Re: boot -P AND autoboot possible?

1999-06-26 Thread Anonymous
Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > On Fri, 25 Jun 1999 13:13:20 MST, Doug wrote: > > > I can submit patches for the man page(s) if I can get a grip on what's > > happening where (and when). :-/ What I'd really like to see is a > > chronological listing, like: > > I think you're reading the wrong manpage

Re: place of logfile for cron (PR 7682) - move it?

1999-06-26 Thread Anonymous
It seems that no one really has any objections to moving the log file. These would the locations to change(find | grep /var/log) src/usr.sbin/cron/cron/config.h src/usr.sbin/cron/doc/CHANGES (src/usr.sbin/cron/doc/CHANGES.FreeBSD a la xntpd?) src/etc/Makefile src/etc/newsyslog.conf src/etc/sysl

Re: Out of file descriptors ??

1999-06-26 Thread Anonymous
On 26-Jun-99 Ben Rosengart wrote: > rc.conf, and change it -- unless I don't understand the new setup > correctly. That makes more work for me, not less. What's the idea > here? When you upgrade and use mergemaster its a lot less work.. The new defaults for the upgrade take place automatic

Re: ktrace causes kernel panic

1999-06-26 Thread Anonymous
Greg Lehey wrote: [snip] > >>> Using a recent (few days) -current I had a process lock up on me > >>> last night, so I did a 'ktrace -p whateverthepidwas' and let it run for a > >>> while. When I issued a 'ktrace -C' in another screen, everything froze and > >>> the kernel panic'ed. I dropped

-current breakage? (11.00 bst, 26/6/1999)

1999-06-26 Thread Anonymous
I've just tried building the world three times, cvsup'd at around 11.00 bst, and again at 12.00 and 13.00 - they all break at the point below... Any suggestions? :) - I was running "make buildworld -j8 | tee /var/tmp/mw.out". Each time I carefully blow away /usr/obj before re-running... -Kp " /

Re: kernel profiling

1999-06-26 Thread Anonymous
At Sat, 26 Jun 1999 16:11:43 +0200, Pierre Beyssac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just curious: would it be easily doable to profile the kernel by > sampling the program counter, la profil(2) but for kernel mode? > Has anyone attempted to write this? You can enable kernel profiling by configure

Re: kernel profiling

1999-06-26 Thread Anonymous
On Sun, 27 Jun 1999, Hidetoshi Shimokawa wrote: > At Sat, 26 Jun 1999 16:11:43 +0200, > Pierre Beyssac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Just curious: would it be easily doable to profile the kernel by > > sampling the program counter, la profil(2) but for kernel mode? > > Has anyone attempted

Who leads networking?

1999-06-26 Thread Anonymous
Hey Folks, I'm new to contributing to FreeBSD but not to working with kernels etc. I'm thinking of adding a new framing type to PPP which is described in the latest Transactions on Networking. Who do I talk to about this kind of stuff? Thanks, George To Unsubscribe: send mail to [E

Re: kernel profiling

1999-06-26 Thread Anonymous
Doug Rabson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Another excellent alternative for kernel profiling is iprobe. Can we get a pointer? /assar To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: kernel profiling

1999-06-26 Thread Anonymous
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Do ug Rabson writes: >> You can enable kernel profiling by configure kernel with `-p' or '-pp' >> option. See config(8) and kgmon(8) for detail. >> >> I have a patch for FreeBSD/alpha to support kernel profiling. > >Another excellent alternative for kernel profili

Re: kernel profiling

1999-06-26 Thread Anonymous
On 26 Jun 1999, Assar Westerlund wrote: > Doug Rabson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Another excellent alternative for kernel profiling is iprobe. > > Can we get a pointer? There is a nice tutorial at http://www.cs.duke.edu/ari/iprobe.html. This tool is alpha specific though. -- Doug Rabson

Re: kernel profiling

1999-06-26 Thread Anonymous
On Sat, 26 Jun 1999, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Do > ug Rabson writes: > > >> You can enable kernel profiling by configure kernel with `-p' or '-pp' > >> option. See config(8) and kgmon(8) for detail. > >> > >> I have a patch for FreeBSD/alpha to support kernel p

Re: Building -current with 3.1?

1999-06-26 Thread Anonymous
Hello, The standard compiler has changed between 3.x and -Current (gcc2.7.2.1 => egcs) - so don't even think of compiling code from -Current with Stable tools. You may want to try some "make upgrade" to upgrade all of your OS from 3.X to 4.0 (then you will use the -Current sources for your kerne

Re: Building -current with 3.1?

