clients.
mst="modulate state"
ext_if="em0"
int_if1="em1"
table persist {192.168.10/24}
set skip on {lo}
set ruleset-optimization basic
set state-policy if-bound
set require-order yes
scrub on $ext_if all random-id no-df min-ttl 128
### ALTQ
altq on $ext_if hfsc b
2011/10/26 Виталий Владимирович :
>
> Recently I worked around traffic prioritization of my router
> (FreeBSD9-BETA3). I would like to prioritization traffic coming from external
> interface and coming from internal LAN.
>
> ## ALTQ
>
> altq on $ext_if hfsc bandwidth 800
2011/10/26 Виталий Владимирович
>
> Recently I worked around traffic prioritization of my router
> (FreeBSD9-BETA3). I would like to prioritization traffic coming from
> external interface and coming from internal LAN.
>
> ## ALTQ
>
> altq on $ext_if hfsc bandwidth 800
Hello,
I'm interested in PF and HFSC. There is one limit in HFSC - classes, which are
only 64. So I am interesting why 64?
Can You tell me, why are so or there is some information about that? I want to
find this out. Maybe I can write about
that researh and find out why and how to improve
68.100.11,
192.168.100.12, \
192.168.100.100 }"
ipunlimit = "{ !192.168.1.0/30, !192.168.100.200 }"
scrub in all
altq on $ifint0 hfsc bandwidth 1Mb queue { downstream }
queue downstream bandwidth 10% priority 0 hfsc (upperlimit 99% default)
altq on $ifext0 hfsc bandwidth 256Kb que
hail,
I have 7-STABLE running as a router, and now I found to have this issue:
altq on $ext_if bandwidth 310Kb hfsc queue { ack_dns, ack_ssh, ack_msn,
ack_http, ack_http2, ack_bolo, ack_jogos }
queue ack_dnsbandwidth 7% priority 7 qlimit 500 hfsc (realtime
5%)
queue ack_ssh
EM_DEFAULT}
> queue AVNQOS1 bandwidth 100Mb priority 7 qlimit 1 hfsc( ecn
> realtime 100Mb upperlimit 100Mb )
>
> But in Realtime m1 is 100Mb, m2 is 50MB and d is 18.
>
> My Rule configuration:
>
> pass out on em0 inet proto tcp from 192.168.16.8 to 192.168.16.50
Altq configuration:
queue root_em0 bandwidth 1Gb priority 1 qlimit 100 {SYSTEM_QUEUE}
queue SYSTEM_QUEUE bandwidth 1Gb qlimit 100 {AVNQOS1, SYSYTEM_DEFAULT}
queue AVNQOS1 bandwidth 100Mb priority 7 qlimit 1 hfsc( ecn
realtime 100Mb upperlimit 100Mb )
But in Realtime m1 is 100Mb, m2 is 50MB
If you want to know something more for HFSC in this link there is some
explanation on how to use and configure it to suit your needs.
The link:
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?PHPSESSID=efbbb6e4e74cdefced188b28de395e46&topic=2484.0
___
freebs
Hi,
I'm having an issue with HFSC where anything coming over my internal
interface NATed to the outside is not being placed in the default
queue on the external IF. I have a DMZ that's not NATed and packets
coming out of the DMZ are being placed in the queue, so I have reason
to believ
I'm trying to make sure I understand the meaning of bandwidth, realtime
and linkshare when it comes to hfsc queues.
Given the lines:
altq on $up_int bandwidth 98Mb hfsc queue { ex_q1, ex_q2 }
queue ex_q1 bandwidth 90% priority 6 hfsc(realtime 80% linkshare 90%)
queue ex_q2 bandwid
Dear All,
I was wondering what will be the best setting for empty ACKs queue in my
example. Is 50Kb will be enough for ?
