I'VE DONE IT FOR YOU BRO, THE PASSWORD IS "4hLoLum4dBr0", MAKE SURE TO ENTER IT
ALL IN CAPS LOCK EVEN THE NUMBERS OR IT WON'T WORK.
IF THAT WORKED FOR YOU MAKE SURE TO SEND MONEY VIA PAYPAL TO
ohg4wd...@freebsd.org.
AGAIN MAKE SURE YOU TYPE IT ALL IN CAPS LOCK BRO OR IT WON'T WORK !!!1!
I NE
On 20 Feb 2013, at 08:46, Paul Schenkeveld wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 02:42:57AM -0500, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>> Just a thought with no working example but…
>>
>> bootp / tftp - from a remote secured management frame to TX a key filesytem
>> to unlock your rootfs.
>>
>> Could be somet
On 30 Jan 2013, at 22:46, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 30 January 2013 16:39, Eitan Adler wrote:
>> There has been some discussion about removing plip support from GENERIC
>> kernels.
>> plip still appears in sys/conf/NOTES
>
> A quick follow up to this: the documentation about plip from the
> h
On 17 Jan 2013, at 20:27, Devin Teske wrote:
>
> On Jan 17, 2013, at 11:14 AM, Steven Hartland wrote:
>
>> - Original Message - From: "Devin Teske"
>>> You're the perfect person to help us figure out why when we:
>>>
>>> 1. back-port mfi(4) from stable/8 into releng/8.3 (8.3-RELEASE-
On 5 Dec 2012, at 18:39, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Dec 5, 2012, at 9:42 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday, December 04, 2012 2:41:32 pm Ryan Stone wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 10:52 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
>>>
Hmm, I certainly see the module directories being built in paralle
On 7/10/12 4:36 PM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 10 Jul 2012, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>
>>
>> On 10 Jul 2012, at 12:10, Wojciech Puchar
>> wrote:
>>
>>> this is what i've got from kernel (same visible after dmesg of course)
>
On 10 Jul 2012, at 12:10, Wojciech Puchar
wrote:
> this is what i've got from kernel (same visible after dmesg of course)
>
>
> Jul 9 08:56:53 ... kernel: <<66<>p>ipd6id >p336i65d0 43432 ((hh6ttt6p2d4
> )(t,p dht)t,pu di)du,i ud1i 0d14 80:10 e44x88i::t eex die txoiedtn eo dn
> sosini gg
On 7/9/12 12:44 AM, Dan Lukes wrote:
> On 07/08/12 23:55, Doug Barton:
>> On 07/08/2012 07:41, Dan Lukes wrote:
> ...
>> Sorry, you're not understanding what is being proposed. Specifically
>> you're confusing the system stub resolver (the bit that's compiled into
>> libc, and used by binaries) a
On 7/5/12 7:18 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Jul 5, 2012, at 10:45 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>
>>
>> On 7/5/12 6:38 PM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>>>> inexperienced users.
>>>>
>>>> Having to enable it manually defeats its very purpose.
&
On 7/5/12 6:38 PM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>> inexperienced users.
>>
>> Having to enable it manually defeats its very purpose.
>
> so is FreeBSD future direction to be moron-OS just like linux is now, or
> is that just another stupid idea on that forum that came and... will pass?
>
> Quite impor
On 7/5/12 12:15 PM, Jonathan McKeown wrote:
> On Thursday 05 July 2012 11:03:32 Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 07/05/2012 01:28, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>>> On 2012-Jul-05 09:22:25 +0200, Jonathan McKeown
>>>
>>> wrote:
As for the idea that Linux refugees need extra help to migrate,
that's the s
On 7/5/12 11:03 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 07/05/2012 01:28, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>> On 2012-Jul-05 09:22:25 +0200, Jonathan McKeown
>> wrote:
>>> As for the idea that Linux refugees need extra help to migrate,
>>> that's the sort of thinking that led to things like:
>>>
>>> alias dir=ls
>>
>> Whi
On 7/3/12 3:36 PM, Mark Felder wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Jul 2012 07:39:34 -0500, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
>
>>
>> I don't think there will be as much whinging as you expect. Times have
>> changed.
