Hi,
Is the ULI M526x NIC somehow supported in Free-or any other BSD?
If so, how do I go about installing support for it, without a working internet
connection?
The m526x belongs to the 'tulip'-family with the linux-kernel.
Thanks for any poin
At 19:04 11/12/2001 -0800, you wrote:
>On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Tom Peck wrote:
>
> > YES! That's exactly the problem! Your memory is obviously far superior to
> > most :-).
> >
>
> That's a scary proposition indeed! :)
>
> > > Of course, if
here, but if not I'm happy to
send anyone a pdf.
- Tom
On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 02:55:21PM +0200, tue...@freebsd.org wrote:
> > On 26. Oct 2022, at 10:57, Tom Jones wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 12:14:25PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Some thoughts about this topic.
>
On Sat, Feb 3, 2024, at 20:20, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> I there any public source repository for the development of VPP on
> FreeBSD? Any link to follow?
>
> Benoît
I’m working to upstream changes right now and plan to start a development
branch early next week.
- Tom
breaks and the VPP
configurations that FreeBSD users expect to be available.
Thanks
Tom
uot; for actual usage. Marco's paper
might be a good starting point for further digging:
https://papers.freebsd.org/2003/zec-vimage/
Tom
ity and are looking forward to
users reporting their success running VPP on FreeBSD or any issues they
encounter.
I look forward to your feedback.
Tom
ical cheap Intel gigabit NICs (I forget the exact chipset,
PCI-e 1x, ~$30 USD) that do not negotiate gigabit on my cheap Linksys
switch from Windows, yet happily do so from Linux and FreeBSD, and
will always negotiate gigabit from any OS with my HP Procurve.
Cheers
Tom
__
when this next occurs that
would explain why or how it is wedged, so that I can either rule
myself in or out of this case?
Cheers
Tom
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send a
I've seen this setup with IPv4 before when the ISP does native IPv6. Maybe you
can get global IPv6 addresses and can SSH directly over that. If not, at least
go on record requesting IPv6 with your provider to push them along.
Tom
> On Jun 7, 2014, at 10:12 AM, None Secure via fre
>
> > [prr.patch]
> >
> > [newcwv.patch]
>
> Apologies for not looking at this as yet. It is now closer to the top of my
> list.
>
> Best,
> George
Hi George,
I have a set of patches for draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv-06 that I was going
Hello,
Attached is a patch which implements draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv-06, "Updating TCP
to support Rate-Limited Traffic". The patch is a port of the Linux
implementation by Raffaello Secchi with influence from Aris
Angelogiannopoulos's patch set that was sent to the list earlier this
pact to performance be by moving the state
out into a struct?
> On 30 June 2014 10:04, Tom Jones wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Attached is a patch which implements draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv-06, "Updating
> > TCP
> > to support Rate-Limited Traffic". T
ure of freebsd-update to check the
status of world - "freebsd-update IDS"
I'm not sure of the best way of restoring a particular release, but
you could always download {base,doc,games,kernel,ports,src}.txz from
9.0 release and install them o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am trying to get if_lagg working in an HP blade for failover between
the 2 in chassis cisco switches, but it would seem that the link state
is not being propagated up to the lagg device.
Any hints/ideas?
dmesg:
bxe1: metric 0
mtu 1500
options=
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30/10/2012 12:12, Adam McDougall wrote:
> On 10/30/12 11:23, Tom Judge wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>>
>>
>> I am trying to get if_lagg working in an HP blade for failover
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30/10/2012 12:51, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Oct 30, 2012, at 9:45 AM, Tom Judge wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 30/10/2012 12:12, Adam McDougall wrote:
>>> On 10/30/12 11:23,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/31/12 3:47 AM, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:23:37AM -0400, Tom Judge wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> I am trying to get if_lagg working in an HP blade for failover
>> between the 2 in chassis cisco switches
seeing a fast retransmission of the data between the
current ACK sequence number and the SACK start sequence.
Maybe you are seeing something similar?
Tom
> http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/dup_ack_collapsed.txt
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/sysctl_dup_acks.txt
>
>
> Sean
>
n try to make the underlying problem go away?
>
Take a look at the following page:
http://www.tomjudge.com/index.php/FreeBSD/CARP_vs_VRRP
It contains a patch to change the CARP protocol ID to something that is
not used so these messages go away.
Tom
___
s a pity, because I wanted one in there.
> (Oh well, I guss I can append it from my /etc/rc.local file.)
>
Like what options? Most things can be controlled from dhclient.conf.
Cheers
Tom
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.free
ng kern.ipc.nmbjumbo9 and kern.ipc.nmbclusters
up to suite its needs?
