> > Will the IP address of the client host ever enter buf[] if the
> > accept() is _not_ uncommented?
> > I don't need portability, since this is for use within the FreeBSD inetd
> > exclusively.
>
> Well if you CAN'T do it in FreeBSD, is there an OS we can copy the API from
> that D
Ruslan Ermilov writes:
> * Clean the existing code (both userland and kernel) (10-20% done)
> * Re-design the ipfw's API
> * Port the existing functionality to the new API
> * Proceed with new features
Pretty please with sugar on top, design an API that can be extended
without breaking binary com
On 19 Jun 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Ruslan Ermilov writes:
> > * Clean the existing code (both userland and kernel) (10-20% done)
> > * Re-design the ipfw's API
> > * Port the existing functionality to the new API
> > * Proceed with new features
>
> Pretty please with sugar on top, desi
Actually I have a "patch" that will get sound working on this board (its
working in mine right now...) but it disables support for all the other
ad1848 sound cards ;) I'm actually going through to make it work for all
of them now (at worst its just a couple case statements *shrug*)
If you are only
On Sat, 19 Jun 1999, Doug Rabson wrote:
> On 19 Jun 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
>
> > Ruslan Ermilov writes:
> > > * Clean the existing code (both userland and kernel) (10-20% done)
> > > * Re-design the ipfw's API
> > > * Port the existing functionality to the new API
> > > * Proceed with
On Sat, 19 Jun 1999, Brian F. Feldman wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Jun 1999, Doug Rabson wrote:
>
> > On 19 Jun 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> >
> > > Ruslan Ermilov writes:
> > > > * Clean the existing code (both userland and kernel) (10-20% done)
> > > > * Re-design the ipfw's API
> > > > * Port t
I find in the routine ffs_blkfree() there is a new statement saying:
VOP_FREEBLKS(ip->i_devvp, fsbtodb(fs, bno), size);
which calls spec_freeblks() in file spec_vnops.c. The routine
spec_freeblks() looks simple. When D_CANFREE is set, it gets an empty
buffer and call strategy routine fo
"Brian F. Feldman" writes:
> It might be worth (discussion of) making ipfilter the firewall of
> choice for 4.0. There would of course be rule conversion
> scripts/programs (ipfw->ipf(5)), and ipfilter would be converted to
> a KLD, cruft removed (I'm going to work on these), and ipfilter KLD
> su
On 19 Jun 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> "Brian F. Feldman" writes:
> > It might be worth (discussion of) making ipfilter the firewall of
> > choice for 4.0. There would of course be rule conversion
> > scripts/programs (ipfw->ipf(5)), and ipfilter would be converted to
> > a KLD, cruft remov
On 19 Jun 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> "Brian F. Feldman" writes:
> > It might be worth (discussion of) making ipfilter the firewall of
> > choice for 4.0. There would of course be rule conversion
> > scripts/programs (ipfw->ipf(5)), and ipfilter would be converted to
> > a KLD, cruft remov
Hi All,
I'm now analyzing ipfilter in 3.2 and our goal is to port our
IPSec/firewall. I'm still in the beginning of reading the code
so, at this time, I can't yet tell how nice it fits our needs.
I just have some concerns which I'd like the people who are
going to re-design the ipfilter to hear. I
On Sat, Jun 19, 1999 at 11:12:07AM -0400, Brian F. Feldman wrote:
> On 19 Jun 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
>
> > "Brian F. Feldman" writes:
> > > It might be worth (discussion of) making ipfilter the firewall of
> > > choice for 4.0. There would of course be rule conversion
> > > scripts/prog
On Sat, 19 Jun 1999, Doug Rabson wrote:
> On 19 Jun 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
>
> > "Brian F. Feldman" writes:
> > > It might be worth (discussion of) making ipfilter the firewall of
> > > choice for 4.0. There would of course be rule conversion
> > > scripts/programs (ipfw->ipf(5)), and
"Brian F. Feldman" writes:
> On 19 Jun 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > Rewriting ipfw rules to ipfilter rules on the fly should be trivial; a
> > simple Perl script should be sufficient.
