google-earth-4.0.1693 Locks up...

2006-08-18 Thread Eric Schuele
Hello, Surely I'm missing something basic here. The latest version (v.1693) does not work for me on RELENG_6. Running it, it stops at "loading myplaces.kml". If I delete the ~/.googleearth directory it gets a little further... myplaces appear to get loaded, and then it just locks up. It do

Re: ports tree tagging again

2006-08-18 Thread Mark Linimon
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 04:21:38PM +0400, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote: > > There are severe logistical problems: Ports are currently expected to > > build for at least 3 different src branches, with between 2 and 6 > > different architectures in each. Multiply this by over 15,000 ports > > and that pr

Re: Cannot install linux_base-fc4 fetch fails ...

2006-08-18 Thread Boris Samorodov
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 12:32:38 +0200 Kiffin Gish wrote: > On Sun, 2006-08-13 at 03:27 -0700, Bill Blue wrote: > > On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 02:56:46 -0700, Kiffin Gish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi there. > > > > > > I recently upgraded my server to FreeBSD 6.1 but cannot for the life of >

Re: FreeBSD Port: squid-2.6.2

2006-08-18 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 06:40:06PM +0200, Reinhard Haller wrote: > Hi, > > is there a simple way to get squid 2.6 with portupgrade? Assuming you want to switch from www/squid to www/squid26 you could do: portupgrade -f -o www/squid26 squid I don't know what if any configuration compatibility is

FreeBSD Port: squid-2.6.2

2006-08-18 Thread Reinhard Haller
Hi, is there a simple way to get squid 2.6 with portupgrade? Thanks Reinhard -- Dipl. Inform. Reinhard Haller INTERACTIVE Computer Systems GmbH Gesellschaft für Systemtechnik Hermann-Hesse-Str. 5 85551 Kirchheim b. München Tel.: 089/904885-0 Mob.: 0171/8022551 Fax: 089/904885-22 mailto: [EMA

Re: Apache 2.2 and Postgres

2006-08-18 Thread alan bryan
On 8/18/06, Roman Bogorodskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I could use (and have in the past on apache 2.0) www/mod_auth_pgsql2 > but I was getting "No Authn provider configured" with the following > ..htaccess: Yeah, I had the same error. It fixed by placing line "LoadModule auth_pgsql_module

Re: ports tree tagging again

2006-08-18 Thread Roman Bogorodskiy
Peter Jeremy wrote: > > There are severe logistical problems: Ports are currently expected to > build for at least 3 different src branches, with between 2 and 6 > different architectures in each. Multiply this by over 15,000 ports > and that process isn't going to work. And this ignores inte

Re: FreeBSD Port: bazaar-ng-0.8.2

2006-08-18 Thread Ulf Lilleengen
*snip* > retrieving revision 1.1 > diff -u -r1.1 patch-bzrlib_osutils.py > --- files/patch-bzrlib_osutils.py 28 Oct 2005 09:36:43 - 1.1 > +++ files/patch-bzrlib_osutils.py 18 Aug 2006 08:05:47 - > @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ > bzrlib/osutils.py.orig Fri Oct 28 11:30:13 2005 > -+++ b

Re: FreeBSD Port: awstats-6.5_1,1

2006-08-18 Thread Stefan Walter
Hi, Peter Barfield, 18.08.06, 12:07h CEST: > I note that you're listed as the maintainer for the awstats FreeBSD > Port. This version has a security vulnerability and cannot be installed. > It's been fixed in v6.6 and I was hoping it would be updated in the > ports soon? There is www/awstatus-de

Re: ports tree tagging again

2006-08-18 Thread Dmitry Marakasov
* Roman Bogorodskiy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > 2. Port tree is unstable > > IMO, port tree is not very stable. I mean: we're all human and more or > less often make mistakes and inaccurate commits. So you cannot be sure > that if you cvsup/portsnap your tree, it will not break something > (e.g.

