https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264908
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |Closed
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169898
Alexander V. Chernikov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |Overcome By Events
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264908
--- Comment #1 from Vladislav V. Prodan ---
I need a mechanism to maintain availability in a virtual machine and not only
when network settings are not set on network interfaces.
Many network interfaces can be added to the virtual machine t
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264908
Bug ID: 264908
Summary: It does not work to obtain an IP address via DHCP
simultaneously for multiple interfaces
Product: Base System
Version: 12.3-STABLE
Hardware
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088
Pat Maddox changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p...@patmaddox.com
--- Comment #17 fr
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088
Alexander V. Chernikov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|In Progress |Closed
Resolution
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088
Alexander V. Chernikov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Open|In Progress
--- Comment #
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088
--- Comment #15 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit in branch releng/13.0 references this bug:
URL:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=dba80ca2cfb0b0c1447269e8a6a3545f428c51e6
commit dba80ca2cfb0b0c1447269e8a6a3545f428c51e6
Auth
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088
--- Comment #14 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit in branch stable/13 references this bug:
URL:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=f67641675958cb566b0ae50dc6942017d42393fe
commit f67641675958cb566b0ae50dc6942017d42393fe
Author
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088
--- Comment #13 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit in branch main references this bug:
URL:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=9fdbf7eef5c006002769add15b1ebb8fa8d9e220
commit 9fdbf7eef5c006002769add15b1ebb8fa8d9e220
Author:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088
--- Comment #12 from Alexander V. Chernikov ---
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D28673
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing
?,
||mfc-stable11?
Keywords||needs-patch, needs-qa
Summary|Assigning the same IP to|Assigning same IP to
|multiple interfaces in |multiple interfaces in
|different FIBs creates
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088
Allan Jude changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||allanj...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #11
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088
--- Comment #10 from Rodney W. Grimes ---
Your going to find that difficult. You shall need to teach
ifa_maintain_loopback_route about fibs, and how to walk them to add and remove
its attempt at loopback route maintainance. Or simply kill
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088
Rodney W. Grimes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||n...@freebsd.org
--
You are re
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088
Alexander V. Chernikov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|n...@freebsd.org |melif...@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088
Rodney W. Grimes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|Not A Bug |Feedback Timeout
--- Comment #8
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088
Eugene Grosbein changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |Not A Bug
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|In Progress |Open
--- Comment #6 from Mark Linim
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169898
Rodney W. Grimes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|n...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #3
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088
Alan Somers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|asom...@freebsd.org |n...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226622
Eugene Grosbein changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||n...@freebsd.org
Sta
Synopsis: ifconfig(8) fails to set MTU on multiple interfaces.
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Jul 16 03:16:57 UTC 2012
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintainer(s).
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi
Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Some years ago, I checked to see whether I would be able to let a
single snort process listen on more than one NIC.
At the time it was only possible in Linux.
Now, I searched a bit, but nothing new came up.
Did anything improve since then? Do we still need multiple snor
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> Some years ago, I checked to see whether I would be able to let a single
> snort process listen on more than one NIC.
> At the time it was only possible in Linux.
>
In Linux the packet capture facility is implemented in a different
(and
Some years ago, I checked to see whether I would be able to let a single
snort process listen on more than one NIC.
At the time it was only possible in Linux.
Now, I searched a bit, but nothing new came up.
Did anything improve since then? Do we still need multiple snort
processes to listen on
When configuring a system with three interfaces, two of them as a
transparent bridge and a management interface one could configure the
rules to allow users to connect to the management interface from being
behind the bridge. However, if an rdr rule is applied to force this
then, the clients connec
Josh Paetzel wrote:
Jeffrey Williams wrote:
I have a server with two interfaces, I want to run the host and a couple of
jails using one interface on one subnet (internal interface, private IP, behind
NAT/firewall) and some other jails using the other interface on another subnet
(external inter
Jeffrey Williams wrote:
> I have a server with two interfaces, I want to run the host and a couple of
> jails using one interface on one subnet (internal interface, private IP,
> behind
> NAT/firewall) and some other jails using the other interface on another
> subnet
> (external interface, pu
I have a server with two interfaces, I want to run the host and a couple
of jails using one interface on one subnet (internal interface, private
IP, behind NAT/firewall) and some other jails using the other interface
on another subnet (external interface, public IP, DMZ).
