On 19-Jun-99 Aaron Smith wrote: > On Sat, 19 Jun 1999 14:26:52 EDT, John Baldwin writes: >>Then don't use BootEasy. The OS-BS boot manager is quite nice, and the beta >>version (which seems very stable in my experience) even provides a nice >>colorful menu on boot up as well as a nice installation utility. >> >>And with that you can name each partition whatever you want, put them in any >>order, and optionally have a default partition to boot to. > > LILO's an option too, right? Is no one mentioning it for some > incompatibility I don't know about (I haven't used it with FreeBSD), or is > the reason political? > > Aaron
No, I just happen to use OS-BS in an environment of machines that dual boot NT and FreeBSD. (And my machine which dual boots '95 and FreeBSD). I don't happen to use Linux, so I don't happen to use LILO. No politics there. Also, both BootEasy and OS-BS (stable and beta versions) come on the FreeBSD CD's, so I'd reccommend those to a FreeBSD user just because they are easy to get to (no 'net surfin' required) if they have the CD's. FWIW, OS-BS is a completely OS-independent project with no affiliation with FreeBSD, it just happens to be on the CD. (AFAIK) --- John Baldwin <jobal...@vt.edu> -- http://members.freedomnet.com/~jbaldwin/ PGP Key: http://members.freedomnet.com/~jbaldwin/pgpkey.asc "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
