rs.
> >
> > Going back, I'm thinking about porting OpenBSD's MPLS to FreeBSD.
>
> I have had similiar thoughts on and off over the years,
> and one pretty solid "want" for this.
>
> >
> > I have a two questions:
> >
> > * Is po
hink it is better to make MPLS implementation independent from
netgraph. At least until it become lockless.
--
WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 11:08:38AM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> On 07.12.2021 17:28, Lutz Donnerhacke wrote:
>> I do use netgraph for carrier-grade stuff.
>> Yes, ng_bridge was limited, but this is fixed.
> Doesn't it take separate lock for each packet passed though hook? I'm sure,
> it was tr
about to make
such stupid mistake.
I thought, MPLS is carrier-grade stuff, and netgraph is very limited now.
I do use netgraph for carrier-grade stuff.
Yes, ng_bridge was limited, but this is fixed.
Doesn't it take separate lock for each packet passed though hook? I'm su
>>
> >> On 2021-12-04 10:42, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
> >>>> * Is porting OpenBSD MPLS to FreeBSD feasible, or are we better off
> >>>> doing a from-scratch implementation based on netgraph?
> >>> It depends. MPLS implementaiton can be splitted in
, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
Hi Alexander,
On 2021-12-04 10:42, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
* Is porting OpenBSD MPLS to FreeBSD feasible, or are we better off
doing a from-scratch implementation based on netgraph?
It depends. MPLS implementaiton can be
On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 11:41:27PM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> On 19.11.2021 23:16, Lutz Donnerhacke wrote:
>>> * Is porting OpenBSD MPLS to FreeBSD feasible, or are we better off doing
>>> a from-scratch implementation based on netgraph?
>>
>> I'd p
On 19.11.2021 23:16, Lutz Donnerhacke wrote:
* Is porting OpenBSD MPLS to FreeBSD feasible, or are we better off doing
a from-scratch implementation based on netgraph?
I'd prefer a netgraph approach, if possible.
It helps to concentrate on the important things.
Isn't netgraph i
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
> Hi Alexander,
>
> On 2021-12-04 10:42, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
> >> * Is porting OpenBSD MPLS to FreeBSD feasible, or are we better off
> >> doing a from-scratch implementation based on netgraph?
> > It de
Hi Alexander,
On Sun, 2021-12-05 at 22:19 +, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
> > If I were to work on this, would I be better off starting with the
> > dataplane or control plane?
> I’d start with dataplane first - it’ll allow to get something simple
> actually working and establish the basic da
> On 5 Dec 2021, at 03:49, Neel Chauhan wrote:
>
> Hi Alexander,
>
> On 2021-12-04 10:42, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
>>> * Is porting OpenBSD MPLS to FreeBSD feasible, or are we better off doing a
>>> from-scratch implementation based on netgraph?
>&
Hi Alexander,
On 2021-12-04 10:42, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
* Is porting OpenBSD MPLS to FreeBSD feasible, or are we better off
doing a from-scratch implementation based on netgraph?
It depends. MPLS implementaiton can be splitted into multiple logical
parts - dataplane (input, control
ckages and some GPU drivers.
>
> Going back, I'm thinking about porting OpenBSD's MPLS to FreeBSD.
>
> I have a two questions:
>
> * Is porting OpenBSD MPLS to FreeBSD feasible, or are we better off doing a
> from-scratch implementation based on netgraph?
It de
> Hi freebsd-net@,
>
> Long time no see. I've gotten a (Ports) commit bit since then.
>
> I haven't been very active in TCP/IP hacking as of late, as more
> recently I've been more focused on GNOME packages and some GPU drivers.
>
> Going back, I
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 11:17:42AM -0800, Neel Chauhan wrote:
> * Is porting OpenBSD MPLS to FreeBSD feasible, or are we better off doing
> a from-scratch implementation based on netgraph?
I'd prefer a netgraph approach, if possible.
It helps to concentrate on the important things.
Hi freebsd-net@,
Long time no see. I've gotten a (Ports) commit bit since then.
I haven't been very active in TCP/IP hacking as of late, as more
recently I've been more focused on GNOME packages and some GPU drivers.
