On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 01:14:49AM +0300, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 12:53:52AM +0300, Maxim Konovalov wrote: > M> IMHO restoring the historic behaviour (even broken in some respects) > M> is the best thing we can do at the moment. > > + my vote.
Mine too. > Using 'ipfw fwd' on packets just being nated, is a very common and used > technique. I know several places where people are delaying move from RELENG_4 > to > RELENG_5 because of this problem. It doesn't happen often that I break the transparent WWW proxy, the POP3 virus scanner and the SMTP interceptor with one upgrade :-) Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Weblog: http://weblog.barnet.com.au/edwin/ _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
