Re: Port of FUSE-NTFS to FreeBSD (sort of)

2006-07-16 Thread Csaba Henk
On 2006-07-15, Ulrich Spoerlein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > the FUSE NTFS team has release a new version of its NTFS driver which > promises to deliver write support for NTFS to FreeBSD. > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=3D23836054&forum_id= >=3D2697 > > I made a port of the

Re: hpijs/hplip, foomatic-rip, and CUPS 1.2.0

2006-07-16 Thread E. J. Cerejo
Create another printer using a different name from the one you have right now and see if you can see it. Anthony Agelastos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: On Jul 16, 2006, at 10:08 PM, John Merryweather Cooper wrote: > Anthony Agelastos wrote: >> On Jul 16, 2006, at 3:19 PM, Doug Barton wrote: >

Re: hpijs/hplip, foomatic-rip, and CUPS 1.2.0

2006-07-16 Thread John Merryweather Cooper
Anthony Agelastos wrote: On Jul 16, 2006, at 10:08 PM, John Merryweather Cooper wrote: Anthony Agelastos wrote: On Jul 16, 2006, at 3:19 PM, Doug Barton wrote: For future reference, please don't post to both -ports and -questions. Thank you for this clarification. Anthony Agelastos wrote

FreeBSD ports that you maintain which are currently marked forbidden

2006-07-16 Thread linimon
Dear FreeBSD port maintainer: As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we are attempting to notify maintainers of ports that are marked as "forbidden" in their Makefiles. Often, these ports are so marked due to security concerns, such as known exp

FreeBSD ports which are currently scheduled for deletion

2006-07-16 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often, this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or the cessation of development on th

FreeBSD ports that you maintain which are currently marked broken

2006-07-16 Thread linimon
Dear FreeBSD port maintainer: As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we are attempting to notify maintainers of ports that are marked as "broken" in their Makefiles. In many cases these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD

Re: hpijs/hplip, foomatic-rip, and CUPS 1.2.0

2006-07-16 Thread Anthony Agelastos
On Jul 16, 2006, at 10:08 PM, John Merryweather Cooper wrote: Anthony Agelastos wrote: On Jul 16, 2006, at 3:19 PM, Doug Barton wrote: For future reference, please don't post to both -ports and - questions. Thank you for this clarification. Anthony Agelastos wrote: Does anyone out there h

Re: hpijs/hplip, foomatic-rip, and CUPS 1.2.0

2006-07-16 Thread John Merryweather Cooper
Anthony Agelastos wrote: On Jul 16, 2006, at 3:19 PM, Doug Barton wrote: For future reference, please don't post to both -ports and -questions. Thank you for this clarification. Anthony Agelastos wrote: Does anyone out there have network printing working with hpijs/hplip and CUPS 1.2.0?

Re: pkg_* [was: Problems creating port, pkg_info?]

2006-07-16 Thread Lowell Gilbert
"mal content" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is it safe to mix ports and packages? Yes. Once installed, there is no difference between them; you may not even be able to tell which method was used. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.

Re: hpijs/hplip, foomatic-rip, and CUPS 1.2.0

2006-07-16 Thread Anthony Agelastos
On Jul 16, 2006, at 3:19 PM, Doug Barton wrote: For future reference, please don't post to both -ports and -questions. Thank you for this clarification. Anthony Agelastos wrote: Does anyone out there have network printing working with hpijs/ hplip and CUPS 1.2.0? Yes. You need to follow t

Re: New portmaster version available for testing/feedback

2006-07-16 Thread Ricardo A. Reis
On Sun, 16 Jul 2006 03:45:26 -0300, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thanks to all who've sent in their bugs, suggestions, and ideas for improvement, I've got a new version of portmaster ready for those who would like to check it out. It im

Re: multimedia/bmx

2006-07-16 Thread Roman Bogorodskiy
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > The dependency on deskutils/notification-daemon is missing. I will have a look tomorrow, too sleepy right now. Thanks! Roman Bogorodskiy pgpjUqd3LvpXl.pgp Description: PGP signature

