First up, thanks to Ken and Dan for getting this port started... nice
work chaps!
I've been playing with Ken's eclipse-europa-dan port for the last couple
of days and haven't had a lot of joy so far... it might just be my
environments, but here are the notes from the two hosts I've tested with
Greg Lewis wrote:
G'day Mike,
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 11:11:54AM -0700, Mike Bowie wrote:
First up, thanks to Ken and Dan for getting this port started... nice
work chaps!
I've been playing with Ken's eclipse-europa-dan port for the last couple
of days and haven't had
Ken Yamada wrote:
Sorry one more...
The instruction says;
: ::
# In the build.xml
* update the compilelibs property in the init target to reflect the new
architecture
* update the compilelibs target to reflect the new architecture
# Run the
Mike Bowie wrote:
Ken Yamada wrote:
Sorry one more...
The instruction says;
: ::
# In the build.xml
* update the compilelibs property in the init target to reflect
the new architecture
* update the compilelibs target to reflect the new
Ok campers... see how this suits.
I've diff'd a patch against Ken and Dan's port bundle from September
6th. (See http://www.tydfam.jp/eclipse-europa-dan.tgz)
http://www.buzmo.com/projects/eclipse-europa-port/Makefile-090807.diff
It's changes are based on the 3.2 port, but it installs into
$
Ken Yamada wrote:
Opps!
You missed ${WRKSRC} in ${CP}.
It needs to be ;
do-build:
@(cd ${WRKSRC}; ${SETENV} ${MAKE_ENV} \
./build -os ${ECLIPSE_OS} -ws ${ECLIPSE_WS} -arch ${ECLIPSE_ARCH} -comp
ilelibs)
@${CP} ${WRKSRC}/launchertmp/library/${ECLIPSE_WS}/eclipse_10
58AM -0700, Mike Bowie wrote:
Ken Yamada wrote:
Opps!
You missed ${WRKSRC} in ${CP}.
It needs to be ;
do-build:
@(cd ${WRKSRC}; ${SETENV} ${MAKE_ENV} \
./build -os ${ECLIPSE_OS} -ws ${ECLIPSE_WS} -arch ${ECLIPSE_ARCH}
-comp
ilelibs)
@${CP}
Ken Yamada wrote:
Mike,
It does not run with jdk1.5.0 - it generates "Bad version number in .class
file" error. So, we'd better include JAVA_HOME=/usr/local/jdk1.6.0 in eclipse.in.
I reflected your patch, the above and eliminating unnecessary working files
to my eclipse-europa-dan.tgz
Daniel Rucci wrote:
Hey is the internal web-browser working for anyone?
Thanks,
Dan
___
freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-eclipse
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Daniel Rucci wrote:
Ken Yamada wrote:
I'm not familiar with this, but from your error message, I created a patch
and it seemingly make external browser -firefox- run.
They are reflected to the http://www.tydfam.jp/eclipse-europa-dan.tgz.
Yes, This works for me, I'm able to open
Ken Yamada wrote:
I agree, Mike.
It was just a quick patch to see if it solves the problem, and I rewrote it.
I also created jdk15 version successfully (http://www.tydfam.jp/eclipse-europa-jdk15.tgz) that enables me to run JBossTools-2.0.0b3.
I found a bug at org.eclipse.swt.widget.Fil
Ken Yamada wrote:
Do you have steps to reproduce the chooser bug? Does it occur in
build's against both 1.5 and 1.6 or are you running a 1.5 build against
a 1.6 JAVA_HOME? (Or visa versa.)
It occurs on both 1.5 and 1.6 version.
Preference -> Connectivity -> Driver Definitions -> A
Nickolay,
I rebuilt my -CURRENT yesterday and am running Eclipse 3.2 under both
jdk16 and diablo-jdk-1.5 from ports without any problems.
Are you able to run other Java applications successfully?
Cheers,
Mike.
Nickolay D. Hodyunya wrote:
Hello, I have installed diablo-jdk1.5 and eclipse-3
Greg Lewis wrote:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 08:51:44AM -0700, Greg Lewis wrote:
I grabbed the two versions of the Eclipse 3.3 port that seem to have been
mentioned on the list and am looking at committing one to eclipse-devel.
