are operated
on. It seems the VFs are not seen as individual entities
but a group of children in detach_method().
Thoughts?
Thanks,
John
- Konstantin Belousov's Original Message -
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 04:32:30AM +0000, John wrote:
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> >Working against 13.2-STABLE.
> >
> >I have a chance to get some bhyve VMs running on new hardware
> > with Mella
izeof(caps), &caps);
if (rc != 0) {
device_printf(sc->dev,
"failed to pre-process config file: %d.\n", rc);
return (rc);
}
Has anyone run into this?
Thanks,
John
ps: And the output from loading the driver module
3.0 -0400
@@ -46,9 +46,10 @@
.Ed
.Pp
To load the driver as a
-module at boot time, place the following line in
+module at boot time, place the following lines in
.Xr loader.conf 5 :
.Bd -literal -offset indent
+t4fw_cfg_load="YES"
if_cxgbe_load="YES"
.Ed
.Sh DESCR
ly update
that also after finding out what the updates target.
Does anyone have any ideas what the problem might be, or place
I might want to look? I have a 9.1 system being put in to run some
comparison benchmarks against to see if the same problem oc
II 1 GigE1f67
Does anyone have any experience with these?
Thanks,
John
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
, am I missing something simple about
using carp? Should I implement my own control interface on the
private network and not use carp? What are other folks doing?
Thanks,
John
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
f broadcast 10.24.255.255 alias
The man page for ifconfig says one 'must' use a different netmask,
typically 0x. However, everything still seems to work ok.
Has something changed, is the manpage wrong, am I totally missing
something?
Thanks,
John
man ifconfig
If the ad
finition has no type or storage class
/usr/include/netinet/ip.h:157: parse error before `}'
/usr/include/netinet/ip.h:157: warning: data
definition has no type or storage class
/usr/include/netinet/ip.h:158: parse error before `}'
bash-2.03$
thanks
john
Hi
I tried that as you had advised, but the error remains
the same.
bash-2.03$ gcc -o rawsocket rawsocket.c
In file included from rawsocket.c:7:
/usr/include/netinet/ip.h:152: parse error before
`n_long'
/usr/include/netinet/ip.h:152: warning: no semicolon
at end of struct or union
/usr/include
Try these links:
http://free.mine.nu/~squirrel/PPPoE/FreeBSD%20PPPoE%20Howto.htm
http://www.freebsddiary.org/pppoe.php
http://renaud.waldura.com/doc/freebsd/pppoe/
JT.
- Original Message -
From: "alexis georges" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 12:
Long -
Adam wrote:
> Any suggestions on how to test this effectively?
SInce this is very intermittant and to the point where you have to reboot my
first suggestion:
Run top and check for a memory leak from a process. I had this once where
apache would slowly use up the memory then all the swap s
I've been talking with Luca Deri about a paper he wrote (
http://luca.ntop.org/Ring.pdf). In it he says he plans to port
this to FreeBSD. I was just wondering if anyone has looked this
his work. I'd help him but seeing as this is way over my perl skills
head i though i would post over here about i
cusses the relative strengths and weaknesses
of these different implementations, and why you might want to use
one rather than another?
--
John Lind
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/free
an hour at Barnes & Nobel
last night looking through various firewalling books that were long
on theory, or even examples, but not examples for an ipfw / natd
situation.
Thanks!
--
John Lind
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http
rth
raising the conversation more broadly. The change to add this field is in
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D35339. Drew has tested this isolated change
under load at Netflix and found no impact on performance.
--
John Baldwin
Hi Benoit,
It will allow multicast packets to go through, which IPv6 depends on. Maybe
there is a problem setting up the multicast filter for that driver / card.
Regards
John
On Mon, 15 Aug 2022 at 12:08, Benoit Chesneau
wrote:
> So I noticed that tcpdump was enabling the "promiscuo
Hi folks -- I opened this on Freebsd 13.1.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=268246
I'm stumped, as I have about half a dozen other systems just like this one,
which do not exhibit this condition.