Going back, I'm thinking about porting OpenBSD's M
Hello there,
I would like to know if you are interested in acquiring a list of companies
using Cisco MPLS.
Information fields: Names, Title, Email, Phone, Company Name, Company URL,
Company physical address, SIC Code, Industry and Company Size (Revenue and
Employee).
Let me know if you are
Hi,
I Asked several times about getting mpls into freebsd but seems its not
gonna happen.
Alexander Chernikov work was not completed (not i know of otherwise) and
even his site for that matter seems down for long time.
Sami
בתאריך 1 באפר׳ 2017 05:45 PM, "kdev code" כתב:
I search how
I search how to enable MPLS on FreeBSD but I found it seem not yet
implement as follow link
https://wiki.freebsd.org/Networking
even though it has been implemented in 2008 as follow link
https://wiki.freebsd.org/RyanFrench/Implementation%20of%20MPLS%20in%20FreeBSD
my question is
- What MPLS
> Silence means dead project? even the mpls site is dead :(
>
> linux and openbsd best choices for mpls implementation right now?
I'd probably say Juniper and Cisco myself :-) MPLS in FreeBSD is
only going to happen if there is sufficient interest *and* coding
resources. Somebo
hi again,
Silence means dead project? even the mpls site is dead :(
linux and openbsd best choices for mpls implementation right now?
Sami
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe
anyone?
sami
בתאריך 18 במרץ 2016 21:39, "Sami Halabi" כתב:
> hi ,
> I would like to ask about the status of implementing MPLS in FreeBSD.
> Are there any progress ? is it going to be implemented soon?
>
> Sami
>
___
fre
hi ,
I would like to ask about the status of implementing MPLS in FreeBSD.
Are there any progress ? is it going to be implemented soon?
Sami
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe
Hi Alex,
Got any progress? I'm excited to test mpls in fbsd :)
Sami
בתאריך 15 במאי 2013 17:43, מאת "Sami Halabi" :
> Hi Alex,
> Any progress on mpls fbsd?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Sami
> On Mar 17, 2013 8:57 PM, "Alexander V. Chernikov"
> wrot
Hi Alex,
Any progress on mpls fbsd?
Thanks in advance,
Sami
On Mar 17, 2013 8:57 PM, "Alexander V. Chernikov"
wrote:
> On 17.03.2013 13:20, Sami Halabi wrote:
>
>> any one? :)
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Sami Halabi wrote:
>>
>&g
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Sami Halabi wrote:
>>At least, the per-CPU netisr and other related per-CPU network stuffs
>>(e.g. routing table) work quite well as we have _expected_ (the
>>measured bi-directional IPv4 forwarding performance w/ fastforwarding
>>is 5.6Mpps+, w/o fastforwarding 4.6
:54, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 17.03.2013 19:57, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 17.03.2013 13:20, Sami Halabi wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ITOH OpenBSD has a complete implementation
7.03.2013 13:20, Sami Halabi wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ITOH OpenBSD has a complete implementation of MPLS out of the box,
>>>>>> maybe
>>>>
>>>> Their control plane code is mostly useless due to design approach
>>>> (
On 18.03.2013 17:41, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 18.03.2013 13:20, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
On 17.03.2013, at 23:54, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 17.03.2013 19:57, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
On 17.03.2013 13:20, Sami Halabi wrote:
ITOH OpenBSD has a complete implementation of MPLS out of
On 18.03.2013 13:20, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
On 17.03.2013, at 23:54, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 17.03.2013 19:57, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
On 17.03.2013 13:20, Sami Halabi wrote:
ITOH OpenBSD has a complete implementation of MPLS out of the box, maybe
Their control plane code is
On 17.03.2013, at 23:54, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> On 17.03.2013 19:57, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
>> On 17.03.2013 13:20, Sami Halabi wrote:
>>>> ITOH OpenBSD has a complete implementation of MPLS out of the box, maybe
>> Their control plane code is mostly use
On 17.03.2013 19:57, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
On 17.03.2013 13:20, Sami Halabi wrote:
ITOH OpenBSD has a complete implementation of MPLS out of the box, maybe
Their control plane code is mostly useless due to design approach (routing
daemons talk via kernel).