1999-06-26 Thread Anonymous
> The standard compiler has changed between 3.x and -Current (gcc2.7.2.1 > => egcs) - so don't even think of compiling code from -Current with > Stable tools. > > You may want to try some "make upgrade" to upgrade all of your OS from > 3.X to 4.0 (then you will use the -Current sources for your k

Re: Building -current with 3.1?

1999-06-26 Thread Anonymous
On Sat, Jun 26, 1999 at 12:53:31PM -0700, George V. Neville-Neil wrote: > > The standard compiler has changed between 3.x and -Current (gcc2.7.2.1 > > => egcs) - so don't even think of compiling code from -Current with > > Stable tools. > > > > You may want to try some "make upgrade" to upgrade a

Re: boot -P AND autoboot possible?

1999-06-26 Thread Anonymous
> > > I can submit patches for the man page(s) if I can get a grip on what's > > > happening where (and when). :-/ What I'd really like to see is a > > > chronological listing, like: > > > > I think you're reading the wrong manpage. I've just had a look at > > loader(8) and can't really see what

Re: Who leads networking?

1999-06-26 Thread Anonymous
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, George V. Neville-Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm new to contributing to FreeBSD but not to working with kernels > etc. I'm thinking of adding a new framing type to PPP which is described in > the latest Transactions on Networking. Who do I talk to

Re: kernel panic w/regard to setting io permissions bitmap

1999-06-26 Thread Anonymous
>>The panic occurs at 'swtch_com+0x6e: ltr %si'. At the time, %si is >>0x20, which indexes to what appears to be a busy tss (type=01011b) >>with a limit of 0x67. That instruction generates a general protection >>fault with an error code of 0. The current process was Idle. The busy tss seems to

boot -c causes pagefault in userconfig.c:savelist+18

1999-06-27 Thread Anonymous
This in current as of Saturday. The attached patch to i386/i386/userconfig.c fixes the problem.: Regards -- Peter Holm | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://login.dknet.dk/~pho/ -[ Member of the BSD-Dk User Group / http://www.bsd-dk.dk/ ] - *** userconfig.c~ Sun Jun 27 18:39:23 1999 ---

Re: Found the startup panic - ccd ( patch included )

1999-06-28 Thread Anonymous
First off, sorry for the silence. This is gay freedom weekend in San Francisco, and I've been rather busy socially. It was poor timing on my part to commit such a big change just before I was going to be gone all weekend. I have tried to answer several questions below. Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1

Re: Found the startup panic - ccd ( patch included )

1999-06-28 Thread Anonymous
On Sun, 27 Jun 1999, Kirk McKusick wrote: > I see that Peter has already committed it. > > On the subject of BUF_KERNPROC, this must be done as I have coded > it, not later in biodone. The problem is when the filesystem does > a readahead. It starts the I/O on the buffer that it really wants,

Re: Found the startup panic - ccd ( patch included )

1999-06-28 Thread Anonymous
:On the subject of BUF_KERNPROC, this must be done as I have coded :it, not later in biodone. The problem is when the filesystem does :a readahead. It starts the I/O on the buffer that it really wants, :... :recursive locking is allowed, then it will get the buffer (since :it holds the exclusive l

Re: Found the startup panic - ccd ( patch included )

1999-06-28 Thread Anonymous
Kirk McKusick wrote: [..] Re: kern_lock.c - looks like a reasonable fix. There isn't much point panicing for a poll. > I do not see the problem that you are pointing out with missing > BUF_KERNPROC in cluster_callback, but it is well past midnight, > so I may not be thinking clearly. No, you ar

Re: Found the startup panic - ccd ( patch included )

1999-06-28 Thread Anonymous
On Monday, 28 June 1999 at 16:36:31 +0800, Peter Wemm wrote: > Kirk McKusick wrote: > [..] > Re: kern_lock.c - looks like a reasonable fix. There isn't much point > panicing for a poll. > >> I do not see the problem that you are pointing out with missing >> BUF_KERNPROC in cluster_callback, but i

Re: **HEADS UP** newsyslog.conf syntax change

1999-06-28 Thread Anonymous
* From: "David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * * On your next ``make world'', you will need to change any "user.group" * specifications in /etc/newsyslog.conf to "user:group". This is not the right way to do it. === -if ((group = strchr(q, '.')) != NULL) { +if