Don't know if it matters, but this is the backup firewall in a carp
configuration.
On Dec 4, 2023, at 3:26 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:Is IPv6 underlay fully supported with FreebBSD ? I have created the a tunnel and associated an Ipv6 address to each side. I'm able to ping between each devicesl. But when I want to curl from the remote side it timeout. Locally on the remote side i
I use RIP all the time. Removing it would be a pain. What is the justification?
Moving it to ports is an option, but now we have to compile, distribute, and
install it.
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 15, 2024, at 07:40, Tomek CEDRO wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 4:20 PM Scott wrote:
>>> O
if your FreeBSD system contains undesired software.
Cheers
Marek
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 1:01 PM John Howie
mailto:j...@thehowies.com>> wrote:
I use RIP all the time. Removing it would be a pain. What is the justification?
Moving it to ports is an option, but now we have to compile, distri
Regards
John
On Sat, 18 May 2024 at 16:50, Mike Karels wrote:
> I have no networking changes at all in the 14.1 release notes. Is there
> anything that should be mentioned? Feel free to reply to me individually.
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
>
>
if the
encap routine frees the mbuf you try to dereference a freed pointer when
you call drbr_dequeue(). I really think you will instead need some sort
of 'drbr_putback()' and have 'drbr_peek()' dequeue in the ALTQ case and
use 'drbr_putback()' to put it back (P
o that
this is an orthogonal knob). Linux also makes this an orthogonal knob rather
than requiring a separate CC algo.
--
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, se
On Tuesday, February 05, 2013 10:24:24 am Randall Stewart wrote:
> Here is an updated patch… sigh.. I foobar'd the ALTQ stuff.. lots of crashes
;-D
Heh, I like this better, thanks. I think you can remove buf_ring_swap() as it
is no longer used?
--
John
t patch with all fixes and suggested changes from emaste
(thanks Ed)
Oh, I see now why that is needed.
--
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
and just stores it at the head unconditionally and have drbr_putback()
use that?
--
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
store vs
> the always store.. though the same now, would be far more expensive
> in the _mc version.. if we do a _mc version of course ;-)
I would just not bother with an _mc version until we actually need it. :)
I think doing the sort of peek/advance type logic only works well with
single co
gt; this is probably not changed…
> >
> > I really would prefer not to since the compare and maybe store vs
> > the always store.. though the same now, would be far more expensive
> > in the _mc version.. if we do a _mc version of course ;-)
> >
> > But I am wil
d
never occur.
--
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Tuesday, February 05, 2013 12:44:27 pm Andre Oppermann wrote:
> On 05.02.2013 18:11, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Wednesday, January 30, 2013 12:26:17 pm Andre Oppermann wrote:
> >> You can simply create your own congestion control algorithm with only the
> >> restart w
On Wednesday, February 06, 2013 6:27:04 am Randall Stewart wrote:
> John:
>
> A burst at line rate will *often* cause drops. This is because
> router queues are at a finite size. Also such a burst (especially
> on a long delay bandwidth network) cause your RTT to increase even
&
On Feb 7, 2013, at 4:13 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
> I just aquired a brand new chepie gigabit PCI ethernet card off eBay.
> The main chip on it appears to be an RTL8110S-32.
>
> I stuck this card into a 9.1-RELEASE system that I have been putting
> together, and it seemed to be recognized o
On Feb 8, 2013, at 1:48 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
> In message ,
> John Nielsen wrote:
>
>> On Feb 7, 2013, at 4:13 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette =
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I just aquired a brand new chepie gigabit PCI ethernet card off eBay.
>>> The
On Feb 9, 2013, at 5:02 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
> P.S. While I appreciate all the friendly advice people here have given
> me, i.e. to go with a card based around some non-Realtek chip, I have to
> say that up until now I have always and consistantly had -zero- problems
> with the many ot
On Tuesday, February 19, 2013 9:37:54 pm Sepherosa Ziehau wrote:
> John,
>
> I came across this draft several days ago, you may be interested:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv-00
Yes, that is extremely relevant. My application does use its own
rate-limiting.