One thing that stands out immediately is files/launchersrc.zip. Wh
FreeBSD bugmaster wrote:
Current FreeBSD problem reports
Critical problems
Serious problems
Non-critical problems
S Tracker Resp. Description
o ports/104959 eclipsejava/eclipse does not work on 7-CURRE
Greg Lewis wrote:
Talking to myself again...
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 11:13:50PM -0700, Greg Lewis wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 04:45:33PM +0900, Ken Yamada wrote:
Greg, would you please update the downloaded file to the most updated one?
I could not reproduce your problem using the down
Mike Bowie wrote:
Greg Lewis wrote:
Talking to myself again...
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 11:13:50PM -0700, Greg Lewis wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 04:45:33PM +0900, Ken Yamada wrote:
Greg, would you please update the downloaded file to the most
updated one?
I could not reproduce your
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I assume this question has been asked before and I apologize for the
duplication; I've been away from this list for quite a while. Is there a 3.3
port of Eclipse available somewhere for 6.2?
Peter
___
freebsd-eclipse@freebsd
Greg Lewis wrote:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 12:12:23PM +0900, Ken Yamada wrote:
I tried Mike's patch and found that it based on gmake while
recent my tgz uses make, and it cuases an error. I also confirmed
what Mike is pointing and confirmed that his change enables to
compile with WITHOUT_GN
Ken Yamada wrote:
Mike,
I am working with 3.3.1 and may take a day or two to compile w/o errors.
3.3.1 seems that it does not need launchersrc.zip - I need another few hours to
confirm it.
Do we better go for 3.4M?
ps. I still have nasty problem I cannot identify the cause and I am not
Ken Yamada wrote:
Guys,
Would you please check if eclipse-europa-3.3.1 works? If it does work, I
think that we'd better use 3.3.1 rather than 3.3.0 because it does not need
launchersrc.zip - now it is compiled from
features/org.eclipse.equinox.executable. And I could eliminate some of p
Ken Yamada wrote:
Mike,
I found that it does not work for NFS files I am using for the workspace. It says
"it is in use ...". I do not think it is because of eclipse-europe, but I am
not sure
Any idea?
Ken,
3.3.1 (so far) and 3.3 work fine with NFS for me... my work on this
Ken Yamada wrote:
From: Mike Bowie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ken,
3.3.1 (so far) and 3.3 work fine with NFS for me... my work on this
particular project is exclusively based on NFS mounts. (Others are SVN
or RSE.)
Ummm..., then something goes wrong with my -current
Ken,
Ken Yamada wrote:
Two issues I noticed with 3.3.1.
a) I have the following error if I try to assign workspace to NFS directory.
I have no problems in accessing any of NFS files with other than this eclipse-europa331, and Mike says that he does not have any problem in accessing NFS files with
Ken Yamada wrote:
Thank you Greg for uploading eclipse-devel (europa 3.3).
Yes, a) was my fault. client side had not have rpc.lockd/statd. I did the
same mistake with 3.3 before, I remember.
Good morning Greg et al,
Thanks for getting 3.3 into the ports tree... it's great to see
FreeBSD bugmaster wrote:
Current FreeBSD problem reports
Critical problems
Serious problems
Non-critical problems
S Tracker Resp. Description
o ports/104959 eclipsejava/eclipse does not work on 7-CURRE
Luis Neves wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/java/eclipse-devel]# make fetch
eclipse is using xulrunner for gecko support, but you can
change that by defining WITH_GECKO to the following values:
xulrunner
firefox
mozilla
seamonkey
===> Vulnerability check disabled, database no
Greg,
Have you had a chance to take a look at Ken's 3.3.1 port? I've been
using it for a couple of days now and so far it's certainly as groovy as
the 3.3 that we have in eclipse-devel.
What do you think about kicking eclipse-devel up to 3.3.1? From what I
can see, 3.3.1 is the current rel
Doing a bit of a 'Greg' and replying to myself...
Greg,
Have you had a chance to take a look at Ken's 3.3.1 port? I've been
using it for a couple of days now and so far it's certainly as groovy as
the 3.3 that we have in eclipse-devel.
