Greg,
Sounds good to me... I was going to ask at what point that might be
feasible. It might drum up a bit of feedback, which couldn't hurt.
I'm guessing someone out there has commit access to the ports tree ;-)
Cheers,
Mike.
Greg Lewis wrote:
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 08:39:58AM -0700, Mike Bowie wrote:
Ken Yamada wrote:
Opps!
You missed ${WRKSRC} in ${CP}.
It needs to be ;
do-build:
@(cd ${WRKSRC}; ${SETENV} ${MAKE_ENV} \
./build -os ${ECLIPSE_OS} -ws ${ECLIPSE_WS} -arch ${ECLIPSE_ARCH}
-comp
ilelibs)
@${CP}
${WRKSRC}/launchertmp/library/${ECLIPSE_WS}/eclipse_1017a.so \
${WRKSRC}/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.${ECLIPSE_WS}.${ECLIPSE_OS}.${ECLIPSE_ARCH}_1.0.0.v20070606
Yes, it works - better than I thought..., but, we may better tailor
build.xml further before committing as a port so that we can port next
version easier...
Ah yes! That's what I get for rushing through!
http://www.buzmo.com/projects/eclipse-europa-port/Makefile-090907.diff
has said fix included. (Ironically enough, made manually to the diff
and untested... will I never learn?!?)
And you're right on your second point too, it does work very well.
Sounds like its good enough to at least commit to eclipse-devel?
_______________________________________________
freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-eclipse
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
