
Hello,
In the new 0.10 version, the action rule creates the tables for you
based on the jail configuration. If you look at the jail files, you'll
see that you now call pfctl using additional arguments such as ports
that are affected and a suffix to add to the default "f2b-" table name.
s just an old dependency that is no longer
relevant. I'll look into this as well.
> Is your ports tree up-to-date?
>
Ports tree is up-to-date using portsnap as of 11pm Mountain Time
yesterday.
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hello Matthew,
On 12/14/2016 10:22 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 2016/12/14 16:53, Janky Jay, III wrote:
>> Hello All,
>>
>> So, mail/p5-Net-SMTP-SSL is a requirement of security/maia (a port I
>> maintain) and it is apparently being deprecated as of March of nex
, etc...
My question is, what port am I supposed to use instead of
p5-Net-SMTP-SSL? I see no configuration options for SSL in the other
ports. Just want to make sure I do this correctly. Any information will
be greatly appreciated!
Kind Regards,
Janky Jay, III
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Vlad,
On 12/11/2016 07:58 PM, Vlad K. wrote:
> On 2016-12-12 03:42, Janky Jay, III wrote:
>> This very, VERY rarely happens to me and I use ports *ONLY* in
>> production environments. If you could please provide examples and report
>> the issues to the port maintai
d I had no idea there was an
issue with my port, how would I fix it? So, please, PLEASE report any
issues with ports that aren't building. It's not too time consuming on
your part. Just a simple BUG report and how to re-produce and you're
finished.
Kind Regards,
Janky Jay, III
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hello,
Can someone please commit this (it's been waiting a while and is only a
simple "sed" change in the Makefile). If there's anything else I need to
do, let me know. Thanks!
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210138
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
signa
a fresh svn update of src
> tree.
>
This was actually covered in this thread (first post, actually) by
Torfinn Ingolfsen:
"Better to use this:
pw groupmod dialer -m myuser
it will ony affect the dialer group, and not mess with any other groups.
"
The above will
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Torfinn,
On 03/25/2016 10:20 AM, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Janky Jay, III
> wrote:
>>
>> While your solution is not incorrect, your assumption on the
>> proposed/given solution from the
user belongs
to groups admin,wheel,test and you run the suggested "pw" command from
the port, your user will now be in groups admin,wheel,test,dialer.
It's the '-g' (lower-case) switch you want to avoid...
That being said, your suggestion does the exact same thin
;
> I ultimately fixed it by switching to the "latest" repo (the repo
> config edit you mentioned). I was already disinterested in the
> quarterly repos because it smacks of Debian-ness, and this
> confirms why stability-by-staleness is a bad idea.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hrm... Numerous inquiries regarding this and no response is somewhat
disappointing. If anyone gets any feedback from anywhere else, please
update the rest of us (BSDCan contacts/update included... I can't make
it... :( )
Regards,
Janky Jay, II
certainly like to be
on the list as well. If anyone knows of a way to join this list, please
let me know.
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
iEYEARECAAYFAlVniZsACgkQGK3MsUbJZn78mQCfYA9HqU8/94CqMfle8wbKdAdS
syQAnjp+Hptkc8hsfbh4bWzFEJpI2Zi7
=dvQG
-END P
this latest PR
contains the previous fix(es) plus the version update.
Thanks!
-Janky Jay, III
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-uns
quot;bitchy" if it's excluded.
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
2014 at 03:01:47PM -0700, Janky Jay, III wrote:
Hi Ruslan,
I most certainly will (providing that it actually works)! :) Once it's
verified, I'll submit the PR.
On 02/14/2014 02:21 PM, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote:
Janky Jay, III wrote on 15.02.2014 01:16:
Hello Greg,
Hi Ruslan,
I most certainly will (providing that it actually works)! :) Once it's
verified, I'll submit the PR.
On 02/14/2014 02:21 PM, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote:
Janky Jay, III wrote on 15.02.2014 01:16:
Hello Greg,
Simply editing the Makefile and the distinfo file insi
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
On 02/14/2014 11:00 AM, Greg Rivers wrote:
Since the recent update of pidgin to version 2.10.9, pidgin aborts
(signal 6) whenever I connect to a Office Communicator account via the
pidgin-sipe plugin. The pidgin-sipe port is very much out of date, so I
suspect that pidg
my /var/db/pkg directory. *shrug* It's not causing any problems. It's
just confusing
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
On 02/13/2014 04:39 PM, LuKreme wrote:
I was running FreeBSD 8-2 and used freebsd-update to update:
FreeBSD 8.4-RELEASE-p7 #0: Sat Jan 11 01:45:47 UTC 2014
r...@am
able to do some
end-of-year admin tasks with this fixed port, and that's looking less
promising now...
Thanks.
Jay B.
Fernando Apesteguía writes:
> El 20/12/2013 17:26, "Jay Borkenhagen" escribió:
> >
> > Th
> On 20/12/13 09:49 -0500, Jay Borkenhagen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It was suggested to me that I ask this question here.
> >
> > Per http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=181836
> >
> > An issue in the FreeBSD port of smartmontools was f
updated port to be distributed?