What do you think about kicking eclipse-devel up to 3.3
Daniel Rucci wrote:
I seem to have a degradation in stability after applying updates &
installing plugins, need to track down the culprit. Is everyone
acquiring all of the updates after installing?
Not sure yet which added patches or plugins are making my 6.2
installation not work nicely but
Jonas Wolz wrote:
Ken Yamada wrote:
From: Mike Bowie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
One caveat I failed to mention, is that 3.3.1 doesn't build with jdk1.5
so far. The instructions indicate that it should, but Ken hasn't had
any success as far as I know and I've not looked at it.
Jonas Wolz wrote:
Mike Bowie wrote:
One of the 3.3.0 port version we had built and ran quite happily with
jdk1.5, but we've not seen the same success with 3.3.1 so far.
I may have a poke at it this weekend and see what we can wrangle. For
now the eclipse-devel port is tied to jdk1.6 an
Good day all, long time no see! Happy New Year etc etc ;-)
Just wanted to ask if anyone has been playing with Ganymede under
FreeBSD yet?
Cheers,
Mike.
___
freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ec
ken wrote:
Hi!
I ported eclipse 3.3.1 to FreeBSD and Greg registered it as eclipse-devel in
ports tree.
I updated eclipse-devel to 3.3.1.1 which is the latest stable version and am
about ready to ask Greg to update the eclipse-devel.
I recognized the bug [EMAIL PROTECTED] pointed out in
ken wrote:
Mike,
Yea, I am surviving...
I am using it and touching it every time I have a problem. So, it is a
turtle walk...
About plugins;
I know that JBossTools GUI which requires newer version of xulrunner does
not work properly. Also, GUI editor of eclipse may/may not work.
Greg Lewis wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 08:06:07PM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote:
Mass category moves are stressful for our users IMHO, so we should only
use them if we really feel the hierarchy will be in much better shape
going forwards.
So thats the big question. If we leave the category the
ken wrote:
My appology, Mike.
I found that I made a mistake and brought in a lot of bugs relating to minor
versioning of plugins with eclipse-devel332.tgz.
Please pick up newer one from http://www.tydfam.jp/eclipse-devel332.tgz and
give a try. I checked it with amd64/jdk15 and it is see
ken wrote:
My appology, Mike.
I found that I made a mistake and brought in a lot of bugs relating to minor
versioning of plugins with eclipse-devel332.tgz.
Please pick up newer one from http://www.tydfam.jp/eclipse-devel332.tgz and
give a try. I checked it with amd64/jdk15 and it is see
Jonathan Chen wrote:
Hi,
After seeing some progress on the 3.3.2 port the past few months, I
was hoping that someone would commit it to java/eclipse-devel, or
even java/eclipse. Any possibility of that happening?
Cheers.
Of course, I'd be happy to jump on Jonathan's bandwagon here.
I've been
Rick C. Petty wrote:
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 11:59:16AM -0700, Mike Bowie wrote:
After seeing some progress on the 3.3.2 port the past few months, I
was hoping that someone would commit it to java/eclipse-devel, or
even java/eclipse. Any possibility of that happening?
Of course, I&#
Greg Lewis wrote:
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 01:43:13PM -0700, Mike Bowie wrote:
Interesting "New Zealand connection" trifecta we seem to have so far...
Jon looks to be *in* NZ, I'm *from* NZ and Rick's "kiwi-computer.com"
rounds it out. (Although who's to
Mike Bowie wrote:
Greg Lewis wrote:
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 01:43:13PM -0700, Mike Bowie wrote:
Interesting "New Zealand connection" trifecta we seem to have so
far... Jon looks to be *in* NZ, I'm *from* NZ and Rick's
"kiwi-computer.com" rounds it out. (Altho
Mike Bowie wrote:
Mike Bowie wrote:
Greg Lewis wrote:
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 01:43:13PM -0700, Mike Bowie wrote:
Interesting "New Zealand connection" trifecta we seem to have so
far... Jon looks to be *in* NZ, I'm *from* NZ and Rick's
"kiwi-computer.com" roun
Good day all,
Couldn't help but notice that 3.4 is only five days away from release;
which should (more or less) mean that the current RC4 is what they're
going to roll with.
