Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >-Jail(2) specify "ip_number" and/or "ip6_number" into the kernel. > > Well, I guess we want it to be "and", right ? Will people want to > bind both a IPv4 and IPv6 address (does it make sense to do so ?) > or will people only need to bind one of them ? What about multiple IPv6 or IPv4 addresses per jail? It might be a good idea while Inoue-san is at it. Or is this an incredibly stupid question? Cheers, Jeroen -- Jeroen C. van Gelderen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Interesting read: http://www.vcnet.com/bms/ JLF To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: Should jail treat ip-number? Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Should jail treat ip-numb... Yoshinobu Inoue
- Re: Should jail treat ip-number? Yoshinobu Inoue
- Re: Should jail treat ip-number? Warner Losh
- Re: Should jail treat ip-number? Pierre Beyssac
- Re: Should jail treat ip-number? Yoshinobu Inoue
- Re: Should jail treat ip-number? Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Should jail treat ip-number? Yoshinobu Inoue
- Re: Should jail treat ip-number? Yoshinobu Inoue
- Re: Should jail treat ip-numb... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Should jail treat ip-... Jeroen C. van Gelderen
- Re: Should jail treat ip-... Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: Should jail treat ip-... Yoshinobu Inoue
- Re: Should jail treat ip-... Jeroen C. van Gelderen
- Re: Should jail treat ip-... Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: Should jail treat ip-number? Daniel C. Sobral