"S.Gopinath" wrote:
> > $ foxplus
> > /usr/lib/foxplus/no87: 1: Syntax error: newline unexpected (expecting ")")
> > /usr/lib/foxplus/foxplus.pr: 1: Syntax error: word unexpected (expecting
> > ")")
> > $ file /usr/lib/foxplus/no87
> > /usr/lib/foxplus/no87: Microsoft a.out separate pure segmented
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 03:14:27PM +0530, S.Gopinath wrote:
> > > I'm required to run a.out binaries like foxplus
> > > in a recent Intel based hardware. I have chosen
> > > FreeBSD 5.1 and successfuly installed. But I could
> > > not run a.out binaries like Foxplus. I tried
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 03:14:27PM +0530, S.Gopinath wrote:
> Dear Sir,
> >
> > I'm required to run a.out binaries like foxplus
> > in a recent Intel based hardware. I have chosen
> > FreeBSD 5.1 and successfuly installed. But I could
> > not run a.out binaries like Foxplus. I tried it by
> > load
- Original Message -
From: "S.Gopinath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Kris Kennaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 7:39 PM
Subject: Re: your mail
> Dear Sir,
>
> As per your suggestion, I installed the packages Compat 2.x,
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 08:12:47PM -0400 or thereabouts, Derek Santamassino seemed to
write:
> Hi, I need some help with FreeBSD 4.8 Release. I installed
> FreeBSD. It does not recognize my hardware. After the installation
> it goes right to command prompt instead of going to desktop. My
> hardwar
On 2002-05-23 22:38, echo dev wrote:
> Now the problem is when the player answers it correctly it ouputs
> would you like to play again.. When it prompts for your answer it
> automaicly acwers it self.
> scanf("%c", &qNa);
> printf("WOULD YOU LIKE TO PLAY AGAIN?(y/n)>");
> scanf("%c", &qNa);
Jus
On May 23, echo dev wrote:
> is there anyone that might know why the fflush did not work I fugre
> this works besuse it shoves an empty vale into the buffer thus casuseing
> it to be empty.
>From the C-FAQ - http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/top.html
12.26: How can I flush pending input
V I R U S A L E R T
Our viruschecker found the
'W32/Aliz-A'
virus(es) in your email to the following recipient(s):
-> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Please check your system for viruses, or ask your system administrator
to do so.
For your reference, here are the head
lease use the test@ email list for testing. None of us care
> if your Mail:: module works
>
> On Sat, 25 Aug 2001, Charlie Root wrote:
>
> > Subject: Mail::Internet test subject
> >
> >
> > This is a test message that was sent by the test suite of
&
>From now on, please use the test@ email list for testing. None of us care
if your Mail:: module works
On Sat, 25 Aug 2001, Charlie Root wrote:
> Subject: Mail::Internet test subject
>
>
> This is a test message that was sent by the test suite of
> Mail::Internet.
>
Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010723 19:47] wr
> ote:
> > Hello
> > I am experimenting with kernel modules and am trying to write to a file.
> > This is the syscall function (sorry of my terminology is messed up)
> >
> > static int write_f
On 23 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> static int write_file(struct proc *p, void *arg) {
> struct write_args *wstructure;
> struct open_args *ostructure;
>
> ostructure->path="/tmp/blehfile";
> ostructure->flags = O_CREAT;
> ostructure->mode = 0;
> wst
ou pick up a couple of non-vendor
specific OS programming textbooks you should have more fun.
please use a more descriptive subject line, using an empty subject
is likely to get your mail skipped over, also please do not send
to the list more than once if possible.
and lastly... check your dam
On Sunday, 15 July 2001 at 16:51:51 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> am a kernel newbie. i tried adding code to the kernel
> and compiled it and installed . when i tried rebooting
> my new image the kernel panics with a fatal trap 12:
> page fault ( for which i know the reason). How do i
> boot t
On Thu, 24 May 2001, Mattias Berge wrote:
> Hi, I have sme major problems with getting the SMP support to work.
> My machine is a Compaq Proliant 380D with dual 733 mhz pIII processors.
> I run FreeBSD 4.3-REL.
> I have added the two SMP lines in my kernel conf and delöeted the I*86_CPU
> that I
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 11:40:43AM -, samrat basuthakur wrote:
> let me know about you peoples and your website.
Us, we're just a bunch of weenies high on LS^H^HBSD, and the website's
www.FreeBSD.org, thanks for your attention :)
G'luck,
Peter
--
I've heard that this sentence is a rumor.
On 06-Apr-2001 Rasputin wrote:
> * Daniel O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010406 10:08]:
> >
> > On 06-Apr-2001 Rasputin wrote:
> > The loader can load the kernel and modules off any filesystem it understands.
>^^
> Gimme a 'D'! Gimme an 'O'! Gimme an
* Daniel O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010406 10:08]:
>
> On 06-Apr-2001 Rasputin wrote:
> The loader can load the kernel and modules off any filesystem it understands.
^^
Gimme a 'D'! Gimme an 'O'! Gimme an 'H'!
For some reason I thought the kernel loade
Don't worry, Rasputin, we're not all really out to get you.
(Reminder to the Get Rasputin! club, we'll be meeting at 7AM on
irc.newgold.net in #Tech to discuss more ideas to confuse him).
Actually, I'd point you to some good papers, but I don't know any. In
fact, I'm not even sure how I learned.
