On Wed, 09 Jun 1999 23:14:47 EST, Dan Nelson wrote:
> Install the linux_devel port and resign yourself to building Linux
> executables whenever you have to talk to Oracle.
We've _just_ been through this whole nightmare and resigned ourselves to
using a Sparc for talking to Oracle. :-(
Ciao,
Sh
In the last episode (Jun 09), Chad David said:
> I have managed to install Oracle 8.0.5 on FreeBSD 3.2-STABLE, and
> everything seems to be fine, but I am unable to run an OCI program
> that I am porting from Solaris. I started out with unresolved
> symbols in libclntsh.so, and I "got rid" of them
I have managed to install Oracle 8.0.5 on FreeBSD 3.2-STABLE, and
everything
seems to be fine, but I am unable to run an OCI program that I am
porting from
Solaris. I started out with unresolved symbols in libclntsh.so, and I
"got ride" of
them by relinking libclntsh.so against /usr/compat/linux/l
On Wed, Jun 9, 1999, Robert Butler wrote:
> Anybody know where I can get the source code of ISDN
> support in freebsd?
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/branches/-current/src/usr.sbin/i4b/
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/usr.sbin/i4b
>
> Robert
>
>
Anybody know where I can get the source code of ISDN
support in freebsd?
Robert
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hacker
On Wed, 09 Jun 1999 23:34:36 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> It suddenly occured to me while I was testing this that I might be
> going to a lot of trouble under the misguided assumption that a fork is
> expensive. Am I wrong?
Please disregard my previous post. I was working around a bug I
introd
One of the nice things about Unix has always been low process-spawning overhead.
FreeBSD should do quite well, especially, since it is demand-paged and a fork
doesn't actually copy much, just the vm map and makes everything COW.
Brian Feldman_ __ ___ ___ ___ ___
gr...@uni
Hi folks,
I'm currently working on our libwrap support in inetd. Working with the
originators of a few PR's, I've come up with a diff that gets most of
what we need right, including the severity option of hosts_options.
I'm taking on hosts_options' twist now. The problem with twist is that
it ex
>Also, even in single monitor more, accelX is extremely slow compared to Xfree,
>so much that it is practically useless. I suppose I could install freebsd2.2
>but I'd give up the second Xeon processor then. :(
Wow, is this true? In the past on my machine (MM II w/ 8MB) I found the
Xig server to
Hi all,
I've got an asus XG-DLS dual xeon mainboard with two matrox millenium G200
pci boards with 16 megs of ram each and I'm trying to run Accelerated X v5
on freebsd 3.2-stable.
First, I was wondering if anyone else out there is successfully running
multihead accelX 5 on freebsd 3+.
It seems
Thanks for your response, you are probably right.
I created the vinum volym under the 3.1 release (or it may have been the 3.0
release) and I maximized the partition size to the last block with trial and
error. When checking the sector number returned by fsck (44609178, ...), it
seems to be exactly
In article
you write:
>> And more directly for you, if they're not harming your performance, I
>> wouldn't do *anything*. They do serve a purpose.
>>
>
>When benchmarking proxies we find the MSL creates a resource problem for
>us with Web Polygraph (http://polygraph.ircache.net/).
>
>I must a
> And more directly for you, if they're not harming your performance, I
> wouldn't do *anything*. They do serve a purpose.
>
When benchmarking proxies we find the MSL creates a resource problem for
us with Web Polygraph (http://polygraph.ircache.net/).
I must admit that we have never measured
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Dan Moschuk wrote:
>
>I noticed on a very high traffic'd webserver, I have just over 4000 sockets
>stuck in the TIME_WAIT state. Ideally, I want to "bend" the RFC a bit and
>close the descriptor before it hits that state, or, ignore the 2MSL wait
>when it enter
On Wed, Jun 09, 1999 at 03:11:23PM +0200, John Andersson wrote:
> I seem to have some bad sectors on my vinum volume, fsck reports the
> following and does not seem to be able to fix it:
> THE FOLLOWING SECTORS COULD NOT BE WRITTEN: 44609178, 44609179,
>
> * FILE SYSTEM STILL DIRTY *
> ***
In the FAQ of FreeBSD 2.X, 13.12. Alternative layout policies for
directories, there is the following sentence:
Most filesystems are created from archives that were created by a depth
first search (aka ftw).
What does ftw stand for (My guess is File Tree Walk)? Can anyone give me
examples of p
I noticed on a very high traffic'd webserver, I have just over 4000 sockets
stuck in the TIME_WAIT state. Ideally, I want to "bend" the RFC a bit and
close the descriptor before it hits that state, or, ignore the 2MSL wait
when it enters that state.
I take it there is no sysctl switch to trigg
Hi there,
I'm a newbie in kernel programming,
Could someone help me to know in which case
should I use splimp, splnet, etc .. levels.
I have to copy entirely some mbuf chains and to
allocate memory in IP layer.
