Hi!
I developped a basic implementation of MPLS over Ethernet in the FreeBSD
Environment! If someone is interested in my code just e.mail me!
Bye
Luigi Iannone
>
Luigi Iannone
LIP 6 : Laboratoi
Hello,
> I developped a basic implementation of MPLS over Ethernet in the FreeBSD
> Environment! If someone is interested in my code just e.mail me!
Great! Although I do not have the devices to test this, it is very
nice to hear that. I think the patches should go to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
to give th
Luigi Iannone wrote:
>
> Hi!
> I developped a basic implementation of MPLS over Ethernet in the FreeBSD
> Environment! If someone is interested in my code just e.mail me!
I'm interested in it.
--
Andre
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body o
Attila Nagy wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> > I developped a basic implementation of MPLS over Ethernet in the FreeBSD
> > Environment! If someone is interested in my code just e.mail me!
> Great! Although I do not have the devices to test this, it is very
> nice to hear that. I think the patches should g
> Attila Nagy wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > > I developped a basic implementation of MPLS over Ethernet in the FreeBSD
> > > Environment! If someone is interested in my code just e.mail me!
> > Great! Although I do not have the devices to test this, it is very
> > nice to hear that. I think the
"Louis A. Mamakos" wrote:
>
> > Attila Nagy wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > > I developped a basic implementation of MPLS over Ethernet in the FreeBSD
> > > > Environment! If someone is interested in my code just e.mail me!
> > > Great! Although I do not have the devices to test this, it is
Something bizzaro with the 'struct ng_parse_struct_info' declarations,
please suggest or make a fix:
cc -c -O -pipe -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -Wno-format -ansi -g
-nostdinc -I- -I. -I../../.. -I../.
> If there is no kind of software involved on the forwarding plane
> then I don't know how the control plane can communicate via ethernet
> with the line cards... The internal communication in the router is
> via ethernet.
To be clear, "forwarding plane" to me means the machinary which
causes pa
dummynet is not behaving as expected, and I'm wondering whether the command
is compatible with bridging mode (freebsd 4.5):
sysctl -w net.link.ether.bridge=1
Here is the setup:
___
| |
192.168.1.1 --- |FreeBSD 4.5 Bridge | --- 19
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 08:40:36AM -0700, Albuquerque, Marcelo M wrote:
> dummynet is not behaving as expected, and I'm wondering whether the command
> is compatible with bridging mode (freebsd 4.5):
xmit cannot match on bridged packets
luigi
>
> Here is the setup:
>
>
"Louis A. Mamakos" wrote:
>
> > If there is no kind of software involved on the forwarding plane
> > then I don't know how the control plane can communicate via ethernet
> > with the line cards... The internal communication in the router is
> > via ethernet.
>
> To be clear, "forwarding plane" t
Thanks Luigi.
> xmit cannot match on bridged packets
Is it a hard problem to make xmit compatible with bridged packets or is it
just that no one had the need yet to implement the changes? Is there any way
around this limitation that would allow us to achive the same goal?
-Original Message-
...
> It's clear to me that this is not based on the old 3.6 gated that is
> have in ports. The Nexthop stuff is more advanced. Zebra also is very
> reliable ...
You might want to check the status of ports/net/gated. I've been giving
this some thought since the rev 1.32 of the Makefile caught my
Hello,
> > I developped a basic implementation of MPLS over Ethernet in the FreeBSD
> > Environment! If someone is interested in my code just e.mail me!
> I'm interested in it.
BTW, there is a Linux-based effort to make it MPLS-aware ->
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mpls-linux/
[ Free
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 04:24:03PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> > >
> > > It is true that JUNOS is more or less FreeBSD. But it's only the
> > > control plane. All the switching and stack processing happens on
> > > the line cards which have their own CPUs and OS.
> >
> > There is no software
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 06:08:28PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
>
> It's clear to me that this is not based on the old 3.6 gated that is
> have in ports. The Nexthop stuff is more advanced. Zebra also is very
> reliable and I use it on many FreeBSD based routers here around. Agreed,
> each of th
Hello,
> It is true that JUNOS is more or less FreeBSD. But it's only the control
> plane. All the switching and stack processing happens on the line cards
> which have their own CPUs and OS.
You are wrong :)
That FreeBSD has many things to do. But it doesn't really involved (in a
direct way) in
Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 04:24:03PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> > If there is no kind of software involved on the forwarding plane
> > then I don't know how the control plane can communicate via ethernet
> > with the line cards... The internal communication in
Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 06:08:28PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> >
> > It's clear to me that this is not based on the old 3.6 gated that is
> > have in ports. The Nexthop stuff is more advanced. Zebra also is very
> > reliable and I use it on many FreeBSD based
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 09:35:12AM -0700, Albuquerque, Marcelo M wrote:
> Thanks Luigi.
>
> > xmit cannot match on bridged packets
>
> Is it a hard problem to make xmit compatible with bridged packets or is it
in the place the ipfw filter are in the bridging code, the info
on the output interfa
> Bwah... It lacks things like transparent-nexthop and transparent-as
> which is quite useful in Route Servers and such.
We don't add features to code unless people are willing to pay for them and
use them.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the b
> On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 09:35:12AM -0700, Albuquerque,
> Marcelo M wrote:
> > Thanks Luigi.
> >
> > > xmit cannot match on bridged packets
> >
> > Is it a hard problem to make xmit compatible with bridged
> packets or is it
>
> in the place the ipfw filter are in the bridging code, the info
This book seems to be essentially the annotated source for the BSD
4.4 networking code. Can anybody tell me whether it is still current
enough to use with today's FreeBSD source in a networking course?
Thanks
--
-
Jimmy Wilkinson
> This book seems to be essentially the annotated source for the BSD
> 4.4 networking code. Can anybody tell me whether it is still current
> enough to use with today's FreeBSD source in a networking course?
>
A lot has changed. The theory is often similar but a lot of details have
changed.
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 08:31:24PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> > Basically just gut the current radix tree and fast-switch like route-cache
> > system, and replace it with something optimized for fast insertions and
> > deletions (and FIB building) but not longest prefix matching for the RIB,
I think these materials are helpful to you.
Performance Problems in BSD4.4 TCP
http://www.cs.arizona.edu/xkernel/people/brakmo-papers/abstracts.html
New Callout and Timer Facilities for NetBSD
http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~amc/research/timer/
These modifications are applyed to FreeBSD.
--
Daik
Hello
At Wed, 29 May 2002 19:52:26 +0200 (CEST),
Attila Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I developped a basic implementation of MPLS over Ethernet in the FreeBSD
> > > Environment! If someone is interested in my code just e.mail me!
> > I'm interested in it.
I'm interested in the implemen
27 matches
Mail list logo
