[Bug 264908] It does not work to obtain an IP address via DHCP simultaneously for multiple interfaces

2025-01-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264908 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Status|New |Closed Resolution|---

[Bug 169898] ifconfig(8) fails to set MTU on multiple interfaces.

2023-06-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169898 Alexander V. Chernikov changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |Overcome By Events

[Bug 264908] It does not work to obtain an IP address via DHCP simultaneously for multiple interfaces

2022-06-27 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264908 --- Comment #1 from Vladislav V. Prodan --- I need a mechanism to maintain availability in a virtual machine and not only when network settings are not set on network interfaces. Many network interfaces can be added to the virtual machine t

[Bug 264908] It does not work to obtain an IP address via DHCP simultaneously for multiple interfaces

2022-06-26 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264908 Bug ID: 264908 Summary: It does not work to obtain an IP address via DHCP simultaneously for multiple interfaces Product: Base System Version: 12.3-STABLE Hardware

[Bug 189088] Assigning same IP to multiple interfaces in different FIBs only creates a host route for the first

2022-04-10 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088 Pat Maddox changed: What|Removed |Added CC||p...@patmaddox.com --- Comment #17 fr

[Bug 189088] Assigning same IP to multiple interfaces in different FIBs only creates a host route for the first

2021-04-19 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088 Alexander V. Chernikov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|In Progress |Closed Resolution

[Bug 189088] Assigning same IP to multiple interfaces in different FIBs only creates a host route for the first

2021-04-04 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088 Alexander V. Chernikov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|Open|In Progress --- Comment #

[Bug 189088] Assigning same IP to multiple interfaces in different FIBs only creates a host route for the first

2021-03-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088 --- Comment #15 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit in branch releng/13.0 references this bug: URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=dba80ca2cfb0b0c1447269e8a6a3545f428c51e6 commit dba80ca2cfb0b0c1447269e8a6a3545f428c51e6 Auth

[Bug 189088] Assigning same IP to multiple interfaces in different FIBs only creates a host route for the first

2021-03-10 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088 --- Comment #14 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit in branch stable/13 references this bug: URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=f67641675958cb566b0ae50dc6942017d42393fe commit f67641675958cb566b0ae50dc6942017d42393fe Author

[Bug 189088] Assigning same IP to multiple interfaces in different FIBs only creates a host route for the first

2021-02-16 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088 --- Comment #13 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit in branch main references this bug: URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=9fdbf7eef5c006002769add15b1ebb8fa8d9e220 commit 9fdbf7eef5c006002769add15b1ebb8fa8d9e220 Author:

[Bug 189088] Assigning same IP to multiple interfaces in different FIBs only creates a host route for the first

2021-02-14 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088 --- Comment #12 from Alexander V. Chernikov --- https://reviews.freebsd.org/D28673 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing

[Bug 189088] Assigning same IP to multiple interfaces in different FIBs only creates a host route for the first

2020-07-18 Thread bugzilla-noreply
?, ||mfc-stable11? Keywords||needs-patch, needs-qa Summary|Assigning the same IP to|Assigning same IP to |multiple interfaces in |multiple interfaces in |different FIBs creates

[Bug 189088] Assigning the same IP to multiple interfaces in different FIBs creates a host route for only one.

2020-07-18 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088 Allan Jude changed: What|Removed |Added CC||allanj...@freebsd.org --- Comment #11

[Bug 189088] Assigning the same IP to multiple interfaces in different FIBs creates a host route for only one.

2020-07-12 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088 --- Comment #10 from Rodney W. Grimes --- Your going to find that difficult. You shall need to teach ifa_maintain_loopback_route about fibs, and how to walk them to add and remove its attempt at loopback route maintainance. Or simply kill

[Bug 189088] Assigning the same IP to multiple interfaces in different FIBs creates a host route for only one.

2020-07-12 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088 Rodney W. Grimes changed: What|Removed |Added CC||n...@freebsd.org -- You are re

[Bug 189088] Assigning the same IP to multiple interfaces in different FIBs creates a host route for only one.

2020-07-12 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088 Alexander V. Chernikov changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|n...@freebsd.org |melif...@freebsd.org

[Bug 189088] Assigning the same IP to multiple interfaces in different FIBs creates a host route for only one.