2) Should this be documented in igb(4)?
Tom
--
TJU13-ARIN
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail
e
memory area get fragmented and the system can't allocate any new 9k
clusters.
>
> So... any feedback is good right now.
>
I will provide more feedback in the coming weeks as we load these (4)
systems up. Currently they are idling waiting for the application jails
to be deployed on th
On 19/02/2011 11:07, kevin wrote:
>> No, you have to specify stp there. The default STP mode is RSTP.
>> If you don't specify stp, you'll get a dumb ethernet bridge.
> Thanks very much for clarification. This helps me immensely. My room for
> testing is limited so this will help me take the right s
ernet.
So can net.inet.tcp.msl be set per interface?
(*) Or similar: Sphinx, memcached, perhaps.
Tom
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freeb
Thanks, Kip, good to know.
I partly understand what you said, especially the last sentence, which I
rather like.
As a next step I should ask the TCP cognoscenti if this kind of tuning is
as wise as I imagine.
Tom
On 5/28/11 9:09 AM, "K. Macy" wrote:
>Unfortunately msl is a gl
2011/8/7 Sergey Kandaurov :
> On 7 August 2011 17:11, Tom Vijlbrief wrote:
>> I installed BETA1 in a fresh ubuntu 11.04 KVM virtual machine with the
>> new installer.
>>
>> Major issue I noticed was the missing /home.
>>
>> It took me quite some time to
2011/8/22 Sergey Kandaurov :
> On 8 August 2011 22:06, Tom Vijlbrief wrote:
>> 2011/8/7 Sergey Kandaurov :
>>> On 7 August 2011 17:11, Tom Vijlbrief wrote:
>>>> I installed BETA1 in a fresh ubuntu 11.04 KVM virtual machine with the
>>>> new installe
Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Hello.
Fast question: are the two above compatible?
Can I use CARP over a lagg interface?
Yes it should work just fine, we use it here with lagg+carp and
lagg+vlan+carp.
Tom
bye & Thanks
av.
___
freebsd
join
Hope this helps
Tom
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Hi,
Has anyone seen these errors before:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=135836&cat=
The system is a Dell R610 and it happens on both cold and warm boots.
I am about to check a second chassis, and test with 8, and will follow
up after my tests.
Tom Judge wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone seen these errors before:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=135836&cat=
The system is a Dell R610 and it happens on both cold and warm boots.
I am about to check a second chassis, and test with 8, and will follow
up after my tests.
Here ar
to my page.
Tom
- Original Message - From: "Tom Judge"
To:
Cc: ; "Xin LI" ; "David
Christensen" ; ;
"Stanislav Sedov"
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 8:11 PM
Subject: Re: bce(4) BCM5907 CTX write errors on 7.2 driver
Tom Judge wrote:
The following reply was made to PR kern/139761; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Tom Judge
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, sebastian.tym...@gmail.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/139761: [bce] bce driver on IBM HS22 [No PHY found on Child
MII bus]
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:25:30 +
Hi,
This
The following reply was made to PR kern/135836; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Tom Judge
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, rwilli...@borderware.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/135836: [bce] bce BCM5709 Watchdog after warm boot - ok
after cold boot
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:30:51 +
Hi,
This
The following reply was made to PR kern/134658; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Tom Judge
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, harald_jen...@dell.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/134658: [bce] bce driver fails on PowerEdge m610 blade.
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:32:24 +
Hi,
This seems to be a
however I do have a patched 6.2 that works correctly
based on changes that went into HEAD leading up to /Fri Jul 20 09:19:15
2007 UTC).
Tom
/
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe
The following reply was made to PR kern/107850; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Tom Judge
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, ol...@ipunplugged.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/107850: [bce] bce driver link negotiation is faulty
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:51:05 +
This bug should not be present in
The following reply was made to PR kern/108542; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Tom Judge
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, r...@unix-asp.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/108542: [bce] Huge network latencies with 6.2-RELEASE /
STABLE
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:53:41 +
This should not be a problem
esponse.
Dell have firmware 5.0.9 on their website here: http://tiny.cc/ex834
Will that work?
Tom
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
First sorry for the top post, the blackberry won't allow me to bottom post or I
can't find the option.
I will try this update when I get to the office in the morning. Hopefully it
will resolve the issue.
Thanks
Tom
--Original Message--
From: David Christensen
To: Tom J
no go, PHY still not supported :(
Looking though the mii code it seems the SerDes PHY support was moved
into the brgphy code in 2007.
This driver however only seems to support the 5708S PHY and not the 5709.
