On 14 Jun 2012, at 16:41, Mark Linimon <lini...@lonesome.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:29:22AM +0200, Damien Fleuriot wrote: >> Whoever said STABLE is no good for production ? >> >> I used to make us stick to 8.2-RELEASE here at work, but some bugfixes >> are just too important to skip (we're running firewalls and had a >> problem with a CARP bug). > > In theory we try our best to keep -STABLE, well, stable in behavior and > not just the API, but in practice any given snapshot of -stable may or > may not have uncaught regressions in it. > > I reiterate, the major difference between -stable and -release is a more > thorough QA process for the latter :-) > > mcl We're indeed pretty happy with 8-STABLE :) We're ready to take the risk of a regression if the update squashes a bug that's a major PITA Thanks for your work on the project guys_______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
