Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> I admit that it doesn't seem a minor addition, but
> I'd like ot get netgraph down -nto 3.x now that it has been shaken down a
> bit in 4.x
>
> reasons:
> 1/ DSL in Canada is now switching rapidly to PPPoE.
> 2/ PPP will start using it soon (other than with pppoe)
> and we'd like ONE version not 2 for Brian to maintain.
> 3/ ISPs who may wan tto use the PPPOE server side are generally running
> 3.x, not 4.x
Is there any doc on how to implement ISP-side PPPoE ? (or is it PPP over
ATM, on the PVCs terminating the ADSL connections ?)
TfH
>
> Supporting facts:
> Netgraph is written to generally be non intrusive.
> No code is changed in the non "options NETGRAPH" case and only minor
> changes are made in normal code paths in the NETGRAPH case.
> (with the exception of the if_sr and if_ar drivers)
>
> I might hold off on some of the more intrusive of those
> changes (e.g. no real need to add it to netstat immediatly)
> which will not really effect the functionality.
>
> And last but not least:
> We are actually developing Netgraph under 3.3 so we are already keeping
> two source trees in sync, 3.3. and 4.0 so we might as well let others get
> at it.
>
> Anyone violently object?
>
> Julian
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
