Thanks for the answers. I must have missed that part of carp(4). On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 11:44:29AM +0200, Daniel Hartmeier wrote: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 11:29:31AM +0200, Gergely CZUCZY wrote: > > > On a dual-carp scenario on two gateways when both the internal and > > the external IFs are carp(4)'d in a master-slave way and a link > > disconnects only on one side, would this trigger a carp failover > > of the other interface also? > > See carp(4) > > net.inet.carp.preempt Allow virtual hosts to preempt each other. It > is also used to failover carp interfaces as a > group. When the option is enabled and one of > the carp enabled physical interfaces goes down, > advskew is changed to 240 on all carp inter- > faces. See also the first example. Disabled > by default. > > i.e. for your scenario you'd set preempt=1 so all interfaces failover > together, to avoid the problem you describe (which otherwise would > occur, yes). > > Daniel
Sincerely, Gergely Czuczy mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Weenies test. Geniuses solve problems that arise.
pgpWC5M4RqtLd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
