On 2006-07-15, Ulrich Spoerlein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the FUSE NTFS team has release a new version of its NTFS driver which
> promises to deliver write support for NTFS to FreeBSD.
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=3D23836054&forum_id=
>=3D2697
>
> I made a port of the
Create another printer using a different name from the one you have right now
and see if you can see it.
Anthony Agelastos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
On Jul 16, 2006, at 10:08 PM, John Merryweather Cooper wrote:
> Anthony Agelastos wrote:
>> On Jul 16, 2006, at 3:19 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
>
Anthony Agelastos wrote:
On Jul 16, 2006, at 10:08 PM, John Merryweather Cooper wrote:
Anthony Agelastos wrote:
On Jul 16, 2006, at 3:19 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
For future reference, please don't post to both -ports and -questions.
Thank you for this clarification.
Anthony Agelastos wrote
Dear FreeBSD port maintainer:
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the
FreeBSD ports system, we are attempting to notify maintainers of
ports that are marked as "forbidden" in their Makefiles. Often,
these ports are so marked due to security concerns, such as known
exp
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in
the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports
that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often,
this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or
the cessation of development on th
Dear FreeBSD port maintainer:
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the
FreeBSD ports system, we are attempting to notify maintainers of
ports that are marked as "broken" in their Makefiles. In many cases
these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD
On Jul 16, 2006, at 10:08 PM, John Merryweather Cooper wrote:
Anthony Agelastos wrote:
On Jul 16, 2006, at 3:19 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
For future reference, please don't post to both -ports and -
questions.
Thank you for this clarification.
Anthony Agelastos wrote:
Does anyone out there h
Anthony Agelastos wrote:
On Jul 16, 2006, at 3:19 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
For future reference, please don't post to both -ports and -questions.
Thank you for this clarification.
Anthony Agelastos wrote:
Does anyone out there have network printing working with hpijs/hplip
and
CUPS 1.2.0?
"mal content" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is it safe to mix ports and packages?
Yes. Once installed, there is no difference between them; you may not
even be able to tell which method was used.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.
On Jul 16, 2006, at 3:19 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
For future reference, please don't post to both -ports and -questions.
Thank you for this clarification.
Anthony Agelastos wrote:
Does anyone out there have network printing working with hpijs/
hplip and
CUPS 1.2.0?
Yes. You need to follow t
On Sun, 16 Jul 2006 03:45:26 -0300, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks to all who've sent in their bugs, suggestions, and ideas for
improvement, I've got a new version of portmaster ready for those who
would
like to check it out. It im
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
> The dependency on deskutils/notification-daemon is missing.
I will have a look tomorrow, too sleepy right now. Thanks!
Roman Bogorodskiy
pgpjUqd3LvpXl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi all,
Any reason for kdebase3 not compile in current ?
# $FreeBSD: ports/x11/kdebase3/Makefile,v 1.179 2006/07/05 23:22:17 lofi
Exp $
-
gmake[3]: Entering directory
`/usr/ports/x11/kdebase3/work/kdebase-3.5.3/kwin'
if /bin/sh /usr/local/bin/libtool --silent --tag=CXX -
Thanks. I'll work with John Peacock to resolve this problem. I
think we'll need to make version.pm not rely on Module::Build.
-Ken
On Jul 16, 2006, at 3:34 AM, Cheng-Lung Sung wrote:
Hi,
Since version 0.2802, Module-Build add new dependency of
'version > 0.64', but in FreeBSD, p5-
The dependency on deskutils/notification-daemon is missing.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
For future reference, please don't post to both -ports and -questions.
Anthony Agelastos wrote:
> Does anyone out there have network printing working with hpijs/hplip and
> CUPS 1.2.0?
Yes. You need to follow the instructions at
file:///usr/local/share/doc/hplip-0.9.11/install/step4/cups/net.htm
On Sunday 16 July 2006 14:16, Anthony Agelastos wrote:
> Using either hpijs or hplip (which displays the printer driver as
> hpijs since hpijs is part of the hplip codebase),
> /usr/local/libxec/ cups/filter/foomatic-rip still has issues with
> network printing (foomatic-rip fails). Does anyone hav
Using either hpijs or hplip (which displays the printer driver as
hpijs since hpijs is part of the hplip codebase), /usr/local/libxec/
cups/filter/foomatic-rip still has issues with network printing
(foomatic-rip fails). Does anyone have any ideas for me to try? Does
anyone out there have ne
I deleted all installed packages to clear up the mess, I've not
worked up the nerve to play about with ports again but I do
need to in the future as I have a few ports to submit + maintain.