The following reply was made to PR kern/172113; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: John Baldwin
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org,
egrosb...@rdtc.ru
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/172113: [panic] [e1000] [patch] 9.1-RC1/amd64 panices in
igb(4): m_getjcl: invalid cluster type
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:12:55
The following reply was made to PR kern/176446; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: John Baldwin
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org,
jchar...@verisign.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/176446: [netinet] [patch] Concurrency in ixgbe driving
out-of-order packet process and spurious RST
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013
The following reply was made to PR kern/176446; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: John Baldwin
To: "Charbon, Julien"
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org,
"De La Gueronniere, Marc" ,
j...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/176446: [netinet] [patch] Concurrency in ixgbe driving
out-of-
. :( It also fixes interrupt filters to really work properly
and be on by default.
--
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
ou need to split the 'struct file' reference count into two different
counts similar to the how we have vref/vrele vs vhold/vdrop for vnodes. The
fget for accept and probably most other system calls should probably be
equivalent
to vhold, whereas things like open/dup (and storing an fd
or your help!
Hmm, does the same vlan setup work on a standalone machine?
--
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Tuesday, April 02, 2013 2:33:18 pm Vijay Singh wrote:
> Hi, this is based on the the understanding that the SS_NBIO is a
> socket state, and not a state of the socket buffer.
Committed, thanks!
--
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org m
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:31:09PM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
>
> On Apr 12, 2013, at 7:43 PM, Rui Paulo wrote:
>
> > On 2013/04/11, at 13:18, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> >
> >> Lack of maintainer in a near future would lead to bitrot due to changes
> >> in other areas of network stack, kernel APIs,
es
can shm_open /foo and mmap it and they will all share the same memory.
You could even share a SHM_ANON fd among multiple processes by passing it
across a UNIX domain socket.
Hope this helps.
--
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
ht
9.1 in the same ESXi host that do not have this problem, but maybe the
> problem is with my sysctl.conf and loader.conf settings:
Which NIC driver are you using?
--
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mail
*/
- if ((staterr & IXGBE_RXD_STAT_DD) != 0) {
- ixgbe_rearm_queues(adapter, (u64)(1 << que->msix));
- return (TRUE);
- }
-
- return (FALSE);
+ return ((staterr & IXGBE_RXD_STAT_DD) != 0);
}
--
John Baldwin
___
E_QUEUE_HUNG;
- if (txr->tx_avail == txr->num_desc) {
+ if (txr->tx_avail == txr->num_desc)
txr->queue_status = IXGBE_QUEUE_IDLE;
- return (FALSE);
- }
-
- return TRUE;
}
/***
The following reply was made to PR kern/176446; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: John Baldwin
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Cc: Jack Vogel ,
bug-follo...@freebsd.org,
Mike Karels
Subject: Re: kern/176446: [netinet] [patch] Concurrency in ixgbe driving
out-of-order packet process and spurious
The following reply was made to PR kern/176446; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: John Baldwin
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Cc: Jack Vogel ,
bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/176446: [netinet] [patch] Concurrency in ixgbe driving
out-of-order packet process and spurious RST
Date: Fri
On Friday, April 19, 2013 12:32:18 pm C. L. Martinez wrote:
> On Friday, April 19, 2013, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Friday, April 19, 2013 3:11:41 am C. L. Martinez wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I have a strange problem with my FreeBSD 9.1 (fully patched): I
On Friday, April 19, 2013 4:14:43 pm C. L. Martinez wrote:
> On Friday, April 19, 2013, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Friday, April 19, 2013 12:32:18 pm C. L. Martinez wrote:
> >> On Friday, April 19, 2013, John Baldwin wrote:
> >> > On Friday, April 19, 2013 3
ook that object directly
rather than an fd.