What's your app
On 17.03.2013 13:20, Sami Halabi wrote:
any one? :)
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Sami Halabi wrote:
Hi,
Are there ongoing job of mpls in freebsd?
I saw thd site http://freebsd.mpls.in for aboug a year now and I don't
see much progress.
Yep. It was frozen for a while.
Currentl
On 17 March 2013 02:20, Sami Halabi wrote:
> any one? :)
I'd love to see MPLS support in FreeBSD.
The question is finding someone willing to do it, or sponsor the work.
Adrian
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.fre
any one? :)
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Sami Halabi wrote:
> Hi,
> Are there ongoing job of mpls in freebsd?
> I saw thd site http://freebsd.mpls.in for aboug a year now and I don't
> see much progress.
> ITOH OpenBSD has a complete implementation of MPLS out of the
Hi,
Are there ongoing job of mpls in freebsd?
I saw thd site http://freebsd.mpls.in for aboug a year now and I don't see
much progress.
ITOH OpenBSD has a complete implementation of MPLS out of the box, maybe
porting it would be short and more straight forward than porting linux LDP
implement
On 06.05.2012 12:11, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hello,
is there any on-job work on MPLS support in FreeBSD?
Do you know this site ? It points to some svn repository with mpls patches.
http://freebsd.mpls.in/
Major number of depends are already merged to the tree.
I'm currently working to u
Hello,
> is there any on-job work on MPLS support in FreeBSD?
Do you know this site ? It points to some svn repository with mpls patches.
http://freebsd.mpls.in/
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 8 years to
Hi,
is there any on-job work on MPLS support in FreeBSD?
what are the plan to integrate this in production use?
Thanks in advance,
--
Sami Halabi
Information Systems Engineer
NMS Projects Expert
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http
> Pawel wrote:
>> I had notices some GSOC project in maybe 2008
>> on MPLS. There doesn't seem to be much current
>> talk of this. So I am unsure, excluding the GSOC,
>> of the overall picture of MPLS in FreeBSD.
>> Is there any current work? Or directions
Hi grappamp,
> I had notices some GSOC project in maybe 2008
> on MPLS. There doesn't seem to be much current
> talk of this. So I am unsure, excluding the GSOC,
> of the overall picture of MPLS in FreeBSD.
> Is there any current work? Or directions planned?
> Overall int
I had notices some GSOC project in maybe 2008
on MPLS. There doesn't seem to be much current
talk of this. So I am unsure, excluding the GSOC,
of the overall picture of MPLS in FreeBSD.
Is there any current work? Or directions planned?
Overall interest / demand?
T
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 10:56 PM, Pawel Tyll wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
>
> > Actually, I'm working on MPLS support.
>
> > Project page: http://freebsd.mpls.in
> > Wiki: http://freebsd.mpls.in/wiki/index.php?title=Architecture
>
> > Documentation is a bit out
Hi Alexander,
> Actually, I'm working on MPLS support.
> Project page: http://freebsd.mpls.in
> Wiki: http://freebsd.mpls.in/wiki/index.php?title=Architecture
> Documentation is a bit outdated especially in QoS case
> I plan to get L3VPN working in several weeks
That'
On 03.06.2011 18:04, Pawel Tyll wrote:
Hi list,
I've mailed FreeBSD Foundation about this, but for wider exposure this
seems like a good place too.
We are currently looking for some hardware solution that supports MPLS
and VPLS tunnels for IP and PPPoE (at the same end-point interface).
Hi list,
I've mailed FreeBSD Foundation about this, but for wider exposure this
seems like a good place too.
We are currently looking for some hardware solution that supports MPLS
and VPLS tunnels for IP and PPPoE (at the same end-point interface).
While testing RedBack SmartEdge route
Was reading through the OpenBSD 4.8 release notes.
Seems they have a good bit of work/support for MPLS going on.
I've seen light mention of it on FreeBSD lists now and then
yet am unaware of any committed work.
Is MPLS of age such that FreeBSD should have designs on doing it?
