Re: seeking clarification of makefile rules 'safe' with -j

2002-11-20 Thread Brian Reichert
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 11:53:45PM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote: > .y.out uses a constant filename (y.tab.c) as an intermediate file. If > make -j decided to compile two .y files in the same directory at the > same time, one's going to get overwritten. .l.out avoids this by using > ${.PREFIX}, which e

Re: seeking clarification of makefile rules 'safe' with -j

2002-11-20 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Nov 21), Brian Reichert said: > I'm crunching out some complex 'make' rules , and am having a brain > fart as to what sorts of rules are safe to use with '-j'. > > As a matter of example, I'm looking at /usr/share/mk/sys.mk under > 4.5-RELEASE: > > # XXX not -j safe > .y.

seeking clarification of makefile rules 'safe' with -j

2002-11-20 Thread Brian Reichert
I'm crunching out some complex 'make' rules , and am having a brain fart as to what sorts of rules are safe to use with '-j'. As a matter of example, I'm looking at /usr/share/mk/sys.mk under 4.5-RELEASE: # XXX not -j safe .y.out: ${YACC} ${YFLAGS} ${.IMPSRC} ${CC} ${CFLAGS} $

Épargnez de 15% à 80% sur vos coûts publicitaires !

2002-11-20 Thread Didier__b_r
Du bureau de Didier Bonneville-Roussy St-Barthélemy Cher ami et entrepreneur, Ceci est le premier numéro de la Lettre du marketing géométrique. Le coût de l'abonnement pour un an est de 197$. Par contre, j'ai décidé de vous envoyer cette première lettre gratuitement et de vous offrir un abo

Re: Intel PCI Modem

2002-11-20 Thread Braulio José Solano Rojas
Hi! On Wednesday, November 06, 2002 2:38 AM, WATANABE Kiyoshi wrote: > > On Thu, 31 Oct 2002 11:04:18 -0600, Braulio Jos$Bi (BSolano Rojas wrote: > > > > I have an "Intel V92 HaM Data Fax Voice" Modem. It is a hardware based > > modem. Mi pnpbios recognizes it as "Simple COMM. controler IRQ12

Re: if_ti DEVICE_POLLING patch (Was: Re: [hackers] Re: Netgraphcouldbe a router also)

2002-11-20 Thread Terry Lambert
[ ... why you want something more than interrupt coelescing ... ] Don Bowman wrote: > Actually I have pushed it to the livelock case. I'm shocked at how > easy this is to do with BSD (I'm used to system like vxworks with > much lower over head interrupt processing). > I found that for a 2x XEON @

Re: cvs commit: src/bin/sleep sleep.c

2002-11-20 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I'm curious how well COW sharing really works under FreeBSD. Earlier this > year, I fixed a piece of code which was O((processes sharing a page)^2) in > the VM system. When certain simple forkbombs were run, they would cause > the machine to freez

Re: cvs commit: src/bin/sleep sleep.c

2002-11-20 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake Tony Finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > David Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >BSS and modified data are not shared, and Matt is only counting > >zero fill and COW faults. > > Most of the BSS is mmapped zero pages that are copy-on-write, so in simple > programs they should be mostly

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/cam/scsi scsi_cd.c scsi_cd.h src/sys/dev/ataatapi-cd.c src/sys/sys cdrio.h src/usr.sbin/burncd burncd.8 burncd.csrc/usr.sbin/cdcontrol cdcontrol.1 cdcontrol.c

2002-11-20 Thread Nate Lawson
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Dirk Froemberg wrote: > What about CDRIOCGETBLOCKSIZE and CDRIOCSETBLOCKSIZE? Any chance > to have these ioctl in cd(4)? > > This would allow mplayer to play (S)VCD with SCSI cd drives. 8-) > > Regards Dirk I'm open to reviewing a patch that does this if someone wants

Re: Backup/restore of bootable w2k fat32 part from freebsd

2002-11-20 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 18:42, Michael Reifenberger wrote: > are there experiences with backup/restore of an bootable w2k > partition from within FreeBSD? > I've seen `newfs_msdos -B`, but how to extract the w2k bootblock (dd?) ? > Is it sufficient to get an bootable partition? I think you'll have t

Re: cvs commit: src/bin/sleep sleep.c

2002-11-20 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Tony Finch wrote: > David Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >BSS and modified data are not shared, and Matt is only counting > >zero fill and COW faults. > > Most of the BSS is mmapped zero pages that are copy-on-write, so in simple > programs they should be mostly sha