Re: ports tree tagging again

2006-08-18 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 02:21:38PM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > When/if we get a new VCS, where branching is not as painful > as it is now, I expect it to be used extensively by developers. > > Projects can be then brought back into our main repo from > marcuscom, p4 and other local repos. We

Re: ports tree tagging again

2006-08-18 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
When/if we get a new VCS, where branching is not as painful as it is now, I expect it to be used extensively by developers. Projects can be then brought back into our main repo from marcuscom, p4 and other local repos. We often work on some things together and/or from multiple locations. It feels

Re: ports tree tagging again

2006-08-18 Thread (LI Xin)
在 2006-08-18五的 10:50 +0400,Roman Bogorodskiy写道: > Paul Schmehl wrote: > > > As a maintainer of several ports, I can assure you that I would not be > > interested in doing *more* work on the ports than I already am. And my > > ports are relatively simple ones. Imagine the guys who do KDE and

FreeBSD Port: awstats-6.5_1,1

2006-08-18 Thread Peter Barfield
MIDLANDCOMPUTERS tel:01952 588688 fax:01952 588555 web:www.midlandcomputers.com email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, I note that you're listed as the maintainer for the awstats FreeBSD Port. This version has a security vulnerability and cannot be installed. It's been fixed in v6.6 and I was

Respect of various variables

2006-08-18 Thread Soeren Straarup
Hi I'm trying to figure out what to cleenup in ports. Which of following variables should be respected (either ?= or +=)? CPPFLAGS LDFLAGS CONFIGURE_ENV CONFIGURE_ARGS /Soeren Soeren Straarup | aka OZ2DAK aka Xride FreeBSD wannabe | FreeBSD since 2.2.6-R If a program is not working righ

Re: ports tree tagging again

2006-08-18 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 10:45:37AM +0400, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > If this comes up every few months, then it's really needed, isn't it? > > > > No, it means that a handful of people think that it would be great if > > the rest of the people all started doing more

Re: FreeBSD Port: bazaar-ng-0.8.2

2006-08-18 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 05:40:55PM -0600 I heard the voice of Chad Phillips -- Apartment Lines, and lo! it spake thus: > > was just wondering if you had a time estimate for updating the ports > for bzr/bzrtools to 0.9? i'm looking forward to it! Attached is an update of the port I just bashed ou

Re: Apache 2.2 and Postgres

2006-08-18 Thread Roman Bogorodskiy
alan bryan wrote: > On 8/18/06, Roman Bogorodskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I compiled ports/apache22 with WITH_PGSQL=yes and also tried > >> WITH_PGSQL=/usr/local/pgsql with no changes in result. Am I doing > >> something wrong here? > > > >Hm... www/apache22 port has no WITH_PGSQL knob.

Re: Apache 2.2 and Postgres

2006-08-18 Thread alan bryan
On 8/18/06, Roman Bogorodskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I compiled ports/apache22 with WITH_PGSQL=yes and also tried > WITH_PGSQL=/usr/local/pgsql with no changes in result. Am I doing > something wrong here? Hm... www/apache22 port has no WITH_PGSQL knob. I was figthing with apache22 + auth

Re: ports tree tagging again

2006-08-18 Thread Christopher Vance
On 8/18/06, Roman Bogorodskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm not the only person who wants to have stable ports tree and binary packages. Actually, about 90% people whom I asked about that said it would be nice. OpenBSD does exactly what you want - a branched, stable ports tree, and a preferenc

Re: Apache 2.2 and Postgres

2006-08-18 Thread Roman Bogorodskiy
alan bryan wrote: > I'm trying to get Apache 2.2 and Postgres to work together so that I > can use mod_authn_dbd. > > I think the problem is that APR is not being passed the correct > arguments so that it configures with PGSQL support. > > # ldd /usr/local/libexec/apache22/mod_authn_dbd.so > /