Would it fit b
Ryan French wrote:
Hi All,
My name is Ryan French. I am a uni student at Waikato University in New
Zealand. This year I will be porting the Ayame project (an
implementation of the MPLS networking stack) to FreeBSD as part of my
course. I was wondering if there was anyone out there wanting to
cc
Subject
02/14/2008 11:16 MPLS and Google SoC
Hi All,
My name is Ryan French. I am a uni student at Waikato University in New
Zealand. This year I will be porting the Ayame project (an
implementation of the MPLS networking stack) to FreeBSD as part of my
course. I was wondering if there was anyone out there wanting to be a
mentor for me
On 10/29/07, Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
> > Ermal Luçi wrote:
> >> I was wondering why this implementation of MPLS isn't integrated into
> >> FreeBSD?!
> >> http://www.info.ucl.ac.be/~iannone/Files/MPLS-C
Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
Ermal Luçi wrote:
I was wondering why this implementation of MPLS isn't integrated into
FreeBSD?!
http://www.info.ucl.ac.be/~iannone/Files/MPLS-Complete.zip
there's a hell of a lot of these sorts of things out there
that no-one has heard of
At
Ermal Luçi wrote:
I was wondering why this implementation of MPLS isn't integrated into FreeBSD?!
http://www.info.ucl.ac.be/~iannone/Files/MPLS-Complete.zip
At least two reasons spring to mind:
1. It seems to be targeted at FreeBSD 4.2, which is very old indeed.
2. No mention of it in
I was wondering why this implementation of MPLS isn't integrated into FreeBSD?!
http://www.info.ucl.ac.be/~iannone/Files/MPLS-Complete.zip
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe,
Luca Da Col wrote:
Hello,
I would like to know if someone is actively working on MPLS project for
FreeBSD. I would also like to know if James Leu's MPLS implementation for
Linux has been considered as starting point for this project.
No one is actively working on this to the best
Hello,
I would like to know if someone is actively working on MPLS project for
FreeBSD. I would also like to know if James Leu's MPLS implementation for
Linux has been considered as starting point for this project.
Thank you,
Luca Da Col
___
fr
Sam Wun wrote:
Hi,
Is there any MPLS implementation for FreeBSD?
I found a port ayame mpls for netbsd, but the last implementation was
dated
back to 2003, seems very old.
There is NISTswitch, but it is most likely very bit-rotted by now.
I would suggest helping Anihudda Bodhra out on the
Hi,
Is there any MPLS implementation for FreeBSD?
I found a port ayame mpls for netbsd, but the last implementation was dated
back to 2003, seems very old.
Thanks
S
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 10:05:21PM +0300, Kalin Hristov wrote:
K> It would be very nice
K> As they say about the MPLS "The feature of the Internet"
This is a very big piece of work to be done. In my humble
opinion it would be at least one year of full time work
for a couple of dev
Kalin Hristov wrote:
It would be very nice
As they say about the MPLS "The feature of the Internet"
Did they change the acronym from "Mostly Pointless Lamp Switching"?
Pete
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It would be very nice
As they say about the MPLS "The feature of the Internet"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8
iQA/AwUBQVsHc2cb2v9P9sWHEQJxQgCglXvPzlF6R9Ev7pKzM+p7QW35SIgAnAmV
uJxBcDZODDPamn2C6230+cO8
=jyFP
--
Julian Elischer wrote:
Kalin Hristov wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I'd like to ask is there any plans to implement MPLS control and
forwarding plane into FreeBSD? This is extremely valuable feature :-)
I don't think there are plans yet, but if you and
Hi,
Is someone working or has already done
an implementation of a netgraph MPLS stack?
--
===
Christophe Prevotaux Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HEXANET SARLURL: http://www.hexanet.fr/
Z.A.C Les CharmillesTel
>
> I've overly simplified much of what is here, and I'm sure I've missing
> items. So as you can see there is still a lot of work to do. If anyone
> else is working on related items, please let me know.
Did you check the AYAME's work on MPLS ? They have a MPLS
I'm currently working on exactly work your refering to. It is going to
take a lot more work before it is realized, but it is my end goal.
Here are the pieces I have:
MPLS forwarding (linux only, in theory the work from NIST could be used for
FreeBSD)
LDP signaling integrated with zebra
Did you check the Ayame's MPLS support ?