2020-07-12 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088 Rodney W. Grimes changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|Not A Bug |Feedback Timeout --- Comment #8

[Bug 189088] Assigning the same IP to multiple interfaces in different FIBs creates a host route for only one.

2020-07-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088 Eugene Grosbein changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |Not A Bug CC|

[Bug 189088] Assigning the same IP to multiple interfaces in different FIBs creates a host route for only one.

2020-07-10 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Status|In Progress |Open --- Comment #6 from Mark Linim

[Bug 169898] ifconfig(8) fails to set MTU on multiple interfaces.

2019-02-12 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169898 Rodney W. Grimes changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|n...@freebsd.org --- Comment #3

[Bug 189088] Assigning the same IP to multiple interfaces in different FIBs creates a host route for only one.

2019-02-07 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088 Alan Somers changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|asom...@freebsd.org |n...@freebsd.org --- Comment #5 from

[Bug 226622] Error when specifying multiple interfaces through firewall_nat_interface in /etc/rc.conf

2018-05-02 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226622 Eugene Grosbein changed: What|Removed |Added CC||n...@freebsd.org Sta

Re: kern/169898: ifconfig(8) fails to set MTU on multiple interfaces.

2012-07-15 Thread linimon
Synopsis: ifconfig(8) fails to set MTU on multiple interfaces. Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Jul 16 03:16:57 UTC 2012 Responsible-Changed-Why: Over to maintainer(s). http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi

Re: snort on multiple interfaces

2009-10-28 Thread Tom Judge
Andrea Venturoli wrote: Some years ago, I checked to see whether I would be able to let a single snort process listen on more than one NIC. At the time it was only possible in Linux. Now, I searched a bit, but nothing new came up. Did anything improve since then? Do we still need multiple snor

Re: snort on multiple interfaces

2009-10-28 Thread Vlad Galu
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Some years ago, I checked to see whether I would be able to let a single > snort process listen on more than one NIC. > At the time it was only possible in Linux. > In Linux the packet capture facility is implemented in a different (and

snort on multiple interfaces

2009-10-28 Thread Andrea Venturoli
Some years ago, I checked to see whether I would be able to let a single snort process listen on more than one NIC. At the time it was only possible in Linux. Now, I searched a bit, but nothing new came up. Did anything improve since then? Do we still need multiple snort processes to listen on

multiple interfaces and pf rdr bug

2009-03-19 Thread Patrick Goggins
When configuring a system with three interfaces, two of them as a transparent bridge and a management interface one could configure the rules to allow users to connect to the management interface from being behind the bridge. However, if an rdr rule is applied to force this then, the clients connec

Re: Running jails on multiple subnets with multiple interfaces

2007-08-29 Thread Julian Elischer
Josh Paetzel wrote: Jeffrey Williams wrote: I have a server with two interfaces, I want to run the host and a couple of jails using one interface on one subnet (internal interface, private IP, behind NAT/firewall) and some other jails using the other interface on another subnet (external inter

Re: Running jails on multiple subnets with multiple interfaces

2007-08-28 Thread Josh Paetzel
Jeffrey Williams wrote: > I have a server with two interfaces, I want to run the host and a couple of > jails using one interface on one subnet (internal interface, private IP, > behind > NAT/firewall) and some other jails using the other interface on another > subnet > (external interface, pu

Running jails on multiple subnets with multiple interfaces

2007-08-28 Thread Jeffrey Williams
I have a server with two interfaces, I want to run the host and a couple of jails using one interface on one subnet (internal interface, private IP, behind NAT/firewall) and some other jails using the other interface on another subnet (external interface, public IP, DMZ). Now my understanding

Re: carp on multiple interfaces

2007-08-28 Thread Gergely CZUCZY
Thanks for the answers. I must have missed that part of carp(4). On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 11:44:29AM +0200, Daniel Hartmeier wrote: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 11:29:31AM +0200, Gergely CZUCZY wrote: > > > On a dual-carp scenario on two gateways when both the internal and > > the external IFs are ca

Re: carp on multiple interfaces

2007-08-28 Thread Daniel Hartmeier
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 11:29:31AM +0200, Gergely CZUCZY wrote: > On a dual-carp scenario on two gateways when both the internal and > the external IFs are carp(4)'d in a master-slave way and a link > disconnects only on one side, would this trigger a carp failover > of the other interface also?

