onality and alert me about it.
Edwin, who at least now knows why tcpdump on 8.0B3 did look so trange.
--
Edwin Groothuis Website: http://www.mavetju.org/
ed...@mavetju.org Weblog: http://www.mavetju.org/weblog/
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.or
sn't have a
serial port), want to try patches, or just have a laugh at the
contents of my home directory.
Edwin
--
Edwin Groothuis Website: http://www.mavetju.org/
ed...@mavetju.org Weblog: http://www.mavetju.org/weblog/
___
freebsd
The following reply was made to PR kern/144755; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Edwin Groothuis
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/144755: [iwi] [panic] iwi panic when issuing /etc/rc.d/netif
restart on 8-STABLE r205159
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:33:42 +1000
Please note
The following reply was made to PR kern/144755; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Edwin Groothuis
To: Bernhard Schmidt
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/144755: [iwi] [panic] iwi panic when issuing /etc/rc.d/netif
restart on 8-STABLE r205159
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 08:31:27 +1000
The following reply was made to PR kern/127266; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Edwin Groothuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Serg Livitin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: misc/127266: gif tunnel error ifconfig: SIOCSIFPHYADDR: Can't
assign requested address
- "killall -TERM shutdown"
That way even if the ifconfig goes wrong for some reason (it will
happen if you do 700 machines) the machine will come back after the
reboot.
Don't forget about possible ipfw rule changes!
Edwin
--
Edwin Groothuis |
t; ifconfig vlan2 create vlan 1 vlandev xl0
Another one, which was reported on IRC but I don't know if it was
send-pr'd:
ifconfig fxp0.-1 inet 1.2.3.4
Also instant panic.
Edwin
--
Edwin Groothuis Website: http://www.mavetju.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Webl
es to test this and I don't know
> hardware internals of all drivers.
When booting diskless via PXE I sometimes run into this problem
too: machine boots via NFS, NIC gets down and up and oh, it doesn't
work anymore.
Edwin
--
Edwin Groothuis Website: http://www.mavetju.org/
ed
ones profile protocols \
rc rc.bsdextended rc.firewall rc.firewall6 rc.initdiskless \
rc.sendmail rc.shutdown \
rc.subr remote rpc services shells \
--
Edwin Groothuis Website: http://www.mavetju.org/
ed...@mavetju.org Web
First thanks to everybody who replied, I've read it all.
The ntpd.conf in the etc/Makefile was a typo of me.
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 08:52:01AM -0500, Sean C. Farley wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
>
> >After pondering at conf/58595, I came with this text.
&
Hello Frank,
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 04:24:18PM +0200, Frank Behrens wrote:
> Edwin Groothuis wrote on 5 Jun 2009 22:44:
> > After pondering at conf/58595, I came with this text.
> >
> > The ntpd is not enabled by default, so the fact that the servers
> > are com
hich is
> not specified
While it might not be specified, it is being observed and therefore
an issue when we want to restrict traffic specified by hostname.
Edwin
--
Edwin Groothuis Website: http://www.mavetju.org/
ed...@mavetju.org Weblog: http://www.mavetju.org/weblog/
Please note that it just has been committed.
Everybody thanks a lot for your input!
Edwin
--
Edwin Groothuis Website: http://www.mavetju.org/
ed...@mavetju.org Weblog: http://www.mavetju.org/weblog/
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing
m for easier comparing, I haven't changed them.
But as you can see, they both give the same.
Edwin
--
Edwin Groothuis Website: http://www.mavetju.org/
ed...@mavetju.org Weblog: http://www.mavetju.org/weblog/
___
freebsd-net
ly re-read the /etc/services
file if it got changed.
Other things to worry(?) about are YP/NIS. From what I've seen in
getservent() is that is happily intertwined with the /etc/services
code.
Anybody with comments or suggestions from earlier threads like this?
Edwin
--
g@, but I never heard of it since it
is in -current only. I'll look at it, and wonder if I don't have
to worry about this anymore then :-)
Edwin
--
Edwin Groothuis |Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Weblog: http
ble. Only after I executed "ifconfig lo0 inet 127.0.0.1
netmask 0xff00 alias" on all machines they were happy again.
Now I'm not asking for a how and why, just if somebody has ever
experienced such an issue...
