Mike Bowie wrote:
Ken Yamada wrote:
Sorry one more...
The instruction says;
: : :
# In the build.xml
* update the compilelibs property in the init target to reflect
the new architecture
* update the compilelibs target to reflect the new architecture
# Run the build using "build -compilelibs" to force the recompilation
of the native libaries
: :
However, I cannot find any <property name="compilelibs" ...> in
original build.xml in the top directory.
What should I do for this?
Evening all,
My (rather rushed) attempt at building under diablo-jdk1.5 was not
successful... I didn't really look into it though, as my fresh jdk1.6
build finished about the same time; which was of significantly greater
interest.
I managed to build the port at it stands on a machine at the office and
here at home, (6.2R and 6.1-RC1 respectively) both to the point of
displaying the loader error Ken reported earlier. A quick google found
me a few similar problems and copying the loader library from the build
to the install seemed to progress things a little. I was about to post
my findings when I received Ken's musings, which made mine rather
insignificant! ;-)
Responding to your last point Ken, so far I'd have to agree... I can't
find more than two instances of compilelibs in build.xml; one defining
the target, the other referencing it as a dependency of the "run"
target. It doesn't seem to make much sense.
I'll keep poking around with it over the weekend if I find some time.
Cheers,
Mike.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-eclipse
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Ken,
I've been using the build from last night actively for about six hours
now with the PHPeclipse plugin and it's been working very well; nothing
unusual to report at all.
Perhaps someone with a bit more Java knowledge can comment on the
warnings generated and someone closer to the Eclipse release team might
be able to resolve the confusion with build.xml. (Although I'm still
asking around and digging.) It may just be that the file wasn't updated
to reflect changes for the 3.3 release... the verbiage between the 3.2
and 3.3 versions is almost identical, except version numbering.
All in all, I'd have to say congratulations to Ken and Dan for a
successful port! I'll be running it on both my work machines and will
report in if anything comes up... and will keep an eye on the list.
Nice work chaps!
Cheers,
Mike.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-eclipse
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"