Maybe David can shed some light on the support for t
config_bridge0="addm fxp0 addm fxp1 monitor up"
And then have you snort process run on bridge0.
Tom
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
t the
temporary files inside. Thanks for the link.
After fighting with the update process for a bit and then learning about
the live cycle manager I have managed to test the R610 with the 5.0.9
firmware.
On the face of it, it seems that this resolves the issue.
Tom Judge wrote:
David Christensen wrote:
Thanks for the rapid response.
Dell have firmware 5.0.9 on their website here: http://tiny.cc/ex834
Will that work?
Yes, that release does include a good version of BCM5709 bootcode
(v5.06).
I couldn't really tell until I downloaded the fil
Bypass Works
WarmBypass Fails
We can provide full remote access to the following hardware (via
enterprise drac) if required and on site hands if this will help get
this issue resolved.
3 * R610
4 * R410
7 * R710
Tom
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.
David Christensen wrote:
Can you try a different test? Power-on the system with the network
cable attached to an idle switch (i.e. keep all network
traffic from
being forwarded to the NIC during driver initialization). Does the
system power up successfully? Repeatedly? The problem I saw wa
d the bootcode version are similar but
they are not the same. The bootcode you have (v5.0.6) is
sufficient to fix the problem.
Ok just checked in the life cycle manager and it has 5.0.9 installed my bad.
Running the other test now.
Tom
___
freebsd-net@
Tom Judge wrote:
David Christensen wrote:
The next test is to diable the LOM's management firmware
but boot to
an active network.
After disabling the management firmware and doing 1 cold reboot and 3
warms all worked correctly.
After re enabling the firmware and doing 1 cold reboot
ically the R610).
Thanks,
Tom
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
8-RC2
as well as 7.1 with the 7.2 driver plus the split header patch).
For the record we also have not been able to reproduce the issue on the
R710 only the R610.
Tom
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/f
Hi,
I was why I get the following error when trying to create a vlan on top
of if_bridge:
# ifconfig bridge0 create
# ifconfig vlan2 vlan 2 vlandev bridge0
ifconfig: SIOCSETVLAN: Protocol not supported
And if there was/is any reason for this to not be supported.
Thanks
Tom
Josh Paetzel wrote:
On Nov 21, 2009, at 11:39 AM, Tom Judge wrote:
Hi,
I was why I get the following error when trying to create a vlan on top of
if_bridge:
# ifconfig bridge0 create
# ifconfig vlan2 vlan 2 vlandev bridge0
ifconfig: SIOCSETVLAN: Protocol not supported
And if there was/is
next week on vacation.
Hi David,
This patch seems to do the trick, on at least one of the R610's that we
have.
Just did cold boot, 5 warm boots, cold boot, 5 warm boots and have not
had any issues.
Thanks
Tom
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org ma
# ifconfig bridge0 create
> # ifconfig
> ...
tun is a IP interface, you can not bridge to it, you can bridge to a
ethernet compatible device such as tap or gif.
Tom
> tun0: flags=8010 metric 0 mtu 1500
> bridge0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu
> 1500
>ether 5e:e7:af:1b:14:d3
>
t the administrator
can select a different protocol number at boot/runtime if desired.
Tom
- --
TJU13-ARIN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLH7eiAAoJEMSwVS7lr0OdLWMH/2akcs8bMsdBlHHb+0K
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 02:43:46PM +0000, Tom Judge wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We have had some issues with running both carp and VRRP i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kurt Buff wrote:
> Sigh. Yes, that works.
>
> So, to expose even more of my ignorance, any thoughts on why it isn't
> up at boot?
>
/etc/rc.conf:
ifconfig_em0="UP"
> Kurt
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:35, Jack Vogel wrote:
>> Not familiar wi
I didn't think this routing patch was related to the "bad neighbor solicitation
messages" as suggested in the subject field but I tried it anyway. It does not
fix my IPv6 problem. I still get "bad neighbor solicitation messages" and
freebsd 8 doesn't respond to 4/
You are correct. I added the route and it works fine.
route add -inet6 2610:28:1800:4001::/64 -iface em0
Thanks,
Tom
On Dec 15, 2009, at 5:00 PM, Li, Qing wrote:
> Thanks for sending me the routing table output.
>
> Actually I believe both your problems are indeed related to the
unning your patch in production for some time now and all seems well.
Thanks
Tom
- --
TJU13-ARIN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLTgd3AAoJEMSwVS7lr0Od0GkH/2sk3BGbMbOrpRtwj90Fe
me posts in freebsd-net where they have mentioned about
> "SIOCGIFAFLAG_IN6 ioctl"
> which gives the flags value where the TENTATIVE flag value can be plooed.
