In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "David E. Cross" writes:
: I have been noticing of late a disturbing trend of AMD wedging and
: eventually taking the entire system down. The WCHAN that it is locked in is
: "sbwait". I now have the luxury of having this happen on a non-critical
: system with DDB c
According to Wilko Bulte:
> It's been done. It's called MS Exchange.
AFAIK, it is the opposite. M-Sexchange use one unique database for all
mailboxes, making recovery of a lost message an "interesting" challenge. It is
worse than the mbox format...
--
Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD
> > >-Jail(2) specify "ip_number" and/or "ip6_number" into the kernel.
> >
> > Well, I guess we want it to be "and", right ? Will people want to
> > bind both a IPv4 and IPv6 address (does it make sense to do so ?)
> > or will people only need to bind one of them ?
>
> I also think it is "and",
> >-Jail(2) specify "ip_number" and/or "ip6_number" into the kernel.
>
> Well, I guess we want it to be "and", right ? Will people want to
> bind both a IPv4 and IPv6 address (does it make sense to do so ?)
> or will people only need to bind one of them ?
I also think it is "and", but maybe som
I have been noticing of late a disturbing trend of AMD wedging and
eventually taking the entire system down. The WCHAN that it is locked in is
"sbwait". I now have the luxury of having this happen on a non-critical
system with DDB compiled in (the system is the one I am typing on now).
How would
> Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> > >-Jail(2) specify "ip_number" and/or "ip6_number" into the kernel.
> >
> > Well, I guess we want it to be "and", right ? Will people want to
> > bind both a IPv4 and IPv6 address (does it make sense to do so ?)
> > or will people only need to bind one of them ?
>
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >-Jail(2) specify "ip_number" and/or "ip6_number" into the kernel.
>
> Well, I guess we want it to be "and", right ? Will people want to
> bind both a IPv4 and IPv6 address (does it make sense to do so ?)
> or will people only need to bind one of them ?
What about mul
> >
> > /me shivers at the thought of my (easily) 500+ new messages a day
> > and hundreds of thousands of messages being stored one file for each
> > message...
>
> It's been done. It's called MS Exchange.
You don't have to use vile language in public :-)
MH has been storing
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Doug Rabson
writes:
: I've always used 57600 and it seems to work fine...
On some carefully hand picked machines, I run at 115200 w/o
problems... Don't try this if your mcahines don't have good UARTs and
can service the interrupts fast enough...
Warner
To Unsub
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Dennis writes:
: regarding loading over 1024 cylinder...does this work?
even w/o uniload, I've managed to get my FreeBSD partition to work on
my Sony VAIO laptop. It starts at cylnder 2193... It all depends on
the BIOS that you are using...
Warner
To Unsubscrib
On Wednesday, 17 November 1999 at 21:10:58 +, Doug Rabson wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Nov 1999, Greg Lehey wrote:
>
>> On Monday, 15 November 1999 at 16:46:50 -0500, Zhihui Zhang wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 15 Nov 1999, Greg Lehey wrote:
>>>
On Monday, 15 November 1999 at 15:13:53 -0700, Kenneth D. Me
On Tue, 16 Nov 1999, Greg Lehey wrote:
> On Monday, 15 November 1999 at 16:46:50 -0500, Zhihui Zhang wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 15 Nov 1999, Greg Lehey wrote:
> >
> >> On Monday, 15 November 1999 at 15:13:53 -0700, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
> >>> Zhihui Zhang wrote...
>
> I have set up a remo
> db> gdb 19200
> Next trap will enter GDB remote protocol mode at 19200 bps
>
> Comments?
Yes: Please do.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
As Daniel C. Sobral wrote ...
> Jos Backus wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 16, 1999 at 10:03:07AM -0800, Doug White wrote:
> > > If so you're breaking the cardinal rule of NFS: Never serve mail spools
> > > via NFS.
> >
> > ...unless you're using the Maildir mailbox format and delivery protocol:
> >
Greetings,
I have been in light contact with Warner over the course of the last couple
of weeks, and I am still at wits end with this one.
Currently, my laptop (VAIO F270 with a 3Com 589E pcmcia nic card) runs
3.3-REL with the PAO hacks, and works near-perfect. However, I would love
to use th
The core team has discussed the issue of bumping the libstdc++
version numer because of the compiler upgrade:
Yes, we do have a rule saying ``only one bump per release'',
and that rules still stands. But no rule without exception:
Clearly what we're looking at here deserves a version number
b
Yoshinobu Inoue wrote:
>
> -As already commented, checking those addresses which
>already specified by other jail'ed processes is necessary.