It is written for NetBSD, however, it could be ported to FreeBSD.
Moreover they have added the LDP support for Zebra.
The source code is available on http://www.ayame.org/Download.php
Vincent
Le Mercredi 25 Septembre 2002 00:45, PSI, Chan Yoon a
Is there any freeware/shareware implementation of MPLS on FreeBSD?
It seems that NIST version is no longer updated.
Any comments will be welcomed!
Thanks,
Chan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Mike Silbersack wrote:
>
> On Sat, 1 Jun 2002, Andre Oppermann wrote:
>
> > I'm axing that right now and will provide a tcp_hostcache that will
> > assume that role (tcp is the only consumer of rt_metrics, except for
> > rmx_mtu and rmx_pksent). By moving this every node/leaf in the routing
> >
On Sat, 1 Jun 2002, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> I'm axing that right now and will provide a tcp_hostcache that will
> assume that role (tcp is the only consumer of rt_metrics, except for
> rmx_mtu and rmx_pksent). By moving this every node/leaf in the routing
> table shrinks by 48 bytes. On a defau
Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 05:21:17PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> > > This is a non sequitur. All routes will be available through the kernel
> > > RIB, but for exact matches only. When is a longest prefix match needed
> > > there?
> >
> > When the routing daemon
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 05:21:17PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
>
> > Please explain how that would not work for servers?
>
> It would work but not optimal because the packet flow is different for
> locally terminated/generated packets.
Howso? Both do a routing lookup exactly the same.
> > Th
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 12:16:50PM -0700, Paul Traina wrote:
>
> > Bwah... It lacks things like transparent-nexthop and transparent-as
> > which is quite useful in Route Servers and such.
>
> We don't add features to code unless people are willing to pay for them and
> use them.
which is why we
if you want MPLS on BSD, check out http://www.ayame.org/.
itojun
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 11:46:21AM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> > The theorie about the LC-Trie is that it'll fit into L2 cache for the
> > entire default-free forwarding table.
>
> Versus the reality of doing bit operations instead of byte operations. In
> my te
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 11:46:21AM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> > Flow has its benefits, such as netflow export, and maybe even at some
> > point it could be tied into ipfw to improve performance... I'd like to see
> > it stay around as a route-cache method, but probably not in its current
> >
> Hi!
> I developped a basic implementation of MPLS over Ethernet in the FreeBSD
> Environment! If someone is interested in my code just e.mail me!
> Bye
>Luigi Iannone
>
> --
Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 08:31:24PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> > > Basically just gut the current radix tree and fast-switch like route-cache
> > > system, and replace it with something optimized for fast insertions and
> > > deletions (and FIB building) but n
Hello
At Wed, 29 May 2002 19:52:26 +0200 (CEST),
Attila Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I developped a basic implementation of MPLS over Ethernet in the FreeBSD
> > > Environment! If someone is interested in my code just e.mail me!
> > I'm inter
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 08:31:24PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> > Basically just gut the current radix tree and fast-switch like route-cache
> > system, and replace it with something optimized for fast insertions and
> > deletions (and FIB building) but not longest prefix matching for the RIB,
> Bwah... It lacks things like transparent-nexthop and transparent-as
> which is quite useful in Route Servers and such.
We don't add features to code unless people are willing to pay for them and
use them.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the b
Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 06:08:28PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> >
> > It's clear to me that this is not based on the old 3.6 gated that is
> > have in ports. The Nexthop stuff is more advanced. Zebra also is very
> > reliable and I use it on many FreeBSD based
Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 04:24:03PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> > If there is no kind of software involved on the forwarding plane
> > then I don't know how the control plane can communicate via ethernet
> > with the line cards... The internal communication in
Hello,
> It is true that JUNOS is more or less FreeBSD. But it's only the control
> plane. All the switching and stack processing happens on the line cards
> which have their own CPUs and OS.
