On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 09:25:21PM -0700, Doug White wrote:
> Mmm, mail server tuning, something I have some experience in :-)
Just what I was hoping to hear!
> First off, what are the specs of the server? Cpu? Disk? Memory? Network?
> You mention it's a dual 800MHz. What kind of NIC does it hav
On Wed, 2002-05-15 at 16:23, Dmitry Shupilov wrote:
> system doesn't see the modem. What should I do or where can I find
> some info about it? (On windozz it works on COM4, so I try to trick
> with device sioX but it didn't help).
It's almost certainly a Win modem.
I don't believe there ar
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> As Terry stated you can't do that, however you could cache that the
> VNODE has a lock, that would reduce the requirement for calling the
> ADVLOCK VOP.
You'd really have to know when the lock list went to NULL, to get
any benefit out of it, since locking would still end
Eugene Panchenko wrote:
> SysV defines SIGPOLL, as well as Linux, Solaris, and (IIRC) Irix.
> However, it is NOT defined in any of *BSD. In Linux it is
> simple "#define SIGPOLL SIGIO". Some apps need it, thought. What are
> the general policy for this: keep as *BSD and patch every SIGPOLL-app
Dmitry Shupilov wrote:
> Sorry for non-topic question but HELP me!
> I got laptop Compaq Armada m700 with internal modem Compaq 56K mini
> PCI. After the new install FreeBSD on laptop I cannot dial out -
> system doesn't see the modem. What should I do or where can I find
> some info abo
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 01:50:45AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Dmitry Shupilov wrote:
> > Sorry for non-topic question but HELP me!
> > I got laptop Compaq Armada m700 with internal modem Compaq 56K mini
> > PCI. After the new install FreeBSD on laptop I cannot dial out -
> > system does
Wilko Bulte wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 01:50:45AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > Dmitry Shupilov wrote:
> > > Sorry for non-topic question but HELP me!
> > > I got laptop Compaq Armada m700 with internal modem Compaq 56K mini
> > > PCI. After the new install FreeBSD on laptop I cannot
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 02:11:10AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 01:50:45AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > Dmitry Shupilov wrote:
> > > > Sorry for non-topic question but HELP me!
> > > > I got laptop Compaq Armada m700 with internal modem Comp
Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > Do you mean "ltmdm", the Lucent Winmodem driver?
>
> Correct.
[ ... ]
> Win2K calls it a LT Win Modem.
Definitely a Lucent.
> > Did your E700 work with -STABLE? The "ltmdm" thing didn't work
> > with some Lucent modems, in the same way the binary only Olicomm
> > drive
Already running the card and switch port in 100BaseTX FDX (forced) :)
Would use GigE if the switch supported it tho
Thus spake Matthew Dillon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) :
> It should also work if you force the GigE card into 100BaseTX mode,
> assuming the switch can deal with it. Though
The following email address, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" has been removed from the
Verba Volant Newsletter list.
If you did not cancel your email address or you wish to continue receiving Verba
Volant, please send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you and best regards,
Verba Volant
To Unsubscribe
All,
I have a need to be able to determine the amount of physical
memory in
a machine. Looking at the man page for sysctl(), that seems to be the
answer, but it behaves a oddly in that it doesn't return what I feel is
the actual amount of RAM in the machine. It appears to be taking some
A thousand pardons for the duplicate post - forgot the subject on the
original!!
---
All,
I have a need to be able to determine the amount of physical
memory in
a machine. Looking at the man page for sysctl(), that seems to be the
answer, but it behaves a oddly in that it doesn't retur
* Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020515 01:36] wrote:
> Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > As Terry stated you can't do that, however you could cache that the
> > VNODE has a lock, that would reduce the requirement for calling the
> > ADVLOCK VOP.
> You'd really have to know when the lock list went t
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
:* Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020515 01:36] wrote:
:> Alfred Perlstein wrote:
:> > As Terry stated you can't do that, however you could cache that the
:> > VNODE has a lock, that would reduce the requirement for calling the
:> > ADVLOCK VOP.
:>
* Andrew R. Reiter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020515 09:54] wrote:
> On Wed, 15 May 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> :* Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020515 01:36] wrote:
> :> Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> :> > As Terry stated you can't do that, however you could cache that the
> :> > VNODE has a loc
Basically I have a program that does a lot of I/O and alloctes/frees a lot
of memory. The time command gives result like this:
6.239u 19.329s 7:59.76 5.3% 310+775k 3993+246io 7pf+0w
I want to know why CPU is running only 5.3% of the total time. I just
want know how long it is waiting for me
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Richard Sharpe wrote:
> > Hmmm, I wasn't very clear ...
> >
> > What I am proposing is a 'simple' fix that simply changes
> >
> > p->p_flag |= P_ADVLOCK;
> >
> > to
> >
> > fp->l_flag |= P_ADVLOCK;
> >
> > And never resets it, and t
* Zhihui Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020515 10:33] wrote:
>
> Basically I have a program that does a lot of I/O and alloctes/frees a lot
> of memory. The time command gives result like this:
>
> 6.239u 19.329s 7:59.76 5.3% 310+775k 3993+246io 7pf+0w
>
> I want to know why CPU is running only 5
On Mon, 13 May 2002, Geoffrey C. Speicher wrote:
> On Thu, 2 May 2002, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
>
> > I'll see if I can put some time over the next few days into delving into
> > it and at least getting the first step (of making the locking work more
> > usefully) work.