> Laurie
>
> --- On Thu, 4/18/13, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> From: John Baldwin
> Subject: Re: shm_map questions
> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Cc: "Laurie Jennings"
> Date: Thursday, April 18, 2013, 6:50 AM
>
e such
bug was fixed in 8.x here (that is after 8.3):
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=235553
This may not help with any issues in pf(4), but we had workloads at work (not
involving pf) where this bug could cause boxes to spend 100% CPU in igb
threads.
--
John Baldwin
___
On Thursday, May 23, 2013 5:05:39 pm Guy Helmer wrote:
>
> On Jan 9, 2013, at 2:35 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday, November 13, 2012 4:40:57 pm Guy Helmer wrote:
> >> To try to completely resolve the race in bpfread(), I have put together
> > these cha
er in
> production and all of them are an indication that something is very wrong
> with the packet or the caller.
Eh, but if the only caller is ether_nh_input() then by definition you know
that m->m_pkthdr.rcvif == ifp.
--
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
> >
>
> From reading the source it looks like this is done by attaching a vlan
> interface to the interface. So try:
>
> ifconfig vlan create vlandev ib0 vlan 0xc
>
> This will create a ne
ctories at FreeBSD. Wat shall I do?
Have you tried looking for dev.ib.0 sysctls? It looks like the OFED bits in
FreeBSD map Linux sysfs entries to sysctl nodes, but I don't have a box with
IB handy to see what it looks like at runtime.
--
John Baldwin
_
On Thursday, May 30, 2013 3:29:46 am Alex Liptsin wrote:
> Hi John.
>
> I did it, but there is no ping between the vlans. Ping without VLANs on
that ports pass.
Unfortunately I do not have an IB setup to test this. I also don't know
how IB treats vlans (e.g. does it use an
D$");
#include
#include
-#defineDC_USEIOSPACE
+//#define DC_USEIOSPACE
#include
If this fixes it then I can take this PR as a test case for handling the ISA
enable bit in the PCI-PCI bridge code.
--
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-net@freebs
IB module is missing in /sys/modules.
>
> 1. Where can I find it?
>
> 2. How can I compile ipoib support?
You will have to create one. You should be able to use the existing module
Makefiles as a guide.
--
John Baldwin
_
On Monday, June 10, 2013 3:13:11 pm Mr. Clif wrote:
> Hi John and Pyun,
>
> Ok got the new kernel installed and tested. Yes it works! :-) Maybe that
> will also fix a simular problem with the sun cards (cas[03]), except I
> don't see a define like that in if_cas.c. Sugge
e configuration issues?
Do you see memory allocation errors in netstat -m?
Specifically this line:
0/0/0 requests for mbufs denied (mbufs/clusters/mbuf+clusters)
If so, it may be that the IPoIB layer has an mbuf leak. The rest of netstat -
m might be useful here
The following reply was made to PR kern/17; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: John Baldwin
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org,
shah...@mellanox.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/17: [ofed] [patch] Bug assigning HCA from IB to ETH
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 14:10:42 -0400
Thanks, I think the sysfs fix
On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 12:37:13 am Mr. Clif wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Thanks for working on this. I'm very interested in getting this fixed
> for everyone that uses the Affected Atom boards and other small format
> boards that work well in small custom routers.
>
>
CSUM_IP)
+ tx_desc->ctrl.srcrb_flags |=
+ cpu_to_be32(MLX4_WQE_CTRL_IP_CSUM);
+ if (mb->m_pkthdr.csum_flags & (CSUM_TCP|CSUM_UDP)) {
+ tx_desc->ctrl.srcrb_flags |=
+ cpu_to_be32(MLX4_WQE_CTRL_TCP_UDP_CSUM);
On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 12:37:13 am Mr. Clif wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Thanks for working on this. I'm very interested in getting this fixed
> for everyone that uses the Affected Atom boards and other small format
> boards that work well in small custom routers.