carp on multiple interfaces

2007-08-28 Thread Gergely CZUCZY
Hello This question just popped out of my head today when playing around with linux's LVS and keepalived. On a dual-carp scenario on two gateways when both the internal and the external IFs are carp(4)'d in a master-slave way and a link disconnects only on one side, would this trigger a carp fail

Re: multiple interfaces

2005-08-19 Thread Brooks Davis
[Please don't top post.] On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 12:25:55PM -0700, Daniel Valencia wrote: > > Hi > > Yes, I tried that, and although I can ping the local > interface (10.0.1.2), I cant reach the remote > interface (10.0.0.2). This is expected. Only one of those interfaces has a network route s

Re: multiple interfaces

2005-08-19 Thread Daniel Valencia
Hi Yes, I tried that, and although I can ping the local interface (10.0.1.2), I cant reach the remote interface (10.0.0.2). Thanks, Daniel --- Özkan KIRIK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You cannot define same network to more then one > interface! > > As you post below; > xl0: inet 10.0.1.1 ne

Re: multiple interfaces

2005-08-19 Thread Özkan KIRIK
You cannot define same network to more then one interface! As you post below; xl0: inet 10.0.1.1 netmask 0x broadcast 10.0.255.255 xl1: inet 10.0.1.2 netmask 0x broadcast 10.0.255.255 They are at the same network, so your freebsd searchs 10.0.1.2 at xl0. You should define your xl

Re: multiple interfaces

2005-08-19 Thread Donatas
hmm...our machine successfully works with 6 physical ethernet(2x-fxp 4x-em) adapters and 1 physical ATM(he155)... > Hello, everybody > > Is there any limit as of how many interfaces can > freebsd handle? Im trying to build a switch in a PC > box, putting multiple NICs and some software... The >

Re: multiple interfaces

2005-08-18 Thread Daniel Valencia
Hello all, and thanks for your replies. Please let me explain myself a little more. Im going to do research in routing protocols, so I created a switching software for ethernet packets. I plugged 3 computers (a, b, c), all of them running R5.4, in the following manner: a connects to c. b connec

Re: multiple interfaces

2005-08-18 Thread Brooks Davis
[Please don't top pos it loses context. Also, please find a mailer that doens't mangle output. This is really hard to read]. On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 12:40:31PM -0700, Daniel Valencia wrote: > Hi > > from the boot messages, i can see that the network > devices are started up properly. Strangely

Re: multiple interfaces

2005-08-18 Thread Max Laier
On Thursday 18 August 2005 21:40, Daniel Valencia wrote: > Here goes my ifconfig > > > ifconfig > > inet 10.0.1.1 netmask 0x broadcast 10.0.255.255 > inet 10.0.1.2 netmask 0x broadcast 10.0.255.255 Can you also show your routing table for this? Please try to disable word wrap thi

Re: multiple interfaces

2005-08-18 Thread Daniel Valencia
Hi from the boot messages, i can see that the network devices are started up properly. Strangely enough, the one that doesnt seem to be assigned an IRQ# is not having any problems, but one of the ones that is. Here are the boot messages de0: port 0x4000-0x407f mem 0xf4a01000-0xf4a0107f at devi

Re: multiple interfaces

2005-08-18 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 11:36:55AM -0700, Daniel Valencia wrote: > Hello, everybody > > Is there any limit as of how many interfaces can > freebsd handle? Im trying to build a switch in a PC > box, putting multiple NICs and some software... The > issue is, even though all of the cards work correct

multiple interfaces

2005-08-18 Thread Daniel Valencia
Hello, everybody Is there any limit as of how many interfaces can freebsd handle? Im trying to build a switch in a PC box, putting multiple NICs and some software... The issue is, even though all of the cards work correctly by themselves, once I put them together, it doesnt matter what slots i use

Re: Multiple Interfaces with the same IP

2005-05-08 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2005-05-08 19:22, Michael Bretterklieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Max Laier wrote: >>On Sunday 08 May 2005 18:54, Michael Bretterklieber wrote: >>> it looks like that under 5-stable it's allowed to have different >>> interfaces with the same IP, bug or feature? >> >> Feature and required for

Re: Multiple Interfaces with the same IP

2005-05-08 Thread Michael Bretterklieber
Hi, Max Laier wrote: On Sunday 08 May 2005 18:54, Michael Bretterklieber wrote: it looks like that under 5-stable it's allowed to have different interfaces with the same IP, bug or feature? Feature and required for CARP to function. You need to change your routeing ok, this make sense. table to