Edwin
--
Edwin Groothuis |Personal website: http:
1
I could call it a cloud (e.g. routing cloud). I admit that the
people here at work still don't understand it, but that's only a
matter of time :-)
Edwin
--
Edwin Groothuis |Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org
[EMAIL
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;ps_other.a.shifen.com. IN MX
;; Query time: 523 msec
;; SERVER: 220.181.27.59#53(220.181.27.59)
;; WHEN: Wed Feb 13 14:16:13 2008
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 39
Status on the sixth line is NOTIMP. That is the part that host fails
on.
Edwin
--
Edwin Groothuis |
gives you all the questions and answers you need.
Edwin
--
Edwin Groothuis |Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Weblog: http://www.mavetju.org/weblog/
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
h
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 06:42:37PM -0800, Xin LI wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 05:31:57PM -0800, Xin LI wrote:
> >> Received 127 bytes from 127.0.0.1#53 in 0 ms
> >> [EMAIL PROT
.251.1.18.51852 > 202.108.22.102.53: 18450 MX?
ps_other.a.shifen.com. (39)
12:49:46.086227 IP 202.108.22.102.53 > 10.251.1.18.51852: 18450 NotImp*- 0/0/0
(39)
That's the one it is complaining about, not about the hostname
itself.
Yes, the warning/error message could be a little bit
The following reply was made to PR kern/121774; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Edwin Groothuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: FreeBSD Gnats Submit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: kern/121774: 6.3 kernel panic in swi1: net
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:24:21 +1100
On
TS is "0" according to /etc/protocols. Making everything IPv4,
it gives this:
nat6to4d 67899 root3uIPv4 0xc865421c0t0 DIVERT
*:8669
which is what I expected. So why doesn't this get displayed for the
IPv6 sockets?
Edwin
--
Edwin Groothui
On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 08:00:43PM +1000, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> Before somebody shoots me down on it: I know that ipfw_divert() is
> not suitable for IPv6 packets.
Please note that the above statement is only partly true now: on
my laptop ipfw_divert() can handle IPv6 forwards, but the p
an do dynamic protocol
registrations with IPv4 but not yet with IPv6. Every time when I
get one step further I end up with a new problem :-(
Let's call it a learning excercise!
Edwin
--
Edwin Groothuis |Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org
[EMAI
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 04:18:54PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> >On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 01:15:29PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> >>>This should provide a direct answer to you question of "why"? But I
> >>>suspect the under
he rough edges on it. I'm very keen on getting help
from somebody to check it and to polish it up once I'm happy with
it. For example with regarding to the "inpcb" things which I have
absolutely no idea about what they are or what they do, or how to
properly manage them.
Edw
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 12:37:58AM +1000, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> It contains links to patches for FreeBSD 6.3 and the nat6to4d.c.
Needless to say that the code of nat6to4d.c is a proof-of-concept
and is missing essential features like garbage-collection and
configurationability.
Ed
o request seq 744
13:59:25.265928 IP 10.10.12.2 > 10.10.10.3: icmp 64: echo request seq 745
13:59:26.276274 IP 10.10.12.2 > 10.10.10.3: icmp 64: echo request seq 746
Does anybody know a good reason why a packet arrived for a gif-tunnel
doesn't get delivered properly into the gif-tunnel,
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 02:11:46PM +1000, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> gif-interface on server:
> 13:28:30.220792 10.10.12.1 > 10.10.12.2: icmp: echo request
> fxp-interface on server:
> 13:28:30.291934 IP 218.185.88.254 > 192.168.1.1: IP 10.10.12.1 > 10.10.12.2:
> i
12.1 netmask 0xff00
203.111.122.8 is my ADSL routers address.
192.168.1.1 is my computers RFC1918 address.
Two static routes, one on each machine, and it works.
Edwin
--
Edwin Groothuis |Personal website: http://www.mav
virus scanner and the SMTP interceptor with one upgrade :-)
Edwin
--
Edwin Groothuis |Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Weblog: http://weblog.barnet.com.au/edwin/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailin
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 01:26:52PM +0300, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Dec 2004, 11:58+0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
>
> > Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 01:14:49AM +0300, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Dec 05,
If they want to be paranoid, let them be. It will only make debugging
harder because they don't give the raw data.
Edwin
--
Edwin Groothuis |Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Weblog: http://we
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 02:52:56PM +, Andre wrote:
> How can I open a TCP connection with a source IP
> address that's not configured on the machine?
Have a look at mail/p3scan, I think that does do what you want (but
then for POP3).