I disagree. The address is specified by the admin of the machine.
Letting him shoot himself in the foot is not particular bad, and the
test can be pe
Jos Backus wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 16, 1999 at 10:03:07AM -0800, Doug White wrote:
> > If so you're breaking the cardinal rule of NFS: Never serve mail spools
> > via NFS.
>
> ...unless you're using the Maildir mailbox format and delivery protocol:
>
> http://cr.yp.to/proto/maildir.html
regarding loading over 1024 cylinder...does this work?
Can someone provide a pointer? The URL previously provided on this list
does not work.
Dennis
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
At 05:40 PM 11/17/99 +0300, Aleksandr A.Babaylov wrote:
>Kelly Yancey writes:
> > On Tue, 16 Nov 1999, Leif Neland wrote:
> > > I've been asked if this is possible:
> > >
> > > Having a webserver running a database of some sort.
> > > User clicks a button on a form, a cgi-script runs, determines t
[redirected to -CURRENT]
Repeat after me:
If I am running -CURRENT, I should be subscribed to -CURRENT, and
that's where I should send my messages about -CURRENT.
On Wednesday, 17 November 1999 at 9:53:19 -0500, Christopher Stein wrote:
>
> Could someone please tell me why bdevsw has disa
On Wed, 17 Nov 1999, Thierry Herbelot wrote:
> Is there any doc on how to implement ISP-side PPPoE ? (or is it PPP over
> ATM, on the PVCs terminating the ADSL connections ?)
>
> TfH
Documenttion is on its way.
The present pppoe man page will give some help but it is not complete
yet. B
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Yoshinobu Inoue writes:
>-Only think about inet and inet6. Forget about other protocol
> family and sockaddr.
> (Just as current jail only think about inet.)
This has basically been the policy until now: Don't worry about a protocol
until somebody needs it.
>-Jus
On Monday, 15 November 1999 at 16:46:50 -0500, Zhihui Zhang wrote:
>
> On Mon, 15 Nov 1999, Greg Lehey wrote:
>
>> On Monday, 15 November 1999 at 15:13:53 -0700, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
>>> Zhihui Zhang wrote...
I have set up a remote debugging environment. But I think default 9600
Could someone please tell me why bdevsw has disappeared
from FreeBSD-current and what I should use for the block
device switch.
Thanks
Chris Stein
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Kelly Yancey writes:
> On Tue, 16 Nov 1999, Leif Neland wrote:
> > I've been asked if this is possible:
> >
> > Having a webserver running a database of some sort.
> > User clicks a button on a form, a cgi-script runs, determines the ip of
> > the user, and sends a command to "something" on the
Kelly Yancey wrote:
[..]
> For the list: while I was checking OpenBSD's kern_descrip.c to see
> whether they zeroed the memory first, I noticed that they had the
> following check that my 3.3-stable system does not:
>
> [ ... ]
> /* Don't let non-root see generation numbers (for NFS
You're missing a #include of
- Dave R. -
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
I am trying to compile a C source, but i get some strange error.
In file included from stats.c:15:
/usr/include/sys/socket.h:139: parse error before `u_char'
/usr/include/sys/socket.h:139: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or
union
/usr/include/sys/socket.h:140: warning: data definition has
On Tue, Nov 16, 1999 at 10:03:07AM -0800, Doug White wrote:
> If so you're breaking the cardinal rule of NFS: Never serve mail spools
> via NFS.
...unless you're using the Maildir mailbox format and delivery protocol:
http://cr.yp.to/proto/maildir.html
--
Jos Backus
On Thu, 11 Nov 1999 00:45:52 +0100, Ollivier Robert wrote:
> Your Perl binary is compiled without '-Wl,-E' (or
> '-Wl,--export-dynamic'). Without this option the Perl binary doesn't
> expoert its symbols thus preventing any dynamically loaded module to
> use anything from the binary.
Hi Olliv
Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> I admit that it doesn't seem a minor addition, but
> I'd like ot get netgraph down -nto 3.x now that it has been shaken down a
> bit in 4.x
>
> reasons:
> 1/ DSL in Canada is now switching rapidly to PPPoE.
> 2/ PPP will start using it soon (other than with pppoe)
> a
32 matches
Mail list logo
