horde4-base www moved

2011-11-15 Thread Per olof Ljungmark
Hi, I did a make deinstall/reinstall of horde4-base and to my surprise the installation placed the web accessible files in /usr/local/lib/php/pear/www/horde/ and they used to be in /usr/local/www/horde Is this intentional or did I mess anything up somewhere? I have no special options set any

Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform

2011-11-15 Thread Sahil Tandon
On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 17:55:57 +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > Jase Thew píše v út 15. 11. 2011 v 16:31 +: > > > What networking/DNS configuration is Pointyhat lacking (or have > > sufficiently different to break the socket code inside of postconf)? > > It is a purposefully no-networking sand

Re: Plan to add a bsd.pure.mk

2011-11-15 Thread Zhihao Yuan
Currently, 12. Plus 3 committed, 1 unsubmitted, 3~4 planning to port. The total existing addons are listed here: http://code.google.com/p/pure-lang/wiki/Addons I probably not going to port all of them, but this list is growing. On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > On Thu,

Re: Plan to add a bsd.pure.mk

2011-11-15 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 13:02:38 -0600 Zhihao Yuan wrote: > Hi, > > The PR which updates all pure-* ports was passed to portmgr for a long > time, since it seem that to put a > > .if defined(USE_PURE) > .include "${PORTSDIR}/Mk/bsd.pure.mk" > .endif > > In bsd.port.mk may a be better choice. Thoug

Re: multimedia/phonon: CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:58 (if):

2011-11-15 Thread Boris Samorodov
15.11.2011 01:29, Raphael Kubo da Costa пишет: > Thanks, I've just fixed this upstream and added my fix to area51 > (r7826). I'll commit it to ports as soon as I get an OK from avilla or > makc. Great, the port compiles now. Thanks! > BTW, you were supposed to get a warning instead of an error to

Re: Recent ports removal

2011-11-15 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 15/11/2011 19:25, Chris Rees wrote: > On 15 November 2011 19:19, Matthew Seaman > wrote: >> On 15/11/2011 19:01, Matthew Seaman wrote: >>> On 11/11/2011 22:23, Doug Barton wrote: > By its >> nature, deprecated ports tends not to be updated for long time, port >> tools like portmaste

Re: Recent ports removal

2011-11-15 Thread Chris Rees
On 15 November 2011 19:19, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 15/11/2011 19:01, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> On 11/11/2011 22:23, Doug Barton wrote: By its > nature, deprecated ports tends not to be updated for long time, port > tools like portmaster, portupgrade will not even see it because no >

Re: Recent ports removal

2011-11-15 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 15/11/2011 19:01, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 11/11/2011 22:23, Doug Barton wrote: >>> By its nature, deprecated ports tends not to be updated for long time, port tools like portmaster, portupgrade will not even see it because no PORTREVISION bump happen. > >> portmaster -L will w

Re: Recent ports removal

2011-11-15 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 11/11/2011 22:23, Doug Barton wrote: >> By its >> > nature, deprecated ports tends not to be updated for long time, port >> > tools like portmaster, portupgrade will not even see it because no >> > PORTREVISION bump happen. > portmaster -L will warn you about ports marked > DEPRECATED/FORBIDDEN

Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform

2011-11-15 Thread Sahil Tandon
On Nov 15, 2011, at 11:55 AM, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > Jase Thew píše v út 15. 11. 2011 v 16:31 +: > >> What networking/DNS configuration is Pointyhat lacking (or have >> sufficiently different to break the socket code inside of postconf)? > > It is a purposefully no-networking sandbox jail.

Re: [removed ports] sysutils/cpuburn

2011-11-15 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 15/11/2011 18:04 Chris Rees said the following: > On 15 November 2011 14:34, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> >> Does anyone know good any alternative(s) for cpuburn? >> If not, then I would like to request that this port be restored. >> I am prepared to be designated as its maintainer and to host its di

Re: [removed ports] sysutils/cpuburn

2011-11-15 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 15/11/2011 17:07 Baptiste Daroussin said the following: > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 04:34:22PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> >> Does anyone know good any alternative(s) for cpuburn? >> If not, then I would like to request that this port be restored. >> I am prepared to be designated as its maintai

Re: cvs checkout ./. csup

2011-11-15 Thread Chip Camden
Quoth Daniel Nebdal on Tuesday, 15 November 2011: > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Matthew Seaman > wrote: > > On 15/11/2011 09:48, Matthias Apitz wrote: > >> Since many years I'm fetching or updating /usr/ports with > >> > >> # cd /usr > >> # setenv CVSROOT :pserver:anon...@anoncvs.fr.freebsd.

Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform

2011-11-15 Thread Pav Lucistnik
Jase Thew píše v út 15. 11. 2011 v 16:31 +: > What networking/DNS configuration is Pointyhat lacking (or have > sufficiently different to break the socket code inside of postconf)? It is a purposefully no-networking sandbox jail. What networking activity postconf wants to run? -- -- Pav L

Re: ports/16254: New port: www/cronolog

2011-11-15 Thread miwi
Synopsis: New port: www/cronolog State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: miwi State-Changed-When: Tue Nov 15 16:51:48 UTC 2011 State-Changed-Why: close again was a mistake http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=16254 ___ freebsd-ports

Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform

2011-11-15 Thread Jase Thew
On 15/11/2011 14:31, Sahil Tandon wrote: It was marked broken on a particular architecture, hence the genesis of this thread. I appreciate that diagnosis is difficult; perhaps Olli's suggestion is helpful in isolating the issue. I do not know how else to troubleshoot since these pointyhat er

Re: ports/16254: New port: www/cronolog

2011-11-15 Thread miwi
Synopsis: New port: www/cronolog State-Changed-From-To: closed->open State-Changed-By: miwi State-Changed-When: Tue Nov 15 16:26:29 UTC 2011 State-Changed-Why: Maintainer has approved. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=16254 ___ freebsd-ports@

Re: [removed ports] sysutils/cpuburn

2011-11-15 Thread Chris Rees
On 15 November 2011 14:34, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > Does anyone know good any alternative(s) for cpuburn? > If not, then I would like to request that this port be restored. > I am prepared to be designated as its maintainer and to host its distfile > (via my > FreeBSD account). > > Maintaining the

Re: [removed ports] sysutils/cpuburn

2011-11-15 Thread Bernhard Froehlich
On 15.11.2011 16:07, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 04:34:22PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: Does anyone know good any alternative(s) for cpuburn? If not, then I would like to request that this port be restored. I am prepared to be designated as its maintainer and to host its d

Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform

2011-11-15 Thread Jerry
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 09:31:49 -0500 Sahil Tandon articulated: > It was marked broken on a particular architecture, hence the genesis > of this thread. I appreciate that diagnosis is difficult; perhaps > Olli's suggestion is helpful in isolating the issue. I do not know > how else to troubleshoot

Re: [removed ports] sysutils/cpuburn

2011-11-15 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 04:34:22PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > Does anyone know good any alternative(s) for cpuburn? > If not, then I would like to request that this port be restored. > I am prepared to be designated as its maintainer and to host its distfile > (via my > FreeBSD account). > >

[removed ports] sysutils/cpuburn

2011-11-15 Thread Andriy Gapon
Does anyone know good any alternative(s) for cpuburn? If not, then I would like to request that this port be restored. I am prepared to be designated as its maintainer and to host its distfile (via my FreeBSD account). Maintaining the port should be rather easy as it can not have any security i

Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform

2011-11-15 Thread Sahil Tandon
It was marked broken on a particular architecture, hence the genesis of this thread. I appreciate that diagnosis is difficult; perhaps Olli's suggestion is helpful in isolating the issue. I do not know how else to troubleshoot since these pointyhat errors are not - AFAIK - reproducible by othe

Re: cvs checkout ./. csup

2011-11-15 Thread Daniel Nebdal
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 15/11/2011 09:48, Matthias Apitz wrote: >> Since many years I'm fetching or updating /usr/ports with >> >> # cd /usr >> # setenv CVSROOT :pserver:anon...@anoncvs.fr.freebsd.org:/home/ncvs >> # cvs checkout ports >> >> and later do the up

Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform

2011-11-15 Thread olli hauer
On 2011-11-15 10:45, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > 1) The problem is not amd64 specific > > 2) No point unmarking BROKEN, it currently fails on i386 pointyhat nodes > too > > 3) Diagnosis is hard because the postfix-install shell script prints no > useful progress messages > > Example failure log: > ht

Re: cvs checkout ./. csup

2011-11-15 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 15/11/2011 09:48, Matthias Apitz wrote: > Since many years I'm fetching or updating /usr/ports with > > # cd /usr > # setenv CVSROOT :pserver:anon...@anoncvs.fr.freebsd.org:/home/ncvs > # cvs checkout ports > > and later do the updating just with: > > # cd /usr/ports > # cvs update > # portup

Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform

2011-11-15 Thread Pav Lucistnik
1) The problem is not amd64 specific 2) No point unmarking BROKEN, it currently fails on i386 pointyhat nodes too 3) Diagnosis is hard because the postfix-install shell script prints no useful progress messages Example failure log: http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-errorlogs/e.8.20

cvs checkout ./. csup

2011-11-15 Thread Matthias Apitz
Hello, Since many years I'm fetching or updating /usr/ports with # cd /usr # setenv CVSROOT :pserver:anon...@anoncvs.fr.freebsd.org:/home/ncvs # cvs checkout ports and later do the updating just with: # cd /usr/ports # cvs update # portupgrade -ai The FreeBSD handbook describes (or recommend