>
> Agreed; if we need DNS in base (really, why?)
Because when people install a server, they expect
On 6/15/12 10:52 AM, Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:16:30AM +0200, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>> I'm thinking we might jump straight from 8.x to 10 when the time comes,
>> I'm really looking forward to Gleb's work on CARP and PF ;)
>
> I d
On 6/15/12 4:25 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 9 will mature as people use it and report bugs/regressions. It would
> be really great if you could try some of your workload on -9 and
> provide feedback and file PRs.
>
> Engaging with the community (and hiring developers :) is by far the
> be
On 14 Jun 2012, at 16:41, Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:29:22AM +0200, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>> Whoever said STABLE is no good for production ?
>>
>> I used to make us stick to 8.2-RELEASE here at work, but some bugfixes
>> are just too impor
On 14 Jun 2012, at 15:13, Mark Felder wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 16:49:18 -0500, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>
>>
>> I for one, as a fbsd admin on corporate servers ( read not commiter), would
>> dearly like less releases but a more aggressive MFC approach.
>
&
On 6/14/12 9:09 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
> On Jun 14, 2012 5:52 AM, "Wojciech Puchar"
> wrote:
>>>
>>> Friends,
>>>
>>> I am looking at the upcoming release schedule, and I only see 9.1 listed
> - can anyone confirm or deny 8.4 ?
>>
>>
>> does it matter. cvsup RELENG_8 and you see updates are done co
On 13 Jun 2012, at 19:27, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 13, 2012 11:52:28 am Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> On 13 June 2012 05:53, John Baldwin wrote:
>>
You don't need to change the FreeBSD culture. We'd love to do an 8.4
release. And an 8.5 release, and 8.6 release, etc. The pro
On 3/9/12 5:53 PM, Vincent Hoffman wrote:
> On 09/03/2012 11:52, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>> On 3/8/12 7:08 PM, Sean Bruno wrote:
>>> I'm trying to decide if I should cram "mfid" for mfi(4) controllers into
>>> the src tree or if we should package it up
On 3/8/12 7:08 PM, Sean Bruno wrote:
> I'm trying to decide if I should cram "mfid" for mfi(4) controllers into
> the src tree or if we should package it up into a ports package. I
> suspect that either one is acceptible, but it seems to make more sense
> to put it into the src tree since mfiutil
Hello Elman,
None of us was born a seer so you might want to tell the model of the
network card.
On 3/5/12 12:16 PM, Elman wrote:
> Hallo hacker.
>
> I try install freebsd 9.0 in server Hp proliant ML370 G6, in process install,
> freebsd can't detect ethernet card in automatic. Freebsd doesn
On 26 Feb 2012, at 14:34, Bob Bishop wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to hear from somebody who understands this stuff on the relative
> merits of blackhole routes vs firewall drop rules for dealing with packets
> from unwanted sources. I'm particularly interested in efficiency and
> scalability. T
On 2/23/12 2:22 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 9:59:02 pm Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 02/22/2012 01:42, Ivan Voras wrote:
>>> The Dragonfly team has recently liberated their VM from the giant lock and
>>> there are some interesting benchmarks comparing it to FreeBSD 9 and
On 1/25/12 11:44 AM, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote:
> Patch below changes the way mdconfig(8) parses its arguments:
> it removes the ordering requirement and makes error messages
> more descriptive; it also makes the code more readable by
> getting rid of the 'cmdline' variable.
>
> Now, the mdcon
On 1/20/12 2:59 PM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 02:43:55PM +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> D> Don't be mistaken, I greatly appreciate the work you put into this and
> D> the time you devoted to fixing this issue which was *a real annoyance*
> D> in ou
On 1/20/12 2:38 PM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Damien,
>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:09:55AM +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> D> I'm having an increasingly difficult time defending FreeBSD in our
> D> company against the advances of debian kfree which is much easier to
On 1/17/12 4:39 PM, Mark Felder wrote:
> Why is everyone so afraid of running -STABLE? Plenty of stuff gets
> MFC'd. Yeah, I agree -- running -RELEASE is difficult. Hell, it's
> frustrating to us that VMWare only supports -RELEASE and it took until
> ESX 5 to officially support 8.2!