FreeBSD 7.0- Current and x11/kdebase3

2006-07-16 Thread Ricardo A. Reis
Hi all, Any reason for kdebase3 not compile in current ? # $FreeBSD: ports/x11/kdebase3/Makefile,v 1.179 2006/07/05 23:22:17 lofi Exp $ - gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/x11/kdebase3/work/kdebase-3.5.3/kwin' if /bin/sh /usr/local/bin/libtool --silent --tag=CXX -

Re: Module-Build-2802 dependency problem

2006-07-16 Thread Ken Williams
Thanks. I'll work with John Peacock to resolve this problem. I think we'll need to make version.pm not rely on Module::Build. -Ken On Jul 16, 2006, at 3:34 AM, Cheng-Lung Sung wrote: Hi, Since version 0.2802, Module-Build add new dependency of 'version > 0.64', but in FreeBSD, p5-

multimedia/bmx

2006-07-16 Thread [LoN]Kamikaze
The dependency on deskutils/notification-daemon is missing. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: hpijs/hplip, foomatic-rip, and CUPS 1.2.0

2006-07-16 Thread Doug Barton
For future reference, please don't post to both -ports and -questions. Anthony Agelastos wrote: > Does anyone out there have network printing working with hpijs/hplip and > CUPS 1.2.0? Yes. You need to follow the instructions at file:///usr/local/share/doc/hplip-0.9.11/install/step4/cups/net.htm

Re: hpijs/hplip, foomatic-rip, and CUPS 1.2.0

2006-07-16 Thread Anish Mistry
On Sunday 16 July 2006 14:16, Anthony Agelastos wrote: > Using either hpijs or hplip (which displays the printer driver as > hpijs since hpijs is part of the hplip codebase), > /usr/local/libxec/ cups/filter/foomatic-rip still has issues with > network printing (foomatic-rip fails). Does anyone hav

hpijs/hplip, foomatic-rip, and CUPS 1.2.0

2006-07-16 Thread Anthony Agelastos
Using either hpijs or hplip (which displays the printer driver as hpijs since hpijs is part of the hplip codebase), /usr/local/libxec/ cups/filter/foomatic-rip still has issues with network printing (foomatic-rip fails). Does anyone have any ideas for me to try? Does anyone out there have ne

Re: pkg_* [was: Problems creating port, pkg_info?]

2006-07-16 Thread mal content
I deleted all installed packages to clear up the mess, I've not worked up the nerve to play about with ports again but I do need to in the future as I have a few ports to submit + maintain. Is it safe to mix ports and packages? I would like to use binary packages for the majority but I can see th

wmmsg 1.0_3 -- wrong WWW in pkg-descr

2006-07-16 Thread martinko
--- x11/wmmsg/pkg-descr.origSat Jan 24 16:06:47 2004 +++ x11/wmmsg/pkg-descr Sun Jul 16 17:15:32 2006 @@ -2,5 +2,5 @@ by displaying related icons and arrival times. Works with Gaim, X-Chat, etc. Can be used to alert you of various other system events. -WWW: http://taxiway.swapspace.net/~matt

Re: pkg_* [was: Problems creating port, pkg_info?]

2006-07-16 Thread mal content
On 16/07/06, James O'Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What happens when you run this command from within a port directory: % make -VPKG_CMD -VPKG_INFO /usr/sbin/pkg_create /usr/sbin/pkg_info Same output! and % which pkg_info /usr/sbin/pkg_info Likewise... Does /usr/local/sbin/pkg_inf

Re: pkg_* [was: Problems creating port, pkg_info?]

2006-07-16 Thread James O'Gorman
mal content wrote: > On 16/07/06, James O'Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> mal content wrote: >> > What, in the environment, could possibly cause the ports >> > system to suddenly start believing that the pkg tools (pkg_info, >> > pkg_version etc) reside in /usr/local/sbin, as opposed to the >>

Re: pkg_* [was: Problems creating port, pkg_info?]