>
> Hi Matt. Just wonde
What if most I/O are asynchronous writes and handled by a background
process (e.g. SoftUpdate syncer daemon or a special kernel daemon), then I
guess the wait should have something to do with memory or buffer. But I do
not know to to confirm this. Maybe some profiling or instrumentation (too
much
Do you know about performance in postfix? I have on FreeBSD (4.5) box
running postfix and delivering mail in 65.000 mailboxes... I know about
maildirs... but, how maildir would help me??? The postfix delivery agent
simply can't do the jog. This is because a lot of entries???
help please.
To
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> He could also maintain a local cache of this per vnode, basically
> maintain a mirror of the lock list locally in order to see if a remote
> op must be done.
I think we are talking past each other.
This is what I've been suggesting since my first message,
but suggested
"Andrew R. Reiter" wrote:
> :He could also maintain a local cache of this per vnode, basically
> :maintain a mirror of the lock list locally in order to see if a remote
> :op must be done.
>
> Isn't this sorta like coda?
Lock cache, not data cache.
It's "sort of like":
http://www.blackflag.ru/
Zhihui Zhang wrote:
> Basically I have a program that does a lot of I/O and alloctes/frees a lot
> of memory. The time command gives result like this:
>
> 6.239u 19.329s 7:59.76 5.3% 310+775k 3993+246io 7pf+0w
>
> I want to know why CPU is running only 5.3% of the total time. I just
> want k
Zhihui Zhang wrote:
> What if most I/O are asynchronous writes and handled by a background
> process (e.g. SoftUpdate syncer daemon or a special kernel daemon), then I
> guess the wait should have something to do with memory or buffer. But I do
> not know to to confirm this. Maybe some profiling o
A disk in remote 4.5-stable box started to develop bad clusters. The
hosting company replaced the drive for me. I now have a 4.5-RELEASE
system (they have 4.5-RELEASE drives as stock items).
The defective drive is almost mounted in this box. I'm tempted to tar the
old disk over to the new d
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Dan Langille wrote:
>The defective drive is almost mounted in this box. I'm tempted to tar the
>old disk over to the new disk and get everything back running that way.
>It's that or upgrade to stable, install about 30 or so packages, and
>manually configure everything.
Gree
:
:Already running the card and switch port in 100BaseTX FDX (forced) :)
:
:Would use GigE if the switch supported it tho
Ack. Just rip the damn thing out and put in a normal 100BaseTX card,
then (if you haven't already). The whole system will probably be
happier.
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Omar Thameen wrote:
> > First off, what are the specs of the server? Cpu? Disk? Memory? Network?
> > You mention it's a dual 800MHz. What kind of NIC does it have? What is the
> > speed and duplex set to on it?
>
> Dual PIII/800
> 2G SDRAM
> 2x18G IBM 10,000 rpm SCSI drives,
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Dan Langille wrote:
> A disk in remote 4.5-stable box started to develop bad clusters. The
> hosting company replaced the drive for me. I now have a 4.5-RELEASE
> system (they have 4.5-RELEASE drives as stock items).
>
> The defective drive is almost mounted in this box. I
I run dnetc with an argument to run two (one for each processor). If
I realtime nice (not nasty) the processes, the computer freezes for a
few seconds every minute or two. If I have them only regular nice'd,
this does not happen.
I can make a login on the machine available if this helps.
Any i
David Gilbert wrote:
> I run dnetc with an argument to run two (one for each processor). If
> I realtime nice (not nasty) the processes, the computer freezes for a
> few seconds every minute or two. If I have them only regular nice'd,
> this does not happen.
"realtime nice" = idprio? If so, pro
Someone on this list emailed me about a problem in the distributed
folding client a while ago...
Howard has an updated version, can people having problems with it try
to see if it fixes the problem or not?
Also, I don't have access to the source of the client.
Rayson
P.S. Here's his message:
The fixed version is not up yet, I will be posting it tomorrow. I have
confirmed that the networking timeouts if you were having them, have been
fixed. (By updating to a new version of the networking layer).
Rayson Ho wrote:
>
> Someone on this list emailed me about a problem in the distribute
> There is a backdoor in all versions of FreeBSD that are not compiled
> from source code within portmapper and telnetd.
Hmm. Let's check out this logic. The binaries that ship on the FreeBSD
distros are compiled from source. When I upgrade my system, I compile from
source. And the backdoor o
Matthew Emmerton wrote:
> > There is a backdoor in all versions of FreeBSD that are not compiled
> > from source code within portmapper and telnetd.
>
> Hmm. Let's check out this logic. The binaries that ship on the FreeBSD
> distros are compiled from source. When I upgrade my system, I compil
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Terry Lambert writes:
>Matthew Emmerton wrote:
>> > There is a backdoor in all versions of FreeBSD that are not compiled
>> > from source code within portmapper and telnetd.
>>
>> Hmm. Let's check out this logic. The binaries that ship on the FreeBSD
>> distros a
Hi
I had posted this sometime back, but didn't receive much feedback
After installing 4.5-RELEASE, (BSD Mall Feb 2002 CD), when I ran
'sysctl -a', the kernel crashed with the foll message.
Fault trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
fault virtual address = 0x6351ec0c
fault code = superviso
Gautham Ganapathy wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I had posted this sometime back, but didn't receive much feedback
>
> After installing 4.5-RELEASE, (BSD Mall Feb 2002 CD), when I ran
> 'sysctl -a', the kernel crashed with the foll message.
>
> Fault trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
> fault virtu
Thus spake Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Terry Lambert writes:
> >Matthew Emmerton wrote:
> >> > There is a backdoor in all versions of FreeBSD that are not compiled
> >> > from source code within portmapper and telnetd.
> >>
> >> Hmm. Let's check out t
41 matches
Mail list logo