Re: Multiple Interfaces with the same IP

2005-05-08 Thread Max Laier
On Sunday 08 May 2005 18:54, Michael Bretterklieber wrote: > it looks like that under 5-stable it's allowed to have different > interfaces with the same IP, bug or feature? Feature and required for CARP to function. You need to change your routeing table to make sure the right one is used for ou

Multiple Interfaces with the same IP

2005-05-08 Thread Michael Bretterklieber
Hi, it looks like that under 5-stable it's allowed to have different interfaces with the same IP, bug or feature? bash-2.05b# ifconfig ath0 inet 192.168.201.12 netmask 0xff00 up bash-2.05b# ifconfig sk0 inet 192.168.201.12 netmask 0xff00 up bash-2.05b# ifconfig ath0: flags=8843 mtu 1500

Re: starting rtadvd with multiple interfaces

2005-01-27 Thread Michael C. Cambria
JINMEI Tatuya / çæéå wrote: On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 11:48:13 -0500, "Michael C. Cambria" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: On 4.10-Stable & 5.3-Stable, I'm able to forward IPv6 traffic just fine when I manually start rtadvd. However, each reboot, only one interface supplied to rtadvd_interfaces actually

Re: starting rtadvd with multiple interfaces

2005-01-27 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
> On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 11:48:13 -0500, > "Michael C. Cambria" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On 4.10-Stable & 5.3-Stable, I'm able to forward IPv6 traffic just fine > when I manually start rtadvd. However, each reboot, only one interface > supplied to rtadvd_interfaces actually gets enable

starting rtadvd with multiple interfaces

2005-01-22 Thread Michael C. Cambria
Hi, Is one meant to start rtadvd on more than one interface via rc.conf? On 4.10-Stable & 5.3-Stable, I'm able to forward IPv6 traffic just fine when I manually start rtadvd. However, each reboot, only one interface supplied to rtadvd_interfaces actually gets enabled. ps ax shows just one inte

Re: Multiple Interfaces

2003-07-31 Thread Wes Peters
On Thursday 31 July 2003 11:21, Oleg Polyakov wrote: > --- Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Greets > > > > > I have two interfaces and the following info in rc.conf. The > > > first one is > > > setup properly but the second one never gets configured. > > > > I just went through this process mys

Multihomed Routing (was Re: Multiple Interfaces)

2003-07-31 Thread Michael W. Oliver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 +--- On Thursday, July 31, 2003 14:13, | Barney Wolff proclaimed: | | On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 11:07:18AM -0600, Bob wrote: | > All you are missing is the fact FreeBSD cannot handle | > two NICs the same subnet. OpenBSD does, NetBSD does and Linux does.

RE: Multiple Interfaces

2003-07-31 Thread Oleg Polyakov
--- Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Greets > > > I have two interfaces and the following info in rc.conf. The > > first one is > > setup properly but the second one never gets configured. > > I just went through this process myself. > > The word I have is that FreeBSD cannot run two NICs o

Re: Multiple Interfaces

2003-07-31 Thread Barney Wolff
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 11:07:18AM -0600, Bob wrote: > > All you are missing is the fact FreeBSD cannot handle > two NICs the same subnet. OpenBSD does, NetBSD does and Linux does. Wrong. As already stated, make the netmask on the second one /32. Re freevrrpd, so far as I know it's intended for

RE: Multiple Interfaces

2003-07-31 Thread Bob
Greets > I have two interfaces and the following info in rc.conf. The > first one is > setup properly but the second one never gets configured. I just went through this process myself. The word I have is that FreeBSD cannot run two NICs on the same subnet, which is what your included config

Multiple Interfaces

2003-07-31 Thread Bryce Edwards
I have two interfaces and the following info in rc.conf. The first one is setup properly but the second one never gets configured. ifconfig_fxp0="inet a.b.c.186 netmask 255.255.255.192" ifconfig_fxp1="inet a.c.c.187 netmask 255.255.255.192" I'm running 4.8-STABLE FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE #0: Mon Jul 1

DHCP and multiple interfaces

2001-09-20 Thread Richard Tobin
/etc/rc.network takes care to gather up all the DHCP interfaces to pass to a single dhclient program. /etc/pccard_ether on the other hand expects to run a separate dhclient for each interface, carefully storing their pids in different files. I have a laptop with a built-in interface and a wirele