Thank you.
Jay B.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-
Call it "sport" (search ports). :)
On 08/16/2013 02:33 AM, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 7:35 AM, Sergey V. Dyatko
> wrote:
>> 2 aliases from my .cshrc:
>>
>> alias search_name"make -C /usr/ports/ search name='\!*'
>> display=name,path,info"
>>
>> alias search_key"
;>
>>
>
> The above links are NOT containing new pkgng kind packages yet .
>
> For pkgng compatible packages , you may see the following pages :
>
> http://www.exonetric.com/
> http://mirror.exonetric.net/pub/pkgng/
> http://mirror.exonetr
BUILD
OPTIONS*. How is this so difficult to understand?
-Janketh Jay
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Hi Dimitry,
On 06/04/2013 01:31 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On Jun 4, 2013, at 18:01, "Janky Jay, III" wrote:
>> On 06/04/2013 12:44 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>>> On Jun 4, 2013, at 06:52, Janky Jay wrote:
> ...
>>>> aterm: ca't open pseudo
Hi Dimitry,
On 06/04/2013 12:44 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On Jun 4, 2013, at 06:52, Janky Jay wrote:
>> So, I'm unsure if this is related to a difference in pseudo TTY's yet or
>> not, but I'm having a very strange issue that I've never encountered
>> b
What am I missing here?
As always, thanks in advance. I wouldn't mind switching terminal
emulators. I just find Aterm to have a ton of options for the size and
ease of use. I would certainly be disappointed if it were no longer
available for FBSD 10. :(
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
___
my phone. This way,
even if I delete images or other files they are always accessible via
Dropbox. It's also handy for sharing files between a lot of devices as
well, I suppose. *shrug*
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
___
freebsd-ports
On 03/05/2013 11:18 AM, Jerry wrote:
On Tue, 05 Mar 2013 10:37:17 -0700
Janky Jay, III articulated:
Same! I've been voting this up for quite some time. All my
votes are dedicated to this. Hopefully it will be implemented soon.
Just keep the votes coming and I'm sure they&
ts with
native support. I have nearly 8GB of free space on Dropbox going to
waste...
Same! I've been voting this up for quite some time. All my votes are
dedicated to this. Hopefully it will be implemented soon. Just keep the
votes coming and I'm sure they'll take it serio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
Finally got around to submitting this tonight with a big thanks to
Chris. Thanks!
PR number is 174601 and, of course, it can be located here:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/174601
Regards,
Janky Jay
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Umm.. They've managed to b0rk something in the latest release (missing
PHP files that are causing errors.) As soon as that's fixed, I'll
submit the port.
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
On 12/18/2012 11:26 AM, Janketh Jay wrote:
> Hi Paul,
.
Regards,
Janky Jay
On 12/18/2012 10:19 AM, Paul Pathiakis wrote:
> Hi to everyone
>
> Did this make it into ports yet? I assumed it would be under
> finance. However, I can't find it anywhere in the ports at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As far as I'm concerned, the commiters will take care of this when
they need to. Leaving current port headers in-tact is the best way to
go regardless of this discussion...
On 09/01/2012 10:00 PM, Thomas Abthorpe wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 06:42
e 2.0 bit... :o!) Anyhow, I had to skip town for a few
days for something EXTREMELY important (golf...) but I will try to get
this fixed and submitted within the next few days.
Thanks again,
Janky Jay, III
On 08/19/2012 04:00 PM, Paul Pathiakis wrote:
> My thanks to all of you o
needs to be
changed and/or adjusted
On 08/18/2012 08:42 PM, Janketh Jay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 08/18/2012 11:53 AM, Paul Pathiakis wrote:
>> Hi,
>
>> This is probably the best competitor to QuickBooks out there.
>> People can rave about the benefits of GnuCash and K
; those things that will be necessary.
>
> Paul Pathiakis
I've attached a port (in tar.gz form) which is the FrontAccounting
port for FreeBSD. I've tested it a few times and it seems to work
perfectly fine. If someone wants to test this before I submit, that
would be great. Otherw
; those things that will be necessary.
>
> Paul Pathiakis
I'll take a look at it. If it's extremely easy to port, I'll do it.
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmai
you help update the pl file?
>
Actually, Amavis and Maia-Mailguard two separate things. Maiad isn't
amavisd. It is simply an alternative to amavisd to be used with mail
servers. The mailgraph.pl script shouldn't need to be changed.
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
-BEGIN PGP S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Erich,
On 06/03/2012 08:50 PM, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 03 June 2012 PM 7:54:46 Janketh Jay wrote:
>>>>
>>> a person who operated Windows for some years does not see
>>> him/herself as a newcom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Erich,
On 06/03/2012 06:56 PM, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 03 June 2012 PM 5:33:16 Janketh Jay wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hi Erich,
>>
>> FreeBSD is in no way in
like "portdowngrade".
Of course, this becomes a serious security risk (depending on the
port) but FreeBSD will still "allow" anyone to do this. If this simply
isn't good enough, then perhaps the user should think about trying to
use a different OS.