Is it safe to mix ports and packages? I would like to use binary
packages for the majority but I can see th
--- x11/wmmsg/pkg-descr.origSat Jan 24 16:06:47 2004
+++ x11/wmmsg/pkg-descr Sun Jul 16 17:15:32 2006
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
by displaying related icons and arrival times. Works with Gaim, X-Chat,
etc.
Can be used to alert you of various other system events.
-WWW: http://taxiway.swapspace.net/~matt
On 16/07/06, James O'Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What happens when you run this command from within a port directory:
% make -VPKG_CMD -VPKG_INFO
/usr/sbin/pkg_create
/usr/sbin/pkg_info
Same output!
and
% which pkg_info
/usr/sbin/pkg_info
Likewise...
Does /usr/local/sbin/pkg_inf
mal content wrote:
> On 16/07/06, James O'Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> mal content wrote:
>> > What, in the environment, could possibly cause the ports
>> > system to suddenly start believing that the pkg tools (pkg_info,
>> > pkg_version etc) reside in /usr/local/sbin, as opposed to the
>>
On 16/07/06, James O'Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
mal content wrote:
> What, in the environment, could possibly cause the ports
> system to suddenly start believing that the pkg tools (pkg_info,
> pkg_version etc) reside in /usr/local/sbin, as opposed to the
> standard /usr/sbin?
>
> Nothing
Hello,
When I go to http://hplip.sourceforge.net/supported_devices/
laser.html and scroll down to hp LaserJet 1160, it shows up as
working. However, when I install hplip and try to configure the same
printer through CUPS' web interface, the 1160 does not show up. Do
you have any ideas rega
mal content wrote:
> What, in the environment, could possibly cause the ports
> system to suddenly start believing that the pkg tools (pkg_info,
> pkg_version etc) reside in /usr/local/sbin, as opposed to the
> standard /usr/sbin?
>
> Nothing in my environment, or PATH has changed so why did
> it
What, in the environment, could possibly cause the ports
system to suddenly start believing that the pkg tools (pkg_info,
pkg_version etc) reside in /usr/local/sbin, as opposed to the
standard /usr/sbin?
Nothing in my environment, or PATH has changed so why did
it work perfectly for 18 months and
On 16/07/06, mal content <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 15/07/06, Shaun Amott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 09:46:42AM +0100, mal content wrote:
> >
> > On 15/07/06, mal content <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >The rest of the ports system works fine.
> >
> > I tell a lie, no
On 15/07/06, Shaun Amott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 09:46:42AM +0100, mal content wrote:
>
> On 15/07/06, mal content <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >The rest of the ports system works fine.
>
> I tell a lie, now all other ports refuse to build as they've suddenly
> decided
Dear list,
One of the targets I have for the next release of my FreeBSD::Portindex
package is to handle certain exceptional ports where the port version
generated programatically: ie. without any modification to files from the
port, or from any related master port. At the moment I know of precise
Hi,
Since version 0.2802, Module-Build add new dependency of
'version > 0.64', but in FreeBSD, p5-version depends on
p5-Module-Build. Thus we have a cyclic dependency problem.
i.e. p5-Module-Build depends on p5-version, but
p5-version depends on p5-Module-Build, too.
Chris Maness wrote:
> Freddie Cash wrote:
>> On Wed, July 5, 2006 2:08 pm, Chris Maness wrote:
>>
>>> Used to have this cool little tool on my slackware box to monitor
>>> network traffic. Just curious as to why it has not been ported (are
>>> there any issues with it?)
>>>
>>> http://linux.maru
Eric Anholt wrote:
> I think we should be able come up with something to do the transition
> without having to recompile all X11BASE ports. Sure seems to me like
> that ought to be doable.
What about setting the default X11BASE to /usr/local/ depending on
OSVERSION=>70. That way only -CURRENT
Anish Mistry wrote:
> Would you post the port somewhere? Once Csaba gets the next update
> out he might have time to take a look.
Sigh,
I attached it as shar, looks like even those get stripped now? I'll try
again by attaching it as text ...
Ulrich Spoerlein
--
PGP Key ID: 20FEE9DD
33 matches
Mail list logo