Now my understanding
Thanks for the answers. I must have missed that part of carp(4).
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 11:44:29AM +0200, Daniel Hartmeier wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 11:29:31AM +0200, Gergely CZUCZY wrote:
>
> > On a dual-carp scenario on two gateways when both the internal and
> > the external IFs are ca
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 11:29:31AM +0200, Gergely CZUCZY wrote:
> On a dual-carp scenario on two gateways when both the internal and
> the external IFs are carp(4)'d in a master-slave way and a link
> disconnects only on one side, would this trigger a carp failover
> of the other interface also?
Hello
This question just popped out of my head today when playing
around with linux's LVS and keepalived.
On a dual-carp scenario on two gateways when both the internal and
the external IFs are carp(4)'d in a master-slave way and a link
disconnects only on one side, would this trigger a carp fail
[Please don't top post.]
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 12:25:55PM -0700, Daniel Valencia wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Yes, I tried that, and although I can ping the local
> interface (10.0.1.2), I cant reach the remote
> interface (10.0.0.2).
This is expected. Only one of those interfaces has a network route s
Hi
Yes, I tried that, and although I can ping the local
interface (10.0.1.2), I cant reach the remote
interface (10.0.0.2).
Thanks,
Daniel
--- Özkan KIRIK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You cannot define same network to more then one
> interface!
>
> As you post below;
> xl0: inet 10.0.1.1 ne
You cannot define same network to more then one interface!
As you post below;
xl0: inet 10.0.1.1 netmask 0x broadcast 10.0.255.255
xl1: inet 10.0.1.2 netmask 0x broadcast 10.0.255.255
They are at the same network, so your freebsd searchs 10.0.1.2 at xl0.
You should define your xl
hmm...our machine successfully works with 6 physical ethernet(2x-fxp 4x-em)
adapters and 1 physical ATM(he155)...
> Hello, everybody
>
> Is there any limit as of how many interfaces can
> freebsd handle? Im trying to build a switch in a PC
> box, putting multiple NICs and some software... The
>
Hello all, and thanks for your replies.
Please let me explain myself a little more. Im going
to do research in routing protocols, so I created a
switching software for ethernet packets. I plugged 3
computers (a, b, c), all of them running R5.4, in the
following manner:
a connects to c.
b connec
[Please don't top pos it loses context. Also, please find a mailer that
doens't mangle output. This is really hard to read].
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 12:40:31PM -0700, Daniel Valencia wrote:
> Hi
>
> from the boot messages, i can see that the network
> devices are started up properly. Strangely
On Thursday 18 August 2005 21:40, Daniel Valencia wrote:
> Here goes my ifconfig
>
> > ifconfig
>
> inet 10.0.1.1 netmask 0x broadcast 10.0.255.255
> inet 10.0.1.2 netmask 0x broadcast 10.0.255.255
Can you also show your routing table for this? Please try to disable word
wrap thi
Hi
from the boot messages, i can see that the network
devices are started up properly. Strangely enough,
the one that doesnt seem to be assigned an IRQ# is not
having any problems, but one of the ones that is.
Here are the boot messages
de0: port 0x4000-0x407f
mem 0xf4a01000-0xf4a0107f at devi
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 11:36:55AM -0700, Daniel Valencia wrote:
> Hello, everybody
>
> Is there any limit as of how many interfaces can
> freebsd handle? Im trying to build a switch in a PC
> box, putting multiple NICs and some software... The
> issue is, even though all of the cards work correct
Hello, everybody
Is there any limit as of how many interfaces can
freebsd handle? Im trying to build a switch in a PC
box, putting multiple NICs and some software... The
issue is, even though all of the cards work correctly
by themselves, once I put them together, it doesnt
matter what slots i use
On 2005-05-08 19:22, Michael Bretterklieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Max Laier wrote:
>>On Sunday 08 May 2005 18:54, Michael Bretterklieber wrote:
>>> it looks like that under 5-stable it's allowed to have different
>>> interfaces with the same IP, bug or feature?