> Not quite as trivial as you think. ipfw and ipf are completely backwards when
> it comes
> to rule orde
I've bog
F1: FreeBSD
F2: LINUX
F3: FreeBSD
F3 is a non-bootable file system...is there a way to get the boot manager
to only display F1 and F2?
Dennis
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
> The support (after the patches Sheldon brought in) now is
> pretty good; is there any reason why the existing functionality should be
> extended ?
We should support atleast as much as tcpd did. I think the only
thing we're missing now is wrapping the first connection of a
udp/wait service and t
Hmmm...I always thought there was something "broke" inside Celerons to
prevent SMP...maybe I'm wrong? Sure would be neat if you could run them
SMP...
-marc
Marc Nicholas netSTOR Technologies, Inc. http://www.netstor.com
"Fast, Expa
Dennis wrote:
> F1: FreeBSD
> F2: LINUX
> F3: FreeBSD
>
> F3 is a non-bootable file system...is there a way to get the boot manager
> to only display F1 and F2?
At the moment, no. Though you could use the following patch, which
allows the slices to be individually disabled. (The B0FLAGS setti
In message <199906191602.maa10...@etinc.com> Dennis writes:
: F3 is a non-bootable file system...is there a way to get the boot manager
: to only display F1 and F2?
More generally, I'd like my Win98 partition to be identified as Win98,
not . Also, is there a list of partition types to ignore
In message
Marc Nicholas writes:
: Hmmm...I always thought there was something "broke" inside Celerons to
: prevent SMP...maybe I'm wrong? Sure would be neat if you could run them
: SMP...
What is "broke" about the Celerons is their cache. Without a good
cache sharing, you can't get good SMP pe
duplex should work fine in a 2 machine point to point without a
switch.
In reply:
> Hi,
>
> Speed in what protocol? FTP? SMB? Appletalk?
>
> Have you checked the duplexing of cards on both
> machines? Use the DOS program that came with the
> ethernet cards to check. Unless your card is
> connect
Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <199906191602.maa10...@etinc.com> Dennis writes:
> : F3 is a non-bootable file system...is there a way to get the boot manager
> : to only display F1 and F2?
>
> More generally, I'd like my Win98 partition to be identified as Win98,
> not . Also, is there a li
On 19 Jun 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> "Brian F. Feldman" writes:
> > On 19 Jun 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > > Rewriting ipfw rules to ipfilter rules on the fly should be trivial; a
> > > simple Perl script should be sufficient.
> > Not quite as trivial as you think. ipfw and ipf ar
On 19-Jun-99 Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <199906191602.maa10...@etinc.com> Dennis writes:
>: F3 is a non-bootable file system...is there a way to get the boot manager
>: to only display F1 and F2?
>
> More generally, I'd like my Win98 partition to be identified as Win98,
> not . Also, i
On Sat, 19 Jun 1999 14:26:52 EDT, John Baldwin writes:
>Then don't use BootEasy. The OS-BS boot manager is quite nice, and the beta
>version (which seems very stable in my experience) even provides a nice
>colorful menu on boot up as well as a nice installation utility.
>
>And with that you can na
On 19-Jun-99 Aaron Smith wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Jun 1999 14:26:52 EDT, John Baldwin writes:
>>Then don't use BootEasy. The OS-BS boot manager is quite nice, and the beta
>>version (which seems very stable in my experience) even provides a nice
>>colorful menu on boot up as well as a nice installatio
Marc Nicholas writes:
> Hmmm...I always thought there was something "broke" inside Celerons to
> prevent SMP...maybe I'm wrong? Sure would be neat if you could run them
> SMP...
>
>
> -marc
Well there is kind of. If you have a socket 370 adapter you can
un-break it. I am currently running du
Warner Losh writes:
> In message
> Marc Nicholas writes:
> : Hmmm...I always thought there was something "broke" inside Celerons to
> : prevent SMP...maybe I'm wrong? Sure would be neat if you could run them
> : SMP...