ADSL 2mbit/512kbit
### External interface ###
altq on $ext_if hfsc bandwidth 500Kb queue { std_out, tcp_ack_out, voip_out, \
ssh_out, www_out
, inquima_em0,
ibilink_em0, cliente_em0, net1_em0}
[ pkts: 0 bytes: 0 dropped pkts: 0 bytes: 0 ]
[ qlength: 0/ 50 ]
queue voip_em0 bandwidth 64Kb priority 7 hfsc( red upperlimit 64Kb )
[ pkts: 0 bytes: 0 dropped pkts: 0 bytes: 0 ]
[ qlength
On Tuesday 28 November 2006 21:17, Gilberto Villani Brito wrote:
> I have this rules working:
> altq on em0 hfsc bandwidth 100% queue net_em0
> queue net_em0 bandwidth 30Mb hfsc(red realtime 30Mb upperlimit 30Mb)
> { voip_em0 net1_em0 inquima_em0 \
>
> ibilink_em0 flextv
I have this rules working:
altq on em0 hfsc bandwidth 100% queue net_em0
queue net_em0 bandwidth 30Mb hfsc(red realtime 30Mb upperlimit 30Mb)
{ voip_em0 net1_em0 inquima_em0 \
ibilink_em0 flextv_em0 }
queue voip_em0 bandwidth 64Kb priority 7 hfsc(red realtime 64Kb
upperlimit 64Kb)
queue
I think somethink like this:
altq on em0 hfsc bandwidth 100% queue net_em0
queue net_em0 bandwidth 14Mb hfsc(red realtime 14Mb upperlimit 14Mb) {
priority7_em0 priority6_em0 priority5_em0 priority4_em0
priority3_em0 default_em0}
queue priority7_em0
Hi,
As I'm new in packet filter I will like to get some help in setting
my configuration for bandwidth shapping with altq hfsc. Below will be my
network layout;
VSAT for uplink
On 9/9/06, Ivan Levchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
now this helps out a bit, thanks!
No problem. If you find something that is in error or if you learn
any new tricks, please add them to the wiki :)
Scott
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
h
now this helps out a bit, thanks!
On 9/9/06, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/9/06, Ivan Levchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> that i found, but to be honest didn't quite understand.. =)
> maybe somebody could explain it in two words...
HFSC is a fun animal
> HFSC is a fun animal to learn. We've tried to gather some
> data, check out
> http://wiki.pfsense.com/wikka.php?wakka=ReadingRoom and
> http://wiki.pfsense.com/wikka.php?wakka=HFSCBandwidthShapingNotes ..
> Unfortunately the more that I learn about HFSC it seems like
On 9/9/06, Ivan Levchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
that i found, but to be honest didn't quite understand.. =)
maybe somebody could explain it in two words...
HFSC is a fun animal to learn. We've tried to gather some data, check
out http://wiki.pfsense.com/wikka.php?wakka
it used
> for anyway?
Why would you need something about which you don't even know what it does?
On top of that 5 seconds quality time spent with Google would have turned
up http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~hzhang/HFSC/main.html with all the gory details
about HFSC.
> I looked in the openbsd pf f
have turned
up http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~hzhang/HFSC/main.html with all the gory details
about HFSC.
> I looked in the openbsd pf faq on this and could only find Class Based
> Queueing and Priority Queueing.
>
> THanks in advance.
--
/"\ Best regards, | [EMA
Hello Everybody,
Could anybody help with how to use this scheduler and what is it used
for anyway?
I looked in the openbsd pf faq on this and could only find Class Based
Queueing and Priority Queueing.
THanks in advance.
--
Best Regards,
Ivan Levchenko
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
ug further (rather than on my soekris). I would
> really like to have this fixed for 6.1 but time is short so no
> guarantees.