>
> More rel
On 1/16/12 11:28 PM, John Kozubik wrote:
>
> Friends,
>
> I was disappointed to see that 8.3-RELEASE is now slated to come out in
> March of 2012. This will be ~13 months since 8.2-RELEASE and is typical
> of a trend towards longer gaps between minor releases.
>
> I also see that undercutting
On 12/1/11 11:44 AM, Steven Hartland wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "Jason Hellenthal"
>
>> This goes along with the thoughts I had about 4 months ago tending to
>> some
>> zfs statistics as well top showing greater than 100% actual CPU usage.
>> This
>> is a big pet peave of mine.
On 11/30/11 7:48 PM, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 11:52:46AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
>> On Friday, November 25, 2011 2:36:30 am Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>>>
>>> Found a troubling result of the following and figured someone might want to
>> take a look.
>>>
>>> Pay cl
On 11/30/11 7:48 PM, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 11:52:46AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
>> On Friday, November 25, 2011 2:36:30 am Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>>>
>>> Found a troubling result of the following and figured someone might want to
>> take a look.
>>>
>>> Pay cl
On 10/10/11 9:31 PM, elman wrote:
> Dear all
>
> I have plan to cluster server with freebsd 8.2 for mailserver. But I'm
> confusing with the software for clustering. Do you have a reference for me,
> or do you have blog and I can see your blog for reference to create
> clustering with freebsd
On 10/4/11 5:06 PM, rank1see...@gmail.com wrote:
> When I wana add user into DESTDIR, I chroot into it.
> However, in this case, DESTDIR has an arch of amd64, while running machine is
> i386.
> So that isn't an option as all execute attempts would fail(Exec format error).
>
> I've tried with pw's
On 26 May 2011 09:51, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>
>
> On 5/25/11 7:10 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>>> Hello list,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We've got these boxes at work running FreeBSD 8
On 5/25/11 7:10 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>> Hello list,
>>
>>
>>
>> We've got these boxes at work running FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE amd64 and
>> serving as firewalls and openvpn gateways.
>&
Hello list,
We've got these boxes at work running FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE amd64 and
serving as firewalls and openvpn gateways.
We use CARP interfaces to provide an active-passive fault tolerant system.
Today, we received a nagios alert from the master box saying it's
rsyslogd process had crashed.
On 4/9/11 7:33 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>
> Although I see the value of your and Sergey's argument, the problem is
> that it may cause unexpected breakage for other third parties that
> depend on a particular behavior in FreeBSD as Bjoern and others have
> suggested; I have a script at least th
On 4/8/11 5:40 PM, Sergey Vinogradov wrote:
> On 08.04.2011 19:23, Warner Losh wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 8, 2011, at 6:08 AM, Sergey Vinogradov wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, hackers.
>>> I have a question: why ipv4 netmask is displayed by ifconfig in hex
>>> format? Isn't dot-decimal notation more human-readable?
On 3/28/11 6:48 AM, Devin Teske wrote:
> Hi fellow hackers,
>
> I'm designing an open-sourced replacement boot-loader for FreeBSD. I feel
> that the existing options in the boot-loader menu today can be whittled down
> significantly with a stateful menu system rather than a single-action item
On 3/1/11 12:20 PM, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Carl wrote:
>> Kernel drivers can be (and in at least one case are) compiled into the
>> kernel but are not reported when queried for, at least not in a way that I
>> am aware of. For example, the ucom driver is present i
On 3/1/11 5:40 AM, Carl wrote:
> Kernel drivers can be (and in at least one case are) compiled into the
> kernel but are not reported when queried for, at least not in a way that
> I am aware of. For example, the ucom driver is present in the GENERIC
> kernel in this way. My expectation was that "k
On 2/22/11 2:27 PM, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 22, 2011 14:17:46 Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>> On 2/22/11 1:18 PM, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, February 22, 2011 12:31:34 Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>>>> rc.conf
>>>> ---
>>
On 2/22/11 1:51 PM, Ryan Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 6:31 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>> ifconfig_lagg0="laggproto failover laggport em0 laggport em1"
>> ipv4_addrs_lagg0="192.168.1.3/29"
>> ifconfig_lagg0="inet6 fe80::3/64"
>
>
On 2/22/11 1:18 PM, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 22, 2011 12:31:34 Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>> rc.conf
>> ---
>> # LINK AGGREG
>> ifconfig_lagg0="laggproto failover laggport em0 laggport em1"
>> ipv4_addrs_lagg0="192.168.1.3/29&qu
Hello list,
I've been having this odd problem with a lagg interface for some time now...