Regards,
Janky Jay,
hough.
>
> YMMV, of course. :-)
>
That's actually pretty funny. My dad always has the same issue. He
just can't resist chain smoking while on the computer. I've had to
replace numerous parts on his machine due to overheating caused by
dust and other sticky buildu
Thank you, sir! :)
On 01/24/2012 01:27 PM, Chris Rees wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
> On 24 January 2012 17:58, Janketh Jay wrote:
>> Hi Team,
>>
>>I'm the maintainer of the sysutils/syscp port which has been long
>> ditched and replaced with sysutils/froxlor.
Hi Team,
I'm the maintainer of the sysutils/syscp port which has been long
ditched and replaced with sysutils/froxlor. Can someone please remove
sysutils/syscp from the ports tree as it is old and potentially dangerous?
Regards,
Janky Jay
e | grep '^0:'
>
> The tool is already available in ports (sysutils/fpart) but has also
> successfully been used on GNU/Linux.
>
> Enjoy !
>
> Best regards,
>
> PS : comment and patches are, of course, welcome :)
Awesome! This seems like a great idea! Thanks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Rock,
On 01/04/2012 09:24 PM, Da Rock wrote:
> On 01/05/12 14:15, Eitan Adler wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Janketh Jay wrote:
>>> As much as I hate to toss Chris Rees "under the bus" on this, he's
&g
ch as I can with
questions if you want to email me directly about your port. I know the
ins-and-outs about porting and I'd be more than happy to lend a hand.
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
e is responsible for it.
I can also reliably host this so there is more than one upstream.
Lemme know if you need me. :)
>>
>
> I will maintain it if no one else comes forward.
>
>> Also, its last update appears to be in 2003, and it's long dead
>
> s/long d
sleading. My script is the dependency. It is not
> stale. It is
> missing its requisite, namely perl.
>
> It is a constant source of confusion for native speakers of English,
> and to
> a degree a source of amusement that documentation which has not yet
> been
> expressed in
orts/2011-August/069300.html
From what I see, this is exactly correct and the information
provided (while not a Postfix or Dovecot mailing list) should
definitely be of help. In fact, it is the solution to the problem.
Well done! :)
Regards,
J
Folks,
Would it be possible to devise an ipfw 'fwd' rule to pass along a socket
connection with IP_BINDANY set via stunnel that forwards it to another
process? The problem I'm having is the vnc service on the other side
cannot reply back to the IP address because the routing does not redirect
back
ml
which blatantly states that all submissions whether they are new OR
updates be submitted in shar format. Maybe the commiters should bring
this up and have a few less to deal with..? Just a suggestion.
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Martin,
On 05/13/2010 11:38 AM, Martin Turgeon wrote:
> Le 2010-05-11 18:36, Janky Jay, III a écrit :
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hi Darrell,
>>
>> Darrell Betts wrote:
&g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Darrell,
Darrell Betts wrote:
> Hey Jay,
>
> I have been in contact with the author of Maia Mailguard and he is aware
> of the trouble with his program and PHP 5.3 he advised me that a new
> version will be out shortly 1.0.3. Hop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi List,
Janky Jay, III wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> Raphael Becker wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 02:29:08PM -0800, Simon Shapiro wrote:
>>> Hey,
>>> I just updated ports on a few machines and the CLI version of php
&
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi List,
Raphael Becker wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 02:29:08PM -0800, Simon Shapiro wrote:
>> Hey,
>> I just updated ports on a few machines and the CLI version of php
>> dumps its core rather than end nicely. The mhash module appears to be
>
e and submit a port.
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
>> I see no reason for it not to be in ports. If it's useful like you
>> described above then I'm sure other people will make use of it and be
>> glad it is maintained in the ports tree. If you're wil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, Michel.
Ah! Okay. This makes much more sense... Its not a problem at all to
port the mail agent to FreeBSD. Just create a port, test and submit it
and voila! Sorry for the misunderstanding earlier...
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
Michel Talon
lyBSD mail agent, I seriously doubt there will be any
migration to it from Sendmail in the near future.
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
Michel Talon wrote:
> Hello,
>
> would it not be interesting to have the DragonFlyBSD mail agent in
> FreeBSD? It is a very simple mail agent, like ssmtp, b
her-port-1.0.5_1,3'
I haven't had any issues with this at all. Can anyone confirm if
specifying the complete port name wrapped in single quotes allows
portupgrade to finish successfully?
Regards,
Janky Jay, III
Rainer Hurling wrote:
> I have the same trouble with portupgrade
or is this a portmanager
problem? Portupgrade never said much about it...
--
Jay Chandler
Network Administrator, Chapman University
714.628.7249 / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Today's Excuse: Dyslexics retyping hosts file on servers
___
freebsd-ports@f
orted.
*** Error code 22
Stop in /usr/ports/mail/p5-Mail-ClamAV/work/Mail-ClamAV-0.17.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/mail/p5-Mail-ClamAV.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/mail/mailscanner.
--
Jay Chandler
Network Administrator, Chapman University
714.628.7249 / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Today's E
96 matches
Mail list logo