2006-07-16 Thread mal content
On 16/07/06, James O'Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: mal content wrote: > What, in the environment, could possibly cause the ports > system to suddenly start believing that the pkg tools (pkg_info, > pkg_version etc) reside in /usr/local/sbin, as opposed to the > standard /usr/sbin? > > Nothing

FreeBSD Port: hplip-0.9.11

2006-07-16 Thread Anthony Agelastos
Hello, When I go to http://hplip.sourceforge.net/supported_devices/ laser.html and scroll down to hp LaserJet 1160, it shows up as working. However, when I install hplip and try to configure the same printer through CUPS' web interface, the 1160 does not show up. Do you have any ideas rega

Re: pkg_* [was: Problems creating port, pkg_info?]

2006-07-16 Thread James O'Gorman
mal content wrote: > What, in the environment, could possibly cause the ports > system to suddenly start believing that the pkg tools (pkg_info, > pkg_version etc) reside in /usr/local/sbin, as opposed to the > standard /usr/sbin? > > Nothing in my environment, or PATH has changed so why did > it

pkg_* [was: Problems creating port, pkg_info?]

2006-07-16 Thread mal content
What, in the environment, could possibly cause the ports system to suddenly start believing that the pkg tools (pkg_info, pkg_version etc) reside in /usr/local/sbin, as opposed to the standard /usr/sbin? Nothing in my environment, or PATH has changed so why did it work perfectly for 18 months and

Re: Problems creating port, pkg_info?

2006-07-16 Thread mal content
On 16/07/06, mal content <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 15/07/06, Shaun Amott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 09:46:42AM +0100, mal content wrote: > > > > On 15/07/06, mal content <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >The rest of the ports system works fine. > > > > I tell a lie, no

Re: Problems creating port, pkg_info?

2006-07-16 Thread mal content
On 15/07/06, Shaun Amott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 09:46:42AM +0100, mal content wrote: > > On 15/07/06, mal content <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >The rest of the ports system works fine. > > I tell a lie, now all other ports refuse to build as they've suddenly > decided

Ports that generate version numbers dynamically

2006-07-16 Thread Matthew Seaman
Dear list, One of the targets I have for the next release of my FreeBSD::Portindex package is to handle certain exceptional ports where the port version generated programatically: ie. without any modification to files from the port, or from any related master port. At the moment I know of precise

Module-Build-2802 dependency problem

2006-07-16 Thread Cheng-Lung Sung
Hi, Since version 0.2802, Module-Build add new dependency of 'version > 0.64', but in FreeBSD, p5-version depends on p5-Module-Build. Thus we have a cyclic dependency problem. i.e. p5-Module-Build depends on p5-version, but p5-version depends on p5-Module-Build, too.

Re: Netwatch?

2006-07-16 Thread martinko
Chris Maness wrote: > Freddie Cash wrote: >> On Wed, July 5, 2006 2:08 pm, Chris Maness wrote: >> >>> Used to have this cool little tool on my slackware box to monitor >>> network traffic. Just curious as to why it has not been ported (are >>> there any issues with it?) >>> >>> http://linux.maru

Re: RFC: Merging X11BASE to LOCALBASE

2006-07-16 Thread Ulrich Spoerlein
Eric Anholt wrote: > I think we should be able come up with something to do the transition > without having to recompile all X11BASE ports. Sure seems to me like > that ought to be doable. What about setting the default X11BASE to /usr/local/ depending on OSVERSION=>70. That way only -CURRENT

Re: Port of FUSE-NTFS to FreeBSD (sort of)

2006-07-16 Thread Ulrich Spoerlein
Anish Mistry wrote: > Would you post the port somewhere? Once Csaba gets the next update > out he might have time to take a look. Sigh, I attached it as shar, looks like even those get stripped now? I'll try again by attaching it as text ... Ulrich Spoerlein -- PGP Key ID: 20FEE9DD