> I tried to use the same API in my user program but failed.
>
> Can somebody post me the working sample code of SIOCGIFAFLA
ct that I have had some success with on FreeBSD.
http://openlldp.sourceforge.net/
Tom
--
TJU13-ARIN
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Aug 11, 2010, at 3:11 PM, Zeus V Panchenko wrote:
> Pyun YongHyeon (pyu...@gmail.com) [10.08.11 19:31] wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 03:50:14PM +0300, Zeus V Panchenko wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> can enybody help with the subj, please?
>>>
>>> problem: onboard interface re0 link state UP/
The following reply was made to PR kern/149786; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Tom Uffner
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, t...@uffner.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/149786: [bwn] bwn on Dell Inspiron 1150: connections stall
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 19:32:59 -0400
no stalled connections so far
The following reply was made to PR kern/149786; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Tom Uffner
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, t...@uffner.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/149786: [bwn] bwn on Dell Inspiron 1150: connections stall
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 22:56:07 -0400
after a bit more testing, i seem
ldap server sending
large group search results back to nss_ldap or pam_ldap. When it does
this it seems to send each of the 600 results in its own TCP segment
creating a small packet storm (600*~100byte PDU's) at the destination
host. The kernel then retransmits 2 blocks of 100 results each after
On 09/09/2010 07:24 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 03:58:30PM -0500, Tom Judge wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I am just following up on the thread from March (I think) about this issue.
>>
>> We are seeing this issue on a number of systems running 7.1.
On 09/13/2010 01:48 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:04:25AM -0500, Tom Judge wrote:
>
>>
>> Does this mean that these cards are going to perform badly? This is was
>> what I gathered from the previous thread.
>>
>>
> I mean t
On 09/13/2010 02:11 PM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> On 13.09.2010 20:48, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:04:25AM -0500, Tom Judge wrote:
>>> Without BCE_JUMBO_HDRSPLIT then we see no errors. With it we see
>>> number
>>> of errors, however th
On 09/13/2010 02:33 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 02:07:58PM -0500, Tom Judge wrote:
>
>> On 09/13/2010 01:48 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:04:25AM -0500, Tom Judge wrote:
>>>
>>>
gth
> 1256
> 17:59:03.105844 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 253, id 818, offset 1256, flags [none],
> proto ICMP (1), length 25)
> 192.168.225.1 > 192.168.160.248: icmp
> 17:59:03.115617 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 253, id 819, offset 0, flags [+], proto ICMP
> (1), length 1276)
> 192.168.225.1 > 192.168.160.248: ICMP echo request, id 163, seq 4, length
> 1256
> 17:59:03.115707 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 253, id 819, offset 1256, flags [none],
> proto ICMP (1), length 25)
> 192.168.225.1 > 192.168.160.248: icmp
>
> e.g. destination reachable, fragmentation work, routes symmetrical.
>
> any comments ?
>
>
>
Good Luck
Tom
--
TJU13-ARIN
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
ther ip_input() or
ip_foarward() and ecmp_error() does not send the message as M_DECRYPTED
is set.
I have missed/glossed over a few steps here I feel, but in general I
think from my 15 minutes reading the code this is how it works (or at
least
On 09/13/2010 03:53 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 03:38:41PM -0500, Tom Judge wrote:
>
>> On 09/13/2010 02:33 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 02:07:58PM -0500, Tom Judge wrote:
>>>
>>>
>
Hi,
Would it be possible to unhide the output of bce_print_adapter_info()
from under boot verbose?
This information is useful for comparing firmware and card versions
between machines.
Alternatively what about adding a sysctl under dev.bce.X for this info?
Thanks
Tom
--
TJU13-ARIN
> My next question is, is it possible to increase the size of the RX ring
>> without switching to RSS?
>>
>>
> I have a change I've been working on to allow RX/TX ring size
> to be adjusted through a sysctl. Let me pretty it up a bit and
> send it to you for test. You should be able to adjust the ring
> size without enabling RSS.
>
>
If you can provide a patch I have hardware available to test on.
Thanks
Tom
--
TJU13-ARIN
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 09/23/2010 01:39 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:05:33AM -0500, Tom Judge wrote:
>
>> On 09/13/2010 03:53 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 03:38:41PM -0500, Tom Judge wrote:
>>>
>>>
The throttle command I am using in the tests is the one from here:
http://klicman.org/throttle/
On 09/23/2010 02:26 PM, Tom Judge wrote:
> On 09/23/2010 01:21 PM, David Christensen wrote:
>
>>>>> Under testing I have yet to see a memory fra
Hi,
I was looking though the brgphy code toady looking for a way to control
flow control from the host rather than from the switch but didn't find
any hints.
