On Wed, 15 May 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote: :* Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020515 01:36] wrote: :> Alfred Perlstein wrote: :> > As Terry stated you can't do that, however you could cache that the :> > VNODE has a lock, that would reduce the requirement for calling the :> > ADVLOCK VOP. :> You'd really have to know when the lock list went to NULL, to get :> any benefit out of it, since locking would still end up being per-file :> sticky. You could post-check after every successful unlock... but to :> cache the remote state would mean another RPC to ask for locks, which :> would just be front-loading the expense, instead of back-loading it. : :[snip] : :He could also maintain a local cache of this per vnode, basically :maintain a mirror of the lock list locally in order to see if a remote :op must be done.
Isn't this sorta like coda? -- Andrew R. Reiter [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message