Re: **HEADS UP** newsyslog.conf syntax change

1999-06-28 Thread Anonymous
* From: "David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * > Please first change it to accept both syntaxes, with a warning in the * > manpage that the old one will go away in the future. Then remove the * > old syntax after a few months. * * How about we leave it this way in -CURRENT, and the MFC wil

Re: Found the startup panic - ccd ( patch included )

1999-06-28 Thread Anonymous
Greg Lehey wrote: > On Monday, 28 June 1999 at 16:36:31 +0800, Peter Wemm wrote: > > Kirk McKusick wrote: > > [..] > >> Greg Lehey has sent me a panic with the buffer locking in the NFS code. > >> I am too tired to attack it tonight, but will look at it in the morning. > > > > I might have a look

Re: Found the startup panic - ccd ( patch included )

1999-06-28 Thread Anonymous
Peter Wemm wrote: [..] > Also, the swap IO clustering/chainging etc is troubled since it turns on > and off B_ASYNC and does it's own freeing and waiting. I haven't got my > brain around it yet but I don't think it's going to be too hard to fix. [..] This is a false alarm, it's not directly swap

Re: NFS Test patch.. Anyone tested it?

1999-06-28 Thread Anonymous
Today is a schedulued power outage at RPI. I am going to take this opportunity to install Matt's backported (to -STABLE) NFS patches on our primary NFS server. This is the first real chance we have had to put these under real-world load. As another datapoint, everything will be mounting this se

Re: kernel panic w/regard to setting io permissions bitmap

1999-06-28 Thread Anonymous
> >>The panic occurs at 'swtch_com+0x6e: ltr %si'. At the time, %si is > >>0x20, which indexes to what appears to be a busy tss (type=01011b) > >>with a limit of 0x67. That instruction generates a general protection > >>fault with an error code of 0. The current process was Idle. > > The busy

Re: Found the startup panic - ccd ( patch included )

1999-06-28 Thread Anonymous
I hate reeplying to myself, especially when it's to tell me that I'm an idiot.. I just realised (i think) that what I suggest below is exactly what you are doing... julian On Mon, 28 Jun 1999, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > On Sun, 27 Jun 1999, Kirk McKusick wrote: > > > I see that Peter ha

Panic with savecore (and bug with fsck)

1999-06-28 Thread Anonymous
Hi, after 4 crashes in 1 hour without a panic I've got a trace, but it's a trace from a panic produced by "savecore". I didn't think the 4 crashes are related to this trace. I was only able to reboot after commenting savecore in /etc/rc. Btw. after aborting fsck (+) I've got: fsck in free(): wa

Re: Found the startup panic - ccd ( patch included )

1999-06-28 Thread Anonymous
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 01:21:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Kirk McKusick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mike Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Wemm <[EMA

Re: Found the startup panic - ccd ( patch included )

1999-06-28 Thread Anonymous
Kirk McKusick wrote: [..] I've been tinkering around for a while and think I have at least a partial fix for the remaining problems. Certain places use B_CALL and have biodone() from the b_iodone routine, so we can't reliably use B_ASYNC as an indicator of needing to reassign to LK_KERNPROC. We

Re: Found the startup panic - ccd ( patch included )

1999-06-28 Thread Anonymous
:Certain places use B_CALL and have biodone() from the b_iodone routine, :so we can't reliably use B_ASYNC as an indicator of needing to reassign :to LK_KERNPROC. We have to do it on a case-by-case basis. : :It's easier to do cluster_head processing at the point it's gathered :rather than in BUF_

Re: Found the startup panic - ccd ( patch included )

1999-06-28 Thread Anonymous
You are proposing replacing the current buffer locks with two separate locks, one for ownership and the other for I/O. Frankly, I do not find this simpler or easier to understand than what we have now. I also take some issue with the cost of the lockmgr code. It is large, but the critical paths t

Re: Found the startup panic - ccd ( patch included )

1999-06-28 Thread Anonymous
: :You are proposing replacing the current buffer locks with two separate :locks, one for ownership and the other for I/O. Frankly, I do not find :this simpler or easier to understand than what we have now. I also The simplicity that I am requesting is that we do not add all these BUF_KE

Re: Found the startup panic - ccd ( patch included )

1999-06-28 Thread Anonymous
:and B_WANTED code also required protection to avoid races), it would :make a big performance improvement to just go make sure that all the :BUF_ calls are already protected rather than needlessly add those splbio :and splx calls. : : Kirk Not as big as removing the lockmgr() code and r

Re: Found the startup panic - ccd ( patch included )

1999-06-28 Thread Anonymous
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 10:35:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Kirk McKusick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mike Smith <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: HEADS UP: PAO3 branch goes into the tree

