Am 12.04.2012 22:02, schrieb Jerry:
> On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:13:54 +0100
> Chris Whitehouse articulated:
>
>> I'm only a lurker and lowly user but could I humbly request that
>> portmanager is brought back into use? It's simple to use and does
>> what it does extremely well and without fuss. I th
In 1.7 and upgrade results in only one .svn directory located in
/usr/src/.svn.
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 07:53:15PM +0200, Mel Flynn wrote:
> On 4/12/2012 17:30, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>
> > Console# sqlite3 .svn/wc.db "pragma integrity_check"
> > ok
>
> Does that mean /usr/src/sys/.svn is a d
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:15 PM, Jerry wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 20:28:06 +0200
> Torfinn Ingolfsen articulated:
>
>> After I upgraded net/samba35 to version 3.5.14, I noticed this:
>> root@kg-quiet# service samba status
>> Cannot 'status' samba. Set winbindd_enable to YES in /etc/rc.conf or
>
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 20:28:06 +0200
Torfinn Ingolfsen articulated:
> After I upgraded net/samba35 to version 3.5.14, I noticed this:
> root@kg-quiet# service samba status
> Cannot 'status' samba. Set winbindd_enable to YES in /etc/rc.conf or
> use 'onestatus' instead of 'status'.
> root@kg-quiet# s
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:13:54 +0100
Chris Whitehouse articulated:
> I'm only a lurker and lowly user but could I humbly request that
> portmanager is brought back into use? It's simple to use and does
> what it does extremely well and without fuss. I think the fact that
> it still "just works" aft
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Oliver Heesakkers
wrote:
> Kevin Oberman schreef op 12.04.2012 18:13:
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:23 AM, Oliver Heesakkers
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> security/openssl was brought up to 1.0.1 recently which includes bumping
>>> OPENSSL_SHLIBVER from 7 to 8.
>>>
>>> Whi
After I upgraded net/samba35 to version 3.5.14, I noticed this:
root@kg-quiet# service samba status
Cannot 'status' samba. Set winbindd_enable to YES in /etc/rc.conf or
use 'onestatus' instead of 'status'.
root@kg-quiet# service samba start
Cannot 'start' samba. Set winbindd_enable to YES in /etc/r
Kevin Oberman schreef op 12.04.2012 18:13:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:23 AM, Oliver Heesakkers
wrote:
security/openssl was brought up to 1.0.1 recently which includes
bumping
OPENSSL_SHLIBVER from 7 to 8.
Which means, that in order not to break surprisingly many ports on
my
desktop
I have to
On 12.03.12 09:45, Alex Dupre wrote:
Mr Dandy wrote:
May be more correctly set PHP 5.4 by default to lang/php5, and repocopy
current lang/php5 into lang/php53?
Probably current maintainer of php (@ale) has the plan ;)
released, then probably you should stick to lang/php52 port, or find a
m
On 4/12/2012 17:30, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
> Console# sqlite3 .svn/wc.db "pragma integrity_check"
> ok
Does that mean /usr/src/sys/.svn is a directory?
--
Mel
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freeb
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:23 AM, Oliver Heesakkers
wrote:
> security/openssl was brought up to 1.0.1 recently which includes bumping
> OPENSSL_SHLIBVER from 7 to 8.
>
> Which means, that in order not to break surprisingly many ports on my
> desktop
> I have to "portmaster -r" this port.
>
> "portm
After going through a few problem solving sessions with subversion and
the errors it prints doing a svnversion on /usr/src/sys "E200030:
sqlite: callback requested query abort" I came to the conclusion that
either svnversion is broken in its path discovery or they are implying a
new syntax on whic
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 08:50:08PM -0700, Cy Schubert wrote:
> On a tangential issue, php52 should probably be kept around, at least
> for now. [...] I think these ports should be deprecated, giving
> users ample time to migrate to newer ports
AFAIK all the php52 ports are indeed already marked
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/12/2012 04:57 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
> Unfortunately, many of us do not find that it 'just works'. There
> is no-one to ask for support, so people resort to asking ports@ or
> in IRC.
>
> It is also unmaintained, and has many bugs against it:
I
Hi,
Just to let you know I did a portupdate on my FreeBSD 9.0 machine and
then updated the sbcl port (sbcl-1.0.55.0,1); it fails building if
config set the pdf documentation option.
Cheers,
:Nicolas
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lis
security/openssl was brought up to 1.0.1 recently which includes
bumping
OPENSSL_SHLIBVER from 7 to 8.
Which means, that in order not to break surprisingly many ports on my
desktop
I have to "portmaster -r" this port.
"portmaster -w" might have also done the trick and I'll leave mentions
of
On 12 April 2012 10:03, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 12/04/2012 10:57, Chris Rees wrote:
>>> I'm only a lurker and lowly user but could I humbly request that portmanager
>>> > is brought back into use? It's simple to use and does what it does
>>> > extremely
>>> > well and without fuss. I think the
On 12/04/2012 10:57, Chris Rees wrote:
>> I'm only a lurker and lowly user but could I humbly request that portmanager
>> > is brought back into use? It's simple to use and does what it does
>> > extremely
>> > well and without fuss. I think the fact that it still "just works" after
>> > all
>> >
On 12 April 2012 09:13, Chris Whitehouse wrote:
> On 12/04/2012 04:41, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
>>
>> On 04/12/12 03:39, Eitan Adler wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11 April 2012 21:55, Bryan Drewery wrote:
Hi Phillip,
Your last commit on portupgrade [1] indicates to consider portmaster
>>
On 12/04/2012 04:41, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
On 04/12/12 03:39, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 11 April 2012 21:55, Bryan Drewery wrote:
Hi Phillip,
Your last commit on portupgrade [1] indicates to consider portmaster
instead. What are the thoughts on this? Just the lack of a maintainer?
Open PRs
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Anton Yuzhaninov wrote:
> On 04/11/12 12:01, Spil Oss wrote:
>>
>> Please find patches for libmp3splt and mp3splt attached.
>> libmp3splt from 0.7_1 to 0.7.1 and mp3splt 2.4 to 2.4.1 as per
>> upstreamhttp://mp3splt.sourceforge.net/mp3splt_page/downloads.php
>>
>>
On 12 April 2012 08:15, Alex Dupre wrote:
> Chris Rees ha scritto:
>>> On a tangential issue, php52 should probably be kept around, at least for
>>> now.
>>
>> The PHP maintainer disagreed on this point last week-ish.
>
> Eh?! I never said it. It' fine to keep a maintained (not by me) php52,
> sin
Chris Rees ha scritto:
>> On a tangential issue, php52 should probably be kept around, at least for
>> now.
>
> The PHP maintainer disagreed on this point last week-ish.
Eh?! I never said it. It' fine to keep a maintained (not by me) php52,
since php5 will be updated to 5.4 branch.
--
Alex Dupr
23 matches
Mail list logo