Re: if_ti DEVICE_POLLING patch (Was: Re: [hackers] Re: Netgraphcouldbe a router also)

2002-11-20 Thread Hiten Pandya
Don Bowman wrote: From: Terry Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Don Bowman wrote: Is there any point to using device polling with the tigon 3 (broadcom 570x etc)? It has a pretty good interrupt reducer in it by itself. Just tune the 2 rx and the 2 tx parameters and you get a constant interrupt

RE: if_ti DEVICE_POLLING patch (Was: Re: [hackers] Re: Netgraphcouldbe a router also)

2002-11-20 Thread Don Bowman
> From: Terry Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Don Bowman wrote: > > Is there any point to using device polling with the tigon 3 > > (broadcom 570x etc)? It has a pretty good interrupt reducer in it > > by itself. > > Just tune the 2 rx and the 2 tx parameters and you get a constant > > interru

Re: cvs commit: src/bin/sleep sleep.c

2002-11-20 Thread Tony Finch
David Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >BSS and modified data are not shared, and Matt is only counting >zero fill and COW faults. Most of the BSS is mmapped zero pages that are copy-on-write, so in simple programs they should be mostly shared. See rtld-elf/map_object.c Tony. -- f.a.n.finch

Re: if_ti DEVICE_POLLING patch (Was: Re: [hackers] Re: Netgraphcouldbe a router also)

2002-11-20 Thread Terry Lambert
Don Bowman wrote: > Is there any point to using device polling with the tigon 3 > (broadcom 570x etc)? It has a pretty good interrupt reducer in it > by itself. > Just tune the 2 rx and the 2 tx parameters and you get a constant > interrupt rate with good latency for any packet rate. This is hardw

Re: if_ti DEVICE_POLLING patch (Was: Re: [hackers] Re: Netgraphcouldbe a router also)

2002-11-20 Thread Terry Lambert
Hiten Pandya wrote: > > If someone with a Tigon III card could try the patch with the > > DEVICE_POLLING option enabled, and device polling turned on, > > and let us know that the card keeps functioning, rather than > > them getting a panic, then that would be enough, I think, to > > say "commit it

[FreeBSD PR bin/15416] addr2line broken

2002-11-20 Thread Joseph Scott
FreeBSD PR bin/15416 (addr2line is unable to find line numbers) indicates that addr2line appears to be broken. This PR was submitted at the end of 99 when 4.x was -current. It hasn't been touched since. The PR gives a test case where addr2line appears to be broken. I ran this e

RE: if_ti DEVICE_POLLING patch (Was: Re: [hackers] Re: Netgraphcouldbe a router also)

2002-11-20 Thread Don Bowman
> From: Terry Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Hiten Pandya wrote: > > Hehe. I was not being sarcastic. I just acknoledged your > statement. The > > reason I asked about committing the patch in the first > place, is because I > > thought that the patch had been around on the -net@ list, >

Re: if_ti DEVICE_POLLING patch (Was: Re: [hackers] Re: Netgraphcouldbe a router also)

2002-11-20 Thread Hiten Pandya
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 09:20:17AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote the words in effect of: > Hiten Pandya wrote: > > Hehe. I was not being sarcastic. I just acknoledged your statement. The > > reason I asked about committing the patch in the first place, is because I > > thought that the patch had be

Re: SiS 900 Ethernet card

2002-11-20 Thread Alexander
Hello, I just tested the sis.diff patch and it almost worked on me :) I get: sis0: port 0xe400-0xe4ff mem 0xf400-0xf4000fff irq 10 at device 3.0 on pci0 sis0: Ethernet address: 00:40:d0:2a:b0:af miibus0: on sis0 ukphy0: on miibus0 ukphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, aut

Re: if_ti DEVICE_POLLING patch (Was: Re: [hackers] Re: Netgraphcouldbe a router also)

2002-11-20 Thread Terry Lambert
Hiten Pandya wrote: > Hehe. I was not being sarcastic. I just acknoledged your statement. The > reason I asked about committing the patch in the first place, is because I > thought that the patch had been around on the -net@ list, and had been reviewed. > > My apologies. It's been around on th

Re: if_ti DEVICE_POLLING patch (Was: Re: [hackers] Re: Netgraphcouldbe a router also)

2002-11-20 Thread Hiten Pandya
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hiten Pandya wrote: On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 02:32:00PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote the words in effect of: I asked that someone with an if_ti test it first, and report back to me. As far as I know, no one has tested it yet, or if they have, t

Re: SiS 900 Ethernet card

2002-11-20 Thread Willy Offermans
Dear FreeBSD friend, Indeed it is, as you call it, one of those 'silicon on the motherboard' things. So I don't know if this is more difficult for you to do. On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 07:44:05AM -0700, Howard Harvey wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Willy Offermans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

RE: Playing with Current.