I do not use any specific level (no splxxx),
but I think my kernel is not ver
I seem to have some bad sectors on my vinum volume, fsck reports the
following and does not seem to be able to fix it:
THE FOLLOWING SECTORS COULD NOT BE WRITTEN: 44609178, 44609179,
* FILE SYSTEM STILL DIRTY *
* FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *
* PLEASE RERUN FSCK *
This was ju
>
> On Wed, Jun 09, 1999 at 12:40:46AM +0100, Brian Somers wrote:
> > >
> > > Can someone comment please? Is this a bug in the way the gcc2.8 is
> > > installed, or is it a bug in my understanding? (probably the latter).
> >
> > Perhaps you need a gcc-compiled version of libstdc++. It's just
> John S. Dyson writes:
> > Howard Goldstein said:
> > > On Mon, 7 Jun 1999 18:38:51 -0400 (EDT), Brian Feldman
> wrote:
> > > : 4.0-CURRENT
> > >
> > > 3.2R too...
> > >
> > I just checked the source (CVS) tree, and something bad happend
> > between 1.27 and 1.29 on ufs_readwrite.c.
> On Wed, Jun 09, 1999 at 12:40:46AM +0100, Brian Somers wrote:
> > >
> > > Can someone comment please? Is this a bug in the way the gcc2.8 is
> > > installed, or is it a bug in my understanding? (probably the latter).
> >
> > Perhaps you need a gcc-compiled version of libstdc++. It's just a
Hi.
Hackers.
I always install FreeBSD via FTP.
But sysinstall forgot FTP server name after reboot and restart...
I quick hacked sysinstall and it save to /etc/rc.conf as below
line and reuse URL.
# -- sysinstall generated deltas -- #
_ftpPath="ftp://ftp.cc.keio.ac.jp/pub/FreeBSD/";
Curren
John S. Dyson writes:
> Howard Goldstein said:
> > On Mon, 7 Jun 1999 18:38:51 -0400 (EDT), Brian Feldman
> > wrote:
> > : 4.0-CURRENT
> >
> > 3.2R too...
> >
> I just checked the source (CVS) tree, and something bad happend
> between 1.27 and 1.29 on ufs_readwrite.c. Unless other th
> On Wed, 9 Jun 1999, John S. Dyson wrote:
>
> > Howard Goldstein said:
> > > On Mon, 7 Jun 1999 18:38:51 -0400 (EDT), Brian Feldman
> > > wrote:
> > > : On Mon, 7 Jun 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> > > : > ... what version of the operating system?
> > > : 4.0-CURRENT
> > >
> > > 3.2R too
On Wed, 9 Jun 1999, John S. Dyson wrote:
> Howard Goldstein said:
> > On Mon, 7 Jun 1999 18:38:51 -0400 (EDT), Brian Feldman
> > wrote:
> > : On Mon, 7 Jun 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> > : > ... what version of the operating system?
> > : 4.0-CURRENT
> >
> > 3.2R too...
> >
> I just ch
Antti Kaipila wrote:
>
>
> Any ideas? I'm at a loss here. Please CC me, I'm not on the list.
>
Have you done
sh MAKEDEV ccd0
sh MAKEDEV ccd1
sh MAKEDEV ccd2
sh MAKEDEV ccd3
?
--
James E. HousleyPGP: 1024/03983B4D
System Supply, Inc. 2C 3
Howard Goldstein said:
> On Mon, 7 Jun 1999 18:38:51 -0400 (EDT), Brian Feldman
> wrote:
> : On Mon, 7 Jun 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> : > ... what version of the operating system?
> : 4.0-CURRENT
>
> 3.2R too...
>
I just checked the source (CVS) tree, and something bad happend
between
On Wed, 9 Jun 1999, Stephen Hocking-Senior Programmer PGS Tensor Perth wrote:
> Hmm. Has he merged the changes into the SDL codebase yet? (what is it,
> 0.9.13). Is anyone doing anything about the pthread_cancel calls?
As far as I know the changes have been merged into the main SDL code base.
(i
> On Wed, 9 Jun 1999, Stephen Hocking-Senior Programmer PGS Tensor Perth wrote:
> Basically the entire SDL library works now on my FreeBSD-3.2-STABLE box
> ... (as that is where I have the main developer pf the SDL-librray do the
> porting)
>
> The only problem is that the pthread_cancel functio
On Wed, Jun 09, 1999 at 12:40:46AM +0100, Brian Somers wrote:
> >
> > Can someone comment please? Is this a bug in the way the gcc2.8 is
> > installed, or is it a bug in my understanding? (probably the latter).
>
> Perhaps you need a gcc-compiled version of libstdc++. It's just a
> guess, but
On Wed, 9 Jun 1999, Stephen Hocking-Senior Programmer PGS Tensor Perth wrote:
> A while ago, someone mentioned that they were partway through a port of the
> Simple DirectMedia Layer. Has this been completed?
Basically the entire SDL library works now on my FreeBSD-3.2-STABLE box
... (as that is
32 matches
Mail list logo