OK, more info. I just created an OpenBSD 3.9 snapshot image for my
Soekris 4801 so I could do an apples to apples comparison. Same pf
config (queue name changed acc
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 10:12:55PM -0600, Bill Marquette wrote:
> On 2/25/06, Andrew Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You may want to test with another network card to verify that sis(4) is
> > actually working correctly with ALTQ. I am having ALTQ problems which
> > went away when using a x
On 2/25/06, Andrew Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You may want to test with another network card to verify that sis(4) is
> actually working correctly with ALTQ. I am having ALTQ problems which
> went away when using a xl(4) card. I am waiting for a sis card to arrive
> in the mail so I can
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 04:45:41PM -0600, Bill Marquette wrote:
> I've been having massive issues with HFSC for a while. I finally
> spent some time working on it this weekend. I'm testing by using my
> VOIP phone with a 90Kb codec.
>
> This gives me broken calls (
I've been having massive issues with HFSC for a while. I finally
spent some time working on it this weekend. I'm testing by using my
VOIP phone with a 90Kb codec.
Here's a stripped down config that works perfectly:
altq on sis1 hfsc(upperlimit 768Kb) queue { qWANdef }
al
On 2/22/06, Jon Simola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Leave out the linkshare and bandwidth, just use realtime and
> upperlimit. And the priority of the queues matters, in the above each
> of the queues can go as high as 81Mb (90% of 90Mb) but if more than
> one tries to go above 45Mb, the one with t
ueue should be able
> >>to utilize about 25Mb of it. This is a simplified example of what I
> >>sent earlier. But if I can do this, I can accomplish what I'm trying to
> >>and build off it later.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >If you're guarante
and build off it later.
If you're guaranteeing bandwidth allocation, then you want realtime,
and probably avoid the bandwidth declarations which are not quite the
same. HFSC is not trivial to get your head wrapped around and is
poorly documented because of that. It took me reading the man p
ying to
> and build off it later.
If you're guaranteeing bandwidth allocation, then you want realtime,
and probably avoid the bandwidth declarations which are not quite the
same. HFSC is not trivial to get your head wrapped around and is
poorly documented because of that. It took me reading
Bill Marquette wrote:
On 2/22/06, Christopher McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jon Simola wrote:
On 2/22/06, Christopher McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been trying to get hfsc working properly, but I'm obviously doing
something wrong because
On 2/22/06, Christopher McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jon Simola wrote:
>
> >On 2/22/06, Christopher McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I've been trying to get hfsc working properly, but I'm obviously doing
> >>somethi
Jon Simola wrote:
On 2/22/06, Christopher McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been trying to get hfsc working properly, but I'm obviously doing
something wrong because I keep getting errors like this:
pfctl: link-sharing sc exceeds parent's sc
Yeah, the percen
On 2/22/06, Christopher McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been trying to get hfsc working properly, but I'm obviously doing
> something wrong because I keep getting errors like this:
>
> pfctl: link-sharing sc exceeds parent's sc
Yeah, the percentages in li
I've been trying to get hfsc working properly, but I'm obviously doing
something wrong because I keep getting errors like this:
pfctl: link-sharing sc exceeds parent's sc
Here's my current configuration:
altq on $ext_if bandwidth 100Mb hfsc queue { queue1, queue2, q
For advanced configs, you can queue inbound traffic on an outbound
interface if it leaves the router/bridge on a different interface than
it entered on.
Can you show exmaple of this configuration, with some comments about
what that config do ?
I am interested in solution for this network conf
On 11/20/05, Marcus Alves Grando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I trying to limit one interface "rl0" to 256Kb, but when i test with
> iperf he say limit is "7.29 Mbits/sec". What's wrong? Whay iperf say 7Mb/s?
> altq on rl0 bandwidth 512Kb hfsc queu
.d/pf restart
Disabling pf.
pf disabled
Enabling pf.
pf enabled
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cat /etc/pf.conf
altq on rl0 bandwidth 512Kb hfsc queue test
queue test bandwidth 256Kb hfsc (default upperlimit 256Kb)
pass in on rl0 from any to any queue test
pass out on rl0 from any to any queue test
41 matches
Mail list logo