Edwin
--
Edwin Groothuis |
See http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/71910
Don't know why it still plays up after 5.2.1
Edwin
--
Edwin Groothuis |Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Weblog: http://weblog.barnet.com.au/
sn't any such
> function, can you suggest me any other way of achieving this?
You could check the source of arp of course, /usr/src/usr.sbin/arp/arp.c
Edwin
--
Edwin Groothuis | Interested in MUDs? Visit Fatal Dimensions:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
r.
Can somebody please confirm that they have the same, or normal,
behaviour under 4.5 when connecting to an IPv6 enabled site?
Thanks, Edwin
--
Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.MavEtJu.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Interested in MUDs? Visit Fatal Dim
net6
default -interface gif0" statement.
I've submitted a patch for this port to keep it working, I don't
know what to do with the route-command. I'll write a PR about it.
Thanks for your hints!
Edwin
--
Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.MavEtJu
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 08:59:18PM +0900, JINMEI Tatuya / ?$B?@L@C#:H?(B wrote:
> >>>>> On Sun, 17 Feb 2002 12:25:10 +1100,
> >>>>> Edwin Groothuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> >> I recently installed the freenet6 port to test IPv6 and hav
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 11:49:59PM +0900, JINMEI Tatuya / ?$B?@L@C#:H?(B wrote:
> >>>>> On Fri, 22 Feb 2002 23:48:29 +1100,
> >>>>> Edwin Groothuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> >> > I found what caused this. he.net uses the "route
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 07:30:59PM +0900, JINMEI Tatuya / ?$B?@L@C#:H?(B wrote:
> >>>>> On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 08:46:16 +1100,
> >>>>> Edwin Groothuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> >> > And the interface configuration:
> >&g
Hello Jinmei,
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 02:38:28PM +0900, JINMEI Tatuya / ?$B?@L@C#:H?(B wrote:
> Finally I figured out the problem.
Thanks for these two patches, it works like a charm now!
Edwin
--
Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.MavEtJu.org
[EMAIL PROTEC
address
of the outgoing interface, which is the RFC1918 address.
Is there a way (sysctl, kernel option) to define which IP address
is used for locally originated outgoing traffic?
Edwin
--
Edwin Groothuis |Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 08:47:00AM -0500, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> > The situation is as follows:
> >
> > We have a couple of FreeBSD routers, with RFC1918 addresses on the
> > ethernets and a public address on the loopback. This works fine for
&g
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 02:28:46PM +, Brian Candler wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 06:07:22PM +1100, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> > The situation is as follows:
> >
> > We have a couple of FreeBSD routers, with RFC1918 addresses on the
> > ethernets and a public ad
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 09:34:22AM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
>
> [loopback address in jail]
> >Is this something I should open a bug report for?
>
> No, it's a well known "feature" of jails that INADDR_LOO
cprelay from the ports collection. Let it forward the
DHCP requests to a central server, and all will be fine.
The isc-dhcrelay is euhm... quite noisy.
Edwin
--
Edwin Groothuis |Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
blems. Not sure what type of switches you are using but I would check
> your switchport configuration (assuming managed switch).
Look at the behaviour of the ISC-dhcrelay. It's euhm... very
interesting if you have multiple ethernet cards in the server.
Edwin
--
Edwin Groo
ke a little bit sense? Or am I totally going the wrong way?
Or has this topic already been discussed multiple times and decided
not to do it? Maybe there is somebody thinks this is a cool thing
and wants to help me with adding it to the system?
Edwin
--
Edwi
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 11:17:07AM -0700, John Polstra wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Edwin Groothuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This afternoon I ran into the ever lasting of "bpf runs before ipfw"
> > problem again: when you run tcp
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 10:31:01AM -0400, Barney Wolff wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 11:39:23PM +1000, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> >
> > Now my question to you guys is, does what I want or what I describe
> > here make a little bit sense? Or am I totally going the wrong way?
-processed packets
in tcpdump was filled up. In other words, your system is to slow
to process the amount of traffic going through your machine.
Edwin
--
Edwin Groothuis |Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]|Weblog: http://www.
"gcc -Wall -g -o a a.c && ./a"
--
Edwin Groothuis |Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]|Weblog: http://www.mavetju.org/weblog/weblog.php
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
int
res->ai_addr)->sin_port = htons(80);
Many many many thanks for this! You're a champ!
Edwin, will never forgot this lesson.
--
Edwin Groothuis |Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]|Weblog: http:/
56 matches
Mail list logo