1999-06-28 Thread Anonymous
> The PAO3 changes to FreeBSD 3.2 are about to be integrated into the > FreeBSD CVS repository as its own branch off RELENG_3. itojin-san and > the other nomads reached this agreement with -core at Usenix. Warner didn't mention any other list to report problems to, but I just cvsup'd this mornin

MAX_PERF

1999-06-28 Thread Anonymous
What is MAX_PERF option? It's in sys/i386/i386/pmap.c, sys/kern/kern_lock.c, sys/vm/swap_pager.c and others. Thanx, Val _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROT

Re: Found the startup panic - ccd ( patch included )

1999-06-28 Thread Anonymous
:You are right that the buffer cache is very tricky. It is hard to :change it in ways that preserves functionality and performance. :The port of my buffer locking code from BSD/OS has caused problems :largely because of a different buffer cache implementation and :especially SMP models between the

Re: HEADS UP: PAO3 branch goes into the tree

1999-06-28 Thread Anonymous
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Matt Crawford" writes: : Warner didn't mention any other list to report problems to, but : I just cvsup'd this morning and checked out RELENG_3_2_PAO. : "make buildworld" died at usr.sbin/wicontrol/wicontrol.c, for : lack of and ensuing errors. : : The file is pre

Re: MAX_PERF

1999-06-28 Thread Anonymous
: :What is MAX_PERF option? :It's in sys/i386/i386/pmap.c, sys/kern/kern_lock.c, :sys/vm/swap_pager.c and others. : :Thanx, : :Val It stands for 'maximum performance'. If you set this option, the kernel will not bother making certain sanity checks within itself. Basically you sh

Re: HEADS UP: PAO3 branch goes into the tree

1999-06-28 Thread Anonymous
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Matt Crawford" writes: : I never touched that file -- every line is still commented out. But : I don't see how make.conf could check out a file from CVS for me : that's missing in the source tree when I "make buildworld". "make : update" would be different, but wi

Re: HEADS UP: PAO3 branch goes into the tree

1999-06-28 Thread Anonymous
> : Warner didn't mention any other list to report problems to, but... > : lack of and ensuing errors. > : The file is present under the RELENG_3 tag, though. > > I didn't mention it because it didn't break. It works for me. What > are your configuration parameters in /etc/make.conf. I never

Re: HEADS UP: PAO3 branch goes into the tree

1999-06-28 Thread Anonymous
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Matt Crawford" writes: : And I'm doing a new buildworld with a copy of the missing file : inserted into src/sys/i386/include by hand. It's suspicious that : if_wavelan_ieee.h has only one CVS tag on it (RELENG_3), and other : files in that directory have a dozen or

Re: Found the startup panic - ccd ( patch included )

1999-06-28 Thread Anonymous
ok hadn't seen this one when I sent the previous email.. Julian On Mon, 28 Jun 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote: > :You are right that the buffer cache is very tricky. It is hard to > :change it in ways that preserves functionality and performance. > :The port of my buffer locking code fr

Re: panic after loading vinum

1999-06-28 Thread Anonymous
[Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html] On Monday, 28 June 1999 at 23:26:24 +0200, Niels Chr. Bank-Pedersen wrote: > Since the latest patches for vinum were commited I am getting a panic > immediately after vinum has started. This is on a UP -current (as of > today).

[bsdgrep] -w option matches part of words (Was: Apache 2.2 port and missing modules on current.)

2010-08-10 Thread Anonymous
Bartosz Stec writes: ># /usr/local/etc/rc.d/apache22 start >Performing sanity check on apache22 configuration: >httpd: Syntax error on line 68 of >/usr/local/etc/apache22/httpd.conf: Cannot load >/usr/local/libexec/apache22/mod_cache.so into server: Cannot open >"/usr/loca

Re: [CFT] [sys/conf/newvers.sh] Cleanup and additions.

2010-08-10 Thread Anonymous
(a copy for current@) jhell writes: > * Adjust the paths that are checked for binaries to be of only > /usr/local/bin and /usr/bin. "/bin" is highly unlikely to hold svn(1), > git(1) or hg(1). Please, look at conf/146828. That script shouldn't blindly assume where user installs his packages[1]

Re: [CFT] [sys/conf/newvers.sh] Cleanup and additions.

2010-08-10 Thread Anonymous
Anonymous writes: > jhell writes: >> >> And that would be to identify non-conforming ports using non-standard >> locations. Though the option is available to look in a non-standard > > You're confusing default and standard value. LOCALBASE has a default for >

Re: [CFT] [sys/conf/newvers.sh] Cleanup and additions.

