Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2010-05-03 12:38, "C. Bergström" wrote:
What's really the goal here? What problem are you working to solve?
May I humbly say that building software with a different compiler in
itself doesn't really accomplish anything.
Of course it does. It forces you to make your software portable.
and your point is?
Are you trying to say that s/building/porting/ between compilers is
going to magically make the software (have less bugs, more performance
or better robustness) Porting could be a means-to-an-end, but still
it's not an end goal.. I'm digging at what's the end goal.. After it's
all ported what magically happens?
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