I have 2 boxes at home, a NAS running 8.1-RELEASE and a win7 workstation.
I recently purchased 2 intel dual port NICs and gifted my machines one each.
My problem is that on the FreeBSD box, the lagg interf
Rebuild the world first, then the kernel :)
---
Fleuriot Damien
On 22 Feb 2011, at 08:30, gnehzuil wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I updated my kernel source code and try to make a new kernel using make
> buildkernel command. But I got an error as follow:
>
>
> :> hack.c
> cc -
On 2/11/11 4:53 AM, Devin Teske wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'd like to announce the release of a new script. A script that I've
> developed for our field engineers that I'd like to share with the rest
> of the world.
>
> http://druidbsd.sourceforge.net/download/host-setup.txt
>
> host-setup(1) is a di
Hi Devin,
Thanks for sharing your work.
The list strips non-text attachments so there isn't much to see at the moment
though...
---
Fleuriot Damien
On 11 Feb 2011, at 04:53, Devin Teske wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'd like to announce the release of a new script. A script that I've
> developed f
Hi Daniel,
I'm afraid many people subscribed to stable are also hanging here and you may
not have much more luck.
If that is the case, you may wanna try freebsd-fs@
You will also want to:
- increase geom's verbosity
- provide your uname -a + zfs version
- run dmesg -a for any additional info
suited to the dedibox (that's what you are targeting, right?
> :))
>
> I tried to test it in vmware but I have a password issue right now.
>
> It is also a ZFSv28 image.
>
> Le 30 janv. 2011 à 01:56, Damien Fleuriot a écrit :
>
>> On 29 Jan 2011, at 20:26,
On 29 January 2011 23:24, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Jan 2011, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>
>> Hello lists,
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm trying to get FreeBSD 8.0 or 8.1 to run on a Dell poweredge r210
>> server.
>>
>> It ships with a SATA/SAS h
On 29 Jan 2011, at 19:00, jhelf...@e-e.com wrote:
>> Hello lists,
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm trying to get FreeBSD 8.0 or 8.1 to run on a Dell poweredge r210
>> server.
>>
>> It ships with a SATA/SAS h200 RAID controller.
>>
>>
>> Sadly, the MFI driver doesn't seem to register for this card...
>>
>>
On 29 Jan 2011, at 20:26, Andrew Thompson wrote:
> On 30 January 2011 06:20, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>> Hello lists,
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm trying to get FreeBSD 8.0 or 8.1 to run on a Dell poweredge r210 server.
>>
>> It ships with a SATA/SAS h20
On 29 Jan 2011, at 23:24, "Bjoern A. Zeeb"
wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Jan 2011, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>
>> Hello lists,
>>
>>
>> I'm trying to get FreeBSD 8.0 or 8.1 to run on a Dell poweredge r210 server.
>>
>> It ships with a SATA/S
Hello lists,
I'm trying to get FreeBSD 8.0 or 8.1 to run on a Dell poweredge r210 server.
It ships with a SATA/SAS h200 RAID controller.
Sadly, the MFI driver doesn't seem to register for this card...
Find below the pciconf -lcvb
--
none6@pci0:1:0:0: class=0x010700 card=0x1f1d1028 ch
56 matches
Mail list logo
