Marius Nünnerich wrote:
2010/3/11 "C. Bergström" <cbergst...@pathscale.com>:
Shrikanth Kamath wrote:
Just trying to understand the build dependency for ctfconvert...

I see ctfconvert (cddl/usr.bin/ctfconvert/)  has dependency on libctf.a
(cddl/lib/libctf/)

Now the snippet in bsd.lib.mk has this check for various target suffixes,

.c.So:
.if defined(CTFCONVERT)
       ${CTFCONVERT} ${CTFFLAGS} ${.TARGET}
.endif

and sys.mk

.c
.if defined(CTFCONVERT)
       ${CTFCONVERT} ${CTFFLAGS} ${.TARGET}
.endif

My query, libctf includes  <bsd.lib.mk> in it's Makefile, so will the
above
not try to
run 'ctfconvert' on libctf itself?

I'm going to make some assumptions and go out on a limb here..

The CDDL code in FBSD came from OpenSolaris (specifically onnv-gate hg repo)
 When OpenSolaris is built they convert stab debugging information over to
CTF (compressed text format?).  This is done so that they can have debugging
information, but without the overhead of stab (or dwarf2).  I don't know how
much of the original onnv-gate Makefiles came over from OpenSolaris, but
assuming the FBSD kernel doesn't need/use CTF format this dependency can and
probably should go away.  (Only (k)mdb supports CTF that I'm aware of?)

Hopefully this is useful information and I'm not too wrong or someone will
correct me

The CTF information is needed by DTrace.
My guess is that it will run ctfconvert on itself so it should be
there from a prior install or it is part of some early toolchain
stuff.
CTF is needed by DTrace where? The build may depend on it, but this is probably for legacy reasons only. DTrace in opensolaris isn't dependent on it to function correctly. Replace the $(CTFCONVERT) and a few other utilities with /bin/true and the build will succeed. (I can only speak first hand from OSUNIX/OpenSolaris though and not FBSD..)
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to