On 06-Apr-2001 Rasputin wrote:
> > It is not at all like doing FS support as a module.
> Is that because of the loader? I still don't understand how a kernel
> can load a module from a disk it doesn't know how to read yet?
> Although I have a horrible feeling everyone else does...
The lo
* Joseph Mallett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010406 09:46]:
> Actually, it's possibly to do what he's talking about... RE: Using
> ReiserFS as a root filesystem, XFS, etc. As well as HURD which uses a
> seperate fs server, and Johannes Helander's Lites thesis talks about doing
> the same.
>
> It is not
Actually, it's possibly to do what he's talking about... RE: Using
ReiserFS as a root filesystem, XFS, etc. As well as HURD which uses a
seperate fs server, and Johannes Helander's Lites thesis talks about doing
the same.
It is not at all like doing FS support as a module.
/joseph
--
Joseph Mal
* Aman Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010405 19:37]:
> i aim to make ufs run as a module on FreeBSD, which
> surely would require a lot of serious kernel
> code<-entry points.
> -- pitfall
> 1. the system after boot will load the kernel image
> into core fromdis
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Aman Sharma wrote:
>
> project *
> ** kldload ufs ***
> i feel that a real microkernel OS should'nt have a
> bloated kernel in the sense, that heavy OS equipment
> like a FileSystem should run as a module on top of the
> kernel.
> i aim
On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 02:03:28PM -0800, dannyman wrote:
> Has anyone patched 4.x OpenSSH and/or the relevant ports to deal with the CRC
> checksum exploit? I've got to get 2.3 working on my 3.x box, but just
> incrementing the number in the Makefile causes patch-aa to go rejected ...
Ohhh, fat
Greg Black wrote:
>> sudo definitely helps if it's carefully administered, but it still
>> grants root access to a file,
>
>This is wrong -- sudo will grant access with whatever user
>privileges you wish to grant, maybe root and maybe some other
>user. It all depends on the way you set it up.
W
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>David Talkington wrote:
>
>> sudo definitely helps if it's carefully administered, but it still
>> grants root access to a file,
>
>This is wrong -- sudo will grant access with whatever user
>privileges you wish to grant, maybe root and ma
David Talkington wrote:
> sudo definitely helps if it's carefully administered, but it still
> grants root access to a file,
This is wrong -- sudo will grant access with whatever user
privileges you wish to grant, maybe root and maybe some other
user. It all depends on the way you set it up.
I
>
>I think what you're looking for is something similar (or exactly
>like) 'sudo'..
sudo definitely helps if it's carefully administered, but it still
grants root access to a file, which may not really be what you want.
As a Unix advocate in general, I'm looking forward to seeing how well
Sun doe
I think what you're looking for is something similar (or exactly
like) 'sudo'..
You can get it under your ports tree:
/usr/ports/security/sudo/
Or on-line:
www.freebsd.org/ports/security.html
RSN
On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Michael Chong wrote:
> I have a question about FreeBSD...is it possible to
Hi!
Ever read the bottom of the mails??
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
>
Regardsm
Freddy
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
On Fri, 19 May 2000, Manny Obrey wrote:
> I saw the following near the end of running "make depend;make" during a
> kernel re-config ... seriously, is this something to be concerned about? I
No.
Kris
In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
-- Charles Forsyth
This list is for FreeBSD, not Solaris.
*==*
*Gene Harris http://www.tetronsoftware.com*
*FreeBSD Novice*
*All ORBS.org SMTP connections are denied! *
*==*
On Thu, 13 J
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Ramiro Amaya wrote:
> I am new in this mail list, so I do not have so much experience about the
> questions I should ask, If I am in the worng place let me know, please.
> Well my question is related with Solaris 2.6, the story is like this:
>
> I have a Solaris 2.5 server
On Thu, Jan 13, 2000, Ramiro Amaya wrote:
> I am new in this mail list, so I do not have so much experience about the
> questions I should ask, If I am in the worng place let me know, please.
> Well my question is related with Solaris 2.6, the story is like this:
What does this have to do with
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 07:22:19AM +0200, Matthias Buelow wrote:
> BTW.. although risking to be off-topic by miles, I always liked the way
> how NetBSD's ftp(1) (since 1.4 or so) implemented http and ftp URL
> fetching and thus eliminated the need for a fetch(1) command.
> Couldn't the FreeBSD ftp
On Sun 1999-10-03 (07:22), Matthias Buelow wrote:
> Bcc:
> Subject: Re: FTP directory listing with ftpio(3) and fetch(3)
> Reply-To:
> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> BTW.. although risking to be off-topic by miles, I always liked the way
> how NetBSD's ftp(1) (since 1.4 or so) implemen
On Tue, 27 Jul 1999, Anders Vidmark wrote:
> Hi
Hej, :-)
>
> Im getting unreferenced inodes that fills up /.
> The box is running freebsd 2.2.6-release and sendmail 8.8.8
> Sendmails databases are rebuilt once every half hour.
> It seems like the unref. inodes comes from spammers.db and
> doma
On Tue, 27 Jul 1999, Anders Vidmark wrote:
> Hi
Hej, :-)
>
> Im getting unreferenced inodes that fills up /.
> The box is running freebsd 2.2.6-release and sendmail 8.8.8
> Sendmails databases are rebuilt once every half hour.
> It seems like the unref. inodes comes from spammers.db and
> dom
39 matches
Mail list logo