You are wrong :)
That FreeBSD has many things to do. But it doesn't really involved (in a
direct way) in
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 06:08:28PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
>
> It's clear to me that this is not based on the old 3.6 gated that is
> have in ports. The Nexthop stuff is more advanced. Zebra also is very
> reliable and I use it on many FreeBSD based routers here around. Agreed,
> each of th
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 04:24:03PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> > >
> > > It is true that JUNOS is more or less FreeBSD. But it's only the
> > > control plane. All the switching and stack processing happens on
> > > the line cards which have their own CPUs and OS.
> >
> > There is no software
Hello,
> > I developped a basic implementation of MPLS over Ethernet in the FreeBSD
> > Environment! If someone is interested in my code just e.mail me!
> I'm interested in it.
BTW, there is a Linux-based effort to make it MPLS-aware ->
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mpls
...
> It's clear to me that this is not based on the old 3.6 gated that is
> have in ports. The Nexthop stuff is more advanced. Zebra also is very
> reliable ...
You might want to check the status of ports/net/gated. I've been giving
this some thought since the rev 1.32 of the Makefile caught my
"Louis A. Mamakos" wrote:
>
> > If there is no kind of software involved on the forwarding plane
> > then I don't know how the control plane can communicate via ethernet
> > with the line cards... The internal communication in the router is
> > via ethernet.
>
> To be clear, "forwarding plane" t
> If there is no kind of software involved on the forwarding plane
> then I don't know how the control plane can communicate via ethernet
> with the line cards... The internal communication in the router is
> via ethernet.
To be clear, "forwarding plane" to me means the machinary which
causes pa
"Louis A. Mamakos" wrote:
>
> > Attila Nagy wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > > I developped a basic implementation of MPLS over Ethernet in the FreeBSD
> > > > Environment! If someone is interested in my code just e.mai
> Attila Nagy wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > > I developped a basic implementation of MPLS over Ethernet in the FreeBSD
> > > Environment! If someone is interested in my code just e.mail me!
> > Great! Although I do not have the devices to test this,
Attila Nagy wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> > I developped a basic implementation of MPLS over Ethernet in the FreeBSD
> > Environment! If someone is interested in my code just e.mail me!
> Great! Although I do not have the devices to test this, it is very
> nice to hear that.
Luigi Iannone wrote:
>
> Hi!
> I developped a basic implementation of MPLS over Ethernet in the FreeBSD
> Environment! If someone is interested in my code just e.mail me!
I'm interested in it.
--
Andre
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe fr
Hello,
> I developped a basic implementation of MPLS over Ethernet in the FreeBSD
> Environment! If someone is interested in my code just e.mail me!
Great! Although I do not have the devices to test this, it is very
nice to hear that. I think the patches should go to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
t
Hi!
I developped a basic implementation of MPLS over Ethernet in the FreeBSD
Environment! If someone is interested in my code just e.mail me!
Bye
Luigi Iannone
>
Luigi Iannone
LI
On Fri, 20 Jul 2001 12:45:06 +0200 (CEST)
Martin Karsten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MPLS has been implemented for FreeBSD in the Nistswitch project
> http://www.antd.nist.gov/itg/nistswitch/
> but I don't know the current project status.
>
> I've added rudimen
MPLS has been implemented for FreeBSD in the Nistswitch project
http://www.antd.nist.gov/itg/nistswitch/
but I don't know the current project status.
I've added rudimentary MPLS signalling support to RSVP (label distribution
and explicit routing according to draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-lsp
On 18 Jul 2001 06:35:39 -0400, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you wrote:
>Will MPLS and MPLS-TE (and MPLS VPL L2 and L3) be implemented
>under FreeBSD ?
No idea, but there is _talk_ about it from time to time on www.zebra.org
---Mike
Mike Tancsa ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
now? Many thanks!
- Ping
"Christophe Prévotaux" wrote:
>
> oh oh , I did not say I would and I am quite incapable of implementing
> MPLS, but I don't understand what triggered your anger at me ?
>
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2001 09:13:54 -0700
> Ping Pan <[EMAIL P
oh oh , I did not say I would and I am quite incapable of implementing
MPLS, but I don't understand what triggered your anger at me ?
On Thu, 19 Jul 2001 09:13:54 -0700
Ping Pan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Christophe Prévotaux" wrote:
> >
> > Of cour
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