2010-08-10 Thread Anonymous
jhell writes: > On 08/10/2010 19:32, Anonymous wrote: >> jhell writes: >> >>> * Adjust the paths that are checked for binaries to be of only >>> /usr/local/bin and /usr/bin. "/bin" is highly unlikely to hold svn(1), >>> git(1) or hg

Re: [CFT] [sys/conf/newvers.sh] Cleanup and additions.

2010-08-11 Thread Anonymous
jhell writes: > Based on the parts of the script with the additions for tracking source > using git(1) I set out to add support for mercurial hg(1) and ended up > cleaning some of the script while making some of those additions. FYI, some ports don't like unusual characters in uname(1), e.g. por

Re: [CFT] [sys/conf/newvers.sh] Cleanup and additions.

2010-08-11 Thread Anonymous
jhell writes: > On 08/11/2010 08:20, Anonymous wrote: >> jhell writes: >> >>> Based on the parts of the script with the additions for tracking source >>> using git(1) I set out to add support for mercurial hg(1) and ended up >>> cleaning some of the s

Re: Official request: Please make GNU grep the default

2010-08-13 Thread Anonymous
Doug Barton writes: [...] > My reason is simple, performance. While doing some portmaster work > recently I was regression testing some changes I made to the --index* > options and noticed that things were dramatically slower than the last > time I tested those features. Thinking that I had made

Re: better way than hacking termcap to be ca_mode free

2010-08-16 Thread Anonymous
Randy Bush writes: > is there a better way to achieve this? Not sure about ~/.termcap but you can just override ti/te via TERMCAP in environment. $ export TERM=${TERM:-xterm} $ export TERMCAP=${TERM}:ti@:te@:tc=${TERM}: > > *** termcap.FCS Tue Jun 17 15:10:46 2003 > --- termcap Tue Jun

Re: CFR: Replace man/manpath/whatis/apropos with a shell script

2010-08-18 Thread Anonymous
Gordon Tetlow writes: > I've tried to make this mirror the functionality, directory search order, > and arguments as the current base implementation. > > This brings me to my next point. I need some testers willing to try this > out. It would be particularly great if I could get some foreign lang

Re: CFR: Replace man/manpath/whatis/apropos with a shell script

2010-08-18 Thread Anonymous
Anonymous writes: > Gordon Tetlow writes: > >> I've tried to make this mirror the functionality, directory search order, >> and arguments as the current base implementation. >> >> This brings me to my next point. I need some testers willing to try this >&g

Re: [CFT] BSDL iconv in base system

2010-08-23 Thread Anonymous
Anonymous writes: [...] > BTW, running GNU iconv(1) with following in libmap.conf > > libiconv.so.3 libc.so.7 > > produces > > $ gnu-iconv > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Undefined symbol "_libiconv_version" referenced from > COPY relocation in LOCALBASE/bin/

Re: [CFT] BSDL iconv in base system

2010-08-31 Thread Anonymous
Jilles Tjoelker writes: > On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 10:04:16PM +0300, Jaakko Heinonen wrote: >> On 2010-06-15, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: >> > - The iconv.h header files is supposed to be compatible with the GNU >> > version, i.e. sources should build with base iconv.h and GNU libiconv. >> > I've just

Re: ZFS v28 is ready for wider testing.

2010-08-31 Thread Anonymous
Pawel Jakub Dawidek writes: > I'd like to give you ZFS v28 for testing. If you are neither brave nor > mad, you can stop here. [...] > So test whatever you can and report back. Look for regressions, strange > behaviour, missing features, deadlocks, livelocks, preformance > degradation, etc. [...]

Re: ZFS v28 is ready for wider testing.

2010-09-05 Thread Anonymous
Pawel Jakub Dawidek writes: > Hello. > > I'd like to give you ZFS v28 for testing. If you are neither brave nor > mad, you can stop here. [...] > So test whatever you can and report back. Look for regressions, > strange behaviour, I wonder why new files tend to have different ACLs than old ones

Re: CFR: Replace man/manpath/whatis/apropos with a shell script

2010-09-09 Thread Anonymous
Gordon Tetlow writes: > Gordon Tetlow writes: >> Anonymous writes: >>> It doesn't search in bin/../man nor in bin/.man. For example, >>> my PATH contains $LOCALBASE/bin:$HOME/.bin, while /etc/ >>> manpath.config >>> is default one and con

