On 07/ 8/13 05:28 AM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 7/7/13 3:05 PM, "C. Bergström" wrote:
On 07/ 8/13 04:58 AM, Chad J. Milios wrote:
Outline of features:
Extends plain old FreeBSD 9.1 (RELEASE or STABLE) and maintains
total compatibility
We seek to remain nimble
Expect a
On 07/ 8/13 04:58 AM, Chad J. Milios wrote:
Outline of features:
Extends plain old FreeBSD 9.1 (RELEASE or STABLE) and maintains total
compatibility
We seek to remain nimble
Expect a production-ready seal of approval to lag behind releases
by no more than a week or two
and pre
On 08/21/12 09:32 AM, Dan McGregor wrote:
Hi.
I've been working on porting compiler-rt/clang's support for address
sanitization (asan) to FreeBSD. So far I have it building and it
appears to work properly, however the build system expects to be able
to build 32 bit binaries on amd64.
amd64 doe
On 11/26/11 02:26 PM, Tak Pui Lou wrote:
On Nov 25, 2011, at 12:23 PM, C. Bergström wrote:
On 11/25/11 04:38 PM, Tak Pui Lou wrote:
Hello,
I have tested the port from
http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/path64-devel-2017.tar.bz2 and
http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/path64-2015.tar.xz
On 11/25/11 04:38 PM, Tak Pui Lou wrote:
Hello,
I have tested the port from
http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/path64-devel-2017.tar.bz2 and
http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/path64-2015.tar.xz but the compiler failed
in the following tests:
3/6 Test #3: regression_tests .
On 09/21/11 02:17 AM, David Chisnall wrote:
Ooops, I forgot I uninstalled the subversion-freebsd package and installed
subversion to work on libc++ (it would be really nice if these two could
coexist, by the way...).
The updated version of the diff now passes all of the libc++ locale tests (3
On 09/ 9/11 10:53 PM, arrowdodger wrote:
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:11 AM, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
I have done preliminary porting work of PathScale's open-sourced
EKOPath Compiler Suite (https://github.com/pathscale).
http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/ekopath-devel.tar.bz2
This includes experimenta
On 09/ 9/11 05:11 AM, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
I have done preliminary porting work of PathScale's open-sourced
EKOPath Compiler Suite (https://github.com/pathscale).
http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/ekopath-devel.tar.bz2
This includes experimental OpenMP support and PathDB. Unfortuntely,
PathDB bui
On 07/29/11 10:12 PM, James Jones wrote:
Does anyone have a prebuilt MIPS tool chain?
If you need MIPS64 then maybe I could get some binaries built or a cross
compiler. (Can't help with MIPS32 though)
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
htt
On 07/ 5/11 03:27 PM, Robert Millan wrote:
This patch conditionalizes a pair of FreeBSD compiler extensions so
that its CFLAGS are only used on FreeBSD.
Were I work we don't spend much time on compiling any kernel, but I'm
superficially curious about the actual code which necessitates you
need
Rayson Ho wrote:
Related to debuggers... just saw the LLDB (from the LLVM project)
announcement today:
and like any other llvm project it's glued to Mac with little regard for
portability..
Oh wait.. so is pathdb, but we'll at least make an effort to fix that..
We also updated the licens
Ed Maste wrote:
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 07:30:41PM +0700, "C. Bergstr?m" wrote:
PathScale is slowly open sourcing and porting some of our core software
technology and thought the BSD community might be interested in PathDB.
Months ago we gave a few FBSD developers private access to the sou
Bakul Shah wrote:
[Added -hackers as this may be of some interest to others.
Hope you don't mind]
I don't mind at all..
On Sun, 30 May 2010 01:27:12 +0700 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22C=2E_Bergstr=F6m=22?=
wrote:
ps. Tell me what you need to make it interesting and we'll try to make
it happen.
Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Sunday, May 30, 2010 a las 09:15:05PM +0700, "C. Bergström" escribió:
Hi
What's the real status of a fully permissive licensed toolchain?
...
Please don't high-jack another tread with a new topic; your mail
contains:
In-Repl
Hi
What's the real status of a fully permissive licensed toolchain?
1) Benchmarks - (I mean emperical evidence on FBSD and per target with
no anecdotal comments or speculation.. I admit benchmarks can actually
be misleading since many companies optimize for them specifically)
2) Has anyone tes
James Mansion wrote:
C. Bergström wrote:
Apologies.. I didn't really expect anyone to know about it. To me
the best way to describe it is similar to gdb, but much cleaner
codebase.
Might be more effective to offer this to the llvm community, I would
have thought.
While it wou
Matthew Jacob wrote:
On 5/29/2010 9:17 AM, "C. Bergström" wrote:
Can someone in the FreeBSD community please talk with this guy. If
you're going to send a snotty email at least be brave enough to do it
publicly..
Sorry for his rudeness.
fwiw.. I never said free anywh
Thordur I Bjornsson wrote:
PathScale is slowly open sourcing and porting some of our core
software technology and thought the BSD community might be
interested in PathDB. Months ago we gave a few FBSD developers
private access to the source, but never received any feedback. Now
we're asking mor
PathScale is slowly open sourcing and porting some of our core software
technology and thought the BSD community might be interested in PathDB.
Months ago we gave a few FBSD developers private access to the source,
but never received any feedback. Now we're asking more people to please
test
Andrius Morkūnas wrote:
On Mon, 03 May 2010 13:38:07 +0300, C. Bergström
wrote:
I can understand from a commercial perspective why having a permissive
licensed production compiler could be good.. I can understand why many
people don't like gcc or fsf, but what does the BSD community ge
Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2010-05-03 12:38, "C. Bergström" wrote:
What's really the goal here? What problem are you working to solve?
May I humbly say that building software with a different compiler in
itself doesn't really accomplish anything.
Of course it doe
Peter Pentchev wrote:
On Sun, May 02, 2010 at 11:51:52PM +0300, Andrius Mork??nas wrote:
On Sun, 02 May 2010 10:25:22 +0300, Yuri wrote:
Having tried clang++ I have a feeling that it's not quite ready to be a
generic c++ compiler.
[snip]
Very immature.
Many problems
Marius Nünnerich wrote:
2010/3/11 "C. Bergström" :
Shrikanth Kamath wrote:
Just trying to understand the build dependency for ctfconvert...
I see ctfconvert (cddl/usr.bin/ctfconvert/) has dependency on libctf.a
(cddl/lib/libctf/)
Now the snippet in bsd.lib.mk has this
Shrikanth Kamath wrote:
Just trying to understand the build dependency for ctfconvert...
I see ctfconvert (cddl/usr.bin/ctfconvert/) has dependency on libctf.a
(cddl/lib/libctf/)
Now the snippet in bsd.lib.mk has this check for various target suffixes,
.c.So:
.if defined(CTFCONVERT)
$
24 matches
Mail list logo