>>
>> Feature and required for
Hi,
Max Laier wrote:
On Sunday 08 May 2005 18:54, Michael Bretterklieber wrote:
it looks like that under 5-stable it's allowed to have different
interfaces with the same IP, bug or feature?
Feature and required for CARP to function. You need to change your routeing
ok, this make sense.
table to
On Sunday 08 May 2005 18:54, Michael Bretterklieber wrote:
> it looks like that under 5-stable it's allowed to have different
> interfaces with the same IP, bug or feature?
Feature and required for CARP to function. You need to change your routeing
table to make sure the right one is used for ou
Hi,
it looks like that under 5-stable it's allowed to have different
interfaces with the same IP, bug or feature?
bash-2.05b# ifconfig ath0 inet 192.168.201.12 netmask 0xff00 up
bash-2.05b# ifconfig sk0 inet 192.168.201.12 netmask 0xff00 up
bash-2.05b# ifconfig
ath0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
JINMEI Tatuya / çæéå wrote:
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 11:48:13 -0500,
"Michael C. Cambria" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
On 4.10-Stable & 5.3-Stable, I'm able to forward IPv6 traffic just fine
when I manually start rtadvd. However, each reboot, only one interface
supplied to rtadvd_interfaces actually
> On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 11:48:13 -0500,
> "Michael C. Cambria" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On 4.10-Stable & 5.3-Stable, I'm able to forward IPv6 traffic just fine
> when I manually start rtadvd. However, each reboot, only one interface
> supplied to rtadvd_interfaces actually gets enable
Hi,
Is one meant to start rtadvd on more than one interface via rc.conf?
On 4.10-Stable & 5.3-Stable, I'm able to forward IPv6 traffic just fine
when I manually start rtadvd. However, each reboot, only one interface
supplied to rtadvd_interfaces actually gets enabled. ps ax shows just
one inte
On Thursday 31 July 2003 11:21, Oleg Polyakov wrote:
> --- Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Greets
> >
> > > I have two interfaces and the following info in rc.conf. The
> > > first one is
> > > setup properly but the second one never gets configured.
> >
> > I just went through this process mys
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
+--- On Thursday, July 31, 2003 14:13,
| Barney Wolff proclaimed:
|
| On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 11:07:18AM -0600, Bob wrote:
| > All you are missing is the fact FreeBSD cannot handle
| > two NICs the same subnet. OpenBSD does, NetBSD does and Linux does.
--- Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greets
>
> > I have two interfaces and the following info in rc.conf. The
> > first one is
> > setup properly but the second one never gets configured.
>
> I just went through this process myself.
>
> The word I have is that FreeBSD cannot run two NICs o
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 11:07:18AM -0600, Bob wrote:
>
> All you are missing is the fact FreeBSD cannot handle
> two NICs the same subnet. OpenBSD does, NetBSD does and Linux does.
Wrong. As already stated, make the netmask on the second one /32.
Re freevrrpd, so far as I know it's intended for
Greets
> I have two interfaces and the following info in rc.conf. The
> first one is
> setup properly but the second one never gets configured.
I just went through this process myself.
The word I have is that FreeBSD cannot run two NICs on
the same subnet, which is what your included config
I have two interfaces and the following info in rc.conf. The first one is
setup properly but the second one never gets configured.
ifconfig_fxp0="inet a.b.c.186 netmask 255.255.255.192"
ifconfig_fxp1="inet a.c.c.187 netmask 255.255.255.192"
I'm running 4.8-STABLE FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE #0: Mon Jul 1
/etc/rc.network takes care to gather up all the DHCP interfaces to pass
to a single dhclient program.
/etc/pccard_ether on the other hand expects to run a separate dhclient
for each interface, carefully storing their pids in different files.
I have a laptop with a built-in interface and a wirele
57 matches
Mail list logo