Re: CFR: Replace man/manpath/whatis/apropos with a shell script

2010-09-09 Thread Anonymous
Gordon Tetlow writes: > 2. Imports configuration from /usr/local/etc/man.d/*.conf and /etc/man.conf > (purposefully changed the manpath.config file since it is a different > syntax). Hmm, and if LOCALBASE != /usr/local? hier(7) does not specify /usr/local as the only place installed packages may

Re: CFR: Replace man/manpath/whatis/apropos with a shell script

2010-09-11 Thread Anonymous
Stefan Bethke writes: > Am 11.09.2010 um 09:35 schrieb Gordon Tetlow: > >> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Anonymous wrote: >> >>> Gordon Tetlow writes: >>> >>>> 2. Imports configuration from /usr/local/etc/man.d/*.conf and >>> /etc/ma

Re: CFR: Replace man/manpath/whatis/apropos with a shell script

2010-09-11 Thread Anonymous
Anonymous writes: > PATH_MAN_SUB bin/../man > PATH_MAN_SUB bin/../.man # e.g. for ~/.bin + ~/.man > PATH_MAN_SUB /usr/bin/../share/man Oops, that would be non-trivial substitution. It's more like PATH_MAN_ADD bin ../man PATH_MAN_ADD .bin ../.man PATH_MAN_ADD /usr/bi

Re: system hangs after logging into gdm

2010-10-11 Thread Anonymous
Ivan Klymenko writes: > В Sun, 10 Oct 2010 15:37:55 -0700 > Garrett Cooper writes: > >>On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Ivan Klymenko wrote: >>> My system has an svn r213507 >>> >>> FreeBSD nonamehost 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0 r213507: Sun >>> Oct 10 22:43:18 EEST 2010 >>> r...@nonameh

Re: utmpx

2010-11-05 Thread Anonymous
Matthias Apitz writes: > I found another port lacking utmpx support: > > # cd /usr/ports/security/chkrootkit > # make > ===> chkrootkit-0.49 is marked as broken: fails to build with new utmpx. > *** Error code 1 There are more, see ports listed under utmpx.h in http://wiki.freebsd.org/PortsB

man(1) no longer understands manpages like .so man3/printf.3

2010-11-05 Thread Anonymous
A few examples from ports tree devel/automake111: automake-1.11(1) devel/gettext: dcgettext(3), dcngettext(3), dgettext(3), dngettext(3) devel/nasm: rdf2com(1), rdf2ihx(1), rdf2ith(1), rdf2srec(1) textproc/gnugrep: egrep(1), fgrep(1) www/neon29: ne_get_{request,session}_flag(3), ne_set_c

Re: world build stuck in gnu for about a week for me.

2010-11-15 Thread Anonymous
eculp writes: > Thanks, Andreas. With a new cvsup this morning it now stops at a > different point for me: > > > Making grotty.1 from > /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/devices/grotty/../../../../../../contrib/groff/src/devices/grotty/grotty.man > gzip -cn grotty.1 > grotty.1.gz > ===> gnu/usr.bin

Re: [PATCH] top(1) inverse display of table header

2010-11-16 Thread Anonymous
Xin LI writes: > Hi, > > Here is a patch that makes top(1) to inverse its table header (PID > USERNAME THR, etc). > That MAX_COLS change in it makes `top -b' produce too much extra whitespace that's not trimmed and spans several lines, e.g. $ stty -a | sed 1q speed 38400 baud; 57 rows; 79 c

Re: [PATCH] top(1) inverse display of table header

2010-11-17 Thread Anonymous
Anonymous writes: > Xin LI writes: > >> Hi, >> >> Here is a patch that makes top(1) to inverse its table header (PID >> USERNAME THR, etc). >> > > That MAX_COLS change in it makes `top -b' produce too much extra > whitespace that's not trim

Re: CFT: patch for process shared pthread objects

2010-11-30 Thread Anonymous
David Xu writes: > Garrett Cooper wrote: > >> Doesn't build :/...: >> >> ===> lib/libthr (obj,depend,all,install) >> make: don't know how to make thr_sleepq.c. Stop >> *** Error code 2 >> > Sorry, I have updated it, please download it again, or just > download file: > http://people.freebsd.org/~d

Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.

2010-12-15 Thread Anonymous
Pawel Jakub Dawidek writes: > Hi. > > The new patchset is ready for testing: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20101212.patch.bz2 > > When applying the patch be sure to use correct options for patch(1)!: > > # cd /usr/src > # fetch http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/pat

Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.

