>Also, even in single monitor more, accelX is extremely slow compared to Xfree, >so much that it is practically useless. I suppose I could install freebsd2.2 >but I'd give up the second Xeon processor then. :(
Wow, is this true? In the past on my machine (MM II w/ 8MB) I found the Xig server to be a hair faster than XFree86. That was only using one machine, and using Xaccel 4.x. Seems strange it would slow down so significantly. I haven't tried doing it under >=3.2 yet, and I may not. I'm holding out for XFree 4.0 with overlay visuals before I plunk down more money for the server. Brian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