>
> What is "broke" about the Celerons is their cache. Without a good
> ca
At 11:52 AM 6/19/99 -0700, you wrote:
>On Sat, 19 Jun 1999 14:26:52 EDT, John Baldwin writes:
>>Then don't use BootEasy. The OS-BS boot manager is quite nice, and the beta
>>version (which seems very stable in my experience) even provides a nice
>>colorful menu on boot up as well as a nice install
On 19 Jun 1999 17:30:13 +0200
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Divert sockets, dummynet and credential-based filtering would be
> sorely missed if they weren't ported to ipfilter.
...but if they were ported to IP Filter, then lots of other systems could
use them, too.
-- Jason R. Thorpe
In an effort to make FreeBSD even more (un)productive, I added in support for
FreeBSD's joystick driver to Koules, a game which can be found in the ports
collection at /usr/ports/games/koules. To compile the game with this patch
follow this sequence:
# cd /usr/ports/games/koules
# make patch
# cd
Wish that was the case for me, might just be my momboard
___
Pat Lynch ly...@rush.net
ly...@bsdunix.net
Systems Adminis
Will it allow you to
1) specify which partitions appear on the menu (ie, eliminate
non-bootables) and
2) set the partition last selected to the default/active partition?
Dennis
At 06:05 PM 6/19/99 -0400, you wrote:
>
>On 19-Jun-99 Dennis wrote:
>> At 03:14 PM 6/19/99 -0400, you wrote:
>>>
>>>On
On 19-Jun-99 Dennis wrote:
> Will it allow you to
>
> 1) specify which partitions appear on the menu (ie, eliminate
> non-bootables) and
Yes.
> 2) set the partition last selected to the default/active partition?
Yes.
> Dennis
Sorry if I wasn't clear enough earlier.
---
John Baldwin -- htt
In message <87k8t0c6tp@dhcp9545042.columbus.rr.com> Shaun Rowland writes:
: Well there is kind of. If you have a socket 370 adapter you can
: un-break it. I am currently running dual Celeron 400's, and they
: truly fly on this box! I can assure you it works without problems.
By "broke" peop
In message <87hfo4c6dj@dhcp9545042.columbus.rr.com> Shaun Rowland writes:
: Do you mean the ones that don't have cache or the ones that have 128Kb
: cache on the chip? Is there that big of a hit of the cache is on the
: chip? I have seen some benchmarks and the system I have seemed to
: keep
We use IPFW to great effect in the interjet
whatever we end up with had better have the same features or we can't use
it..
1/ simple to use programatic API
2/ Divert sockets are a MUST. We do a lot of our filtering in userland.
3/ The ability to branch the rules using 'skipto' (goto?) is used hea
On Sat, 19 Jun 1999, Brian F. Feldman wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Jun 1999, Doug Rabson wrote:
>
> > On 19 Jun 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> >
> > > "Brian F. Feldman" writes:
> > > > It might be worth (discussion of) making ipfilter the firewall of
> > > > choice for 4.0. There would of course
As a contributor to ipfw, notice that I will be sticking my oar into the
water when it comes to deleting it unless I'm very sure that the ipf stuff
is better. Unless you're Danish you don't just get to delete bits of the
tree without a lot of agreement, especially from those who are working on
it..
> is better. Unless you're Danish you don't just get to delete bits of the
s/Unless/Especially if/ :-)
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
It has "fwd stuff" :)
Brian Fundakowski Feldman _ __ ___ ___ ___ ___
gr...@freebsd.org _ __ ___ | _ ) __| \
FreeBSD: The Power to Serve!_ __ | _ \._ \ |) |
http://www.FreeBSD.org/ _ |___/___/___/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
On Sat, 19 Jun 1999, Julian Elischer wrote:
> As a contributor to ipfw, notice that I will be sticking my oar into the
> water when it comes to deleting it unless I'm very sure that the ipf stuff
> is better. Unless you're Danish you don't just get to delete bits of the
> tree without a lot of agr
42 matches
Mail list logo