2010-12-15 Thread Anonymous
Anonymous writes: > $ zfs allow > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/lib/zfs/pyzfs.py", line 35, in > import zfs.util > File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/zfs/util.py", line 31, in > > import solaris.misc >

idle priority > 30 in top(1) and idprio > 31

2010-12-16 Thread Anonymous
Is the following a regression? $ uname -vm FreeBSD 9.0-HEAD-20101216-JPSNAP #0: Thu Dec 16 07:13:24 UTC 2010 r...@build-amd64-fbsd.allbsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 $ yes >/dev/null & $ idprio 31 -$(pgrep yes) $ top PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATETI

Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.

2010-12-19 Thread Anonymous
Pawel Jakub Dawidek writes: > The new patchset is ready for testing: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20101212.patch.bz2 > `-e' option in zdb(8) now looks under /dev/dsk by default $ zdb -ec blah Configuration for import: vdev_children: 1 version: 6

Re: No human readable message with g_vfs

2011-01-03 Thread Anonymous
Garrett Cooper writes: > On Jan 3, 2011, at 8:33 AM, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote: > >> Wiadomość napisana przez Kostik Belousov w dniu 2011-01-03, o godz. 15:18: >>> On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 02:16:37PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote: Am 03.01.2011 14:14, schrieb Ivan Voras: > On 12/29/10

Re: No human readable message with g_vfs

2011-01-03 Thread Anonymous
Bakul Shah writes: > On Mon, 03 Jan 2011 21:20:42 +0300 Anonymous wrote: >> >> Do you mean perror(1)? >> >> $ perror 5 >> Input/output error > > I prefer mine: > > $ errno () { grep "^#.*\\<$*\\>" /usr/include/sys/errno.h } &

Re: nfssvc not available or version mismatch (nfsv4 client)

2011-01-07 Thread Anonymous
Ivan Voras writes: > On 7 January 2011 20:15, Rick Macklem wrote: >> Well, no UIDs on the wire inside the NFSv4 RPCs. Unfortunately, if >> you are using AUTH_SYS, there are still UIDs in the RPC header. But >> if you use krb5 then, yes, no UIDs on the wire. > > I was thinking about the practical

Re: HEADS UP: Merge of binutils 2.17

2011-01-07 Thread Anonymous
Dimitry Andric writes: [...] > Please report any problems with either the base system, or ports that > come up as a result of this binutils update. Looks like lang/sbcl doesn't like new ld(1), here on amd64. Same error when building using devel/binutils. Can you reproduce? $ make [...] ob

Re: Request for testing/comments -- import of new dialog/libdialog

2011-01-21 Thread Anonymous
Yuri Pankov writes: > Nathan Whitehorn freebsd.org> writes: > >> >> As part of work on a new installer, I would like to update the base >> system dialog and libdialog to the newer one provided by Thomas Dickey >> (http://invisible-island.net/dialog/, ports as devel/cdialog). This is a >> much ni

Re: why panic(9) ?

2011-01-23 Thread Anonymous
David Demelier writes: > In any case, when panic occurs, switching display to the tty can be > great. Why not a sysctl like kern.tty_on_panic? Because when you're > running X and a panic occurs not everybody understand what happens. IIRC, it requires KMS support.

Re: zpool v28 and -current

2011-01-31 Thread Anonymous
Shawn Webb writes: > I'm having trouble building freebsd-current (sources as of 29 Jan 2011) with > the latest zpool v28 patch. `make buildworld` fails. I'd attach a copy of > the build log, but it's pretty big. I can put it online on my tech blog if > needed. Has anyone else had the same problem

Re: zpool v28 and -current

2011-02-01 Thread Anonymous
Olivier Smedts writes: > Hello, > > 2011/1/31 Anonymous : >> Shawn Webb writes: >> >>> I'm having trouble building freebsd-current (sources as of 29 Jan 2011) with >>> the latest zpool v28 patch. `make buildworld` fails. I'd attach a copy of >

libdialog & wide charcter support (Was: Request for testing/comments -- import of new dialog/libdialog)

2011-02-05 Thread Anonymous
Nathan Whitehorn writes: > As part of work on a new installer, I would like to update the base > system dialog and libdialog to the newer one provided by Thomas Dickey > (http://invisible-island.net/dialog/, ports as devel/cdialog). This is > a much nicer, fuller featured version of dialog that s

Re: zpool v28 and -current

2011-02-06 Thread Anonymous
Rich writes: >> Attempted this procedure today, make fails with: [...] >> /usr/local/ncvs/src/sys/modules/zfs/../../cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/arc.c:188: >> error: 'zfs_mdcomp_disable' undeclared here (not in a function) > > First error is just a variable undefined that was define

Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.

