> The support (after the patches Sheldon brought in) now is
> pretty good; is there any reason why the existing functionality should be
> extended ?
We should support atleast as much as tcpd did. I think the only
thing we're missing now is wrapping the first connection of a
udp/wait service and then inetd can do as much as tcpd could.
(Wrapping of internal services is a bonus over what tcpd can do
already).
I'd be happy with just adding support for wrapping udp stuff and
adding a command line flag which turns off wrapping to keep purists
happy. I just wanted to see what the general opinion was.
David.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [email protected]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