>
>
test.c
> >
> > simple compile with gcc -o test test.c and run as normal user.
> >
> > Sean
> >
>
> this is bind() not bind ... :-)
Did the recent commit to HEAD fix this btw?
--
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.or
On Wednesday, July 17, 2013 5:23:37 pm Mikolaj Golub wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:12:46AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Thursday, March 15, 2012 8:07:46 pm Sean Bruno wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 16:59 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> > > > Hey, I just
The following reply was made to PR kern/180430; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: John Baldwin
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org,
me...@mellanox.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/180430: [ofed] [patch] Bad UDP checksum calc for fragmented
packets
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 11:13:44 -0400
Oops, my previous
The following reply was made to PR kern/180430; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: John Baldwin
To: Meny Yossefi
Cc: "bug-follo...@freebsd.org"
Subject: Re: kern/180430: [ofed] [patch] Bad UDP checksum calc for fragmented
packets
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 11:40:08 -0400
On Monday, Jul
The following reply was made to PR kern/180791; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: John Baldwin
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org,
shah...@mellanox.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/180791: [ofed] [patch] Kernel crash on ifdown and kldunload
mlxen
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 15:18:06 -0400
Thanks. One note
On Monday, August 05, 2013 6:49:01 am Meny Yossefi wrote:
> John,
>
> Will this be committed to 9.2 as well ?
Yes, I committed it yesterday.
--
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinf
On Aug 25, 2013, at 5:38 AM, carlopmart wrote:
> I need to monitor/sniff network traffic for three subnets (1 GiB nets) and I
> need to do this using a virtual guest under an ESXi 5 host (yes, it is a
> "handicap").
Not sure about your questions below, but doesn't ESXi 5 support port mirroring
pport (including an rm_assert).
However, one thing to consider is that rmlocks pin readers to CPUs while the
read lock is held (which rwlocks do not do).
--
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/f
On Thursday, August 29, 2013 11:37:08 am Scott Long wrote:
>
> On Aug 29, 2013, at 7:42 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> > On Saturday, August 24, 2013 10:16:33 am Robert Watson wrote:
> >> There are a number of other places in the kernel where migration to an
>
urns void, not an error, so you can't trust the return value.
--
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
f anyone is up for the challenge?
QLogic employs one FreeBSD developer already who maintains the qlxgb(4),
qlxge(4), and qlxgbe(4) drivers: David C Somayajulu .
--
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/
eBSD transfer is good.
>
> The only bad transfer is Windows to FreeBSD. Windows transfer to Mac is
> good. Cant really blame Windows for the poor transfer to FreeBSD then.
> Macbook to FreeBSD is outstanding, cant really blame FreeBSD for poor
> receive performance.
Can you
On Apr 17, 2014, at 2:38 PM, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> Three days ago I upgraded an amd64 8.3 box to the latest 8.4.
> Since then the outside network is misbehaving: large mails are not sended
> (although small ones do), svn operations will work for a while, then come to
> a sudden stop, etc...
I've not checked 9.2, but the 181931 patch has been applied to
10-0-release, and it also fixes my problem.
On 04/19/2014 10:14 PM, lini...@freebsd.org wrote:
> Old Synopsis: mellenox drivers and vlan usage causes kernel panic and reboot
> New Synopsis: [ofed] [vlan] [panic] mellanox drivers and
it to work
more like PXEBOOT, that appears to pass parameters to the kernel to avoid
the need for the NFS BOOTP/DHCP process. If you test on an ARM system with
ubldr in RELEASE you will see a lot of unnecessary network activity going
on, that we should be able to fix.
Regards,
John
j...@thehowie
.
Regards,
John
On 6/1/14, 1:24 PM, "sth...@nethelp.no" wrote:
>> Section 3.5 of RFC 2131 (the DHCP RFC) states that "...Second, in its
>> initial DHCPDISCOVER or DHCPREQUEST message, a client may provide the
>> server with a list of specific parameters the client
or it, and not that a server cannot send the options unsolicited.