Has anyone had a dabble in building the 3.4 branch yet? I may have a
look-and-see this afternoon. If someone else a
User ken wrote:
Go ahead, Mike!!
Does it run on jdk16 or on jdk15/16?
And 3.4 would better replace current 3.3.2 eclipse-devel if it does not cause
much problems to 3.3.2 users. It is because that eclipse depends on
mozilla/seamonkey, etc. And 3.3.2 maintenance may need some retroactive
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
is there any efforts to port eclipse 3.4 (aka ganymede)?
Also i would like to ask your opinion on how hard it would be to port
jboss tools, since they obviously contain stuff written in C.
By installing the whole jboss tools 2.1.1 asis kind of works but is
too unst
ken wrote:
Steph,
Thank you for your reply.
I understand the situation about Equinox p2 that I do not understand what it is.
Hey Ken,
p2 is the new plugin format / manager. Until it's working, the "Classic
Update" system can be activated in "Window" -> "Preferences" under
"General"
Stephane E. Potvin wrote:
If people feels strongly against switching to x86_64 I'll track the PDE
problem down but I think it would be best to spend efforts somewhere
else and follow prior art (the other x86_64 ports) in this case.
What's your opinion?
Hey Stephane,
I'd personally prefer
Igor wrote:
Hi!
When the expected port of Eclipse 3.4 Ganymede?
___
Igor,
The port is available for download from:
http://people.freebsd.org/~sepotvin/eclipse-ganymede_1.tbz
I'm not sure what the outlook is for rolling it into the ports tree.
Mik
Ivan Drobyshevskyi wrote:
I've installed diablo-jdk-1.6.0.07 from ports, after that:
cd /usr/ports/java/eclipse; make
Thanx in advance,
Ivan
___
freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-eclipse
To unsu
Mungyung Ryu wrote:
Hello BSD guys,
My system information is like this.
- FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE amd64
- gcc 4.2.1
- gdb 6.1.1
- eclipse-cdt-3.1.2_1
I used ports tree to compile and install eclipse-cdt-3.1.2_1.
Running eclipse and compiling my C++ project are fine.
But, when I try to debug, an err
Charlie Root wrote:
Sorry to bother you, but I've had no luck with google on this.
Primarily I get the following on the command line:
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1:
/u1/home/ericx/.eclipse/org.eclipse.platform_3.3.0_666729633/configuration/org.eclipse.osgi/bundles/80/1/.cp/libswt-mozilla-gtk-3349.so:
huynhnguyen wrote:
and I wonder where I can't download this patch?
Copying plugins/org.eclipse.swt/Eclipse SWT PI/motif/library/make_linux.mak
into plugins/org.eclipse.swt/Eclipse SWT PI/motif/library/make_freebsd.mak
===> Applying FreeBSD patches for eclipse-3.1.2
File to pa
Greg Lewis wrote:
> G'day all,
>
> I'm looking into a problem with one of the Eclipse plugin ports and I have
> to say that I wonder why we bother having plugin ports. Eclipse has good
> built in plugin management tools, so the only reason I can see for having
> a port for one is if there is some
Vladimir Grebenschikov wrote:
>
> As far as I remember there was an command line option for eclipse to
> reset configuration somehow. Unfortunately I can't remember exact
> spelling. Probably this may help ?
>
eclipse -clean ?
Mike.
--
"You don't see FreeBSD developers sitting in a smoke-f
Stephane E. Potvin wrote:
> ken wrote:
>> Stephane,
>
>> Would you please send me tar file of files under ports/java/eclipse
>> (eclipse.tgz)?
>
>> Standard patch does not allow me to patch using your diff file due to the
>> input buffer size.
>
>
> Hi Ken,
>
> I should have mentioned th
On 4/19/09 10:03 AM, Eugeny N Dzhurinsky wrote:
>
> Could you please suggest what can cause this weird error I am getting during
> the patching the sources with the following command:
>
> patch -d /usr/ports/java/eclipse < eclipse-342-rc1.diff
>
> Patching file files/patch-features-org.ecli
57 matches
Mail list logo
