Hi
Yes, I tried that, and although I can ping the local
interface (10.0.1.2), I cant reach the remote
interface (10.0.0.2).
Thanks,
Daniel
--- Özkan KIRIK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You cannot define same network to more then one
> interface!
>
> As you post below;
> xl0: inet 10.0.1.1 netmask 0xffff0000 broadcast
> 10.0.255.255
> xl1: inet 10.0.1.2 netmask 0xffff0000 broadcast
> 10.0.255.255
>
> They are at the same network, so your freebsd
> searchs 10.0.1.2 at xl0.
> You should define your xl1 as inet 10.0.1.2 netmask
> 255.255.255.255
>
> With Best Regards,
> Ozkan KIRIK
> EnderUNIX [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Software Developer
>
> Daniel Valencia wrote:
>
> >Hi
> >
> >from the boot messages, i can see that the network
> >devices are started up properly. Strangely enough,
> >the one that doesnt seem to be assigned an IRQ# is
> not
> >having any problems, but one of the ones that is.
> >
> >Here are the boot messages
> >
> >de0: <Digital 21140A Fast Ethernet> port
> 0x4000-0x407f
> >mem 0xf4a01000-0xf4a0107f at device 11.0 on pci2
> >de0: SMC 9332BDT 21140A [10-100Mb/s] pass 2.0
> >de0: Ethernet address: 00:00:c0:7f:a1:fd
> >de0: if_start running deferred for Giant
> >xl0: <3Com 3c905C-TX Fast Etherlink XL> port
> >0x4080-0x40ff mem 0xf4a01400-0xf4a0147f irq 10 at
> >device 13.0 on pci2
> >miibus0: <MII bus> on xl0
> >xlphy0: <3c905C 10/100 internal PHY> on miibus0
> >xlphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX,
> >100baseTX-FDX, auto
> >xl0: Ethernet address: 00:01:02:c1:ba:82
> >xl1: <3Com 3c905C-TX Fast Etherlink XL> port
> >0x4400-0x447f mem 0xf4a01800-0xf4a0187f irq 11 at
> >device 15.0 on pci2
> >miibus1: <MII bus> on xl1
> >xlphy1: <3c905C 10/100 internal PHY> on miibus1
> >xlphy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX,
> >100baseTX-FDX, auto
> >xl1: Ethernet address: 00:01:02:44:3c:22
> >
> >Here goes my ifconfig
> >
> >
> >
> >>ifconfig
> >>
> >>
> >de0:
>
>flags=108843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST>
> >mtu 1500
> > inet 128.200.38.140 netmask 0xffffff00
> >broadcast 128.200.38.255
> > inet6 fe80::200:c0ff:fe7f:a1fd%de0
> prefixlen
> >64 scopeid 0x1
> > ether 00:00:c0:7f:a1:fd
> > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX
> ><full-duplex>)
> > status: active
> >xl0:
> >flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST>
> mtu
> >1500
> > options=9<RXCSUM,VLAN_MTU>
> > inet 10.0.1.1 netmask 0xffff0000 broadcast
> >10.0.255.255
> > inet6 fe80::201:2ff:fec1:ba82%xl0 prefixlen
> 64
> >scopeid 0x2
> > ether 00:01:02:c1:ba:82
> > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX
> ><full-duplex>)
> > status: active
> >xl1:
> >flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST>
> mtu
> >1500
> > options=9<RXCSUM,VLAN_MTU>
> > inet 10.0.1.2 netmask 0xffff0000 broadcast
> >10.0.255.255
> > inet6 fe80::201:2ff:fe44:3c22%xl1 prefixlen
> 64
> >scopeid 0x3
> > ether 00:01:02:44:3c:22
> > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX
> ><full-duplex>)
> > status: active
> >lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu
> >16384
> > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000
> > inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
> > inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >And, at last, a few ping attempts
> >
> >
> >
> >>ping -c 1 128.200.38.140
> >>
> >>
> >PING 128.200.38.140 (128.200.38.140): 56 data bytes
> >64 bytes from 128.200.38.140: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64
> >time=0.130 ms
> >
> >--- 128.200.38.140 ping statistics ---
> >1 packets transmitted, 1 packets received, 0%
> packet
> >loss
> >round-trip min/avg/max/stddev =
> >0.130/0.130/0.130/0.000 ms
> >
> >
> >>ping -c 1 10.0.1.1
> >>
> >>
> >PING 10.0.1.1 (10.0.1.1): 56 data bytes
> >64 bytes from 10.0.1.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64
> time=0.128
> >ms
> >
> >--- 10.0.1.1 ping statistics ---
> >1 packets transmitted, 1 packets received, 0%
> packet
> >loss
> >round-trip min/avg/max/stddev =
> >0.128/0.128/0.128/0.000 ms
> >
> >
> >>ping -c 1 10.0.1.2
> >>
> >>
> >PING 10.0.1.2 (10.0.1.2): 56 data bytes
> >
> >--- 10.0.1.2 ping statistics ---
> >1 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100%
> packet
> >loss
> >
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >Thank you very much,
> >
> >Daniel
> >
> >
> >--- Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 11:36:55AM -0700, Daniel
> >>Valencia wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Hello, everybody
> >>>
> >>>Is there any limit as of how many interfaces can
> >>>freebsd handle? Im trying to build a switch in a
> >>>
> >>>
> >>PC
> >>
> >>
> >>>box, putting multiple NICs and some software...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>The
> >>
> >>
> >>>issue is, even though all of the cards work
> >>>
> >>>
> >>correctly
> >>
> >>
> >>>by themselves, once I put them together, it
> doesnt
> >>>matter what slots i use, I can never make more
> >>>
> >>>
> >>than
>
=== message truncated ===
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