2002-11-20 Thread John Baldwin
On 20-Nov-2002 Ryan Sommers wrote: > First off I wasn't sure which list to send this to: current, hackers or > questions; so if this is the wrong destination my apologies. > > Anyway, last year, after years of using Linux, I fell in love with the > FreeBSD project. Now, I've had the desire offer

Re: SiS 900 Ethernet card

2002-11-20 Thread Willy Offermans
Dear FreeBSD friend, I'm not able to hack the code myself, I'm just a FreeBSD user (enthousiastic one) not a developer. So it would be nice if someone else could do it. On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 03:03:24PM +0100, Wolfgang Zenker wrote: > Hello, > > > sis0@pci0:4:0: class=0x02 card=0xb7321

Re: SiS 900 Ethernet card with PCI configuration

2002-11-20 Thread Wolfgang Zenker
Hello, > sis0@pci0:4:0:class=0x02 card=0xb7321019 chip=0x09001039 rev=0x91 >hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Silicon Integrated Systems (SiS)' > device = 'SiS900 Fast Ethernet/Home Networking Ctrlr' > class= network > subclass = ethernet that's apparently a SiS962 chip. T

Re: SiS 900 Ethernet card

2002-11-20 Thread Wolfgang Zenker
> [reports of sis900 driver not working] Could you post the output of "pciconf -lv" on your systems so we can see what exact variant of the sis900 card you have? Wolfgang To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: if_ti DEVICE_POLLING patch (Was: Re: [hackers] Re: Netgraph couldbe a router also)

2002-11-20 Thread tony
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hiten Pandya wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 02:32:00PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote the words in effect >of: > > > I asked that someone with an if_ti test it first, and report > > > back to me. As far as I know, no one has tested it yet, or > > > if they have, they're

PLS GET BACK TO ME.

2002-11-20 Thread sandra savimbi
> > DEAR FRIEND, > THIS LETTER MAY COME TO YOU AS A SURPRISE DUE TO THE FACT THAT WE > HAVE NOT YET MET. THE MESSAGE COULD BE STRANGE BUT REAL IF YOU PAY > SOME ATTENTION TO IT. I COULD HAVE NOTIFIED YOU ABOUT IT AT LEAST > FOR THE SAKE OF YOUR INTEGRITY. PLEASE ACCEPT MY SINCERE APOLOGIES. > IN B

Re: SiS 900 Ethernet card

2002-11-20 Thread Alexander
I just to say that I have similar problem and I also have SiS900 on my Laptop but I only receive MII without any PHY and the system reboots before even booted ! The mac is 00:00:00:00:00:00 It seems that the driver for this network card is not working at all ! P.S. Thanks for the patches, I'll tr

SiS 900 Ethernet card

2002-11-20 Thread Willy Offermans
Dear FreeBSD friends, In an email before I reported about a problem with the SiS 900 ethernetcard: > Dear FreeBSD friends, > > I have bought a nice laptop computer (Gericom Masterpiece 25340 XL). > It has an ethernet card inside, based on SiS 900 chip. > During boot, FreeBSD can detect the card,

fsck -p

2002-11-20 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
Hi! Today I've got a hard lockup with 4.7 box. Upon reboot, ``fsck -p'' was run, and it resulted in the following, in particular: /dev/da0s1h: UNREF FILE I=591 OWNER=nobody MODE=100644 /dev/da0s1h: SIZE=81269024 MTIME=Nov 20 09:50 2002 (CLEARED) /dev/da0s1h: FREE BLK COUNT(S) WRONG IN SUPERBLK

Backup/restore of bootable w2k fat32 part from freebsd

2002-11-20 Thread Michael Reifenberger
Hi, are there experiences with backup/restore of an bootable w2k partition from within FreeBSD? I've seen `newfs_msdos -B`, but how to extract the w2k bootblock (dd?) ? Is it sufficient to get an bootable partition? Thanks! Bye! Michael Reifenberger ^.*Plaut.*$, IT, R/3 Basis, GPS To Unsub