2011-02-07 Thread Anonymous
Anonymous writes: > Pawel Jakub Dawidek writes: > >> The new patchset is ready for testing: >> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20101212.patch.bz2 >> > > `-e' option in zdb(8) now looks under /dev/dsk by default > >

Re: zpool v28 and -current

2011-02-11 Thread Anonymous
Anonymous writes: > Shawn Webb writes: > >> I'm having trouble building freebsd-current (sources as of 29 Jan 2011) with >> the latest zpool v28 patch. `make buildworld` fails. I'd attach a copy of >> the build log, but it's pretty big. I can put it o

Re: OpenSSL 1.0.0d for Freebsd HEAD

2011-02-14 Thread Anonymous
Alexandre Martins writes: > For those interested in testing, you can find a patch that add OpenSSL 1.0d > to head. [...] Hmm, doesn't build with ld(1) from /projects/binutils-2.17. $ make -dl all as -o rc4-amd64.o /usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypto/amd64/rc4-amd64.s [ -z "ctfconvert" -o -n "1

Re: HEADSUP: BSD iconv coming to the base system with default off

2011-02-24 Thread Anonymous
Anonymous writes in "[CFT] BSDL iconv in base system": > I guess gettext hanging is due to ABI incompatibility, too. > > $ cat foo.po > msgid "" > msgstr "" > "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n" > "Content

SC_PIXEL_MODE in GENERIC on i386/amd64?

2010-05-08 Thread Anonymous
- jfbterm - boot splash - apps that use libvgl (e.g. mplayer) - other uses for graphic modes Is there a way to avoid recompiling kernel just to use them? ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-curre

Re: [INFO]: import of clang/LLVM to happen on June 9th

2010-06-04 Thread Anonymous
Doug Barton writes: > On 06/04/10 17:38, Doug Barton wrote: >> On 06/04/10 11:28, Andrius Morkūnas wrote: >> >>> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/custom-gcc/configuring-ports-gcc.html > > Ok, everything in that section seems clear except this in 3.3: > It is possible to complet

Re: kernel make noise with clang suppression

2010-06-10 Thread Anonymous
Matthew Jacob writes: > Comments? (yes, I know -fformat-extensions have just been added...) > > > > diff -r ea5e09d013e7 sys/conf/kern.mk > --- a/sys/conf/kern.mkThu Jun 10 07:40:51 2010 -0700 > +++ b/sys/conf/kern.mkThu Jun 10 11:35:50 2010 -0700 > @@ -63,9 +67,15 @@ > # reserve

Re: two buildworld problems

2010-06-14 Thread Anonymous
Alexander Best writes: > On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Roman Divacky wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 10:28:23PM +0200, Alexander Best wrote: >>> hi there. i'm experiencing two problems during buildworld. i'm not >>> sure if these are the result of me doing weird stuff or a problem in >>> t

Re: [CFT] BSDL iconv in base system

2010-06-14 Thread Anonymous
Gabor Kovesdan writes: [...] > The rather big patch (42,5M) is available here: > http://www.kovesdan.org/patches/iconv_base_integrate.diff Why not compress it with gzip(1) or xz(1)? > > Any comments, suggestions or bugreports are very welcome. ___ fre

Re: [CFT] BSDL iconv in base system

2010-06-15 Thread Anonymous
Gabor Kovesdan writes: [...] > Any comments, suggestions or bugreports are very welcome. Does it respect lib32? $ iconv -f ascii iconv: iconv_open(UTF-8, ascii): Invalid argument /usr/lib/i18n/libiconv_std.so.4: unsupported file layoutzsh: exit 1 iconv -f ascii $ file /usr/lib/i18

Re: [CFT] BSDL iconv in base system

2010-06-16 Thread Anonymous
Anonymous writes: > Gabor Kovesdan writes: > > [...] >> Any comments, suggestions or bugreports are very welcome. > > Does it respect lib32? > > $ iconv -f ascii > iconv: iconv_open(UTF-8, ascii): Invalid argument > /usr/lib/i18n/libiconv_std.so.4: u

Re: [CFT] BSDL iconv in base system

2010-06-16 Thread Anonymous
Alexander Best writes: > On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Alexander Best > wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: >>> cc1: warnings being treated as errors /usr/src/lib/libiconv_modules/BIG5/../../libc/iconv/citrus_stdenc_template.h: In functi

<    1   2   3   >