Is it possible to control the flow control negotiation on these PHY's?
Thanks
Tom
--
smaller) frames.
All of our systems running bce(4) NIC's with jumbo's have header
splitting turned on to reduce/remove issues with jumbo allocation. We
first noticed this issue in 6.2 and have had use header splitting with
all our bce(4) hardware since then.
Tom
--
TJU13-ARIN
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 09/23/2010 02:33 PM, Tom Judge wrote:
> The throttle command I am using in the tests is the one from here:
>
> http://klicman.org/throttle/
>
>
> On 09/23/2010 02:26 PM, Tom Judge wrote:
>
>> On 09/23/2010 01:21 PM, David Christensen wrote:
>>
>>
ow,
>
The R610 has a NetXtream II chipset which uses the bce(4) driver. If
you are going to doing heavy network traffic, or using jumbo frames I
would personally recommend you fit an Intel PCIe card to this server
before you put it in production.
Tom
--
TJU13-ARIN
On 10/08/2010 08:48 AM, a.sm...@ukgrid.net wrote:
> Quoting Tom Judge :
>
>>
>> The R610 has a NetXtream II chipset which uses the bce(4) driver. If
>> you are going to doing heavy network traffic, or using jumbo frames I
>> would personally recommend you fit an
it?
>
The same way as has been done since they invented the MX record type -
if no MX record exists, fallback to an A record. See RFC 5321, section
5.1.
Cheers
Tom
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Ian Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Oct 2010, Tom Evans wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Ian Smith wrote:
> > > On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> > > > Hi!
> > > >
> > > > FreeB
doesn't have an MX record' :/
>> That domain has an MX record, so it wouldn't do either. When I do a
>> dig isi.edu, I just get a single A record, so I would assume an SMTP
>> server would attempt to deliver mail there.
Cheers
Tom
__
che_chkrst: Spurious RST without matching syncache entry (possibly
> syncookie only), segment ignored
>
> All sysctl and apache conf are same on both server, is there a tcp
> problem with FreeBSD 7.x?
>
> Paulo Fragoso.
>
Just to rule it out, have you tried testing using a
On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 11:09 +0100, Lazar Szilard wrote:
> hi,
>
>
>
> I have a beginner quieston.
>
> I use FreeBSD 7.1-RC1 without X on my notebook.
>
> How can I configure my network to
>
> 1. use proxy to http or ftp connections (proxy address: (10.0.1.1:8080)
>
> or (on another place, w
Could you define an IPv4 IP address that wouldn't be matched by that
definition? IE - aren't they both the same thing? I might be being
dense..
Cheers
Tom
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fr
The following reply was made to PR kern/96268; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Tom Judge
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, jost2...@users.sourceforge.net
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/96268: [socket] TCP socket performance drops by 3000% if
packets are split at the first byte
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19
The following reply was made to PR kern/87194; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Tom Judge
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, gr...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/87194: [fxp] fxp(4) promiscuous mode seems to corrupt hw-csum
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:22:17 -0600
Can you add the output of
ient running in production.
My response was just to say that I have also seen this bug on a more recent
release.
Regards
Tom
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail
f you have firewalls that can
help you out with the distribution.
Tom
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 09:53:59PM +0100, Tom Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:29:44PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Cool! Would you mind throwing it into a bugzilla ticket so it's not
> > lost and it can be assigned for some review?
> &g
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 03:19:20PM +0100, Tom Jones wrote:
>
> I have updated the patch to move the new variable introduced with newcwv into
> a
> struct within the tcpcb.
Forgot some files in the diff.
--
Tom | I don't see how we are going to build the d
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 02:43:49PM +, Eggert, Lars wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the newcwv patch is probably stale now with Tom Jones' recent patch based on
> a more up-to-date version of the Internet-Draft, but the PRR patch should
> still be useful?
My newcwv patch is much more up
that.
Is that what you're looking for? To see if someone is working on changes to
rtadvd?
Thanks,
Tom
> On Sep 6, 2014, at 6:46 PM, Garrett Wollman wrote:
>
> So is anyone working on an RFC 7217 ("Stable and Opaque IIDs with
> SLAAC") implementa
been out for a while.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Lars
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 2014-8-26, at 20:09, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>&g
Lots of embedded devices (like Cisco IP Phones) send TFTP requests with 0
checksums.
Tom
> On Oct 1, 2014, at 12:58 PM, Michael Tuexen
> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> in udp6_input() we have the following code:
>
>if (nxt == IPPROTO_UDP && plen != ulen) {
1 - 100 of 256 matches
Mail list logo