Best regards,
John
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 1, 2014, at 19:30, "sth...@nethelp.no" wrote:
>> In short, no, I have no packet traces. Given that the DHCP code in the
>> FreeBSD boot loader and NFS subsyste
segment. The current code just grabs the first server to reply at
each stage (going through each NIC in turn) and has affinity to it for the
remainder of that stage but not through the entire boot process.
Regards,
John
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 1, 2014, at 19:01, "Rick Macklem
vendors I should be considering?
If anyone else has tried 40GbE cards, I am most interested in your
experiences -- especially in stability, performance and performance tuning.
Thanks in advance!
-- John Jasen (jja...@gmail.com)
___
freebsd-net@freebs
oughts? Am I missing something?
-- John Jasen (jja...@gmail.com)
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 06/12/2014 01:02 PM, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> If it is a dual port card, shouldn't it be em0 and em1 ?
Yes. I do have two dual port cards however.
-- John Jasen (jja...@gmail.com)
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.fre
#
While looking through the code I saw that ltr is called with different
styling. Is there a reason for it? Which is the prefered style?
ltr ${_if} "${_punct}" '_' _if
ltr "$_if" "$_punct" &quo
Hi Hiroki,
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 12:48:03PM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> John Hay wrote
> in <20140619103513.ga92...@zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za>:
>
> jh> Hi Guys,
> jh>
> jh> freebsd-rc did not react, so I'm just checking on -net too.
> jh>
> jh>
ot sure if it would
break things, but I would be tempted to move this even earlier right after it
is removed from the global ifnet list but before the taskqueue_drain, etc.
--
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
ever the results were as before, i.e. "ping -D -s 400 somehost"
> would work, but "ping -D -s 500 somehost" would yield "frag needed and
> DF set";
>
> _ no way I could ping with a packet bigger than 500 bytes until I rebooted.
>
> Is this expected be
On Monday, June 23, 2014 1:12:54 pm Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On 23/06/14 18:49, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
> > On 23.06.2014 20:39, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
> >> On 23.06.2014 19:32, John Baldwin wrote:
> >>> On Friday, June 20, 2014 11:25:51 am Roger
remap) {
struct mbuf *m;
- m = m_defrag(*m_headp, M_NOWAIT);
+ m = m_collapse(*m_headp, M_NOWAIT, EM_MAX_SCATTER);
+ if (m == NULL)
+ m = m_defrag(*m_headp, M_NOWAIT);
if (m == NULL) {
missing for a reason?
> >
> > I'm wondering too if there's any good reason not to MFC?
>
> I also don't see any obvious reason.
>
> If nobody objects on -net@, I can do it.
I think this looks fine to merge.
--
John Baldwin
__
s.
ada0 is mounted. but the system is running the old kernel.
> Pulling the 2nd fixed the problem.
>
> What can cause this to happen? Is it a supermicro problem (it's a 5017R-MTF
superserver) or is it something with FreeBSD.
Are you using a software RAID between the two
xpend N=nodelay T=tstmp "
> + "S=sack X=winscale F=fastrec");
> 3) I feel that the header line for o/p (specially 'tcp accepts and
> connects' terminology) can be improved but I do not have a better
> suggestion :-)
4) Should numtok() just be humanize_number? Or rat
On Thursday, July 10, 2014 6:31:43 pm Rick Macklem wrote:
> John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Thursday, July 03, 2014 8:51:01 pm Rick Macklem wrote:
> > > Russell L. Carter wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 07/02/14 19:09, Rick Macklem wrote:
> &
n this speculation, based on others experience?
g) Are there other settings I should be looking at, that may squeeze out
a few more packets?
Thanks in advance!
-- John Jasen (jja...@gmail.com)
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.f
.
-- John Jasen (jja...@gmail.com)
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
1 - 100 of 1015 matches
Mail list logo
